![]() |
Bumping Threads
Have noticed in the past week or two there have been a few threads bumped. I don't see a problem with this as long as there's an update. Mods have now been locking these threads. The most recent being:
http://forum.dvdtalk.com/other-talk/...ction-day.html And that bump was relevant to the thread and it gets locked??? So what's the deal here? We haven't had a problem with thread bumps before and most never resulted in a lock. |
Re: Bumping Threads
Start new thread, get yelled at for not using search. Bump old thread related to a comment and get moderated. /shrug
|
Re: Bumping Threads
It's mostly the bumping of an old thread without commenting on the bump article.
"Someone" previously liked to start threads without commenting on his/her post and got "mod noted" about it. Now he/she bumps old threads instead and does the same thing. :shrug: |
Re: Bumping Threads
Originally Posted by Rex Power Colt-Robot Man
(Post 12098178)
Start new thread, get yelled at for not using search. Bump old thread related to a comment and get moderated. /shrug
Originally Posted by The Cow
(Post 12098197)
It's mostly the bumping of an old thread without commenting on the bump article.
"Someone" previously liked to start threads without commenting on his/her post and got "mod noted" about it. Now he/she bumps old threads instead and does the same thing. :shrug: "Both, and..." situation. |
Re: Bumping Threads
I'm seeing a trend...
|
Re: Bumping Threads
I don't have many examples, but I don't think you can say these bumps are relevant. In most cases, it seems as if they're loosely connected at best. The example given in the OP, which was locked, bears that out. A random post about an ebay auction was tacked on to the end of a 2006 thread about another ebay auction. Hardly a reason to resurrect an old thread, in my opinion.
|
Re: Bumping Threads
^And it's a pattern with that particular poster, and he was recently warned about it.
|
Re: Bumping Threads
It's penguin joe.
Is his name unmentionable or something |
Re: Bumping Threads
Originally Posted by Cardsfan111
(Post 12098242)
I don't have many examples, but I don't think you can say these bumps are relevant. In most cases, it seems as if they're loosely connected at best. The example given in the OP, which was locked, bears that out. A random post about an ebay auction was tacked on to the end of a 2006 thread about another ebay auction. Hardly a reason to resurrect an old thread, in my opinion.
It's fun seeing a very old thread getting bumped once in a blue moon, but it becomes tedious when it happens on a weekly basis. Though to be honest, this entire site isn't a hotbed of fast-paced discussion at the moment, lessening the crime. It would have been a more serious problem during DVDTalk's halcyon days. |
Re: Bumping Threads
Since I locked the thread, I will comment.
Originally Posted by Rex Power Colt-Robot Man
(Post 12098178)
Start new thread, get yelled at for not using search. Bump old thread related to a comment and get moderated. /shrug
Originally Posted by Cardsfan111
(Post 12098242)
I don't have many examples, but I don't think you can say these bumps are relevant. In most cases, it seems as if they're loosely connected at best. The example given in the OP, which was locked, bears that out. A random post about an ebay auction was tacked on to the end of a 2006 thread about another ebay auction. Hardly a reason to resurrect an old thread, in my opinion.
