How do we improve DVDTalk?
#26
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Greenville, South Cackalack
Posts: 28,825
Received 1,882 Likes
on
1,238 Posts
Re: How do we improve DVDTalk?
I'm a little puzzled because the other thread was teeming with so many gripes about how Internet Brands has neglected the site, and then when this opportunity to make suggestions comes along, the main thing people talk about are avatars. I mean, I agree that ought to be a standard thing, but why is the conversation pretty much ending there?
For my money, a general UI refresh is necessary.
For instance, when I go to the frontpage of DVD Talk:
1) HD DVD is featured as one of the first links, despite not really being a thing for 6 years now.
2) Many of the featured columns haven't been updated in multiple years.
3) Features are linked to like DVD giveaways (nothing since last Fall) and Easter Eggs (nothing since 2010).
4) There's a promo for new DVD reviews but nothing for, say, Blu-ray, despite the fact that DVD Talk's Blu-ray reviews on average garner more page views.
Even within the forums, the long-dead video game section is still heavily promoted, the "HD Reviews" heading should've been relabeled "Blu-ray Reviews" ages ago, the music forum description lists long-since-stillborn formats like SACD, and I'm sure the list goes on.
There's little-to-no connectivity between the other portions of the site and the forum proper. The columns use Movable Type and don't allow commenting, and even if they did, it's still removed from the forum. The columns each have their own mostly-but-not-quite-the-same site header/footers which makes it tougher to keep everything consistent and up-to-date. Nothing's promoted/cross-promoted between the columns and the forums. They're just so...disconnected. A tighter integration could make readers feel more invested in the site and its content. More eyeballs per column, more conversation: it's a good thing.
I'm not saying that the design needs to be super-slick and flashy. Clean and simple would be fine. Just get rid of the stuff that doesn't need to be there, and use that space to more effectively tease/promote. As things stand now, the site looks like it's been abandoned. Just looking like it's being updated -- that the people running the site care! -- could do wonders for getting casual visitors and new eyeballs to take it more seriously.
Even if there were some little tool in a CMS somewhere to promote threads, think of how useful that'd be. The reason I first started lurking around DVD Talk in 1998 or 1999 was because of the bargains forum. Have some kind of top deals promo where a moderator or something plugs a URL into a very simple form. A "What movies are coming out this weekend?" box, with links to the DVD Talk reviews section and corresponding discussion threads. New release Tuesday lists, extremely popular reviews...there's a lot you could do there. It's genuinely useful, and it'd probably get plenty of clicks.
Features that are standard elsewhere -- such as autocompletes when using review searchboxes -- aren't in place. There's not a way on the site to search the text of reviews. That DVD Talk has three distinct groups of reviews (DVD, Blu-ray, and theatrical releases) makes it tougher, but I'd love to see something like our sister site High Def Digest has with graphical promos, an indication of what's popular, etc. One long list of mostly plain-text followed by another long, textual list followed by another long, textual list is kind of uninvolving. It wouldn't take much within each review to have a "you might also like..." promo featuring similar reviews. Again, that could be useful, it keeps people feeling engaged, and it gets more ad impressions.
I'm totally willing to help out with any of this too. The review CMS I wrote for DVD Talk is pretty powerful but many years out of date. I wrote/maintained it for Geoff for free, and I'm willing (eager, even!) to continue doing the same. The code/database structure is fairly lousy because this was the first project I ever worked on like this (all the way back in 2001!), and I promise I'm way better now.
For my money, a general UI refresh is necessary.
For instance, when I go to the frontpage of DVD Talk:
1) HD DVD is featured as one of the first links, despite not really being a thing for 6 years now.
2) Many of the featured columns haven't been updated in multiple years.
3) Features are linked to like DVD giveaways (nothing since last Fall) and Easter Eggs (nothing since 2010).
4) There's a promo for new DVD reviews but nothing for, say, Blu-ray, despite the fact that DVD Talk's Blu-ray reviews on average garner more page views.
Even within the forums, the long-dead video game section is still heavily promoted, the "HD Reviews" heading should've been relabeled "Blu-ray Reviews" ages ago, the music forum description lists long-since-stillborn formats like SACD, and I'm sure the list goes on.
