Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Feedback > Forum Feedback and Support
Reload this Page >

Future of the political forum

Forum Feedback and Support Post forum feedback and related problems, here.
View Poll Results: Questions are grouped: 1&2, 3-5, 6-8, 9&10
Leave Politics as it's own sub-forum
103
73.57%
Wrap it back into the Other forum
9
6.43%
Recently... it's getting better here
16
11.43%
... it's about the same
37
26.43%
... it's getting worse
17
12.14%
More rules are needed (such as ________)
8
5.71%
Fewer rules are needed (get rid of ________)
9
6.43%
Better enforcement of the rules is needed
48
34.29%
I've left the Political forum but I would come back if ___________
15
10.71%
I've left and I don't see myself going there again
33
23.57%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 140. You may not vote on this poll

Future of the political forum

Old 04-10-06 | 10:22 AM
  #151  
DVD Talk God
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 68,522
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by TracerBullet
That's just not true. There have been many forum regulars who wanted to see a change.
Do you?

If so - why?
Old 04-10-06 | 10:27 AM
  #152  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,058
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Portland, OR
Originally Posted by classicman2
Do you?

If so - why?
I'm not sure I consider myself a forum regular, but yes, I support the new rules. In my opinion DVDTalk tries very hard to keep the level of discussion here higher than on a lot of other forums, and this was glaringly absent in Politics Talk. The kinds of posts that are now against the rules never would have been acceptable in any of the other forums.
Old 04-10-06 | 10:46 AM
  #153  
DVD Talk God
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 68,522
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post


This is about politics. It's not about 'I need advice on which lawn mower to buy' or when I can get the best deal on a particular DVD.

Obviously there's going to more 'heated' discussions when you're talking about abortion, gay marriages, religion, etc. than there is on the less controversial forums.

I've seem some very heated 'discussions' in the Sports Forum - witness the one about Bonds.
Old 04-10-06 | 10:56 AM
  #154  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,058
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Portland, OR
Originally Posted by classicman2


This is about politics. It's not about 'I need advice on which lawn mower to buy' or when I can get the best deal on a particular DVD.

Obviously there's going to more 'heated' discussions when you're talking about abortion, gay marriages, religion, etc. than there is on the less controversial forums.

I've seem some very heated 'discussions' in the Sports Forum - witness the one about Bonds.
That's an easy out for people that just want to be able to say whatever they want without repercussions. To me, that's even more reason to have these rules in place. If you want a free-for-all atmosphere where you can say anything you want, there are lots of forums that will accomodate you.

Passionate discussion should not preclude respectful discussion.
Old 04-10-06 | 11:06 AM
  #155  
DVD Talk God
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 68,522
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Where did I say I wanted a free-for-all, you can say anything forum?

I did say there are two many restrictions - generalization is one.

"The Republican Party best represents the interests of the rich in this country" is a generalization. It's true, but it's a generalization nevertheless.
Old 04-10-06 | 11:34 AM
  #156  
LurkerDan's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 26,091
Received 971 Likes on 682 Posts
From: Suburban hellscape
Originally Posted by classicman2
It, at least it seems to me, that the rules come about because people who rarely visit the Politics Forum are not happy with what's happening in the forum. They want rule changes; and, 'management' seems to oblige.
I think there are an awful lot of people who used to contribute to political discussions on DVDTalk (both before and after the birth of the Politics Forum) who no longer visit, or rarely visit, the Politics forum these days. I think some of these people may want rules changes, and their opinions or desires shouldn't be dismissed or even slightly discounted because they no longer visit the Politics forum very often. You make it sound like there are people who are disinterested in political discussion on DVDTalk who want rules changes. The reality is that some of these people, perhaps most or all, may just be disinterested in political discussion as it occurs now on DVDTalk.

After all, there's got to be a reason that they want rules changes...
Old 04-10-06 | 12:04 PM
  #157  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 25,058
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Portland, OR
Originally Posted by classicman2
"The Republican Party best represents the interests of the rich in this country" is a generalization. It's true, but it's a generalization nevertheless.
How does such a generalization help the level of debate?

Look, you're either going to accept that the rules are place to help foster more intelligent (not kneejerk) debate, or you're not. Instead of saying something like the above, why not mention specific people or policies?
Old 04-10-06 | 12:48 PM
  #158  
Retired
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 27,449
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by TracerBullet
Passionate discussion should not preclude respectful discussion.
Exactly.

The discussion here is tightly moderated in the other forum areas, and politics needed rained in.

Of course the discussion will be passionate, but that doesn't mean they have to devolve into heated arguments involving snide attacks on other members, or bashings of parties etc. that add nothing to the argument.

I applaud the mods for trying to rein the discussion in, and it seems to be going well as far as I can see. Their aren't fewer posts in the forum, and debates seem to be staying more on course.

