Attack of the Clones in HD
#1
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Attack of the Clones in HD
I've been watching Attack of the Clones on Fox tonight for the first time since getting an HDTV and couldn't help but notice how incredibly poor this movie looks under such a high resolution. Everything looks like plastic and the actors look like they are amateurishly photoshopped into the film. I never noticed this in the theater when I saw it, perhaps I was too involved in the film then. Has it always been this bad or is HD simply revealing more flaws in the blue screen technology used for Episode II?
For comparison sake, I watched a few minutes of Pirates of the Caribbean on ABC, and that looked incredibly film-like and natural.
For comparison sake, I watched a few minutes of Pirates of the Caribbean on ABC, and that looked incredibly film-like and natural.
#2
Banned
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: NYC
The broadcast on Fox was shit. Don't judge it. I did the same thing (switching between the two). In fact, I don't think this was full HD resolution, although I could be wrong. Fox has a habit of broadcasting in "enhanced definition" or some shit.
Btw...i actually prefer this "cut" of the film. I think it's closer to the IMAX cut.
Btw...i actually prefer this "cut" of the film. I think it's closer to the IMAX cut.
#3
DVD Talk God
Considering how awesome the third flick looked recently on HBO, I'd imagine it's a Fox issue.
#12
Banned
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: NYC
Originally Posted by ShagMan
Um, isn't this in cropped/non-OAR form? That could be part of it.
#13
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Wow, that looked nearly as bad as Fox's so-called "HD" baseball broadcasts.
I've seen "TPM" on HBO previously (or maybe Showtime/Cinemax, can't recall), and it looked way better than the Fox broadcast of "Clones" (but also non-OAR).
I've seen "TPM" on HBO previously (or maybe Showtime/Cinemax, can't recall), and it looked way better than the Fox broadcast of "Clones" (but also non-OAR).
#14
Banned
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: NYC
Originally Posted by Richard Malloy
Wow, that looked nearly as bad as Fox's so-called "HD" baseball broadcasts.
I've seen "TPM" on HBO previously (or maybe Showtime/Cinemax, can't recall), and it looked way better than the Fox broadcast of "Clones" (but also non-OAR).
I've seen "TPM" on HBO previously (or maybe Showtime/Cinemax, can't recall), and it looked way better than the Fox broadcast of "Clones" (but also non-OAR).
#15
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Cary, NC
I'm glad I'm not the only once who noticed how crappy their baseball coverage is. I was hoping it wasn't just me. What's the problem over at Fox anyway? Are they too cheap or something?
#16
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,830
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Mpls, MN
Keep in mind that the film was shot muchly on HD video 16:9 open matte 1080. The matte was removed, making the resolution of the 2.35:1 film around only 3/4 of the 16:9. (~820 res) Then it was cropped for this showing and blown up to a 16:9 frame again. Then it was cut down to 720p for Fox transmission.
Plus the acting (I'm being generous, here) was stiff and the colors were always a bit strange.
It's really an unsatisfying experience, watching this in HD so far. I didn't even turn it on this time. It does sound as though this time around was worse than last year on Fox, or HBO replays. I haven't seen too many complaints before this week about resolution issues, mainly just non-OAR complaints, so they must've screwed something up. At least a disc would theoretically put it back into OAR without multiple layers of reconfiguration of the shape/signal/resolution. I'm willing to wait til then, whenever then is.
Plus the acting (I'm being generous, here) was stiff and the colors were always a bit strange.
It's really an unsatisfying experience, watching this in HD so far. I didn't even turn it on this time. It does sound as though this time around was worse than last year on Fox, or HBO replays. I haven't seen too many complaints before this week about resolution issues, mainly just non-OAR complaints, so they must've screwed something up. At least a disc would theoretically put it back into OAR without multiple layers of reconfiguration of the shape/signal/resolution. I'm willing to wait til then, whenever then is.
#17
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't think this was an open matte presentation on Fox. I can't speak for the HBO airing, as I don't have HBO. I was very aware of what might look differently framed. There were scenes where the tops of character heads were cropped off (not abnormal) but if there were 2.35:1 mattes on it, they would come down over the faces of the characters.
I could be wrong, I couldn't bear to watch too much of it. FoxHD sucks.
I could be wrong, I couldn't bear to watch too much of it. FoxHD sucks.
#18
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Mobile, AL
The broadcast I sampled was definitely cropped (as compared to open matte).
Episode III in OAR 1080i looks AWESOME, I love showing my recording of that to people checking out the movie room
Episode III in OAR 1080i looks AWESOME, I love showing my recording of that to people checking out the movie room
#19
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
I think its funny that this turned into a debate about the quality of signal from Fox. I was trying to point out how "fake" the movie looked in HD, I'm not sure if that was Fox's fault or simply the effects not being up to snuff at the time. I've seen Episode III on HBO HD and that does look great, but Episode II looks like everything is cut and pasted together quickly and nothing blends.
#20
DVD Talk Special Edition
I caught the end, and it didn't look all that great.
Then, when the credits started, the picture "squeezed" up like I was watching A Fistfull of Dollars or something on late night tv.
If it was OAR it would have been letterboxed and it wasn't
Then, when the credits started, the picture "squeezed" up like I was watching A Fistfull of Dollars or something on late night tv.
If it was OAR it would have been letterboxed and it wasn't
#21
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,830
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Mpls, MN
Originally Posted by Qui Gon Jim
I don't think this was an open matte presentation on Fox. I can't speak for the HBO airing, as I don't have HBO. I was very aware of what might look differently framed. There were scenes where the tops of character heads were cropped off (not abnormal) but if there were 2.35:1 mattes on it, they would come down over the faces of the characters.
I could be wrong, I couldn't bear to watch too much of it. FoxHD sucks.
I could be wrong, I couldn't bear to watch too much of it. FoxHD sucks.
#24
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by Davy Mack
I thought Fox was only 480P?



