![]() |
Re: Song of the South
Originally Posted by Trevor
(Post 13592571)
My disc just arrived. Thanks OP!
|
Re: Song of the South
Originally Posted by IBJoel
(Post 13592715)
If you feel strongly about this ad, please write in here: https://forum.dvdtalk.com/sendmessage.php
That form generates emails that I can then send to sales to show them that they really need to stop doing this.
Originally Posted by Meathead
(Post 13592907)
You would have thought the uproar last year over the DVDTalk sponsored ripping software would have done the trick... guess not. Point the sales team to that thread and the current ones.
I'm mainly interested in whether you have advocated on our behalf that the sales team change their policy going forward to have standards that align with forum content rules for what contracts they will sign in the future. I get how the current situation arose, but it should be something that informs a different policy going forward.
Originally Posted by IBJoel
I'll say they've gotten an earful and leave it at that. So hopefully, we don't have to change the forum rules. But I agree that should it happen again, there should be some re-wording on the rules page.
|
Re: Song of the South
That DVDFab ad sure looks sponsored and not Google generated...
|
Re: Song of the South
Originally Posted by kefrank
(Post 13592993)
I agree. It seems shocking that the sales team would need any reminder after that debacle. After that incident, in this thread I pushed for sales team policies to change. It appears that fell on deaf ears. Here's a quote from me in that thread that seems rather applicable now:
IBJoel, in that thread you said this: It has happened again. Are we going to re-word the rules or not? |
Re: Song of the South
Originally Posted by Shannon Nutt
(Post 13592913)
The other thread was locked. :lol: I really don't care all THAT much, but if I were still a DVD Talk reviewer I sure would, as if a studio sees that, the screeners (already thin, from what I've heard) are going to stop.
I think that 99.99% of the people who are going to use a ripper are just going to use it back-up their own DVDs and possibly transfter them to a HTPC. If someone wants to pirate a movie, there a easier ways to do it these days. |
Re: Song of the South
Originally Posted by Josh-da-man
(Post 13593127)
Is DVD piracy still even a concern?
I think that 99.99% of the people who are going to use a ripper are just going to use it back-up their own DVDs and possibly transfter them to a HTPC. If someone wants to pirate a movie, there a easier ways to do it these days. |
Re: Song of the South
Originally Posted by Josh-da-man
(Post 13593127)
Is DVD piracy still even a concern?
I think that 99.99% of the people who are going to use a ripper are just going to use it back-up their own DVDs and possibly transfter them to a HTPC. If someone wants to pirate a movie, there a easier ways to do it these days. |
Re: Song of the South
Since the Ad for DVD piracy thread was locked, and the DVD piracy ads have been a staple on the forum for the last full month at this point, I think we can all assume that discussing DVD/Blu-ray/UHD piracy is A-ok by forum standards now.
The ONLY ads I EVER see at the top of every page here are the DVDFab ads and "DVD Ripper" ads. So discussing these topics must be fine. Thank you, DVDTalk. I look forward to the friendly discussion of piracy going forward. |
Re: Song of the South
Yep, I've seen those ads at the top of every....damn....page for over a month now. Blaming them on Google is obviously not the case at all. So hey let's talk piracy! Hey, you guys remember DVD Shrink?
|
Re: Song of the South
The ripper/fab ads are 100% not Google generated. It's very easy to tell the difference.
|
Re: Song of the South
Yes I totally agree, but that's the excuse we were originally given.
|
Re: Song of the South
I guess the "sales team" forgot that paid ads for (technically) illegal ripping software is a no no on this site per its own rules. :shrug:
|
Re: Song of the South
Guys, please read through this entire thread. These sales contracts were created without my knowledge and I have spoken with our business lead, but the current contracts must be honored. The rules remain the same.
|
Re: Song of the South
Does whoever signs these contracts not understand that ripping software is not allowed on this site or are they accepting contracts from anyone who's willing to advertise?