There's little-to-no connectivity between the other portions of the site and the forum proper. The columns use Movable Type and don't allow commenting, and even if they did, it's still removed from the forum. The columns each have their own mostly-but-not-quite-the-same site header/footers which makes it tougher to keep everything consistent and up-to-date. Nothing's promoted/cross-promoted between the columns and the forums. They're just so...disconnected. A tighter integration could make readers feel more invested in the site and its content. More eyeballs per column, more conversation: it's a good thing.
I'm not saying that the design needs to be super-slick and flashy. Clean and simple would be fine. Just get rid of the stuff that doesn't need to be there, and use that space to more effectively tease/promote. As things stand now, the site looks like it's been abandoned. Just looking like it's being updated -- that the people running the site care! -- could do wonders for getting casual visitors and new eyeballs to take it more seriously.
Even if there were some little tool in a CMS somewhere to promote threads, think of how useful that'd be. The reason I first started lurking around DVD Talk in 1998 or 1999 was because of the bargains forum. Have some kind of top deals promo where a moderator or something plugs a URL into a very simple form. A "What movies are coming out this weekend?" box, with links to the DVD Talk reviews section and corresponding discussion threads. New release Tuesday lists, extremely popular reviews...there's a lot you could do there. It's genuinely useful, and it'd probably get plenty of clicks.
Features that are standard elsewhere -- such as autocompletes when using review searchboxes -- aren't in place. There's not a way on the site to search the text of reviews. That DVD Talk has three distinct groups of reviews (DVD, Blu-ray, and theatrical releases) makes it tougher, but I'd love to see something like our sister site High Def Digest has with graphical promos, an indication of what's popular, etc. One long list of mostly plain-text followed by another long, textual list followed by another long, textual list is kind of uninvolving. It wouldn't take much within each review to have a "you might also like..." promo featuring similar reviews. Again, that could be useful, it keeps people feeling engaged, and it gets more ad impressions.
I'm totally willing to help out with any of this too. The review CMS I wrote for DVD Talk is pretty powerful but many years out of date. I wrote/maintained it for Geoff for free, and I'm willing (eager, even!) to continue doing the same. The code/database structure is fairly lousy because this was the first project I ever worked on like this (all the way back in 2001!), and I promise I'm way better now.
#27
Moderator
Re: How do we improve DVDTalk?
I'm a little puzzled because the other thread was teeming with so many gripes about how Internet Brands has neglected the site, and then when this opportunity to make suggestions comes along, the main thing people talk about are avatars. I mean, I agree that ought to be a standard thing, but why is the conversation pretty much ending there?
In terms of design, there's a lot of tiny icons. Fine for clicking, not so good for touch devices. It would be great to have those enlarged so that I'm not constantly tapping the wrong thing.
It would also be good to see some of the lesser-used forums jettisoned or merged.
As previously mentioned, a stronger emphasis on streaming throughout the site would help bring new users in.
#28
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: How do we improve DVDTalk?
A few suggestions (mostly repeats)
1) Avatars for reasons stated, but mainly it makes the board look better and it is easier to identify people who post.
2) A rebrand towards blu ray/streaming
3) In the earier days of the forum/site, the old ownership did a decent job at getting interviews and chats (I know that is "old school" anymore) with movie makers/DVD makers .. usually with some giveaways. I won a From The Earth to the Moon DVD (when it was expensive as hell) and a signed by Renny Harlin. While I was happy to win these, the real value was in reading the interviews/chats and having a chance to ask questions.
I would imagine that with the massive amounts of product out there from indie films to shows streaming on Netflix., BBC shows in Hulu, etc there are people that would be willing to take the time to be interviewed on a site like this that still has good traffic numbers.
The benefit to DVD Talk is driving people to the site to read this material and hopefully stick around and be a regular and to keep existing members looking coming back more often.
I am on some music sites where the site has declared a few people as interviewers, who I am pretty condifdent do these for next to nothing to free (or to just get some swag/start off a possible career path).
It would get DVD Talk back in the position of making news versus just reporting on it. In the early days, Geoff did a fairly good job at doing that and I am sure it drove a ton of traffic to this site (that and a zillion reel.com coupons )
==========
In conclusion, rebranding the site and making it more of a newsmaker is probably needed for the long term survival of DVDTalk and making it thrive.
1) Avatars for reasons stated, but mainly it makes the board look better and it is easier to identify people who post.
2) A rebrand towards blu ray/streaming
3) In the earier days of the forum/site, the old ownership did a decent job at getting interviews and chats (I know that is "old school" anymore) with movie makers/DVD makers .. usually with some giveaways. I won a From The Earth to the Moon DVD (when it was expensive as hell) and a signed by Renny Harlin. While I was happy to win these, the real value was in reading the interviews/chats and having a chance to ask questions.
