DVD Talk Forum

DVD Talk Forum (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/)
-   Forum Feedback and Support (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/forum-feedback-support-4/)
-   -   The one and only "Why was this thread closed?" thread (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/forum-feedback-support/566791-one-only-why-thread-closed-thread.html)

Trevor 01-27-10 06:49 AM

Re: The one and only "Why was this thread closed?" thread
 
^ I think it is 900.

Numanoid 01-28-10 01:03 AM

Re: The one and only "Why was this thread closed?" thread
 

Originally Posted by John Slider (Post 9957307)
Mean spirited? Towards the guy who did Drink Man Comics? I doubt he took much offense.

I can speak from personal experience that some people here can dish it out but not take it.

dx23 01-28-10 01:01 PM

Re: The one and only "Why was this thread closed?" thread
 
Why is the "JD Salinger" is dead thread I created in Other being deleted?

X 01-28-10 01:03 PM

Re: The one and only "Why was this thread closed?" thread
 
The first thread you started was merged with the existing one in Book Talk. The second one you started was merged with the existing one in Book Talk.

dx23 01-28-10 01:06 PM

Re: The one and only "Why was this thread closed?" thread
 

Originally Posted by X (Post 9968697)
The first thread you started was merged with the existing one in Book Talk. The second one you started was merged with the existing one in Book Talk.

Thanks. didn't see it there when I checked.

LurkerDan 01-28-10 01:28 PM

Re: The one and only "Why was this thread closed?" thread
 
Seems pretty silly that we can't talk about JD Salinger in Otter. :shrug:

dx23 03-25-10 03:33 PM

Re: The one and only "Why was this thread closed?" thread
 
Could someone explain me why this thread was closed?

http://forum.dvdtalk.com/blu-ray-bar...3-27-a-13.html

By explanation, I mean, why in the blue hell does someone here think that using to legally distributed coupons by Disney is fraud or cheating? Just because they closed the thread in another forum, doesn't mean that they are right and we are wrong. Toys R Us will get reimbursement for both coupons and they don't have the policy that Target and Best Buy have of only accepting one coupon.

I went to Toys R Us twice already and the coupons scan without a hitch. The clerks didn't make any fuzz. I went to the thread above to ask something related to the scarcity of the Blu-ray packaging at that specific store and now I don't know if opening a new Toys R Us thread will get me suspended.

By the way, I'm not trying to put pilot on the spot here. He has been a great mod in this forum, but I don't see why people who used the 2 coupons are now called cheaters or think that this is fraudulent behavior.

pilot 03-26-10 12:13 PM

Re: The one and only "Why was this thread closed?" thread
 

Originally Posted by dx23 (Post 10071030)
Could someone explain me why this thread was closed?

http://forum.dvdtalk.com/blu-ray-bar...3-27-a-13.html

By explanation, I mean, why in the blue hell does someone here think that using to legally distributed coupons by Disney is fraud or cheating? Just because they closed the thread in another forum, doesn't mean that they are right and we are wrong. Toys R Us will get reimbursement for both coupons and they don't have the policy that Target and Best Buy have of only accepting one coupon.

I went to Toys R Us twice already and the coupons scan without a hitch. The clerks didn't make any fuzz. I went to the thread above to ask something related to the scarcity of the Blu-ray packaging at that specific store and now I don't know if opening a new Toys R Us thread will get me suspended.

By the way, I'm not trying to put pilot on the spot here. He has been a great mod in this forum, but I don't see why people who used the 2 coupons are now called cheaters or think that this is fraudulent behavior.

The reason I closed it mostly was because I was annoyed at the fact of people who constantly feel the need to while maybe not illegal, but maybe somewhat unethically - by either knowingly or unknowingly use multiple coupons on one purchase, who the post about it here, and then have to sort through the posts of those who call those posters out and having people squabble with each other about doing it, which then requires me to keep going in and editing and deleting posts over and over again.

I was hoping that it would possibly make a statement, albeit maybe a small one which would stop it from reoccurring.

Heat 04-06-10 12:16 PM

Re: The one and only "Why was this thread closed?" thread
 
http://forum.dvdtalk.com/tech-talk/5...re-manage.html

People can't ask about software to copy DVDs? Copying a DVD is legal (fair use), breaking copy protection is not legal (digital rights management act). There are DVDs without copy protection which can be legally ripped to a hard drive, if you had the right software. Asking about the software is not allowed?

