Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > DVD Discussions > HD Talk
Reload this Page >

More Blu-ray bias in the mainstream press...

Community
Search
HD Talk The place to discuss Blu-ray, 4K and all other forms and formats of HD and HDTV.

More Blu-ray bias in the mainstream press...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-12-06 | 07:39 PM
  #51  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
DAMMIT! busted....

Old 07-12-06 | 09:54 PM
  #52  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NYC
Originally Posted by Josh Z
I can't speak for John, but I've got 3 more discs to review and then the player's most likely going back. I'll re-evaluate when other models from different brands come out.
So I guess that answers the question if you get a reviewers model.

Watch out for that restocking fee if you got yours at BB.
Old 07-12-06 | 10:22 PM
  #53  
John Sinnott's Avatar
Defunct Account
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 5,920
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: State College, PA
I'm keeping mine. While I am disappointed there are problems with the first discs, I'm not willing to write off the whole format just yet. (Part of the reason is that there is less competition for the Blu-Ray discs among the reviewers here.)

And no, DVD Talk didn't get any review models for either format, though Geoff did try to get a Blu-Ray since they are so exspensive. His requests were met with deafening silence.
Old 07-12-06 | 10:30 PM
  #54  
Supermallet's Avatar
Banned by request
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 54,150
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Termite Terrace
That's because they realized what the reviews would say about PQ.

I had posted elsewhere that there are rumors that the PS3 is actually making a shortage of parts for other players, so it could be that they really had none to spare. I'm sure G2 will be more plentiful.
Old 07-12-06 | 10:51 PM
  #55  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 2,486
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Stuck doing T.P.S. reports for Lumbergh!!!!
Will the discs that have problems be replaced by the company who made them? There have always been problems with some DVDs in the past...like Back to the Future where they left off (I belive) the low frequency track.
Old 07-12-06 | 11:04 PM
  #56  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NYC
Originally Posted by videophile
I'm keeping mine. While I am disappointed there are problems with the first discs, I'm not willing to write off the whole format just yet. (Part of the reason is that there is less competition for the Blu-Ray discs among the reviewers here.)

And no, DVD Talk didn't get any review models for either format, though Geoff did try to get a Blu-Ray since they are so exspensive. His requests were met with deafening silence.
BD doesn't need reviewers. It's BEYOND reviewers.
Old 07-12-06 | 11:06 PM
  #57  
Supermallet's Avatar
Banned by request
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 54,150
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Termite Terrace
Originally Posted by TheKobra
Will the discs that have problems be replaced by the company who made them? There have always been problems with some DVDs in the past...like Back to the Future where they left off (I belive) the low frequency track.
Which discs exactly do you mean? If it's any made by Sony, the answer is no.
Old 07-13-06 | 06:45 AM
  #58  
Josh Z's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 11,962
Received 350 Likes on 243 Posts
From: Boston
Originally Posted by digitalfreaknyc
So I guess that answers the question if you get a reviewers model.
To be fair, Toshiba didn't send out review models either.
Old 07-13-06 | 08:21 AM
  #59  
Banned
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NYC
Originally Posted by Josh Z
To be fair, Toshiba didn't send out review models either.
Yeah but you'd actually WANT to buy one of those
Old 07-13-06 | 08:54 AM
  #60  
james2025a's Avatar
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 5,358
Likes: 0
Received 63 Likes on 52 Posts
Originally Posted by videophile
Ahhh, that explains why I have to walk past the aisles and aisles of UMD movies everytime I'm in BB, CC, Target, Walmart, etc.

Seriously, I think that's a prefect analogy. Gamers, in general, don't care about movies. That's why UMD's failed and PSPs, which can play video and music, are being outsold by iPods that cost the same or even more.
I think your statement about gamers generally not caring about movies is utterly wrong. Sure there will be some gamers who do not watch many films....but i have yet to meet a gamer who doesn't own a DVD movie, who doesn't go to the cinema or who hasn't actually used their console to watch a movie. UMD movies and the PSP failed for a number of reasons. The PSP was far too expensive, it is too bulky and the fact of the matter is that people who buy these portable devices tend to buy them for one specific purpose. I myself have an Video iPod, but i only use it for music. I have only once watched something on it...and that was to test that it worked. I have actually seen more people watching UMD's on the PSP than have been playing games on it. The idea of watching a movie on a tiny screen is not popular with the majority of people and is purley a gimmick that will only sucker punch the young and uninformed. People buy iPods because it is purely seen as an MP3 player...and the best on the market. It is innovative, well designed and compact. But with the introduction of the Video iPod i have yet to see any other person watching a video on one. The whole market for selling portable video players in ANY format is very limited and will most times fail miserably. And the same goes for these multi-purpose devices. They try to fit everything into one package and succeed in being Jacks of All trades and masters of none. People that want to buy a serious device for listening to MP3's will always go for something specifically designed for that purpose. It makes sense. Added to which i get the impression that PSP's have been marketed more as a childs toy than anything really to be taken seriously.

But getting back to your original point. When i go to the video library, or go to the cinema, or even go to a store selling DVDs/games....i invariably see the same kind of people at each location. All my friends are gamers and we all enjoy watching movies and buying DVDs as much as the next man. Next you will be saying that generally gamers don't watch Television, or eat at McDonalds, or drink Pepsi...etc.

I think that people are getting bogged down with trying to judge a format before it has even been put into wide circulation. I can understand it because most of the high voices will be people that have HD players and movies and are trying to be loyal to the purchases they have made. Thats fine. But i think only a true judgement can be made when a system has been given enough time to introduce itself, finds its flaws and adjust itself accordingly. I look at early DVD releases as an analogy here. I remember buying the first release copy of Boogie Nights on DVD and the picture quality was sub-VHS in quality. It was appallingly bad. But since that time the format has found its feet and has spent time on producing a better product. Looking at the long term i think its impossible to say unequivically that the PS3/Blu-Ray is dead in the water. I know that the price of the PS3 has been set high and a lot of people are saying that they are unwilling to pay the price. However last year with the introduction of th 360 i remember looking at the auctions for them on Ebay and people were paying literally thousands of dollars for a system. And a system that was released with flaws. I don't think there will be any shortage of people lining up to buy the PS3 The PS2 was the fastest selling console in history and sold over 100 million units worldwide. Now even if a small percent of those people buy a PS3 it will mean that the Blu-rays will have been introduced into a large number of homes very quickly.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.