![]() |
Weren't we supposed to go 100% "family friendly"?
I thought I read here that we were moving towards becoming 100% work safe, with no links to adult content at all.
We still have a link to adult reviews at the top center of every single page on the site, and a few other adult mentions/redirects. I'm not a prude, but would prefer this site to be completely work safe, and I swear that is what Geoff said we were aiming for when they created xcritic. |
It was said that was happening, I don't know that a time frame was ever made publicly.
Q: How about XCritic is that part of this? A: No, XCritic.com has be spun off as its own separate site completely separately owned and operated. Going forward Internet Brands and DVD Talk will not have any form of adult content, ads, links, or adult forum on it. http://forum.dvdtalk.com/showthread.php?t=515529 |
The links are not to DVD Talk they are to XCritic and will remain there. All adult content HAS been removed from DVD Talk.
|
Originally Posted by gkleinman
The links are not to DVD Talk they are to XCritic and will remain there. All adult content HAS been removed from DVD Talk.
So all the same content is still there, it just is hosted on a different site, so that makes DVDtalk work-safe / family friendly? So it was decided not to do this: Q: How about XCritic is that part of this? A: No, XCritic.com has be spun off as its own separate site completely separately owned and operated. Going forward Internet Brands and DVD Talk will not have any form of adult content, ads, links, or adult forum on it. |
I'll let Internet Brands clarify, but directing people to content that used to be here for them on another site is essential and there aren't any other links/ads/etc here that are adult vs. what we used to have.
|
But...there ARE adult links here. Which is completely the opposite of what Trevor has twice quoted.
|
Originally Posted by abrg923
But...there ARE adult links here. Which is completely the opposite of what Trevor has twice quoted.
I imagine that xcritic was not thriving on it's own, so it was decided to leave the links here to increase traffic. It's their business, they want the revenue/traffic, but it is completely the opposite of what was told to us earlier. Due to these ubiquitous links (top center of every single page), some of us are blocked at work by filters, have been verbally blocked by supervisors seeing the links, or choose to not go here at work for fear of them being seen. |
Somehow, I'm guessing we won't get a further response to this.
|
$$$$$$
|
Originally Posted by abrg923
Somehow, I'm guessing we won't get a further response to this.
Geoff has said REPEATEDLY that DVD Talk is not supposed to be work safe. If you want it 100% work safe, view it without pics. |
Originally Posted by DVD Josh
Geoff's made his position here. Links to content will continue to be posted here, while the content itself will not be.
Geoff has said REPEATEDLY that DVD Talk is not supposed to be work safe. If you want it 100% work safe, view it without pics. Josh, that's true, but as stated, it does indeed go against the above quote that mentions the stuff that will no longer eb on DVD Talk, and that quote includes the word "links" as well as content and everything else. I don't really care all that much but Trevor and the guys are right and have a valid complaint. |
Originally Posted by DVD Josh
Geoff's made his position here. Links to content will continue to be posted here, while the content itself will not be.
Geoff has said REPEATEDLY that DVD Talk is not supposed to be work safe. If you want it 100% work safe, view it without pics. |
Originally Posted by Brent L
Josh, that's true, but as stated, it does indeed go against the above quote that mentions the stuff that will no longer eb on DVD Talk, and that quote includes the word "links" as well as content and everything else. I don't really care all that much but Trevor and the guys are right and have a valid complaint.
|
It is a valid complaint, but let's wait and as Geoff said,
Originally Posted by gkleinman
I'll let Internet Brands clarify
|
Originally Posted by Trevor
I imagine that xcritic was not thriving on it's own, so it was decided to leave the links here to increase traffic.
Oh, as far as G! responding immediately, he's extremely ill at the moment with a lot on his plate should he feel better. Please give him some extra time to chime in on any threads or answer emails out of common courtesy. Thanks! |
DVDTalk is work safe. There is no adult content on the site. As far as links go, we agreed to support Geoff in this as long as the matter itself was not on DVDTalk which it isn't, and Geoff, himself, has made that quite clear.
DVDTalk is quite work safe, however, it is impossible to make this 100% "family friendly" since the site is not really garnered towards families, but towards movie enthusiasts. If the "links" part is being so much of an issue, we will remove that word from there. Edit: And when I say adult content, I specifically mean porn. |
I have no interest in rehashing the argument, but this thread pretty much outlines what DVDTalk considers "porn" or "adult content": http://forum.dvdtalk.com/showthread.php?t=519290.
Unless I'm mistaken and the "Torture Chamber" cover is now considered "adult content" and explicit sexual acts covered with tiny dots are not permitted on the main site, it's just a lost cause to argue. |
My understand is that if it's on Amazon, it's okay here. Hard to argue with that logic.
|
Originally Posted by DVD Josh
My understand is that if it's on Amazon, it's okay here. Hard to argue with that logic.
For weeks that image was unavoidable on the DVDTalk forum pages, regardless of surfing preferences or specific forum visits. I think there's a pretty clear difference, but if that's the rule, that's the rule. I still consider it beyond disingenuous to say that cover is not pornographic. |
Originally Posted by BravesMG
I still consider it beyond disingenuous to say that cover is not pornographic.
The links (on every blasted page on the site) go to adult content, but because they aren't hosted here it doesn't count. rotfl |
even just having the links makes the site blocked by some software, so I'm not sure how you can call it work safe
|
Originally Posted by LockStock
If the "links" part is being so much of an issue, we will remove that word from there.
|
It's funny to me how desperate this site is to push XC, to the point that we now have blatant hypocrisy. (the whole "no links" post) :shrug: Oh well.
|
Originally Posted by BravesMG
I have no interest in rehashing the argument, but this thread pretty much outlines what DVDTalk considers "porn" or "adult content": http://forum.dvdtalk.com/showthread.php?t=519290.
Unless I'm mistaken and the "Torture Chamber" cover is now considered "adult content" and explicit sexual acts covered with tiny dots are not permitted on the main site, it's just a lost cause to argue. Oh wait.......:( -p |
I'm not sure if this is technically possible, but what about a user option for "family friendly/work safe" that can be turned on or off (and defaults to off). it seems like this would make the most business sense, as the default would leave the site exactly as it is now, but those who decide to turn the work safe setting on will increase their traffic to the site (ie., at work for example, when currently they can't).
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:07 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.