![]() |
Re: What happene to the (superbowl) random picture thread?
I blame Janet Jackson.
|
Re: Otter Picture Thread?
Perhaps the nsfw image threads could be moved to the Premium section? At the very least it's hidden from the general public that read the boards, and with it being a pay section you know everyone viewing it is at least over 18. And Lord knows the Premium section can use the traffic... :D
|
Re: Otter Picture Thread?
Originally Posted by zombeaner
(Post 10029844)
I still think X goes overboard with the decision making on these threads. Granted, it has been a while since this happened, but still, it seems pretty puritanical to me when it does happen.
Originally Posted by spainlinx0
(Post 10029855)
Whatever. I enjoyed the threads because it was a mix of cool pictures and hot chicks. I didn't think anything was that bad.
Originally Posted by spainlinx0
(Post 10028990)
I have never seen a picture there that is any worse than what constantly pops up on DVD covers at the top of every page. Seems a bit hypocritical.
Originally Posted by E. Honda
(Post 10030119)
Perhaps the nsfw image threads could be moved to the Premium section? At the very least it's hidden from the general public that read the boards, and with it being a pay section you know everyone viewing it is at least over 18. And Lord knows the Premium section can use the traffic... :D
|
Re: Otter Picture Thread?
Originally Posted by Dr Mabuse
(Post 10029235)
Well damn... I figured some of the same three or four jack asses who KEPT posting pics of chicks would cost us that thread.
I would have preferred they all got like a long 'vacations' or a ban instead of the thread going, but I understand the situation. Over and over again we would get it back to cool pics after X tried to be reasonable about it, and the very same jackasses would start with chick pictures again after a while. Sucks... It's unfortunate, as there were a lot of cool pictures being posted, but it doesn't surprise me in the least. |
Re: Otter Picture Thread?
It's our own fault for not reporting the few objectionable posts, the ones with visible naughty bits.
I know the mods are underpaid and overworked, but most of the thread was a lot of fun, and I wish a couple of suspensions were the end result instead of a thread delete. But then, I think no post should ever be deleted, outside of really extreme circumstances. Just delete the offending text/pic and posters, not entire posts or threads. |
Re: Otter Picture Thread?
now i really want to see these "girl in a blue dress" pictures...
|
Re: Otter Picture Thread?
Well http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4048/...ebff2159_o.jpg
There were some cool & funny pics in there. |
Re: Otter Picture Thread?
You really should get rid of the NSFW tag since anything NSFW really isn't safe for DVDTalk, or make it a NSFDVDT tag to make it easy to remove the offending things.
I didn't think any of the pics I posted were deserving of the warning I received, but I'm sorry if I caused the closing of the thread in any way. (though nothing I posted was worse than some of the GIFs that are still in that thread) |
Re: Otter Picture Thread?
|
Re: What happene to the (superbowl) random picture thread?
|
Re: Otter Picture Thread?
Dead bloodly bleeding deer = OK!
PG rated shot of girl = BANNED! Glad I dropped my premium subscription. This was a poor moderation decision. |
Re: Otter Picture Thread?
Originally Posted by Chrisedge
(Post 10031520)
Dead bloodly bleeding deer = OK!
PG rated shot of girl = BANNED! Glad I dropped my premium subscription. This was a poor moderation decision. |
Re: Otter Picture Thread?
Originally Posted by Nefarious
(Post 10031160)
Well http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4048/...ebff2159_o.jpg
There were some cool & funny pics in there. |
Re: Otter Picture Thread?
Originally Posted by benedict
(Post 10030276)
Anyhoo, given that this very topic has been discussed at length before, I suggest anyone with strong feelings should look through the old threads and post a detailed argument rather than start up the whole thing from scratch. I can then refer any constructive criticism to IB for comment. But I'm not holding my breath and any sort of descent into "ya, boo, it sucks and isn't fair" can only have one result.
About this picture. http://images.dvdtalk.com/covers/B000V6LT7Q.jpg |
Re: Otter Picture Thread?
Originally Posted by Chrisedge
(Post 10031520)
Dead bloodly bleeding deer = OK!
PG rated shot of girl = BANNED! Glad I dropped my premium subscription. This was a poor moderation decision. I've notified the cover you cited to IB for attention/comment, thank you. It may be that we'll need to find a dedicated email address for such notifications directly to whoever its is at IB that monitors the ads. EDIT: on checking, I see that the reference was to a cover-picture cited in one of the earlier threads but it may be that the referral will generate IB concern/interest regardless of age. |
Re: Otter Picture Thread?
Originally Posted by Trevor
(Post 10031523)
They show labia in PG movies now?
|
Re: Otter Picture Thread?
So what is the verdict on starting up a new one? That one had about reached it's typical limit anyway.
|
Re: Otter Picture Thread?
Originally Posted by riotinmyskull
(Post 10031090)
now i really want to see these "girl in a blue dress" pictures...
|
The Search For Random Pictures thread.
There was a random picture thread, but it seems to have disappeared.
Did it leave any clues behind? http://joe-ks.com/archives_apr2001/Ufo.jpg |
Re: The Search For Random Pictures thread.
Read this.
|
Re: Otter Picture Thread?
Deleting the thread seems a bit extreme. I rather enjoyed that thread for the 99% of the pictures that did not wander outside the nebulous bounds of DVDTalk decency rules.
|
Re: Otter Picture Thread?
If you want to see the girl in the blue dress, I'm sure you could find it in google cache or archive.org...
|
Re: The Search For Random Pictures thread.
|
Re: Otter Picture Thread?
Was the one girl in the blue dress photo that was posted against the rules or something? I'm not even sure why that even keeps coming up.
|
Re: Otter Picture Thread?
Originally Posted by Graftenberg
(Post 10033322)
Me too. Can someone post it over at xcritic?
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:52 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.