Lemmy 04-06-10 01:57 PM

Re: The one and only "Why was this thread closed?" thread
 

Originally Posted by Heat (Post 10091178)
http://forum.dvdtalk.com/tech-talk/5...re-manage.html

People can't ask about software to copy DVDs? Copying a DVD is legal (fair use), breaking copy protection is not legal (digital rights management act). There are DVDs without copy protection which can be legally ripped to a hard drive, if you had the right software. Asking about the software is not allowed?

-popcorn-

mkdevo 04-06-10 02:50 PM

Re: The one and only "Why was this thread closed?" thread
 

Originally Posted by Heat (Post 10091178)
http://forum.dvdtalk.com/tech-talk/5...re-manage.html

People can't ask about software to copy DVDs? Copying a DVD is legal (fair use), breaking copy protection is not legal (digital rights management act). There are DVDs without copy protection which can be legally ripped to a hard drive, if you had the right software. Asking about the software is not allowed?

He wasn't even asking about software to copy DVDs, he was asking about media management software, which makes the lock even more ridiculous. Was the post even read before the thread was locked? It certainly doesn't look like Trevor read it before making his post..

X 04-06-10 02:53 PM

Re: The one and only "Why was this thread closed?" thread
 

Originally Posted by Heat (Post 10091178)
http://forum.dvdtalk.com/tech-talk/5...re-manage.html

People can't ask about software to copy DVDs? Copying a DVD is legal (fair use), breaking copy protection is not legal (digital rights management act). There are DVDs without copy protection which can be legally ripped to a hard drive, if you had the right software. Asking about the software is not allowed?

You may have missed the years of discussion we've had about the DMCA.

And we're not going to help in those endeavors as stated in the same forum that thread was posted. http://forum.dvdtalk.com/tech-talk/4...-material.html

Trevor 04-08-10 10:07 AM

Re: The one and only "Why was this thread closed?" thread
 

Originally Posted by mkdevo (Post 10091449)
It certainly doesn't look like Trevor read it before making his post..

:hscratch: No, I read it. And because I've been here for more than a week I knew it wasn't going to be allowed, and thought I'd let the OP know before anyone reported it or deleted the thread.

Travis McClain 04-27-10 03:30 PM

Re: The one and only "Why was this thread closed?" thread
 
Okay, so I wasn't terribly surprised that "blu ray is Stupid" was closed. But I would take umbrage with the thread closing remarks by nemein:

"Mod note: DVDtalk is not really the place for format wars. If you want to get into those types of discussions I'm sure there are plenty of other places out there that will accommodate you."

Not to be too much of a malcontent, but I'm pretty sure it wouldn't take long to find evidence of format war disputes going on amongst our little community. In fact, one of the more interesting threads I've seen is in the DVD & Home Theater Gear sub-forum, questioning whether there is a double-standard among fans who embrace HD, but shun 3D. There are legitimate questions being asked there, and while I certainly agree that none were raised in "blu ray is Stupid," I definitely think the idea that this community doesn't have, or for some reason isn't the appropriate venue for, those debates is categorically wrong.

benedict 04-28-10 03:23 AM

Re: The one and only "Why was this thread closed?" thread
 

Originally Posted by MinLShaw (Post 10127734)
[...]I definitely think the idea that this community doesn't have, or for some reason isn't the appropriate venue for, those debates is categorically wrong.

You seem to be arguing against something that nemein didn't quite say i.e. "these types of discussions" could more charitably be construed as referring to intemperate, vitriolic, warlike ones.

Although gratuitous "warlike" format bashing clearly is unwelcome, I would expect informed, mature debate to be another thing entirely.

This said, a major problem when endeavouring to keep the forums free of petty bickering is that there are often those who will drag a constructive debate right down into the gutter.

Consequently, there comes a point when an adminstrative decision has to be made that, based on previous warnings to "play nice" constantly being ignored, particular topics are verboten.

Just my two pennies. I don't tend to look into such threads/forums and doubtless nemein will clarify whether a decision has been made on format discussions in particular or just the ill-tempered ones.

Travis McClain 04-28-10 03:35 AM

Re: The one and only "Why was this thread closed?" thread
 

Originally Posted by benedict (Post 10128700)
You seem to be arguing against something that nemein didn't quite say i.e. "these types of discussions" could more charitably be construed as referring to intemperate, vitriolic, warlike ones.

Although gratuitous "warlike" format bashing clearly is unwelcome, I would expect informed, mature debate to be another thing entirely.