And I think it's a good idea to try to keep the rules in that forum consistent with the rules of the site as a whole. If people can't discuss politics in a manner consistent with the general forum rules, then perhaps political discussion should just be tossed aside as it certainly isn't a requirment on a DVD site. I view it, and the other off topic forum areas, as a luxury Geoff provides on his DVD site to help foster the community here.

If politics can't meet those standards, and again devolves into the kind of attacks we were seeing all the time before, do away with it IMO. No need to have a forum area that divides the community being built on the site in general.
Old 04-10-06 | 01:56 PM
  #159  
DVD Talk God
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 68,522
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
We're not a community.

The discussion here is tightly moderated in the other forum areas, and politics needed rained in.
You frequent the Sports Forum, don't you? Do you seriously believe that the thread about Bond's alleged steroid use was tightly moderated?

Even though tempers may flare now and again in the Sports Forum, I heardly believe the giving of baseball scores is contentious as discussions of politics, religion, sexual preference, gun control, etc.

I think you'll forget that fact. The politics is, by nature, different in tone from the other forums.

Last edited by classicman2; 04-10-06 at 01:58 PM.
Old 04-10-06 | 01:59 PM
  #160  
Retired
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 27,449
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I'm imagining no one reported anything in that thread. Forums are tightly moderated when things get reported to the mods, but I'll admit the sports forum is another that probably needs reined in a bit.

At any rate, quit while you're ahead. This just comes across as sour grapes from someone who got exiled.
Old 04-10-06 | 02:09 PM
  #161  
DVD Talk God
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 68,522
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Josh Hinkle
I'm imagining no one reported anything in that thread. Forums are tightly moderated when things get reported to the mods, but I'll admit the sports forum is another that probably needs reined in a bit.

At any rate, quit while you're ahead. This just comes across as sour grapes from someone who got exiled.
I've said over & over the same thing before I was exiled.

I have a simple solution for those who can't stand the heat of the Politics Forum - get out of the kitchen.
Old 04-10-06 | 02:17 PM
  #162  
Retired
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 27,449
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by classicman2
I have a simple solution for those who can't stand the heat of the Politics Forum - get out of the kitchen.
Of course the issue is that this is a private forum and the administration doesn't what certain kinds of "heat" in there, so members will have to adapt.

I don't see the big deal since the rules don't dissallow heated debate, but rather dissallow the type of inflammatory remarks, pointless one liners, etc. that add nothing to the debate.

It should only be an issue for people who can't articulate their opinions in a reasonably thoughtful and respectful manner.
Old 04-10-06 | 06:14 PM
  #163  
Retired
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 27,449
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Vandelay_Inds
But must we dilute our opinions to the level where nobody is offended by them?

Of course not. But people should "dilute" the presentation of their opinions so they are stated in a manner that isn't attacking another member, or just a troll post flame baiting people by making gross over-generalizations.


Originally Posted by Vandelay_Inds
As a frequent recipient of his "hogwash!", and notwithstanding his staunch support for the wrong party , I reiterate my discontent at the suspension of classicman2. It was completely uncalled for, and has made me wary of participating in the forum; I don't feel comfortable posting where I may be subject to administrative action for comments as benign and harmless as the ones the c-man was sanctioned for.
I think responses like that should be banned, just because they piss people off AND add absolutely nothing to the debate.

If you disagree with someone, craft an intelligent, respectul response that deliniates why you disagree with them. Don't just post some dumbass one liner (or in this case one word) response expressing your disagreement and dismissing the other persons opinion in a rude, offhand manner. It adds nothing to the debate.
Old 04-10-06 | 07:56 PM
  #164  
DVD Talk God
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 68,522
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
It's amusing at times to see folks complaining about the lack of serious responses and asking for serious discussions. Often times, IMO, those 'serious discussions' are merely very lengthy posts with a few two-bit words thrown in for good measure and really saying very little - quite often, nothing.
I think this bears repeating.
Old 04-10-06 | 09:29 PM
  #165  
Retired
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 27,449
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
A response doesn't have to be lengthy to be of substantive value, and I agree many of the longer responses are pointless.

But you're arguing in extremes, as if they only response options were "hogwash!" or long, rambling posts.

One can disagree, and state why they disagree in a respectful manner, in only a few sentences. In fact, that describes many of the best posts in the forum.

