Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Feedback > Forum Feedback and Support
Reload this Page >

Circuit City lawyers complain about ad prices posted in DVD Bargain Forum.

Community
Search
Forum Feedback and Support Post forum feedback and related problems, here.

Circuit City lawyers complain about ad prices posted in DVD Bargain Forum.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-05-07, 11:56 AM
  #101  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Goldblum
That's just the point. Many people in this thread have said that they only go to CC to pick up the loss-leaders Speedy posts and never buy anything else. These people are not valued customers in CC eyes.

I'm not defending CC here. I'm just pointing out that a "boycott" of loss-leaders has no negative affect for CC.

This is really a minor side point, though. No need to belabor it.
As someone else pointed out, I doubt many people ONLY get those items when they got to Circuit City. Perhaps that is their only *reason* for going in, but once they are in the store they may buy other things. If they don't, then Circuit City does not have an effective store layout or customer service. The sale item is just to get people in the door- everything after that is out of the control of the sales ad and rests completely on the abilities of the store itself. If the store sucks, it has no one else to blame for fewer sales than itself.

Moreover, I find your continued use of the term "loss-leaders" to be amusing. I do not believe that Circuit City takes a loss on ANY of its items, whether they are on sale or not.
mifuneral is offline  
Old 08-05-07, 12:00 PM
  #102  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 556
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why hasn't Speedy responded to any of this?
Banky is offline  
Old 08-05-07, 12:20 PM
  #103  
Challenge Guru & Comic Nerd
 
Trevor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: spiritually, Minnesota
Posts: 36,891
Received 680 Likes on 456 Posts
Originally Posted by mifuneral
Moreover, I find your continued use of the term "loss-leaders" to be amusing. I do not believe that Circuit City takes a loss on ANY of its items, whether they are on sale or not.
I thought it was well established that any new release priced under $15 was probably selling at below what the store pays.
Trevor is offline  
Old 08-05-07, 12:59 PM
  #104  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Trevor
I thought it was well established that any new release priced under $15 was probably selling at below what the store pays.
1. Well established where?

2. New releases are rarely below 15 anyway. They tend to be 16.99 or higher.
mifuneral is offline  
Old 08-05-07, 01:14 PM
  #105  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
speedy1961's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: In a small pocket universe hoping to someday become a Moderator Emeritus at DVDTalk.com!
Posts: 9,380
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Banky
Why hasn't Speedy responded to any of this?

Simply because when the lockdown first hit, I was somewhat stunned. After all, I've been doing this more or less successfully for two years now. I played by the rules and thought I was doing three important things:

1. Giving a folks a real chance to save some hard earned cash by using my intel to provide which of three major retailers had the best price or incentives on new commodities that we here at DVDTalk (as well as other places) love to aquire / play / enjoy in our free time.


2. Answering questions about said items on sale in a manner that not only reassured the questioner (especially if they had a bad experience with a retailer before) about what was pictured, the terms of deals, any quantity limits, etc. I honestly feel that I succeeded in the question answering portion well above my wildest dreams and that it in turn brought about salient point #3.


3. I established a symbiotic relationship between those sites that publish my intel and also with those retailers that I was examining each and every week. I rarely, if ever, denigrated any of these the companies and I honestly believe that I helped to (A) drive business to said retailers and (B) increase membership here at DVDTalk and other areas on the internet.


I certainly did NOT choose to become an Internet celebrity which was the end result my stating in my weekly post that the PS3 $100 price cut was indeed listed in the Circuit City ad and also later in the Target ad and finally in Best Buy's ad.

That singular event may have intensified the spotlight to a point where I no longer keep my "deep throat" or invisible status. For those that followed that story, the first indication of the price drop was from an anonymous Circuit City manager who went on the record for an Internet game site. Next appeared an actual ad scan watermarked with the letters NSX or NFX (I forget which). After that, I published my weekly thread and the rest you know. Most Game sites were quite complimentary on my accuracy during the past two years and I think that my reliability record, finally convinced the gaming world that the price cut would indeed become fact.

