Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > DVD Discussions > HD Talk
Reload this Page >

CES news - LG to unveil Dual Format player

Community
Search
HD Talk The place to discuss Blu-ray, 4K and all other forms and formats of HD and HDTV.

CES news - LG to unveil Dual Format player

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-10-07 | 09:08 AM
  #151  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NYC
Originally Posted by Suprmallet
There you go. I think, at this point, it's fair to discuss this issue as a problem.
And tsd was right.

.......and so was I, it seems.
Old 01-10-07 | 09:34 AM
  #152  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,010
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Malvern, PA
Originally Posted by digitalfreaknyc
And tsd was right.

.......and so was I, it seems.
As far as tsd is concerned, even a broken clock is right twice a day.
Old 01-10-07 | 11:06 AM
  #153  
Supermallet's Avatar
Banned by request
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 54,150
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Termite Terrace
Originally Posted by Goldblum
As far as tsd is concerned, even a broken clock is right twice a day.
Unless it's a digital clock.
Old 01-10-07 | 01:08 PM
  #154  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 27,815
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: I'm Still Alive in Los Angeles...or am I?
...or a sundial!

( )

-TTTHHHEEEKKK!!!

Last edited by The Edit King; 01-10-07 at 01:11 PM.
Old 01-10-07 | 11:21 PM
  #155  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,830
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Mpls, MN
Originally Posted by DthRdrX
On that note this just in ...

The DVD-Forum, led by MS Kevin Dunn, is considering taking legal action against LG for using HD-dvd logo or attempting to sell a * "less than fully featured" HD-dvd player. [/URL]
So, when do they go after Toshiba? Or Microsoft? Time to stop the frivolous assumption on this forum that one side is bad and the other good. They are both whining and fighting to the end, without any regard for the consumer. It's about time a bystander said something in this stupid war. (no offense to Warner)

Originally Posted by Burnt Thru
LG seem to be trying to launch this player before it's really ready for prime time. Goldstar don't have the best repution in most AV circles, so if they were looking to improve their standing this probably isn't the best way to go about it.
You people really shouldn't talk about companies until you know something about them. Goldstar is dead. LG is something else. They've already shocked the hell out of AV circles. Nothing like Denon, Crown, Meridian, SVS, of course, but definitely a positive surprise.

Jesus, I sound like some sort of LG shill. I've never even used one of their products.
Old 01-11-07 | 01:25 AM
  #156  
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 11,957
Received 17 Likes on 14 Posts
From: Pa
Originally Posted by Spiky
So, when do they go after Toshiba? Or Microsoft? Time to stop the frivolous assumption on this forum that one side is bad and the other good. They are both whining and fighting to the end, without any regard for the consumer. It's about time a bystander said something in this stupid war. (no offense to Warner)

Why would the dvd forum go after Toshiba or Microsoft? AFAIK they have HDi on all of their players from day 1. If its a requirement they have no choice.

If you are talking about optional audio decoding, then both sides have been and continue to be a mess.
Old 01-11-07 | 03:47 AM
  #157  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,154
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: gloucester, uk
Originally Posted by Spiky
You people really shouldn't talk about companies until you know something about them. Goldstar is dead. LG is something else. They've already shocked the hell out of AV circles. Nothing like Denon, Crown, Meridian, SVS, of course, but definitely a positive surprise.

Jesus, I sound like some sort of LG shill. I've never even used one of their products.
Your post contradicts itself.

BTW I have used Goldstar's AV products, and Lucky Goldstar's* AV products. They are certainly shocking, that's for sure! Though they make good dishwashers...

*Goldstar products are simply labled as LG these days after the parent company decided to change their name from Lucky Goldstar to LG.

Last edited by Burnt Thru; 01-11-07 at 03:54 AM.
Old 01-11-07 | 07:03 AM
  #158  
namja's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 25,061
Received 32 Likes on 17 Posts
From: In Transit, HQ
Originally Posted by Burnt Thru
Your post contradicts itself.

BTW I have used Goldstar's AV products, and Lucky Goldstar's* AV products. They are certainly shocking, that's for sure! Though they make good dishwashers...

*Goldstar products are simply labled as LG these days after the parent company decided to change their name from Lucky Goldstar to LG.
Actually, that's not exactly true either. LG continues makes Goldstar brand products (check them out at K-Mart or other discount stores). They created a new LG line several years ago which is the premium brand (think Toyota and Lexus). LG also owns Zenith which, like Goldstar, is their discount brand.
Old 01-11-07 | 07:10 AM
  #159  
namja's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 25,061
Received 32 Likes on 17 Posts
From: In Transit, HQ
As far as the LG Dual Format player is concerned, I hope that TPTB (whether it be the DVD Forum or the upper management at LG or someone else) won't let this player be sold as is.

But, as many have already pointed out, this is progress as is Total HD discs. Perhaps not exactly the way you or I might want it to go, but this certainly is the next step in HD. I have every bit of confidence that in the near future (end of '08?) we will see (1) both players becoming very affordable (
Old 01-11-07 | 07:17 AM
  #160  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,154
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: gloucester, uk
That's true, they do still label some of their products as Goldstar, though the majority are LG these days. Though I'm not sure how the majority of components can be considered the premium brand, a term which suggests some form of exclusivity.
Old 01-11-07 | 09:00 AM
  #161  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 25,295
Likes: 0
Received 51 Likes on 40 Posts
From: Hail to the Redskins!
[QUOTE=namja]As far as the LG Dual Format player is concerned, I hope that TPTB (whether it be the DVD Forum or the upper management at LG or someone else) won't let this player be sold as is.

