Amadeus Sub-Forum?
#5
DVD Talk Godfather
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 54,199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
From: City of the lakers.. riots.. and drug dealing cops.. los(t) Angel(e)s. ca.

http://www.dvdtalk.com/forum/showthr...hreadid=273486
http://www.dvdtalk.com/forum/showthr...hreadid=273436
http://www.dvdtalk.com/forum/showthr...hreadid=273455
http://www.dvdtalk.com/forum/showthr...hreadid=273458
http://www.dvdtalk.com/forum/showthr...hreadid=273416
http://www.dvdtalk.com/forum/showthr...hreadid=273485
http://www.dvdtalk.com/forum/showthr...hreadid=273464
http://www.dvdtalk.com/forum/showthr...hreadid=273510
All of which start with:
" Poll: ____________ Discussion "
I suggest one of two choices...
A.)

Or
B.) Carry one discussion at a time. I can't have more then one conversation at a time. How about some self control with the threads. No need to spam the specific forum with a slew of "____ discussion". Try focusing on one thread at a time. One movie at a time. This way you actually get the full effect instead of what looks like flooding the forum with threads for the sake of padding..
Imagen that. me talking about padding.
#7
Admin Emeritus
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 12,842
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
From: Texas, our Texas! All hail the mighty state!
Amadeus, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you really do want to discuss all of these movies. But in the future, please use some better judgement with the volume of threads you create. When people start a bunch of threads at once, it bumps a lot of other threads off the front page. Searching for existing threads on the movies you brought up would have been good, too.
Edit: Okay, now that I actually read a few of those threads and the lack of substance that you began most of the threads with... when you can't even be bothered to write anything more substantial than "Masterpiece," it's probably a good idea not to start a thread. Even though it costs you nothing to make these posts, it costs Geoff. The forums are not your personal playground... please have a little respect for the services he provides to you free of charge.
Edit: Okay, now that I actually read a few of those threads and the lack of substance that you began most of the threads with... when you can't even be bothered to write anything more substantial than "Masterpiece," it's probably a good idea not to start a thread. Even though it costs you nothing to make these posts, it costs Geoff. The forums are not your personal playground... please have a little respect for the services he provides to you free of charge.
#8
Banned
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,431
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
From: At da Island having a Drink! :)
Originally posted by Static Cling
Amadeus, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you really do want to discuss all of these movies. But in the future, please use some better judgement with the volume of threads you create. When people start a bunch of threads at once, it bumps a lot of other threads off the front page. Searching for existing threads on the movies you brought up would have been good, too.
Amadeus, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you really do want to discuss all of these movies. But in the future, please use some better judgement with the volume of threads you create. When people start a bunch of threads at once, it bumps a lot of other threads off the front page. Searching for existing threads on the movies you brought up would have been good, too.
#9
Banned
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,431
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
1 Post
From: At da Island having a Drink! :)
Fine! You may lock my threads and ban me, but you'll never take away my FREEDOM!
By the way there was really no need to lock those threads.I was actually serious and did want to talk about them.But that's okay, they'll be back.They always come back.
By the way there was really no need to lock those threads.I was actually serious and did want to talk about them.But that's okay, they'll be back.They always come back.