People shouldn't ramble needlessly in lengthy posts, but there's also no reason for even bothering to post something if you're just going to dismiss someone's opinion with a one liner. If you can't take the time to explain why you disagree, don't respond to the post at all. Just my two cents on the matter. :notroll:

And I realize some posts really can't be responded to with more than "hogwash!" or "bullshit!" I simply ignore those posts and don't give them the satisfaction of a response. :notrolls:

Last edited by Josh Hinkle; 04-10-06 at 10:37 PM.
Old 04-11-06 | 11:46 AM
  #166  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 36,984
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Vandelay_Inds
Stuff like "all Republicans are dumb" or "all Democrats evil", should be reprimanded. But talking about a party and its characteristics as a whole very quickly becomes unavoidable. Take that away, and you end up with a forum full of fluff.
no, generalizing millions of people with one line is fluff. the adults who participate in the forum should have the intelligence to put forth an argument that doesn't require generalizations of millions of people to one characteristic
Old 04-11-06 | 11:53 AM
  #167  
DVD Talk God
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 68,522
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Venusian
no, generalizing millions of people with one line is fluff. the adults who participate in the forum should have the intelligence to put forth an argument that doesn't require generalizations of millions of people to one characteristic
You're taking this far too seriously.

You don't think there is room for levity on the forum?

Apparently you don't if your above post is any indication.
Old 04-11-06 | 12:30 PM
  #168  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 22,995
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Originally Posted by classicman2
I've said over & over the same thing before I was exiled.

I have a simple solution for those who can't stand the heat of the Politics Forum - get out of the kitchen.


I heard people who complained about the forum since things are not going the way they wanted to hear.
"This is the reason why I don't wander here anymore."

Well BFD, don't like what you hear or don't agree with it, leave. Last I know, the forum is NOT bend to your party affiliation. It's a discussion board, not Republican Talk or Democrat Talk.
Old 04-11-06 | 12:38 PM
  #169  
Groucho's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 71,383
Received 130 Likes on 92 Posts
From: Salt Lake City, Utah
Straw man. I haven't seen one person, in this thread or elsewhere, say that they weren't reading the forum because it leaned one way or the other politically.
Old 04-11-06 | 12:48 PM
  #170  
Gallant Pig's Avatar
Mod Emeritus
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 15,325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Since it seems pretty out in the open, I'm wondering if our local & vocal Libertarian crew was offended by C-Man's comments.

C-Man, I think your posts that are more along the lines of levity, would better accepted if you added and versus or

Just my 2 cents
Old 04-11-06 | 01:15 PM
  #171  
DVD Talk God
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 68,522
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Be honest now - what is the most memorable post that has been made on the Politics Forum? It wasn't a 12 paragraph, 'reasoned' response, laced with a little fustianism.

It was a rather simple post - You'll never know how close we came to nuking Iraq.

That can't be topped, so don't try.

Some might call that post levity.

I not only thought it was terribly funny - I thought it was a great post - etched in my memory.

Old 04-11-06 | 01:33 PM
  #172  
wendersfan's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 33,921
Received 168 Likes on 123 Posts
From: America!
Based on today's proceedings, someone will have to go a long way to try and convince me that anything is getting better in <b>Politics</b>. The same stupid, partisan crap. The same pointless, "I have nothing to add, but I'm going to slam the other side" mentality. The same old bullshit.
Old 04-11-06 | 02:23 PM
  #173  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 22,995
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Democratik People's Republik of Kalifornia
Originally Posted by Groucho
Straw man. I haven't seen one person, in this thread or elsewhere, say that they weren't reading the forum because it leaned one way or the other politically.
check the forum again
Old 04-11-06 | 02:37 PM
  #174  
Retired
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 27,449
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by wendersfan
Based on today's proceedings, someone will have to go a long way to try and convince me that anything is getting better in <b>Politics</b>.
I saw one thread with any problems, and it has been closed. Looks like it's working.

No one said it was fixed, just that things are getting better in some people's opinion as the mods begin to enforce the new rules.

Like I said, it might not work in the long run, and if so I'd just support axing the forum and letting those interested find another politics board. It's a luxury on a DVD site, and if it can't be held to the same standards of respectful conversation in the rest of the areas, then it has no place here IMO.
Old 04-11-06 | 02:39 PM
  #175  
Retired
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 27,449
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Vandelay_Inds
Any form of meaningful commentary regarding history is a generalization. One couldn't engage in any branch of the social studies without abstracting from individuals and attempting to give meaning to social, political, economic, cultural, and religious trends as a whole.

This objection to "generalizations" is a particularly childish complain of people who cannot find more idoneous ways of invalidating a statement they disagree with. You'll find little mention of individuals in most advanced books in sociology and philosophy, but instead plenty of discussion regarding abstract forces that encompass a society or group as a whole, and which would have probably earned Weber, Elias or Habermas a suspension from this forum on the basis of engaging in "gross generalizations".
You're overstretching. The only types of generalizations that are likely to be dealt with are going to be gross party bashing. Essentially just trolling and flamebaiting where people are bashing a party just to piss others off, rather than to make any kind of point.

There haven't been any drastic changes thus far, just the mods cracking down on blatant rule violations.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.