Those here at DVDTalk as well other areas out in the internet ether already knew how reliable my weekly threads were, which of course helps to prove point #3 above. Folks were joining to read my weekly scribblings and then go to the three retailers I cover and spend money and hoping leave said retailer knowing they got the best possible deal available at the time based on cost and ALSO based on what that particular consumer valued most (whether it be a lenticular cover, a specialized figure ala Hellboy, or a gaming guide, etc.).


I thought long and hard upon what what I just stated above and finally chose to write if for you all to read. It is in no way intended to be an example of me "tooting my own horn" but rather the way I've come up with to keep all the events that have transpired in perspective.


Now to answer Banky's question:

I believe that at the present time that Geoff's advice for everyone to be patient is the best advice I could follow at this time. I do not want to further antagonize the grumpy "lion" as it were.

I'm looking into a few avenues for legal precedent into this unique area and have reached out to a few contacts in my real life circle.

I want you ALL to know that while I'm silent for the moment that I'm still here with you all. I too, am appalled at this course of actions and hope that it can be overturned and be revealed as a cowardly action that I believe it to be.

Plus there is the First Ammendment issue at stake here. I particularly like littlemiss' open letter to Circuit City. Perhaps if they (CC) knew how you guys feel about their operations, they might re-think their position.



Anyway, many gracious thanks to those that have written / e-mailed me. Your kind words have been most comforting during this strenous time. Again, I'm still with you ALL. Let's see how this plays out.

Speedy1961~~~~

Last edited by speedy1961; 08-05-07 at 02:53 PM.
speedy1961 is offline  
Old 08-05-07, 01:32 PM
  #106  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Pizza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,136
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Many thanks to you Speedy for all your hard work.
Pizza is offline  
Old 08-05-07, 02:54 PM
  #107  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
speedy1961's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: In a small pocket universe hoping to someday become a Moderator Emeritus at DVDTalk.com!
Posts: 9,380
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Mosskeeto
I appreciate all the laborious hand keying you've done selflessly for the benefit of all the eyes on these forums.
In the interest of setting your personal note straight: it was littlemiss who drafted the open letter...her post just started with a quote from my post.
Sorry....

My apologies littlemiss but thanks.
speedy1961 is offline  
Old 08-05-07, 02:59 PM
  #108  
Moderator
 
Groucho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 71,383
Received 122 Likes on 84 Posts
Long thread, I haven't read every post, but I'd like to play devil's advocate since nobody is taking CC's side. The reason they want to block this is because it's not just the consumers that can see the info -- it's their competitors as well.
Groucho is offline  
Old 08-05-07, 03:39 PM
  #109  
DVD Talk Legend
 
darkside's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 19,862
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Groucho
Long thread, I haven't read every post, but I'd like to play devil's advocate since nobody is taking CC's side. The reason they want to block this is because it's not just the consumers that can see the info -- it's their competitors as well.
From what I have heard they know about their competitors ads well in advance so they have ways of getting that information outside the internet. I honestly think this really started with the PS3 price drop and then again with the Xbox one. CC probably had to take some heat for the leak and that is why they are taking action.

I understand the CC desire to protect their ads, but they can not do it by stomping on the first amendment.

These leaks probably are happening because the ads have to be printed and submitted early to the newspapers for publication. Another example of old media being unable to deal with the 21st century.
darkside is offline  
Old 08-05-07, 03:50 PM
  #110  
Challenge Guru & Comic Nerd
 
Trevor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: spiritually, Minnesota
Posts: 36,891
Received 680 Likes on 456 Posts
Originally Posted by Groucho
Long thread, I haven't read every post, but I'd like to play devil's advocate since nobody is taking CC's side. The reason they want to block this is because it's not just the consumers that can see the info -- it's their competitors as well.
Yep, we've covered that aspect Groucho, and a few other reasons why CC has the right to do this.

