New Search capability?
#1
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Los Angeles, CA
New Search capability?
For the love of God, can someone (Geoff) please upgrade the search capability for DVDTalk. It irritates me to no end that the same damn questions are posted multiple times. I normally get angry about duplicate posts, however, after trying to use the "search" (and I use that term lightly) function on this site, I see why there are so many duplicates.
There are much better turnkey search solutions out there or hell, maybe even some scripts.
I am sure this has been discussed before but I was unable to find anything using the "search" function!
There are much better turnkey search solutions out there or hell, maybe even some scripts.
I am sure this has been discussed before but I was unable to find anything using the "search" function!
#2
Banned
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: John "57 Varieties" Kerry represents me in the US Senate.
The other day I searched for the thread called Why is the term "colored person" bad, but "person of color" good? I remembered that the title involved the words "colored" and "color," so I searched for each of these - restricting my efforts to the Other Forum, and Titles Only.
I got no matches.
I know *nothing* about how computers / the 'Net work, but why did this happen? Is it because in the actual thread title, color and colored were inside quotes?
I got no matches.

I know *nothing* about how computers / the 'Net work, but why did this happen? Is it because in the actual thread title, color and colored were inside quotes?
#3
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 31,700
Received 2,799 Likes
on
1,861 Posts
From: Greenville, South Cackalack
Re: New Search capability?
Originally posted by Indurain
For the love of God, can someone (Geoff) please upgrade the search capability for DVDTalk.
For the love of God, can someone (Geoff) please upgrade the search capability for DVDTalk.
Some of the "search sucks" threads of days past:
http://dvdtalk.com/forum/showthread....hreadid=277446
http://dvdtalk.com/forum/showthread....hreadid=273482
http://dvdtalk.com/forum/showthread....hreadid=268072
http://dvdtalk.com/forum/showthread....hreadid=266209
http://dvdtalk.com/forum/showthread....hreadid=263010
http://dvdtalk.com/forum/showthread....hreadid=259383
http://dvdtalk.com/forum/showthread....hreadid=254838
http://dvdtalk.com/forum/showthread....hreadid=251291
http://dvdtalk.com/forum/showthread....hreadid=244390
http://dvdtalk.com/forum/showthread....hreadid=217401
http://dvdtalk.com/forum/showthread....hreadid=138479
http://dvdtalk.com/forum/showthread....hreadid=126011
http://dvdtalk.com/forum/showthread....hreadid=123418
#4
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Los Angeles, CA
ctyner,
I understand that Geoff is doing what he can (that's what I hope anyway). I am unfamiliar with BB admin so I am unaware of the issues faced. Does vBulletin allow for search add-ins? I would think vBulletin would not be so naive to think their search functionality was the be-all, end-all of BB search functionality (actually after cruising the forums at vBulletin, they [developers] don't think that good search fuctionality is critical! I have yet to hear anything more shortsighted and just wrong than that statement. Geoff, you might want to reevaluate your BB choice. )
I cruised the vBulletin board and found a wonderful tidbit regarding searching in vBulletin...
Thanks to Wayne Luke for the above information. I guess I will have to put up with and post my own duplicates until then.
I understand that Geoff is doing what he can (that's what I hope anyway). I am unfamiliar with BB admin so I am unaware of the issues faced. Does vBulletin allow for search add-ins? I would think vBulletin would not be so naive to think their search functionality was the be-all, end-all of BB search functionality (actually after cruising the forums at vBulletin, they [developers] don't think that good search fuctionality is critical! I have yet to hear anything more shortsighted and just wrong than that statement. Geoff, you might want to reevaluate your BB choice. )
I cruised the vBulletin board and found a wonderful tidbit regarding searching in vBulletin...
"Well here is the thing... if you limit your indexing to 4 characters minimum, the words BY and IP won't be indexed to begin with so your search will fail.
Not only that but BY is a common word and will be thrown out.
The search in vBulletin 3 is being reworked a little to make it more logical but it won't be able to over-ride the minimum characters like you are suggesting. That would take full-text search which won't be usable until MySQL 4.0 comes out of beta which is slated for the end of the year.
Using full-text search reliably in vBulletin is on the list of things to add but most likely won't be until after 3.0."
Not only that but BY is a common word and will be thrown out.
The search in vBulletin 3 is being reworked a little to make it more logical but it won't be able to over-ride the minimum characters like you are suggesting. That would take full-text search which won't be usable until MySQL 4.0 comes out of beta which is slated for the end of the year.
Using full-text search reliably in vBulletin is on the list of things to add but most likely won't be until after 3.0."
#5
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 31,700
Received 2,799 Likes
on
1,861 Posts
From: Greenville, South Cackalack
Originally posted by Indurain
Does vBulletin allow for search add-ins?
Does vBulletin allow for search add-ins?
#6
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Originally posted by ctyner
In that people can edit the scripts and rewrite the search functionality themselves, sure. I'm not aware of one, and I'd imagine if a better solution were available, vBulletin users would use that instead of (justifiably) complaining about the poor search implementation currently available.