Originally Posted by PhantomStranger
(Post 12098297)
+1
It's fun seeing a very old thread getting bumped once in a blue moon, but it becomes tedious when it happens on a weekly basis. Though to be honest, this entire site isn't a hotbed of fast-paced discussion at the moment, lessening the crime. It would have been a more serious problem during DVDTalk's halcyon days. Also, since the forum isn't a hotbed of activity, we could use the new threads, comments, and discussion. If it really is the same topic, such as the update on the Amanda Knox case for example, bump it. Otherwise, start a new thread. |
Re: Bumping Threads
I've never understood the outrage at not searching for some old thread from 10 or 15 years ago and bumping it just to add a like comment or issue. When I'm reading through the forums and see a relevant thread I'd like to read thinking it's current then finding out the thread was originally from 2004, it gets frustrating. I can see how an individual who's been around for that long might get a charge out of seeing an old topic get bumped for the nostalgia factor, but it gets tedious when you forget to look at the date of the thread to find out it's not actually current, except for maybe the bumping post, which oftentimes isn't even relevant. So why the outrage at not searching for some antiquated POS thread to bump whenever you want to start a new thread about something? Just so the forum doesn't get overrun with threads? Wowsa...:rolleyes:
|
Re: Bumping Threads
Originally Posted by kd5
(Post 12098422)
I've never understood the outrage at not searching for some old thread from 10 or 15 years ago and bumping it just to add a like comment or issue. When I'm reading through the forums and see a relevant thread I'd like to read thinking it's current then finding out the thread was originally from 2004, it gets frustrating. I can see how an individual who's been around for that long might get a charge out of seeing an old topic get bumped for the nostalgia factor, but it gets tedious when you forget to look at the date of the thread to find out it's not actually current, except for maybe the bumping post, which oftentimes isn't even relevant. So why the outrage at not searching for some antiquated POS thread to bump whenever you want to start a new thread about something? Just so the forum doesn't get overrun with threads? Wowsa...:rolleyes:
Agreed. |
Re: Bumping Threads
The converse in this discussion is that he created a Florida Behaving Badly thread and then creates new threads for "Florida man arrested for having sex with pit bull in yard", "FL Woman performs C-section on dog, closes incision with glue (guess the state...FL!)", "Pregnant Florida woman goes on crack binge chews off umbilical cord", and "Florida woman arrested for killing animals in animal torture videos."
Originally Posted by kvrdave
(Post 12039142)
Though this is a great thread, if we don't shut down every thread where Penguinjoe posts a story and no comment, then he won't learn nothin'
Originally Posted by PenguinJoe
(Post 12039163)
I like to plant seeds and watch them grow.
|
Re: Bumping Threads
I wonder if he really does come back to watch his seeds grow. If he did, he'd probably notice the # of threads he starts or bumps that get locked and might understand that he probably shouldn't continue doing the same thing over and over and over.
|
Re: Bumping Threads
Originally Posted by RoyalTea
(Post 12098488)
I wonder if he really does come back to watch his seeds grow. If he did, he'd probably notice the # of threads he starts or bumps that get locked and might understand that he probably shouldn't continue doing the same thing over and over and over.
|
Re: Bumping Threads
Originally Posted by Rex Power Colt-Robot Man
(Post 12098178)
Start new thread, get yelled at for not using search. Bump old thread related to a comment and get moderated. /shrug
|
Re: Bumping Threads
that's 2 down!
|
Re: Bumping Threads
Originally Posted by TomOpus
(Post 12098521)
He probably notices but why should he change? He gets all these mod warnings but no action is taken other than closing an already old thread.
|
Re: Bumping Threads
Originally Posted by Pharoh
(Post 12098428)
Agreed.
|
Re: Bumping Threads
Originally Posted by Rex Power Colt-Robot Man
(Post 12098178)
Start new thread, get yelled at for not using search. Bump old thread related to a comment and get moderated. /shrug
|
Re: Bumping Threads
-- Starting a new thread when there is already a thread on the front page: no-no
-- Bumping a 10 year old thread to add a tangentially related comment: no-no Basic rule of thumb: use common sense. |
Re: Bumping Threads
Also 90% of the "you should have done a search!" comments come from other members, not the moderators.
I think we can agree that Penguin Joe was not fostering discussion regardless of whether he was starting new threads or bumping old ones. |
Re: Bumping Threads
Originally Posted by Supermallet
(Post 12099158)
Also 90% of the "you should have done a search!" comments come from other members, not the moderators.
|
Re: Bumping Threads
I kind of like reading the old threads he would bump but obviously I'm in the minority in that it never really bothered me.
|
Re: Bumping Threads
Originally Posted by auto
(Post 12099565)
I kind of like reading the old threads he would bump but obviously I'm in the minority in that it never really bothered me.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:33 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.