The more I think about it, there is NO reason why any company would want their ad prices released early. Sure they should not mind them being posted on the net on Sat/Sun, the more discussion the merrier. But early? It hurts them in multiple areas.
The big one besides the competition one you mentioned, is the price matching aspect. A lot of people were buying things early and then going back and pricematching, getting an extra 10% savings.

So I hate to say it, but if CC doesn't want their prices posted early, then that is their right, and we shouldn't complain.

:ducks:
Trevor is offline  
Old 08-05-07, 04:35 PM
  #111  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Arizona
Posts: 8,020
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Trevor
Yep, we've covered that aspect Groucho, and a few other reasons why CC has the right to do this.

The more I think about it, there is NO reason why any company would want their ad prices released early. Sure they should not mind them being posted on the net on Sat/Sun, the more discussion the merrier. But early? It hurts them in multiple areas.
The big one besides the competition one you mentioned, is the price matching aspect. A lot of people were buying things early and then going back and pricematching, getting an extra 10% savings.

So I hate to say it, but if CC doesn't want their prices posted early, then that is their right, and we shouldn't complain.

:ducks:
There's a lot of things Circuit City might not want to have happen, the question is whether they have the legal right to prevent them from happening.
WallyOPD is offline  
Old 08-05-07, 06:35 PM
  #112  
DVD Talk Special Edition
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,429
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Trevor
The big one besides the competition one you mentioned, is the price matching aspect. A lot of people were buying things early and then going back and pricematching, getting an extra 10% savings.

So I hate to say it, but if CC doesn't want their prices posted early, then that is their right, and we shouldn't complain.

:ducks:
This is where anyone defending Circuit City, or any other retailer for that matter, is wrong. If the store offers a Price Match guarantee, then it is the consumers right to take advantage of it. This is their way to try to keep people from going to their competitor. If the consumer is going to use this to their advantage, it doesn't matter if they find out what the store prices are weeks in advance, or the day of the sale. The consumer is not going to stop using the Price Match guarantee. If you are a consumer, like myself, who shops for the best prices, then it doesn't matter when they see the ad. So, arguing that people are buying the product early, then going back to Price Match, and get the 10% discount, is void. The store offers this guarantee, no matter if the consumer buys the product early (usually within 30 days), or after the sale ad comes out. It's written in their Price Match guarantee, and is not affected by when the consumer found out about the price.

If Circuit City is worried about the effect of their Price Match guarantee on their sales, then, they need to stop offering it. They are not going to do that, because they want your business. Stop defending Circuit City. They are not losing sales because the ads are posted a few days early. If anything, they are gaining more customers. If a consumer isn't going to shop at Circuit City, it's not because we are, or are not, seeing the ad prices early. It's because of one of the MANY reasons people have already stated for not shopping at Circuit City.

My main reason is, as most others, that you can't find a sales associate. I would have better luck finding someone to help me off the street, than I would at Circuit City.

Last edited by MadonnasManOne; 08-05-07 at 06:41 PM.
MadonnasManOne is offline  
Old 08-05-07, 08:12 PM
  #113  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 620
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We're in your corner, Speedy! CC has lost my future business.
thursdaynighter is offline  
Old 08-05-07, 09:08 PM
  #114  
New Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't wish to put any one in a position of speaking when they should not (i.e. Speedy and Geoff), but does any one think it's a good idea to focus our efforts on a letter writing campaign to CC?

If anyone couldn't guess from my open letter, I quite fed up with CC and their poor service. Perhaps if they become aware that Speedy was doing them a favor by driving customers to their stores, it might make a difference.

I suggest if others would like to do this, we write letters via snail mail. Yes, snail mail. Email complaints do not work. And a large volume of snail mail will make an impact. Beside what's 41 cents? Especially after all of the cash Speedy has saved us!