In that people can edit the scripts and rewrite the search functionality themselves, sure. I'm not aware of one, and I'd imagine if a better solution were available, vBulletin users would use that instead of (justifiably) complaining about the poor search implementation currently available.
#7
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 31,700
Received 2,799 Likes
on
1,861 Posts
From: Greenville, South Cackalack
vBulletin doesn't require that searches include 4 characters or more. It's a setting used here and on pretty much every board with a decent amount of posts. Small sites can accomodate the extra size. Large sites can't.
#8
Mod Emeritus
Originally posted by Alyoshka
I've been to at least one vbulletin site that allows searching for two or three letter words, unlike here.http://www.soundcircuit.com
I've been to at least one vbulletin site that allows searching for two or three letter words, unlike here.http://www.soundcircuit.com
Originally posted by RandyC 12-03-02 05:49 PM
The issue of restricting the search to n characters is a dvdtalk option and intended to deal with server load issues. The issue of the search software not working is not a dvdtalk issue and is a Vbb issue.
The issue of restricting the search to n characters is a dvdtalk option and intended to deal with server load issues. The issue of the search software not working is not a dvdtalk issue and is a Vbb issue.
#9
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: sunny San Diego!
Originally posted by ctyner
vBulletin doesn't require that searches include 4 characters or more. It's a setting used here and on pretty much every board with a decent amount of posts. Small sites can accomodate the extra size. Large sites can't.
vBulletin doesn't require that searches include 4 characters or more. It's a setting used here and on pretty much every board with a decent amount of posts. Small sites can accomodate the extra size. Large sites can't.
Does the review search engine also use vBulletin? It would be *so* helpful if it would recognize keywords without having to match exact phrases. Right now, if you type in the major words from a title but not the connecting words, you won't get any result. Ie. searching for "fellowship ring" or "attack clones" gets no results... even though most other common search engines (like Google or Amazon's engine) work fine that way - in fact, Google specifically doesn't even include the minor words in the search. Heck, if you could just get it to disregard punctuation it would help.
#10
Moderator Emeritus
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 8,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Indurain
Geoff, you might want to reevaluate your BB choice.
Geoff, you might want to reevaluate your BB choice.
#11
DVD Talk Reviewer/ Admin
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 31,700
Received 2,799 Likes
on
1,861 Posts
From: Greenville, South Cackalack
Originally posted by ordway
It would be nice, though, if it could recognize "" as "get exactly what's inside the quotes."
It would be nice, though, if it could recognize "" as "get exactly what's inside the quotes."
Does the review search engine also use vBulletin?
It would be *so* helpful if it would recognize keywords without having to match exact phrases.
It still doesn't handle spelling errors.
in fact, Google specifically doesn't even include the minor words in the search. Heck, if you could just get it to disregard punctuation it would help.
I'm sure I could cobble together something much more powerful than exists now, but the functionality's been fine for me. :shrugs:
#12
Thread Starter
Senior Member
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Los Angeles, CA
AndyCapps,
As I acknowledged before, I am not BB guru. I made the statement simply as a suggestion to reevaluate the current system. I am not a subscriber to the, "if ain't broke don't fix it," camp. Although, I feel that maxim doesn't apply in this situation due to the number of "brokes" with the search functionality.
I like phpbb. It appears to be stable despite the large number of threads, members, and posts. I welcome thoughts on this bbs and its search functionality.
I am sure that Geoff and company have, and will continue, to update, streamline, and improve this site (I hope they do). I'm not trying to diminish the work they do, I am trying to determine the root of the problem and IMO it is vB and not lack of effort.
As I acknowledged before, I am not BB guru. I made the statement simply as a suggestion to reevaluate the current system. I am not a subscriber to the, "if ain't broke don't fix it," camp. Although, I feel that maxim doesn't apply in this situation due to the number of "brokes" with the search functionality.
I like phpbb. It appears to be stable despite the large number of threads, members, and posts. I welcome thoughts on this bbs and its search functionality.
I am sure that Geoff and company have, and will continue, to update, streamline, and improve this site (I hope they do). I'm not trying to diminish the work they do, I am trying to determine the root of the problem and IMO it is vB and not lack of effort.
#13
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,096
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: sunny San Diego!
Originally posted by ctyner
I wasn't trying to be overly critical, really. I was just using a commonly used search engine as an example - if someone is used to using Google, it's logical to think they'd try searching in the same way here.
Hurray! It works great - I think it will be a *lot* easier to find reviews now. Thanks for the fix!
Sorry, but I'm not Google, and I don't write search engines for a living.
I copied over some code from the video game search <small>(which I wrote more recently, so it's more reflective of my current skills)</small> which should accomodate your requests a little better.
Hurray! It works great - I think it will be a *lot* easier to find reviews now. Thanks for the fix!
