Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > DVD Discussions > HD Talk
Reload this Page >

Criterion says "no" to both BluRay and HDDVD

Community
Search
HD Talk The place to discuss Blu-ray, 4K and all other forms and formats of HD and HDTV.

Criterion says "no" to both BluRay and HDDVD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-12-06 | 05:10 AM
  #276  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,154
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: gloucester, uk
Originally Posted by Spiky
That makes no sense at all.
60% of the time it works all of the time!

Bus is right though, it does give an impression of the difference between SD and HD, inspite of itself.
Old 11-12-06 | 05:27 AM
  #277  
Supermallet's Avatar
Banned by request
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 54,150
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Termite Terrace
Originally Posted by Burnt Thru
60% of the time it works all of the time!
Seriously, that smells like pure gasoline.
Old 11-12-06 | 10:31 AM
  #278  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,090
Received 826 Likes on 576 Posts
Originally Posted by The Cow
Your "at first", "initially" and "eventually" just backs up why he is waiting.
My "at first," "initially," and "eventually" were true for DVD as well, so they're not situations that are unique to the new formats. Thus, they're not really valid reasons for not buying into HD any more than they stopped most people from buying DVD.
Old 11-12-06 | 06:29 PM
  #279  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 10,527
Received 955 Likes on 646 Posts
Originally Posted by Jay G.
Yeah, that OOP status is really driving the prices of all those old VHS tapes and LDs into the stratosphere
Don't knock it. I've sold a few hundred vhs tapes of stuff not on dvd for several thousands dollars. Routinely got $50 or more per tape. Especially the 2 tape Republic Home Video serials and Columbia House tv sets not on dvd. This was a couple years ago. Alot of the stuff has been bootlegged to dvd-r by now.
Old 11-12-06 | 06:42 PM
  #280  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,949
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: on a river in a kayak..where else?
Originally Posted by rw2516
I've sold a few hundred vhs tapes of stuff not on dvd for several thousands dollars.
I never sell any tapes that still have yet to hit dvd....and there are plenty. However, it's so true that many people out there care nothing for HD or dvd or anything better than VHS. I once had a tape library of over 1000 titles that have been on dvd for some time, but had no problem selling those at sometimes $50, $75 or even $100 a pop. Just last month, I weeded out another 40 tape titles and eneded up making over $450.

I love people who don't give a shit.
Old 11-12-06 | 06:48 PM
  #281  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,090
Received 826 Likes on 576 Posts
Originally Posted by rw2516
Don't knock it. I've sold a few hundred vhs tapes of stuff not on dvd for several thousands dollars. Routinely got $50 or more per tape. Especially the 2 tape Republic Home Video serials and Columbia House tv sets not on dvd. This was a couple years ago. Alot of the stuff has been bootlegged to dvd-r by now.
Oh, I understand that a few OOP titles can garner a hefty price. I've sold off a few OOP DVDs for sums more than $50. However, I know that the majority of my DVDs, as with the majority of LD and VHS titles, are not going to be selling for very high prices anytime soon. TV sets especially are not going to be as pricey this time around, since they are much more plentiful and affordable on DVD than they ever were on VHS. And bootlegging is going to be even more of an issue due to digital-perfect copying and illegal downloads.

I imagine that if you added in the current or sold value of all the VHS tapes you bought, then subtracted the cost of purchasing in the first place, the total "investment" would be a loss.
Old 11-12-06 | 07:38 PM
  #282  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 10,527
Received 955 Likes on 646 Posts
Yea, if you added them all up, including the ones you sell off for $2-3 you have a loss. Depends on how much of what you have are mainstream popular titles. I remember getting $150 for the OOP Honeymooners classic 39 on vhs about a year before the dvd release which I picked up for less than $30. I had bought the 12 tape set of the Dark Shadows '91 revival series for about $100 and put it on ebay and somebody gave me $120 for it. This was before the dvd was announced. When Lost in Space dvd rumors began to appear I put my complete 40 tape CH up for auction and got $1180, they cost me $900 and change. It all depends on what you got. Same with dvd.
Old 11-12-06 | 09:43 PM
  #283  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Detroit
I realize alot of people are going to wait due to price but cmon, just how cheap does something have to be before you will buy it. You can find a HD-A1 or the RCA equivilent for about 300-350 bucks and then the movies are only a few bucke more than the SD DVD's. I just dont understand the mindset behind it but I guess that is a fualt of mine.