I suggest we write letters to:

Philip J. Schoonover, CEO
-or-
George Danny Clark, Executive Vice President & President of Circuit City-Retail Stores
c/o Circuit City Corporate Office
9950 Mayland Drive
Richmond, VA 23233

If you decide to write, please be respectful in your letter. State the main reasons why you are dissatisfied with Circuit City's customer service and tehir legal action against DVDtalk.com. Be clear and reasonable. Do not call names.

Geoff, if you think this is out of line or will cause more trouble--please feel free to delete my post!

Thank you!


------------------------------

In my letter I will include something like this:

For many years I have been dissatisfied with Circuit City. When I visit the store on a Tuesday (around noon) to purchase a new release, I am often unable to locate it because the employees have not unpacked the boxes. If I cannot find the DVD I am looking for, I search for an employee who often avoids helping me or finally pulls out the DVD from a box behind the counter.

To checkout, I must visit customer service, even though there is a cash register in the DVD section. I know that the clerks used to ring up my purchase there, but they no long seem to be allowed to do this. At customer service, the checkout process is excruciatingly slow--especially for someone who is only purchasing one DVD. I could understand a slow checkout for a big ticket item, but it should not take more than ten to fifteen minutes to ring up my DVD for $29.99. I know from experience that checkout at Target and Best Buy that their checkout process is quite efficient. As I am being checked out, I ask the clerk about my free gift with purchase (for example, a free mass market paperback with my Alias DVD or an iTunes gift card with Arrested Development). Your employees attempt to argue with me that I am wrong. At this point, I must produce your ad to show them that I am correct.

The highlights of any given visit to Circuit City include not being able to locate my DVD, poor customer service, and a painfully slow checkout. After this same scenario happened on multiple occasions, I made the choice to stop shopping at Circuit City because I was left feeling like your company was trying to discourage my business. So if Circuit City offered a lower price in their ad on any given week, I took my ad to Best Buy, Walmart, or Shopko because any one of these stores would match the price, offer better customer service, and a faster checkout.

Within the last few months, I've followed the forums on DVDtalk.com. I appreciated the posts that listed the comparison prices of different retailers. Because of these posts, I decided to return to Circuit City. While none of my previous problems with Circuit City had been resolved, I continued to tough it out and keep shopping there. Within the last few months, I have purchased seven seasons of Seinfeld on sale, three seasons of Arrested Development for gifts, and several seasons of Futurama among other DVDs from Circuit City.

On Tuesday, I will be purchasing Rome season 2 and Muppet Show season 2 for about $85.58. I've seen the prices in the ads in my Sunday paper, and I had previous knowledge of them courtesy of a poster at DVDtalk.com.

As a consumer I have a choice to make, I could spend the exact same amount of money on these DVDs at Best Buy, Target, or Circuit City because no one company offers a lower price than the others. Thanks to Circuit City's decision to instigate a legal matter against DVDtalk.com about posting the ads ahead of time, I will not buy my DVDs from Circuit City this week. Nor will I purchase my copy of Heroes, Prison Break season 2, Ugly Betty, or season three of The Office when they come out within the next few weeks.

Chances are when I go to Best Buy this Tuesday; I will pick up the Walt Disney Treasures box set of Goofy short cartoons for $29.99. I may consider buying Darkwing Duck on DVD as well. I apologize Circuit City, if you had these title in stock I would have bought it from you along with my other DVDs.

Due to the fact that Circuit City has shut down people who shared the ad ahead of time and all of the other factors listed, I feel like I can no longer give you my business. The poster in question did you a favor by driving business to your store. Having knowledge of your prices ahead of time helped me make an informed decision about how to budget my entertainment purchases. I'll still have that knowledge from the Sunday ads, but Circuit City has left lingering bad feeling because of their attack on DVDtalk.com. If the ads will no longer be allowed to be posted ahead of time at DVDtalk.com, I will not continue to shop at your store.
littlemiss is offline  
Old 08-05-07, 09:18 PM
  #115  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: maryland
Posts: 1,859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Boooooooooooo to CC!!!!!!!!