This said, a major problem when endeavouring to keep the forums free of petty bickering is that there are often those who will drag a constructive debate right down into the gutter.

Consequently, there comes a point when an adminstrative decision has to be made that, based on previous warnings to "play nice" constantly being ignored, particular topics are verboten.

Just my two pennies. I don't tend to look into such threads/forums and doubtless nemein will clarify whether a decision has been made on format discussions in particular or just the ill-tempered ones.

Don't get me wrong; there was nothing of any value to be found in the cited closed thread and I think anyone who read the initial post was amazed how long it stayed open before being locked. I'm certainly "on board" with the spirit of nemein's reasoning, and your reiteration of it...but I still think using a phrase like "DVDtalk is not really the place for format wars" is inaccurate.

nemein 04-28-10 10:13 PM

Re: The one and only "Why was this thread closed?" thread
 
As has been mentioned there are threads around in which varying views on formats are being discussed... I wouldn't call those "format wars" myself. To me a "format war" is more akin to troll posting. Make sense? Apologies for any confusion. If you look at the time my post was made, 2315, that was the quickest phrasing I could think of to shut down the thread in a way that would hopefully kill that type of thread/conversation ;)

covenant 04-30-10 03:21 PM

Re: The one and only "Why was this thread closed?" thread
 
Add "HICK by Andrea Portes (my wife)" from the movie section to this thread.

Groucho 04-30-10 03:23 PM

Re: The one and only "Why was this thread closed?" thread
 

Originally Posted by covenant (Post 10133501)
Add "HICK by Andrea Portes (my wife)" from the movie section to this thread.

That one was at the request of the OP.

Trevor 04-30-10 03:39 PM

Re: The one and only "Why was this thread closed?" thread
 

Originally Posted by Groucho (Post 10133504)
That one was at the request of the OP.

Complete bullcrap reason in my opinion.

The OP should have no more 'rights' to a thread than you or I.

If a post was offensive, remove the post and punish the wrongdoer, don't delete the entire thread.

covenant 04-30-10 03:54 PM

Re: The one and only "Why was this thread closed?" thread
 

Originally Posted by Groucho (Post 10133504)
That one was at the request of the OP.

Oh, I know why it was deleted, I just wanted it added to the thread as another example.

Groucho 04-30-10 04:46 PM

Re: The one and only "Why was this thread closed?" thread
 

Originally Posted by Trevor (Post 10133532)
Complete bullcrap reason in my opinion.

The OP should have no more 'rights' to a thread than you or I.

If a post was offensive, remove the post and punish the wrongdoer, don't delete the entire thread.

What's funny is that there was nothing offensive at all. A publicity photo of a published author was posted, and somehow that triggered the complaint.

Trevor 04-30-10 05:21 PM

Re: The one and only "Why was this thread closed?" thread
 

Originally Posted by Groucho (Post 10133627)
What's funny is that there was nothing offensive at all. A publicity photo of a published author was posted, and somehow that triggered the complaint.

I think I caught most of the thread before it was deleted, partially through the email notifications. It did look fairly innocent to me, and I theorize that the OP didn't really know what he was starting, wandered over and took his first look at Otter, and panicked, seeing where things may have gone.

Crow331 04-30-10 05:24 PM

Re: The one and only "Why was this thread closed?" thread
 
delete

Trevor 04-30-10 05:42 PM

Re: The one and only "Why was this thread closed?" thread
 

Originally Posted by Crow331 (Post 10133674)
Actually, it isn't a publicity photo at all and Covenant likes to change the story on where he got the photo to suit his side of it. First he said he got it from myspace then in a private message he tells me he got it from a hubpages blog, then in a 3rd email he tells me he found it in a "google search". Basically Covenant is full of Sh!t

And I originally reported the post itself to be deleted, not the thread, but after I saw that thread basically going to crap I asked for it to be deleted. I'll post again when we actually have casting news and hopefully some dumb ass won't find it necessary to ask for pics of my wife and another dumb ass won't oblige him for a reason that is pointless and adds nothing to the thread except to give Covenant something to think about when he heads to the bathroom on yet another Saturday night he spends alone.

That last part was pretty uncalled for Crow. Somebody is going to do similar things in almost every thread here, we just have to ignore it or have fun with it.

And not really knowing the particulars, the three different answers given up there could all easily be correct on his part, and not anyone being full of crap. I googled, I googled and saw it on site x, I googled and saw it on site y. All correct even if I omit the 'i googled' sometimes.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:01 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.