In other words, could we start seeing ads for guns/tobacco because some business thought it would be beneficial to advertise here? |
Re: Song of the South
Plain and simple: If a company can advertise Product/Service in Category X on this site, then it is completely illogical to suggest that users of the forum of this site cannot have conversations about Products, Services, or Category X.
If I want to talk about "business cards" because I see an ad at the bottom of the page that says "50% off business cards!", then I should be free to do so. It might not garner much discussion because... who cares about business cards. If someone can advertise business card services, I should be able to talk about business cards. If someone can advertise DVD ripping software, I should be able to talk about DVD ripping software. I get that "contracts must be honored!" but as long as they're being honored, then the topics or categories of those advertisements should not be banned during that duration of time. |
Re: Song of the South
Originally Posted by Noonan
(Post 13600705)
Does whoever signs these contracts not understand that ripping software is not allowed on this site or are they accepting contracts from anyone who's willing to advertise?
In other words, could we start seeing ads for guns/tobacco because some business thought it would be beneficial to advertise here? |
Re: Song of the South
Originally Posted by Dan
(Post 13600713)
Plain and simple: If a company can advertise Product/Service in Category X on this site, then it is completely illogical to suggest that users of the forum of this site cannot have conversations about Products, Services, or Category X.
If I want to talk about "business cards" because I see an ad at the bottom of the page that says "50% off business cards!", then I should be free to do so. It might not garner much discussion because... who cares about business cards. If someone can advertise business card services, I should be able to talk about business cards. If someone can advertise DVD ripping software, I should be able to talk about DVD ripping software. I get that "contracts must be honored!" but as long as they're being honored, then the topics or categories of those advertisements should not be banned during that duration of time. |
Re: Song of the South
Originally Posted by IBJoel
(Post 13600719)
There has been no policy change of the forum rules.
I get that the IB sales staff handles all IB sites not just DVDTalk and may not be privy to specific forum rules. But after the dust up last year over the SPONSORED ripping software... it should have been clear to the sales staff that ripping ads aren't allowed on DVDTalk. Guess not. |
Re: Song of the South
The original ban on discussions of ripping software and other piracy was created because the site owner Geoff wanted to remain on good terms with the intellectual property owners, the DVD companies. Maybe IB doesn't care what Disney, Warner, or Sony think. Maybe the big IP companies don't care as much about people ripping DVDs anymore. Maybe this place is like Gormenghast, with lots of old rules that no longer make sense.
|
Re: Song of the South
Originally Posted by Meathead
(Post 13600802)
Except for IB itself.
I get that the IB sales staff handles all IB sites not just DVDTalk and may not be privy to specific forum rules. But after the dust up last year over the SPONSORED ripping software... it should have been clear to the sales staff that ripping ads aren't allowed on DVDTalk. Guess not. |
Re: Song of the South
For what it's worth, I am no longer seeing the ads...at least not today.
|
Re: Song of the South
^ The contract must be over with the start of the new month. I hope promoting piracy for a month was worth it to keep this ship afloat.
|
Re: Song of the South
Originally Posted by kefrank
(Post 13601049)
The thing is, any given sales person shouldn't have to know. For all we know, the entire sales staff might have turned over since then. And it really doesn't matter that none of them are on this forum to have some sort of tribal knowledge about our rules. What there should be is a clearly documented and enforced policy that every sales person follows. It really shouldn't be that hard. How is it that the sales staff doesn't sell sponsored ads for pornographic DVDs, for example? Presumably there are ad categories that they are not allowed to sell, per policy. Why isn't DVD ripping software part of that policy by now??
|
Re: Song of the South
Originally Posted by IBJoel
(Post 13602477)
As I am not part of the sales team, I do not have a say on what their specific policies are, but do offer feedback from you guys and my personal feelings on it (since I handle editorial and therefore liaise with studios, I have an interest in this as well).
|
Re: Song of the South
So I heard back from our head of sales. Official corporate policy is that we do not advertise tobacco and pornography, although advertisement does not equal endorsement. She will be speaking with all our reps to avoid this occurring in the future.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:20 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.