I would imagine that with the massive amounts of product out there from indie films to shows streaming on Netflix., BBC shows in Hulu, etc there are people that would be willing to take the time to be interviewed on a site like this that still has good traffic numbers.
The benefit to DVD Talk is driving people to the site to read this material and hopefully stick around and be a regular and to keep existing members looking coming back more often.
I am on some music sites where the site has declared a few people as interviewers, who I am pretty condifdent do these for next to nothing to free (or to just get some swag/start off a possible career path).
It would get DVD Talk back in the position of making news versus just reporting on it. In the early days, Geoff did a fairly good job at doing that and I am sure it drove a ton of traffic to this site (that and a zillion reel.com coupons )
==========
In conclusion, rebranding the site and making it more of a newsmaker is probably needed for the long term survival of DVDTalk and making it thrive.
#29
DVD Talk Legend
Re: How do we improve DVDTalk?
rename it www.StreamingTalk.com, but watch out for the golden shower fetishists
#30
Re: How do we improve DVDTalk?
Also, I know there was talk of changing the site name to another name w/o "DVD" and DVD being just a sub category. From a marketing perspective, and as this site has grown beyond DVD to other formats (Streaming included)... Maybe make aliases for it that are more modern in the "talk" that is occurring, still leaving "DVD" as appropriate. Not sure what that term would be, but I am sure our collective thinkers could come up with some viable suggestions. Not that this would make it better, but could have the potential for new users.
Tapatalk or a similarly robust mobile option is the only way DVDTalk is going to grow, or even survive. It may already be too late.
And selfishly; if you give avatars to everyone, you better give something really awesome to us premium supporters; as the avatars were pretty much the only real perk for our cash.
And selfishly; if you give avatars to everyone, you better give something really awesome to us premium supporters; as the avatars were pretty much the only real perk for our cash.
Allow a one-time name change for long time members. As you can see, I chose my name at the dawn of the website/DVD beginnings and now I despise it . I don't see how it could hurt to allow a one time name change for people like myself.
I know...it doesn't really help Dvdtalk but it would sure make me want to be more involved.
I know...it doesn't really help Dvdtalk but it would sure make me want to be more involved.
#31
DVD Talk Legend
Re: How do we improve DVDTalk?
This is a big issue, and one that's been discussed both in forum and in office for some time. Rebranding to something more inclusive/wider audience would be ideal. I think we're just not sure what that might be exactly, but please keep suggestions coming. Also, do you think there's a bunch of DVDTalkers that would oppose this kind of thing if it were possible?
I was thinking they were a Premium feature; if that's the case, and we were able to go "wide" with avatars (I'm not sure we can right now, given they are a Premium feature), we'd certainly try to make it up to current Premium subscribers. If we were to re-do Premium, what do you think it should include?
Either get rid of the premium feature all together, or come up with some additions for it that are not already available at other sites that are already so far ahead of DVDTalk as it is. Doing anything but is just another step that will prevent this site from continuing to exist. This forum is not in the same position it was ten years ago, or even just five years ago.
Typically, name changes are verboten. In some circumstances a 1-time change can be done, if we take steps to keep community confusion to a minimum. Let me make some inquiries.
#33
DVD Talk Legend
Re: How do we improve DVDTalk?
Is participation on DVD Talk really that down, or is IB just looking for creative ways to make a profit off this site? I've been here for about 10 years, and I think the forums here are still pretty healthy.
#34
DVD Talk Legend
Re: How do we improve DVDTalk?
I agree. I'm surprised to read the comment above that VG Talk long-dead...that section and its posters are the main reason I still visit this site daily.
#35
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Greenville, South Cackalack
Posts: 28,825
Received 1,882 Likes
on
1,238 Posts
Re: How do we improve DVDTalk?
#36
DVD Talk Legend
Re: How do we improve DVDTalk?
Ah. Sorry, I didn't pick that up. Since you mention it, I haven't visited that section in a long time either.
#37
Challenge Guru & Comic Nerd
Re: How do we improve DVDTalk?
On user name changes, I think they should be allowed rarely and in understandable circumstances; but that if the person was an active poster they should have a tag in their whatever-the-box-thing-to-the-left-is-called say "user formerly known as x" forever.