#14
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Originally posted by ctyner
vBulletin doesn't require that searches include 4 characters or more. It's a setting used here and on pretty much every board with a decent amount of posts. Small sites can accomodate the extra size. Large sites can't.
vBulletin doesn't require that searches include 4 characters or more. It's a setting used here and on pretty much every board with a decent amount of posts. Small sites can accomodate the extra size. Large sites can't.
I think dvdtalk should at least allow three letter searches. It's quite frustrating.
#15
Moderator Emeritus
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 8,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Alyoshka
soundcircuit is much much larger than dvdtalk.
soundcircuit is much much larger than dvdtalk.
Larger in what way?soundcircuit
Total Posts: 1,141,206
Total Threads: 49929
dvdtalk
Total Posts: 1,319,497
Total Threads: 106,791
I don't see a way to tell how many members there are at soundcircuit. Or how many are logged in at any given time. Or what the most users online record is, and how recently it was set(to get a feel for how often it is exceeded). That would all factor in to the board's performance.
A lot of boards I visit have a 4 character minimum. I've seen one recently that disabled search alltogether as a way to increase performance. That's one way to take care of the "problem". Other sites disable searches when the load is high, which is pretty frustrating. I agree that it sucks to not be able to search for three letter words, but I'm sure Geoff had good reasons for limiting it.
#16
Mod Emeritus
<small>
</small>I wonder what version of vB the guys you mention were talking about and on what platform. And who knows the best what the platform/configuration <i>here</i> can support?
I'd be more frustrated if performance was further downgraded. Searching is great but really it is the icing on the cake IMO: I would suggest that one comes here primarily here to read and post what is currently being posted. In-depth research is useful but to some extent that is what google and the rest of the web are for.
I've occasionally read people who say that they can't find a particular non-sticky thread they use a lot and wondered why they didn't bookmark it. Occasionally consolidation etc will mean that the URL changes but, nonetheless, bookmarking seems like a prudent move to me in particular cases.
Originally posted by Alyoshka
Furthermore, I recall some of the vbulletin developers saying that the search function doesn't have the server load problems it had in previous versions. Same goes for the PM function.
I think dvdtalk should at least allow three letter searches. It's quite frustrating.
Furthermore, I recall some of the vbulletin developers saying that the search function doesn't have the server load problems it had in previous versions. Same goes for the PM function.
I think dvdtalk should at least allow three letter searches. It's quite frustrating.
I'd be more frustrated if performance was further downgraded. Searching is great but really it is the icing on the cake IMO: I would suggest that one comes here primarily here to read and post what is currently being posted. In-depth research is useful but to some extent that is what google and the rest of the web are for.
I've occasionally read people who say that they can't find a particular non-sticky thread they use a lot and wondered why they didn't bookmark it. Occasionally consolidation etc will mean that the URL changes but, nonetheless, bookmarking seems like a prudent move to me in particular cases.
#17
DVD Talk Hero
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 28,204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Words
I figured I'd bump this because it does a good job of explaining the search limitations and reasoning.
On a personal note, I think vBulletin is pretty solid (overall) and very popular, but the search feature is its peg leg....not that peg legs are bad, but still a factor....kind of like running a marathon, because it is pretty vital, but it still can be done on a peg leg...eventually you learn to work with the peg leg, and eventually...you don't even notice...unless you try to buy new shoes.
-pedagogue
On a personal note, I think vBulletin is pretty solid (overall) and very popular, but the search feature is its peg leg....not that peg legs are bad, but still a factor....kind of like running a marathon, because it is pretty vital, but it still can be done on a peg leg...eventually you learn to work with the peg leg, and eventually...you don't even notice...unless you try to buy new shoes.
-pedagogue
#19
DVD Talk God
Originally posted by AndyCapps
Larger in what way?
soundcircuit
Total Posts: 1,141,206
Total Threads: 49929
dvdtalk
Total Posts: 1,319,497
Total Threads: 106,791
Larger in what way?soundcircuit
Total Posts: 1,141,206
Total Threads: 49929
dvdtalk
Total Posts: 1,319,497
Total Threads: 106,791
member total would be a better term
of if you can break down to number of posts or number of threads per day
but there are few forums Ive been to, that are as active as this one.. anandtech is one of the few that comes to mind
#20
We haven't forgotten about the search issues. It's the weakest part of the forum software and we have investigated other search hacks/options. Just want to get through the busy season before hacking things as massive as the search index.
#21
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 7,737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Orange
Just in case this helps anyone - I found a little work around on another site. If you want to search for a three letter word, add a * to the end and it should work.
Go ahead - try searching for "vhs*" or something like that - it works with three letter words.
If you search Feedback for vhs*, it will bring up this thread and one other:
The only other one mentioning VHS:
http://www.dvdtalk.com/forum/showthr...ghlight=vhs%2A
Go ahead - try searching for "vhs*" or something like that - it works with three letter words.
If you search Feedback for vhs*, it will bring up this thread and one other:
The only other one mentioning VHS:
http://www.dvdtalk.com/forum/showthr...ghlight=vhs%2A
#22
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 7,737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Orange
Originally posted by twikoff
member total would be a better term
member total would be a better term




