Query About HD-DVD vs. Blu-Ray Comparison/Contrast Reviews
#1
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 6,364
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
From: Right now, my location is DVDTalk, but then again, you should already know that, shouldn't you?
Query About HD-DVD vs. Blu-Ray Comparison/Contrast Reviews
Forgive me if DVDTalk's Search feature has failed me again, since this seems to be a likely subject for a previous thread, but I'm curious if there are any websites that compare and contrast the HD-DVD version of a given movie with its Blu-Ray counterpart. It seems like most of the reviews I've checked out will discuss one format but have no idea how it stacks up (on a movie-to-movie level) to the other (e.g. DVDTalk's U2: RATTLE AND HUM HD-DVD and Blu-Ray reviews, which have no clue how the two respective discs fare against one another).
#2
DVD Talk Legend
Usually there are different reviewers, so it's not always possible. I think Joshua Zyber has done some comparisons in his reviews IIRC. Also, Peter Bracke reviews both formats on his site (www.highdefdigest.com) and will address the other format's versions in his reviews.
#4
Banned by request
Originally Posted by Filmmaker
Forgive me if DVDTalk's Search feature has failed me again, since this seems to be a likely subject for a previous thread, but I'm curious if there are any websites that compare and contrast the HD-DVD version of a given movie with its Blu-Ray counterpart. It seems like most of the reviews I've checked out will discuss one format but have no idea how it stacks up (on a movie-to-movie level) to the other (e.g. DVDTalk's U2: RATTLE AND HUM HD-DVD and Blu-Ray reviews, which have no clue how the two respective discs fare against one another).
In short, it's quite difficult to do comparisons with only one set of screeners.
Josh does provide comparisons of Mission Impossible movies, though.
#5
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,178
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: WV
The best bet is to just check around the net for reviews. Here are some sites that review HD DVD and/or Blu-ray:
Audio Video Revolution
Digitally Obsessed
DVDAuthority
DVDFile
DVD Review
DVDTalk
DVD Times UK
DVDTown
EyeCraveDVD
HDWorld
High Def Digest
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Spot
The Man Room
Secrets of Home Theater and High Fidelity
Ultimate AV
Upcoming Discs
Widescreen Review
Audio Video Revolution
Digitally Obsessed
DVDAuthority
DVDFile
DVD Review
DVDTalk
DVD Times UK
DVDTown
EyeCraveDVD
HDWorld
High Def Digest
Home Theater Forum
Home Theater Spot
The Man Room
Secrets of Home Theater and High Fidelity
Ultimate AV
Upcoming Discs
Widescreen Review
#6
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by Suprmallet
Josh does provide comparisons of Mission Impossible movies, though.
FWIW, I also wrote direct comparisons of Good Night & Good Luck, Sky Captain, Rumor Has It, Full Metal Jacket, The Fugitive, and my Blu-ray review of Training Day discusses a comparison to the HD DVD (which I didn't write up separately).
#7
Emeritus Reviewer
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 1,893
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Houston, TX
Keep in mind that if one reviewer gets both versions of a particular movie, you'll also be subject to his personal biases about the content of the title (which does seem to have an effect on ratings). Further, there are those who would suggest that reviewing on "sub-standard" gear like the game machines impacts the quality of the reviews due to various issues like the audio being handled differently and other technical matters (I'm not sure if I agree with the argument but there are potential merits to it-nothing against Sups' PS3).
In general though, as the formats release more titles, true side-by-side comparisons will be increasingly difficult. I know some readers get upset that the same reviewer doesn't review every double, triple, and quadruple dip release on the market for SD discs but considering you'd still have to factor in equipment and other issues, is it that big an issue? I'd rather have two distinctly different reviews of the same title over a single review with marginal differences (as I've read elsewhere, the reviewer seeming to reach really hard to differentiate the two versions).
On a related note, a friend pointed out to me he'd rather see ALL the discs reviewed on a low end set up using the X-Box HD and the PS3 Blu-ray because (and I quote, or at least paraphrase closely) "those are the systems most apt to have disc issues and the ones most people can afford to own." I haven't followed the disc quirks that closely but if such systems are more apt to have problems, at least running all discs through them for compatibility issues makes sense. Few reviewers have "double adopted" the formats and getting a gaming deck as the backup player (to handle reviews of a second format) seems more likely to take place as the war drags on.
In general though, as the formats release more titles, true side-by-side comparisons will be increasingly difficult. I know some readers get upset that the same reviewer doesn't review every double, triple, and quadruple dip release on the market for SD discs but considering you'd still have to factor in equipment and other issues, is it that big an issue? I'd rather have two distinctly different reviews of the same title over a single review with marginal differences (as I've read elsewhere, the reviewer seeming to reach really hard to differentiate the two versions).
On a related note, a friend pointed out to me he'd rather see ALL the discs reviewed on a low end set up using the X-Box HD and the PS3 Blu-ray because (and I quote, or at least paraphrase closely) "those are the systems most apt to have disc issues and the ones most people can afford to own." I haven't followed the disc quirks that closely but if such systems are more apt to have problems, at least running all discs through them for compatibility issues makes sense. Few reviewers have "double adopted" the formats and getting a gaming deck as the backup player (to handle reviews of a second format) seems more likely to take place as the war drags on.
#8
Banned by request
Originally Posted by Houstondon
Keep in mind that if one reviewer gets both versions of a particular movie, you'll also be subject to his personal biases about the content of the title (which does seem to have an effect on ratings). Further, there are those who would suggest that reviewing on "sub-standard" gear like the game machines impacts the quality of the reviews due to various issues like the audio being handled differently and other technical matters (I'm not sure if I agree with the argument but there are potential merits to it-nothing against Sups' PS3).
In general though, as the formats release more titles, true side-by-side comparisons will be increasingly difficult. I know some readers get upset that the same reviewer doesn't review every double, triple, and quadruple dip release on the market for SD discs but considering you'd still have to factor in equipment and other issues, is it that big an issue? I'd rather have two distinctly different reviews of the same title over a single review with marginal differences (as I've read elsewhere, the reviewer seeming to reach really hard to differentiate the two versions).
In general though, as the formats release more titles, true side-by-side comparisons will be increasingly difficult. I know some readers get upset that the same reviewer doesn't review every double, triple, and quadruple dip release on the market for SD discs but considering you'd still have to factor in equipment and other issues, is it that big an issue? I'd rather have two distinctly different reviews of the same title over a single review with marginal differences (as I've read elsewhere, the reviewer seeming to reach really hard to differentiate the two versions).