#38
Challenge Guru & Comic Nerd
Re: How do we improve DVDTalk?
As for re-doing Premium, I'm with Brent in that it probably never should have been done in the first place. Limiting things allowed by the forum software to specific users seems wrong, and it doesn't appear as if IB has the resources to create anything really special for Premium users. We were promised "many more features to come" years ago, but have received nothing new for our yearly payments.
But if it had to be more of the same, I'd say at least tweak things in Premium members favor as much as the software allows. Give us more characters/lines in our signatures and more PMs and bigger avatars.
More contests would be nice too.
Speaking of PMs, even outside of Premium users you really should give people who run Challenges and Sheep games and fantasy leagues more space. These threads are much of the glue that holds this forum together, and those people are constantly having their PM boxes fill up.
Thanks for the dialogue IB. This forum has been a favorite place and a home for many of us for decades now, and seeing it stay relevant or even thrive again would be nice.
But if it had to be more of the same, I'd say at least tweak things in Premium members favor as much as the software allows. Give us more characters/lines in our signatures and more PMs and bigger avatars.
More contests would be nice too.
Speaking of PMs, even outside of Premium users you really should give people who run Challenges and Sheep games and fantasy leagues more space. These threads are much of the glue that holds this forum together, and those people are constantly having their PM boxes fill up.
Thanks for the dialogue IB. This forum has been a favorite place and a home for many of us for decades now, and seeing it stay relevant or even thrive again would be nice.
#39
DVD Talk Godfather
Re: How do we improve DVDTalk?
That's how it currently is, right? Except the tag isn't permanent, just for a certain amount of months.
#40
DVD Talk Hero
Re: How do we improve DVDTalk?
Speaking of PMs, even outside of Premium users you really should give people who run Challenges and Sheep games and fantasy leagues more space. These threads are much of the glue that holds this forum together, and those people are constantly having their PM boxes fill up.
#41
#42
DVD Talk Godfather
Re: How do we improve DVDTalk?
Private message bump would definitely be useful so I can keep up with the dozens and dozens of users that wants to PM me regularly.
#43
DVD Talk Legend
Re: How do we improve DVDTalk?
I posted this in another post, but videogame talk.com either needs to go or be updated. There are a few gamers (myself included) that could write features and reviews if you need man power.
#45
Re: How do we improve DVDTalk?
As for re-doing Premium, I'm with Brent in that it probably never should have been done in the first place. Limiting things allowed by the forum software to specific users seems wrong, and it doesn't appear as if IB has the resources to create anything really special for Premium users. We were promised "many more features to come" years ago, but have received nothing new for our yearly payments.
But if it had to be more of the same, I'd say at least tweak things in Premium members favor as much as the software allows. Give us more characters/lines in our signatures and more PMs and bigger avatars.
More contests would be nice too.
Speaking of PMs, even outside of Premium users you really should give people who run Challenges and Sheep games and fantasy leagues more space. These threads are much of the glue that holds this forum together, and those people are constantly having their PM boxes fill up.
Thanks for the dialogue IB. This forum has been a favorite place and a home for many of us for decades now, and seeing it stay relevant or even thrive again would be nice.
But if it had to be more of the same, I'd say at least tweak things in Premium members favor as much as the software allows. Give us more characters/lines in our signatures and more PMs and bigger avatars.
More contests would be nice too.
Speaking of PMs, even outside of Premium users you really should give people who run Challenges and Sheep games and fantasy leagues more space. These threads are much of the glue that holds this forum together, and those people are constantly having their PM boxes fill up.
Thanks for the dialogue IB. This forum has been a favorite place and a home for many of us for decades now, and seeing it stay relevant or even thrive again would be nice.
As to PM boxes for those running contests and such, please get in touch with me; that's something I can and will adjust for you immediately.
PM me and we'll discuss with our content manager; not sure if we'll do anything with it but it's worth a talk.
#46
DVD Talk Legend
Re: How do we improve DVDTalk?
It seems like the way people in here are talking the site is dead or dying which doesn't really seem to be true to me. Certain forum sections might be more active than others but overall traffic on the site to me still seems pretty fair. Also I will say the quality of discussion on this site is way better than most others I visit.
Last edited by Mike86; 03-26-13 at 05:10 PM.
#47
DVD Talk Hero
Re: How do we improve DVDTalk?
