![]() |
Doesn't bother me either way, but I do hope I can dump my Toshiba for a better stand-alone player before HD DVD fizzles out.
|
Originally Posted by Qui Gon Jim
If you think WalMart has no bearing on HD sales then... I just don't know what to say.
Casual shoppers are the mainstream, and WalMart= casual shoppers. If this business about the cheap HD DVD players is reality, and if they come in and sit on the shelves, there is no way in hell WalMart will say "Sheesh. HD DVD failed, let's give the more expensive Blu-Ray a shot!" It will be the end of any hopes of mainstream penetration for both formats. If WalMart is successful at moving HD DVD players, then that content you BD faithful so strongly cling to will surely slip away to HD DVD. WalMart has been very succesful moving HDTVs and I see no reason to think that they will be just as successful moving HD DVD players with those TVs if the price is right. Honestly, there's too much to speculate at this point. I'd rather HD DVD win (not for any hatred toward Sony but because I find both formats capable of excellent quality and thus I favor the one that hurts my wallet the least) but I think we're all better off enjoying what we have and just let the markets fluctuate as they will. For all we know, both formats could end up a niche market akin to Laserdisc and eventually some other better format will emerge and both HD DVD and Blu-Ray will be forgotten by all but those of us that purchased the players and enjoyed all the software available. |
Why should Universal buckle under pressure to go nuetral before any of the other studios? Graffeo should tell them that he'll be glad to go nuetral, just as soon as Disney, Fox and Lions Gate do.
|
For what is worth in Germany Concord Video who are directly under the Universal distro-umbrella have chosen to go neutral even though they still carry the Universal logo on each of their releases. Many of the US HD-exclusive titles will be coming out through Universal/Concord on BR.
There was plenty of buzz on the German forums when the news broke out but stateside I did not see any reaction until about a week ago. http://ec1.images-amazon.com/images/...2L._SS500_.jpg http://ec1.images-amazon.com/images/...lL._SS500_.jpg http://ec1.images-amazon.com/images/...DL._SS500_.jpg ...etc.... Pro-B |
That covers very scary.
|
I wish they'd just hurry up and go neutral so it will finish the stupid war.
|
Originally Posted by bunkaroo
LIAR! HERETIC! FANBOI!!!!!!!!
The 'couple of people' I referenced upthread turned out to be someone using different usernames on different forums, and the moderator from the event says drsiebler/Ben Williams' account is way off-base. |
I just wish that Disney and Fox would go neutral so it will finish the stupid war.
|
Originally Posted by dan30oly
I just wish that Disney and Fox would go neutral so it will finish the stupid war.
|
It makes perfect sense to me.
Disney and Fox going nuetral could create a victory for HD DVD just like Universal doing it could create a victory for Blu-Ray. But we all know neither is going to happen, at least not anytime soon. |
Originally Posted by Maxflier
It makes perfect sense to me.
Disney and Fox going nuetral could create a victory for HD DVD just like Universal doing it could create a victory for Blu-Ray. But we all know neither is going to happen, at least not anytime soon. |
Originally Posted by DVD Josh
Still makes no logical sense. All it would do is continue with two competing formats, both with tremendous studio support. The goal is to have ONE format. All this would to is prolong two.
|
No, because if Universal goes neutral then Blu-Ray has all the major studios that are supporting films in HD. Disney and Fox would still be Blu-Ray exclusives so there's no pint in getting an HD DVD player even if it is cheaper than a Blu-Ray player.
However, if Disney and Fox go neutral then HD DVD would get all the major studios that support film in HD. Why pay more for a Blu-Ray player when you can get the same quality for less money on an HD DVD player? Either side going neutral would end the current stalemate. |
Originally Posted by RocShemp
No, because if Universal goes neutral then Blu-Ray has all the major studios that are supporting films in HD. Disney and Fox would still be Blu-Ray exclusives so there's no pint in getting an HD DVD player even if it is cheaper than a Blu-Ray player.
However, if Disney and Fox go neutral then HD DVD would get all the major studios that support film in HD. Why pay more for a Blu-Ray player when you can get the same quality for less money on an HD DVD player? Either side going neutral would end the current stalemate. |
Originally Posted by DVD Josh
Still makes no logical sense. All it would do is continue with two competing formats, both with tremendous studio support. The goal is to have ONE format. All this would to is prolong two.
|
Well I did forget all about Sony itself in my previous post. :blush: So I guess the stalemate would continue regardless. :(
|
Originally Posted by RocShemp
Well I did forget all about Sony itself in my previous post. :blush: So I guess the stalemate would continue regardless. :(
|
And Anchor Bay.
|
Did anyone read this story:
http://www.videobusiness.com/article/CA6461381.html Looks like Bill Hunt is there to lead the charge against HD DVD! According to Bill, it seems like people aren't adopting HD DVD because they get confused - not because the prices are high!! Because you know, its great that HD DVD is a cheaper alternative to Sony's inflated prices - but when the purchase Blu Ray Discs for an HD-DVD player its Toshiba's fault. |
Originally Posted by Josh Z
Explain this to me: If there were 100% equal content available on both formats, and new releases kept coming out at a steady rate, why should it matter to you whether one format won or both survived equally?
Jp6 will never have the brain power to manage the question you pose. They simply won't buy either, because they don't understand any better. If we want to have HD/BD truly advance as the replacement of DVD, we need to get better than 1% of the market. And you don't do that with competing formats, even if you can get titles on either. I guess I should make it clear that "end of the war" is to me, ONE format, and as you said, it doesn't matter which one. Just because you can get all titles on both formats doesn't mean the end of the war to me. I actually would see it destroying the market for both. |
Originally Posted by matome
And Anchor Bay.
|
Plus you can bet the minor players such as Anchor Bay would follow suit after seeing Fox/Disney go neutral.
|
Isn't MGM a part of Sony? I'll grant you Lionsgate but Anchor Bay hasn't been a major studio in a long time. Sure, I love their releases but I don't see them driving a format.
|
Originally Posted by chanster
Did anyone read this story:
http://www.videobusiness.com/article/CA6461381.html Looks like Bill Hunt is there to lead the charge against HD DVD! According to Bill, it seems like people aren't adopting HD DVD because they get confused - not because the prices are high!! Because you know, its great that HD DVD is a cheaper alternative to Sony's inflated prices - but when the purchase Blu Ray Discs for an HD-DVD player its Toshiba's fault. His friend bought the HD DVD player because it played HD movies and because it was cheaper. I mean there's no way you can really confuse the two with all of the logos emblazoned all over all of the packaging. I mean unless there were no HD DVD movies next to the Blu-ray films and there were no Blu-ray players next to the HD DVD players, then how could they honestly be so confused at the store? |
Its not Toshiba's fault, I was being sarcastic. And of course, logically, it could be the exact same situation with a Blu Ray player and HD-DVD disc.
Looks like the person that started this rumor has been posting under two names...hmm..our own DVD Talk member caught him too |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:17 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.