are these types of bashing posts allowed?
08-03-04 | 11:02 AM
#1
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Legend
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 10,634
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: chokin' you out in less than 30 seconds
are these types of bashing posts allowed?
http://www.dvdtalk.com/forum/showthr...hreadid=378108
this isn't the first time discussion threads such as this have turned into group bashing threads.
are posts such as jackskeleton's and turd ferguson's allowed?
actually, the thread title could be considered bashing. unless randyc changed it to that. then it's funny.
this isn't the first time discussion threads such as this have turned into group bashing threads.
are posts such as jackskeleton's and turd ferguson's allowed?
actually, the thread title could be considered bashing. unless randyc changed it to that. then it's funny.
08-04-04 | 10:47 AM
#5
Suspended
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,640
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Now in the Mojave desert...but still, thankfully, outside Los Angeles
Originally posted by Tarantino
If there's 10 fat people, all kickin it...I'd say that's a group of fatties.
If there's 10 fat people, all kickin it...I'd say that's a group of fatties.
08-04-04 | 03:16 PM
#6
DVD Talk Hero
Originally posted by Tarantino
Look, if you're going to post here, you need to develop a sense of humor.
Look, if you're going to post here, you need to develop a sense of humor.
The man's wearing no pants, what more could you ask for?
08-04-04 | 04:21 PM
#8
Retired
I see no problem with them, unless I missed where they cross into personal attacks against members here.
Bashing of groups of people and/or celebrities or people in news articles has pretty much always been allowed with some exceptions like racist comments, bashing religions etc.
Bashing of groups of people and/or celebrities or people in news articles has pretty much always been allowed with some exceptions like racist comments, bashing religions etc.
08-04-04 | 04:55 PM
#9
DVD Talk Legend
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 16,055
Received 1,084 Likes
on
678 Posts
From: Second star to the right and straight on 'til morning.
Originally posted by Josh Hinkle
I see no problem with them, unless I missed where they cross into personal attacks against members here.
Bashing of groups of people and/or celebrities or people in news articles has pretty much always been allowed with some exceptions like racist comments, bashing religions etc.
I see no problem with them, unless I missed where they cross into personal attacks against members here.
Bashing of groups of people and/or celebrities or people in news articles has pretty much always been allowed with some exceptions like racist comments, bashing religions etc.
08-04-04 | 05:50 PM
#12
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 9,412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: florida
Originally posted by ViewAskewbian
And then there's the gay and rainbows thread...
And then there's the gay and rainbows thread...
everyone who's anyone knows that the pantless one has a great sense of humor
08-04-04 | 06:38 PM
#13
DVD Talk God
Originally posted by Tarantino
Look, if you're going to post here, you need to develop a sense of humor.
Look, if you're going to post here, you need to develop a sense of humor.
bahahahhahahahahahahahahahhahahahahah
08-04-04 | 07:27 PM
#14
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Legend
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 10,634
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: chokin' you out in less than 30 seconds
it's fine by me then. people that hide behind any sort of organization are fair game imo.
just wanted to make sure derogatory (well...as derogatory as 8 graders can be) names were ok before i started my thread about people who shoots themselves with low powered air guns on purpose.
just wanted to make sure derogatory (well...as derogatory as 8 graders can be) names were ok before i started my thread about people who shoots themselves with low powered air guns on purpose.
08-04-04 | 08:36 PM
#15
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 4,665
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
From: NYC * See da name? Go get me some coffee...
Originally posted by Kal-El
You can always demand for an apology. I heard that works.
You can always demand for an apology. I heard that works.
What will they think of next.
08-04-04 | 09:30 PM
#16
DVD Talk Legend
Originally posted by crankyman
it's fine by me then. people that hide behind any sort of organization are fair game imo.
just wanted to make sure derogatory (well...as derogatory as 8 graders can be) names were ok before i started my thread about people who shoots themselves with low powered air guns on purpose.
it's fine by me then. people that hide behind any sort of organization are fair game imo.
just wanted to make sure derogatory (well...as derogatory as 8 graders can be) names were ok before i started my thread about people who shoots themselves with low powered air guns on purpose.
08-04-04 | 10:08 PM
#17
DVD Talk Legend
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 16,055
Received 1,084 Likes
on
678 Posts
From: Second star to the right and straight on 'til morning.
Originally posted by Tarantino
Well that little jab at me didn't quite work. Good try though, better luck next time.
Well that little jab at me didn't quite work. Good try though, better luck next time.
08-05-04 | 12:52 AM
#20
DVD Talk God
Originally posted by Preacher
A more important question is "Where did the Otterville Thread Go" people? Tap...Tap.....Tap....
Well?
A more important question is "Where did the Otterville Thread Go" people? Tap...Tap.....Tap....
Well?
mods gotta make up their minds.. one minute Im hearing to stop making new parts because the software can now handle large threads.. and the next, the threads are being closed for lenght, while still relatively small
08-05-04 | 10:14 AM
#21
Mod Emeritus
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 19,053
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Gone to the islands - 'til we meet again.
Originally posted by hotaru_san
(unless the rainbow thread was closed because of the use of a certain word, in which case that post probably would have just been editted)
(unless the rainbow thread was closed because of the use of a certain word, in which case that post probably would have just been editted)
It pretty much was. Could it have been edited? Sure. But by doing so we would have been hiding the offense instead of directly addressing it.
08-05-04 | 10:17 AM
#22
Mod Emeritus
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 19,053
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Gone to the islands - 'til we meet again.
Originally posted by twikoff
closed for length?
mods gotta make up their minds.. one minute Im hearing to stop making new parts because the software can now handle large threads.. and the next, the threads are being closed for lenght, while still relatively small
closed for length?
mods gotta make up their minds.. one minute Im hearing to stop making new parts because the software can now handle large threads.. and the next, the threads are being closed for lenght, while still relatively small
08-05-04 | 11:37 AM
#23
DVD Talk God
Originally posted by Dead
It was closed for length at the request of the member who started the thread... not because a moderator decided it was too long.
It was closed for length at the request of the member who started the thread... not because a moderator decided it was too long.
i missed that part
carry on