I'm a little puzzled because the other thread was teeming with so many gripes about how Internet Brands has neglected the site, and then when this opportunity to make suggestions comes along, the main thing people talk about are avatars. I mean, I agree that ought to be a standard thing, but why is the conversation pretty much ending there?
For my money, a general UI refresh is necessary.
For instance, when I go to the frontpage of DVD Talk:
1) HD DVD is featured as one of the first links, despite not really being a thing for 6 years now.
2) Many of the featured columns haven't been updated in multiple years.
3) Features are linked to like DVD giveaways (nothing since last Fall) and Easter Eggs (nothing since 2010).
4) There's a promo for new DVD reviews but nothing for, say, Blu-ray, despite the fact that DVD Talk's Blu-ray reviews on average garner more page views.
Even within the forums, the long-dead video game section is still heavily promoted, the "HD Reviews" heading should've been relabeled "Blu-ray Reviews" ages ago, the music forum description lists long-since-stillborn formats like SACD, and I'm sure the list goes on.
There's little-to-no connectivity between the other portions of the site and the forum proper. The columns use Movable Type and don't allow commenting, and even if they did, it's still removed from the forum. The columns each have their own mostly-but-not-quite-the-same site header/footers which makes it tougher to keep everything consistent and up-to-date. Nothing's promoted/cross-promoted between the columns and the forums. They're just so...disconnected. A tighter integration could make readers feel more invested in the site and its content. More eyeballs per column, more conversation: it's a good thing.
I'm not saying that the design needs to be super-slick and flashy. Clean and simple would be fine. Just get rid of the stuff that doesn't need to be there, and use that space to more effectively tease/promote. As things stand now, the site looks like it's been abandoned. Just looking like it's being updated -- that the people running the site care! -- could do wonders for getting casual visitors and new eyeballs to take it more seriously.
Even if there were some little tool in a CMS somewhere to promote threads, think of how useful that'd be. The reason I first started lurking around DVD Talk in 1998 or 1999 was because of the bargains forum. Have some kind of top deals promo where a moderator or something plugs a URL into a very simple form. A "What movies are coming out this weekend?" box, with links to the DVD Talk reviews section and corresponding discussion threads. New release Tuesday lists, extremely popular reviews...there's a lot you could do there. It's genuinely useful, and it'd probably get plenty of clicks.
Features that are standard elsewhere -- such as autocompletes when using review searchboxes -- aren't in place. There's not a way on the site to search the text of reviews. That DVD Talk has three distinct groups of reviews (DVD, Blu-ray, and theatrical releases) makes it tougher, but I'd love to see something like our sister site High Def Digest has with graphical promos, an indication of what's popular, etc. One long list of mostly plain-text followed by another long, textual list followed by another long, textual list is kind of uninvolving. It wouldn't take much within each review to have a "you might also like..." promo featuring similar reviews. Again, that could be useful, it keeps people feeling engaged, and it gets more ad impressions.
For my money, a general UI refresh is necessary.
For instance, when I go to the frontpage of DVD Talk:
1) HD DVD is featured as one of the first links, despite not really being a thing for 6 years now.
2) Many of the featured columns haven't been updated in multiple years.
3) Features are linked to like DVD giveaways (nothing since last Fall) and Easter Eggs (nothing since 2010).
4) There's a promo for new DVD reviews but nothing for, say, Blu-ray, despite the fact that DVD Talk's Blu-ray reviews on average garner more page views.
Even within the forums, the long-dead video game section is still heavily promoted, the "HD Reviews" heading should've been relabeled "Blu-ray Reviews" ages ago, the music forum description lists long-since-stillborn formats like SACD, and I'm sure the list goes on.
There's little-to-no connectivity between the other portions of the site and the forum proper. The columns use Movable Type and don't allow commenting, and even if they did, it's still removed from the forum. The columns each have their own mostly-but-not-quite-the-same site header/footers which makes it tougher to keep everything consistent and up-to-date. Nothing's promoted/cross-promoted between the columns and the forums. They're just so...disconnected. A tighter integration could make readers feel more invested in the site and its content. More eyeballs per column, more conversation: it's a good thing.
I'm not saying that the design needs to be super-slick and flashy. Clean and simple would be fine. Just get rid of the stuff that doesn't need to be there, and use that space to more effectively tease/promote. As things stand now, the site looks like it's been abandoned. Just looking like it's being updated -- that the people running the site care! -- could do wonders for getting casual visitors and new eyeballs to take it more seriously.