But, as many have already pointed out, this is progress as is Total HD discs. Perhaps not exactly the way you or I might want it to go, but this certainly is the next step in HD. I have every bit of confidence that in the near future (end of '08?) we will see (1) both players becoming very affordable (
Old 01-11-07 | 09:12 AM
  #162  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NYC
[QUOTE=namja]
But, as many have already pointed out, this is progress as is Total HD discs. Perhaps not exactly the way you or I might want it to go, but this certainly is the next step in HD. I have every bit of confidence that in the near future (end of '08?) we will see (1) both players becoming very affordable (
Old 01-11-07 | 09:15 AM
  #163  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 25,295
Likes: 0
Received 51 Likes on 40 Posts
From: Hail to the Redskins!
Originally Posted by digitalfreaknyc
God I hope not.
Digi, I'm sure you mean the first part of Nammi's comment and not the later, which would be good for everyone.
Old 01-11-07 | 09:36 AM
  #164  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NYC
Originally Posted by DVD Josh
Digi, I'm sure you mean the first part of Nammi's comment and not the later, which would be good for everyone.
I'm sure i mean the 2nd part.
I DO NOT WANT TWO FORMATS.
It's a ridiculously stupid fucking idea.
This is a war. There needs to be one winner (again, I don't care which) or they both die.
Old 01-11-07 | 09:58 AM
  #165  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 25,295
Likes: 0
Received 51 Likes on 40 Posts
From: Hail to the Redskins!
Originally Posted by digitalfreaknyc
I'm sure i mean the 2nd part.
I DO NOT WANT TWO FORMATS.
It's a ridiculously stupid fucking idea.
This is a war. There needs to be one winner (again, I don't care which) or they both die.
I'm not saying you are wrong, but it's reality Digi. The major studios firmly believe in their respective formats.
Old 01-11-07 | 10:01 AM
  #166  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NYC
Originally Posted by DVD Josh
I'm not saying you are wrong, but it's reality Digi. The major studios firmly believe in their respective formats.
Good for them.

Doesn't mean the general public will like it.

And if this keeps up, I honestly hope they BOTH fail. They'd deserve it.

This can't go on forever because the general public will never buy into it and that was the whole point in the first place: picking a successor to DVD to start making money again.
Old 01-11-07 | 10:02 AM
  #167  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 4,956
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Rochester, NY USA
Room for both formats... c'mon... not good for the consumer at all.
Dual players mean dual liscensing fees and technology in one box... More costly players (period).
Dual discs means dual liscensing fees (both camps + liscensing from Time warner for the Total HD technology) and probably less space to expand, or more costly to expand... meaning more expensive discs (period).

Two seperate formats? Now I have to research as to which version of the same movie is better? Or some people can’t get the movies they want be cause they are on the format player they don’t have. Consumers aren’t going to tolerate it. Right now most are waiting for one to win. We want just one to win. That’s why it’s called a standard. DVD was so sucessful because it was a stand alone standard. People just bought a player and the movie they wanted and it worked… they didn’t have to think twice about it.
Old 01-11-07 | 10:03 AM
  #168  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NYC
Originally Posted by mmconhea
Room for both formats... c'mon... not good for the consumer at all.
Dual players mean dual liscensing fees and technology in one box... More costly players (period).
Dual discs means dual liscensing fees (both camps + liscensing from Time warner for the Total HD technology) and probably less space to expand, or more costly to expand... meaning more expensive discs (period).

Two seperate formats? Now I have to research as to which version of the same movie is better? Or some people can’t get the movies they want be cause they are on the format player they don’t have. Consumers aren’t going to tolerate it. Right now most are waiting for one to win. We want just one to win. That’s why it’s called a standard. DVD was so sucessful because it was a stand alone standard. People just bought a player and the movie they wanted and it worked… they didn’t have to think twice about it.
Exactamundo.
Old 01-11-07 | 10:05 AM
  #169  
Adam Tyner's Avatar
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 31,744
Received 2,839 Likes on 1,877 Posts
From: Greenville, South Cackalack
Originally Posted by mmconhea
Dual discs means dual liscensing fees (both camps + liscensing from Time warner for the Total HD technology)
Warner claims that they will not charge royalties for anyone interested in Total HD discs.
Old 01-11-07 | 10:12 AM
  #170  
Mr. Cinema's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 18,044
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I'm sorry, but prolonging a format war with dual players and discs is not progress in my book.
Old 01-11-07 | 11:40 AM
  #171  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,154
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: gloucester, uk
Warner will continue to receive licensing fees from the DVD (HD DVD) side of the disc, of course. Frankly it still surprises me that they chose to support BD before a player had even been launched in either format.

BTW I hate discs without artwork. Makes them far less user friendly in all sorts of ways.
Old 01-11-07 | 11:54 AM
  #172  
Adam Tyner's Avatar
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 31,744
Received 2,839 Likes on 1,877 Posts
From: Greenville, South Cackalack
Originally Posted by Burnt Thru
Warner will continue to receive licensing fees from the DVD (HD DVD) side of the disc, of course. Frankly it still surprises me that they chose to support BD before a player had even been launched in either format.
Warner as a studio didn't want to support Blu-ray, allegedly. It was mandated from higher up the corporate ladder.
Old 01-11-07 | 03:08 PM
  #173  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NYC
Holy shit.

As if this wasn't confusing enough...

According to LG execs quoted in today's CED, they're going to release it sans HD DVD logo...it will not be submitted for certification. LG is describing it as a Blu-ray player that happens to play HD DVD movies. It will *not* be upgraded to support HDi; the next gen model will, though.
Old 01-11-07 | 03:45 PM
  #174  
XavierMike's Avatar
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Indianapolis, IN
Anyone seen this yet at Best Buy.com? http://www.bestbuy.com/site/olspage....=1165610378688

I didn't know it could decode DD+
Old 01-16-07 | 04:49 PM
  #175  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NYC
Looks like these are out already.


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.