My best friend in life, we were friends since I was 6, was run over by a train when he was 18 and ever since then I have lived my life very differently. I live for the here and now and dont really care about minor things like a couple hundred bucks here or a couple hundred bucks there. If I want something I save up and get it and when it comes to the things that I really enjoy and the things I am very passionate about, money just isnt an issue at all. Cinema & Still Photography are really 2 things that I am absolutly passionate about. I absolutly love them and have ever since I can remember.

For me upgrading to HD was an absolute no brainer. It was relativly cheap, especially considering how much I spent for my first DVD player, and they have great titles released already with alot more on the way. While some may think DVD really is good enough that is just not the case for me anymore. Sure it used to be but things change and technology moves forward. SD just doesnt cut it for me anymore, not when I know that there is a format available right now that absolutly blows it out of the water in every single way.

Again I just live my life very differently. I just dont believe in waiting. We all have a limited time in this life and nobody knows when thier ticket is gonna be called. Dont get me wrong, I dont live my life wrecklessly or anything of that manner. I pay my bills on time and I invest a certain percentage of each check I get so I can retire in comfort. I just dont wait. If I really want something that is affordable, I get it. If there is a place I really want to travel to , I go there. My fiance is the same way and its one of the reasons why we are so great together.

I just cant see sitting out of the HD format because there is a format war going on. Whats the worst thing that would happen if HD-DVD folded? So I spent a couple grand on some movies and the format went under. So what!
I have already gotten so much enjoyment out of the format to this point thjat it has already been worth it and its not like I havent repurchased movies that I already owned before. I have repurchasing movies that I already owned for as long as I can remember. Its a price you pay for the leaps technology makes and its all 100% worth it.

I just dont understand the mindset in waiting. If its something that you really want and something you really enjoy then stop waiting and let the chips fall where they fall. You only live once.

PS..
Old 11-12-06 | 11:13 PM
  #284  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,010
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Malvern, PA
Originally Posted by PornoStar
I realize alot of people are going to wait due to price but cmon, just how cheap does something have to be before you will buy it. You can find a HD-A1 or the RCA equivilent for about 300-350 bucks and then the movies are only a few bucke more than the SD DVD's. I just dont understand the mindset behind it but I guess that is a fualt of mine.
$100-150 for me.

I just dont understand the mindset in waiting. If its something that you really want and something you really enjoy then stop waiting and let the chips fall where they fall. You only live once.
I have other things I can live for at the moment.
Old 11-13-06 | 12:25 AM
  #285  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 2,049
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Earth
A friend of mine was on the fence even with the $199 XBox 360 HD-DVD Add-on drive. It took a $40 coupon to get him on board.
Old 11-13-06 | 08:44 AM
  #286  
bunkaroo's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 16,400
Received 206 Likes on 139 Posts
From: Chicago West Suburbs
Originally Posted by The Bus
This bears repeating on the HD/SD "screenshots":

1. No photo that size can portray the difference.
2. These photos are manipulated as the HD ones are sharpened via Photoshop or some other image editing program.

3. The above two statements cancel each other out as the pictures give you an idea of what the SD/HD difference would look like.
I'm sure KK HD looks awesome, but those 480p shots are horrific. If King Kong looked like that on my setup in SD I'd have my eyes and calibration checked.

King Kong SD looked much better than that on my display even before I had my upconverter.
Old 11-13-06 | 03:13 PM
  #287  
lizard's Avatar
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 7,944
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: the Western Slope, Colorado
Originally Posted by bunkaroo
...King Kong SD looked much better than that on my display even before I had my upconverter.
Some displays (mine, for example) do an excellent job of unconverting. I was puzzled by all the fuss over upconverting DVD players (and the upconverting prowess of the HD players) because I assumed that all HD displays would upconvert DVDs. Apparently that isn't so.

Your display may be one of the ones that does a good job of upconverting.
Old 11-14-06 | 11:50 AM
  #288  
bunkaroo's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 16,400
Received 206 Likes on 139 Posts
From: Chicago West Suburbs
Originally Posted by lizard
Some displays (mine, for example) do an excellent job of unconverting. I was puzzled by all the fuss over upconverting DVD players (and the upconverting prowess of the HD players) because I assumed that all HD displays would upconvert DVDs. Apparently that isn't so.

Your display may be one of the ones that does a good job of upconverting.
My understanding is by using an upconverting player, you take the upconverting out of the displays hands.

For instance, with my 480p player, my set would internally convert it to 1080i, since that's what my display is set for (it's an RPTV).

However, since the Oppo player is already feeding the display a 1080i signal, the display upconversion is no longer needed. Now, I had very good results with my Pioneer player, so my guess is that while my display does petty good upconversion, the Oppo is still better.