Even if there were some little tool in a CMS somewhere to promote threads, think of how useful that'd be. The reason I first started lurking around DVD Talk in 1998 or 1999 was because of the bargains forum. Have some kind of top deals promo where a moderator or something plugs a URL into a very simple form. A "What movies are coming out this weekend?" box, with links to the DVD Talk reviews section and corresponding discussion threads. New release Tuesday lists, extremely popular reviews...there's a lot you could do there. It's genuinely useful, and it'd probably get plenty of clicks.
Features that are standard elsewhere -- such as autocompletes when using review searchboxes -- aren't in place. There's not a way on the site to search the text of reviews. That DVD Talk has three distinct groups of reviews (DVD, Blu-ray, and theatrical releases) makes it tougher, but I'd love to see something like our sister site High Def Digest has with graphical promos, an indication of what's popular, etc. One long list of mostly plain-text followed by another long, textual list followed by another long, textual list is kind of uninvolving. It wouldn't take much within each review to have a "you might also like..." promo featuring similar reviews. Again, that could be useful, it keeps people feeling engaged, and it gets more ad impressions.
These are the suggestions I also would have put forward, if I felt like typing them out. Prune dead areas of the forum and rename relevant sub-forums to more appropriate names.
#48
Re: How do we improve DVDTalk?
I'm a little puzzled because the other thread was teeming with so many gripes about how Internet Brands has neglected the site, and then when this opportunity to make suggestions comes along, the main thing people talk about are avatars. I mean, I agree that ought to be a standard thing, but why is the conversation pretty much ending there?
For my money, a general UI refresh is necessary.
For instance, when I go to the frontpage of DVD Talk:
1) HD DVD is featured as one of the first links, despite not really being a thing for 6 years now.
2) Many of the featured columns haven't been updated in multiple years.
3) Features are linked to like DVD giveaways (nothing since last Fall) and Easter Eggs (nothing since 2010).
4) There's a promo for new DVD reviews but nothing for, say, Blu-ray, despite the fact that DVD Talk's Blu-ray reviews on average garner more page views.
Even within the forums, the long-dead video game section is still heavily promoted, the "HD Reviews" heading should've been relabeled "Blu-ray Reviews" ages ago, the music forum description lists long-since-stillborn formats like SACD, and I'm sure the list goes on.
There's little-to-no connectivity between the other portions of the site and the forum proper. The columns use Movable Type and don't allow commenting, and even if they did, it's still removed from the forum. The columns each have their own mostly-but-not-quite-the-same site header/footers which makes it tougher to keep everything consistent and up-to-date. Nothing's promoted/cross-promoted between the columns and the forums. They're just so...disconnected. A tighter integration could make readers feel more invested in the site and its content. More eyeballs per column, more conversation: it's a good thing.
I'm not saying that the design needs to be super-slick and flashy. Clean and simple would be fine. Just get rid of the stuff that doesn't need to be there, and use that space to more effectively tease/promote. As things stand now, the site looks like it's been abandoned. Just looking like it's being updated -- that the people running the site care! -- could do wonders for getting casual visitors and new eyeballs to take it more seriously.
Even if there were some little tool in a CMS somewhere to promote threads, think of how useful that'd be. The reason I first started lurking around DVD Talk in 1998 or 1999 was because of the bargains forum. Have some kind of top deals promo where a moderator or something plugs a URL into a very simple form. A "What movies are coming out this weekend?" box, with links to the DVD Talk reviews section and corresponding discussion threads. New release Tuesday lists, extremely popular reviews...there's a lot you could do there. It's genuinely useful, and it'd probably get plenty of clicks.
Features that are standard elsewhere -- such as autocompletes when using review searchboxes -- aren't in place. There's not a way on the site to search the text of reviews. That DVD Talk has three distinct groups of reviews (DVD, Blu-ray, and theatrical releases) makes it tougher, but I'd love to see something like our sister site High Def Digest has with graphical promos, an indication of what's popular, etc. One long list of mostly plain-text followed by another long, textual list followed by another long, textual list is kind of uninvolving. It wouldn't take much within each review to have a "you might also like..." promo featuring similar reviews. Again, that could be useful, it keeps people feeling engaged, and it gets more ad impressions.
I'm totally willing to help out with any of this too. The review CMS I wrote for DVD Talk is pretty powerful but many years out of date. I wrote/maintained it for Geoff for free, and I'm willing (eager, even!) to continue doing the same. The code/database structure is fairly lousy because this was the first project I ever worked on like this (all the way back in 2001!), and I promise I'm way better now.