(under why they did it though)
dpz301 is offline  
Old 08-05-07, 10:13 PM
  #116  
New Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can add this about all the places too, they never have every new release in. This includes the older films many don't hear about. some do have an interest but they purposely understock and in their system have a cheaper price and make others who don't have online purchasing suffer for not having it the prime week so one missed deal is more in the pocket for them.
VinceGlortho is offline  
Old 08-05-07, 10:29 PM
  #117  
DVD Talk Legend
 
stingermck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Cobra Island
Posts: 17,131
Received 427 Likes on 291 Posts
They should be more concerned how their ads do not reflect current stock. Hardboiled/Stranglehold deal comes to mind. Oh well, another useless store
stingermck is offline  
Old 08-06-07, 04:26 AM
  #118  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by stingermck
They should be more concerned how their ads do not reflect current stock. Hardboiled/Stranglehold deal comes to mind. Oh well, another useless store

Exactly. You can be at the store the first minute they open on Sunday and have about a 25% chance of getting something that just went on sale. It's pretty much textbook bait and switch, and Circuit City is the only store where I have this problem.
Puzznic is offline  
Old 08-06-07, 08:14 AM
  #119  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I thought my Circuit City was the only one where you have to go to the customer service desk to check out. The Hard Boiled situation was the last straw for me. I don't really see a big reason to go there anymore. I mean looking at the list of $3.99 DVDs, Target and Best Buy have most of the same ones on sale.
cerial442 is offline  
Old 08-06-07, 08:34 AM
  #120  
Moderator
 
Groucho's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 71,383
Received 122 Likes on 84 Posts
Originally Posted by darkside
I understand the CC desire to protect their ads, but they can not do it by stomping on the first amendment.
Let's not get overdramatic here. There are certain things the first amendment doesn't cover...copyright violations are one of them.

I'm a big fan of speedy and the ads (helped me get a Wii), but I knew it was only a matter of time before somebody cracked down. The PS3 scoop was the straw that broke the camel's back.
Groucho is offline  
Old 08-06-07, 10:09 AM
  #121  
Cool New Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by speedy1961
I honestly believe that I helped to (A) drive business to said retailers and (B) increase membership here at DVDTalk and other areas on the internet.

You do/did both of these for me. Thank you.
nlyonssmith is offline  
Old 08-06-07, 10:11 AM
  #122  
DVD Talk Legend
 
matome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: NY
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Pretty crappy on CC's part. Anyway kudos to Speedy for saving me lots of $, no matter what happens.
matome is offline  
Old 08-06-07, 10:23 AM
  #123  
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't understand what CC expects to get out of this.

There are quite a few instances where I can get something for cheaper online rather then going through BB, Target, or CC, but I choose to get items at the retailers because the prices are similar enough, and I don't mind paying a few extra bucks to pick it up right there instead of waiting for the mail. For me, I don't have time to go to all the retailers to see what they have on sale so if I don't know the prices before hand, I just buy it online. If it wasn't for speedy, my money would have gone to Amazon or other online competitors.

Whatever happens, thanks speedy for all your work. I hope you and DVDTalk get through this ok.
hwanch is offline  
Old 08-06-07, 11:01 AM
  #124  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Sunrise, FL
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Amazing letter Littlemiss. And I too have little reason to frequent Circuit City in the future since I base my buying decisions ahead of time thanks to Speedy's posts.
CaptStormy is offline  
Old 08-06-07, 11:53 AM
  #125  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Newberg, OR
Posts: 17,562
Received 52 Likes on 43 Posts
Originally Posted by darkside
I understand the CC desire to protect their ads, but they can not do it by stomping on the first amendment.
Circuit City isn't owned by the government. This has nothing to do with the First Amendment. Is it stupid? Yes. Is it a first amendment issue? No.
Jeremy517 is offline  


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.