I think I got it right-hope that makes sense.
Old 11-14-06 | 11:55 AM
  #289  
The Bus's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 54,920
Received 23 Likes on 18 Posts
From: New York
Originally Posted by bunkaroo
I'm sure KK HD looks awesome, but those 480p shots are horrific. If King Kong looked like that on my setup in SD I'd have my eyes and calibration checked.
As some of the camera shots were a bit blurry, I'd have to agree with you.
Old 11-19-06 | 08:48 AM
  #290  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by PornoStar
I realize alot of people are going to wait due to price but cmon, just how cheap does something have to be before you will buy it. You can find a HD-A1 or the RCA equivilent for about 300-350 bucks and then the movies are only a few bucke more than the SD DVD's. I just dont understand the mindset behind it but I guess that is a fualt of mine.
But you're forgetting about the millions of people, like me, who don't own an HDTV. For us, the upgrade to HD would cost a heck of a lot more than $300.

BTW, sorry to hear about your friend.
Old 11-19-06 | 12:47 PM
  #291  
Trevor's Avatar
Challenge Guru & Comic Nerd
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 37,371
Received 951 Likes on 611 Posts
From: spiritually, Minnesota
Originally Posted by Al_Tahoe
But you're forgetting about the millions of people, like me, who don't own an HDTV. For us, the upgrade to HD would cost a heck of a lot more than $300.

BTW, sorry to hear about your friend.
Amen. To both comments.
Old 11-26-06 | 11:18 AM
  #292  
Hokeyboy's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,856
Received 1,041 Likes on 621 Posts
From: Fort Lauderdale, FL
What I find humorous is the smug, sanctimonious "how DARE you wait this so-called 'format war' out! You are just cheap! Live for the moment!! By not supporting the format you are dooming High Definition digital video to oblivion!!" attitude. To blame the consumer for not supporting half-baked competitive strategies in order to support the vast cadre of HD DVD and Blu-Ray manufacturers/vendors/retailers attempts to absolve said corporate interests of ignoring the pitfalls of engaging in competing formats at the dawn of mass HD acceptance and penetration.

If HD or Blu-Ray go under, it doesn't effect me in the slightest. Another HD video format will emerge that will learn the lessons generated by this idiotic dual-format rollout. The only people who will be left smarting were the people who chose sides as an early-adopter from the get-go.

It's not about money, necessarily. And if you generate enjoyment out of your investment in a single format, more power to you! But to label people who are gonna sit on the sidelines with a barrel full of popcorn and wait this out as "foolish" is just ridiculous.
Old 11-26-06 | 11:31 AM
  #293  
Mr. Cinema's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 18,044
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Even more humorous are people who have no interest in HD formats actually spending time posting in the HD forum.
Old 11-26-06 | 12:51 PM
  #294  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,090
Received 826 Likes on 576 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr. Cinema
Even more humorous are people who have no interest in HD formats actually spending time posting in the HD forum.
This thread started in the DVD Talk forum, so anyone who subscribed to it then may still be reading and posting to it now, even though it hopped forums.

I know I've read and posted in threads that have been moved to forums I never usually visit.
Old 11-26-06 | 01:23 PM
  #295  
Hokeyboy's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,856
Received 1,041 Likes on 621 Posts
From: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Originally Posted by Mr. Cinema
Even more humorous are people who have no interest in HD formats actually spending time posting in the HD forum.
Except that I never, ever said I had "no interest" in HD formats, Mister Man. Just that some of the attitudes surrounding them are, to say the least, mondo beyondo.
Old 11-26-06 | 01:33 PM
  #296  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NYC
Originally Posted by Matt Millheiser
To blame the consumer for not supporting half-baked competitive strategies in order to support the vast cadre of HD DVD and Blu-Ray manufacturers/vendors/retailers attempts to absolve said corporate interests of ignoring the pitfalls of engaging in competing formats at the dawn of mass HD acceptance and penetration.

It's not about money, necessarily. And if you generate enjoyment out of your investment in a single format, more power to you! But to label people who are gonna sit on the sidelines with a barrel full of popcorn and wait this out as "foolish" is just ridiculous.
I'll be honest and say that I can completely see both sides of it: why someone would wait it out and why someone would join in and buy HD DVD now. Beyond those two options is why *I* find ridiculous at the moment but to each his own.

That should be the motto of the HD forum (and the world) I guess.
Old 11-26-06 | 03:23 PM
  #297  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 1,423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Indianapolis, IN
I think that this is one of the worst threads at DVDTalk, but I will chime in that I want In The Mood for Love Criterion on HD-DVD now please.


That is all.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.