For my money, a general UI refresh is necessary.
For instance, when I go to the frontpage of DVD Talk:
1) HD DVD is featured as one of the first links, despite not really being a thing for 6 years now.
2) Many of the featured columns haven't been updated in multiple years.
3) Features are linked to like DVD giveaways (nothing since last Fall) and Easter Eggs (nothing since 2010).
4) There's a promo for new DVD reviews but nothing for, say, Blu-ray, despite the fact that DVD Talk's Blu-ray reviews on average garner more page views.
Even within the forums, the long-dead video game section is still heavily promoted, the "HD Reviews" heading should've been relabeled "Blu-ray Reviews" ages ago, the music forum description lists long-since-stillborn formats like SACD, and I'm sure the list goes on.
There's little-to-no connectivity between the other portions of the site and the forum proper. The columns use Movable Type and don't allow commenting, and even if they did, it's still removed from the forum. The columns each have their own mostly-but-not-quite-the-same site header/footers which makes it tougher to keep everything consistent and up-to-date. Nothing's promoted/cross-promoted between the columns and the forums. They're just so...disconnected. A tighter integration could make readers feel more invested in the site and its content. More eyeballs per column, more conversation: it's a good thing.
I'm not saying that the design needs to be super-slick and flashy. Clean and simple would be fine. Just get rid of the stuff that doesn't need to be there, and use that space to more effectively tease/promote. As things stand now, the site looks like it's been abandoned. Just looking like it's being updated -- that the people running the site care! -- could do wonders for getting casual visitors and new eyeballs to take it more seriously.
Even if there were some little tool in a CMS somewhere to promote threads, think of how useful that'd be. The reason I first started lurking around DVD Talk in 1998 or 1999 was because of the bargains forum. Have some kind of top deals promo where a moderator or something plugs a URL into a very simple form. A "What movies are coming out this weekend?" box, with links to the DVD Talk reviews section and corresponding discussion threads. New release Tuesday lists, extremely popular reviews...there's a lot you could do there. It's genuinely useful, and it'd probably get plenty of clicks.
Features that are standard elsewhere -- such as autocompletes when using review searchboxes -- aren't in place. There's not a way on the site to search the text of reviews. That DVD Talk has three distinct groups of reviews (DVD, Blu-ray, and theatrical releases) makes it tougher, but I'd love to see something like our sister site High Def Digest has with graphical promos, an indication of what's popular, etc. One long list of mostly plain-text followed by another long, textual list followed by another long, textual list is kind of uninvolving. It wouldn't take much within each review to have a "you might also like..." promo featuring similar reviews. Again, that could be useful, it keeps people feeling engaged, and it gets more ad impressions.
I'm totally willing to help out with any of this too. The review CMS I wrote for DVD Talk is pretty powerful but many years out of date. I wrote/maintained it for Geoff for free, and I'm willing (eager, even!) to continue doing the same. The code/database structure is fairly lousy because this was the first project I ever worked on like this (all the way back in 2001!), and I promise I'm way better now.
I think what we need first is some votes, or some way to indicate whether the community would like to make each change. Can you take the lead on that? And any input you have from a technical point of view, perhaps you can share directly with me?
#49
Re: How do we improve DVDTalk?
Another idea, not sure if it was mentioned here, but a while back we discussed enabling some sort of collector inventory feature. This would essentially allow a member to search the DVDTalk review database (which is the Amazon database) and select each movie you own, and add it to your collection attached to your DVDTalk profile in some way. Perhaps allow users to export a list of, say, "top ten 80s slasher movies" as a forum post and FB/twitter link?
Is any of this still desirable, or do better versions of this potential feature already exist?
Is any of this still desirable, or do better versions of this potential feature already exist?
#50
DVD Talk Legend
Re: How do we improve DVDTalk?
Another idea, not sure if it was mentioned here, but a while back we discussed enabling some sort of collector inventory feature. This would essentially allow a member to search the DVDTalk review database (which is the Amazon database) and select each movie you own, and add it to your collection attached to your DVDTalk profile in some way. Perhaps allow users to export a list of, say, "top ten 80s slasher movies" as a forum post and FB/twitter link?
Is any of this still desirable, or do better versions of this potential feature already exist?
Is any of this still desirable, or do better versions of this potential feature already exist?