DVD Talk Forum

DVD Talk Forum (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/)
-   DVD Talk (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/dvd-talk-3/)
-   -   "Warner Archive" DVD-R Discs (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/dvd-talk/568682-warner-archive-dvd-r-discs.html)

Sylvia7 01-28-10 01:53 PM

"Warner Archive" DVD-R Discs
 
After some time searching for a hard-to-find movie on dvd, I finally found a copy, but it is only available through the "Warner Archive" on DVD-R discs. Has anyone here purchased DVD-R copies originating from the Warner Archive? If so, is the quality of the picture, sound and menu capabilities comparable with pressed dvds?

Are DVD-R, burned discs any more vulnerable to damage or deterioration than ones that are factory-pressed?

The DVD-R disc I'm interested in is a bit pricey (I usually buy used or sale dvds), but I am willing to make the investment if the quality is high. Thanks!

man*machine 01-28-10 03:11 PM

Re: "Warner Archive" DVD-R Discs
 
Here's one thread of discussion that may help:

http://forum.dvdtalk.com/dvd-talk/55...films-dvd.html

mdnitoil 01-28-10 03:27 PM

Re: "Warner Archive" DVD-R Discs
 
What may or may not be mentioned in that thread is that the picture/sound quality varies widely on a title by title basis. Without knowing specifically which title, it would be hard to provide any more information.

Sylvia7 01-28-10 04:11 PM

Re: "Warner Archive" DVD-R Discs
 
Thank you both for your replies! I checked the thread that "man*machine" linked and from what I read, it appears that while some people haven't had any problems, others received discs with defective burns - pixelation, skipping, etc. (One poster wrote that he/she had to return a few titles from the Warner Archive several times before receiving decent, playable discs!)

The movie I have my eye on (1940s, "The Mortal Storm") is over $20 at amazon. With my limited budget, I'm not sure I am ready to risk the $$ and/or the hassel of a return. I like the movie, but guess I'll wait for more clean reviews of these Warner DVD-Rs, or for a sale, before I buy. Thanks again!

Trevor 01-28-10 04:43 PM

Re: "Warner Archive" DVD-R Discs
 

Originally Posted by Sylvia7 (Post 9969119)
Thank you both for your replies! I checked the thread that "man*machine" linked and from what I read, it appears that while some people haven't had any problems, others received discs with defective burns - pixelation, skipping, etc. (One poster wrote that he/she had to return a few titles from the Warner Archive several times before receiving decent, playable discs!)

The movie I have my eye on (1940s, "The Mortal Storm") is over $20 at amazon. With my limited budget, I'm not sure I am ready to risk the $$ and/or the hassel of a return. I like the movie, but guess I'll wait for more clean reviews of these Warner DVD-Rs, or for a sale, before I buy. Thanks again!

That thread will most likely be bumped for any Warner sales, so just stay subscribed to it and hopefully you won't miss their frequent sales.

BigSue 01-28-10 05:01 PM

Re: "Warner Archive" DVD-R Discs
 
Hi Sylvia.

While helping someone else with this, I found this thread and it's loaded with reviews and comments. I don't know if "The Mortal Storm" is in there, but it's a good thread for reference.

http://www.hometheaterforum.com/foru...eview-thread/0

gerrytwo 01-28-10 07:54 PM

Re: "Warner Archive" DVD-R Discs
 
Warner Archive movie DVD-Rs are cheaply made and mastered and usually sold at near list price except for infrequent sales. From the few I bought, I think their image quality is no better than when TCM broadcasts these movies. The major exception is when the Warner Archive movie is anamorphic and the TCM broadcast would be a 2.35 AR letterboxed version.

I think that pressed DVDs should have greater longevity than DVD-Rs where the data is burnt onto dyes.

Too bad you pretty much can't buy reliable DVD recorders with hard drives made for the U.S. market. The Mortal Storm is on TCM pretty frequently, usually in conjunction with The Shop Around The Corner, so such a recorder would be useful for you (though costing a lot more than $20).

EdTheRipper 01-28-10 09:29 PM

Re: "Warner Archive" DVD-R Discs
 
I've got a handful of Archive titles and have had no problems with any of them.

Silverscreenvid 01-29-10 04:32 AM

Re: "Warner Archive" DVD-R Discs
 

Originally Posted by gerrytwo (Post 9969462)
I think that pressed DVDs should have greater longevity than DVD-Rs where the data is burnt onto dyes.

I really think the longevity issue for DVD-R's is a red herring. Unless you watch a movie every week or so, you're not going to really test the durability of a DVD-R.

The Warner Archive titles I've seen are comparable in A/V quality to most studio catalogue titles of the era. They are good, and in most cases better than anything you're likely to see in another format but not great.I haven't had a problem with any of them in turns of pixilation, viewabiltiy, or anything else. But frankly, it's a matter of cost versus return. No matter how good many of these movies look and sound, there's a limited market for them, so the studio is really wasting money by spending a lot to clean the films up. Casablanca they will clean up, but not these titles.

The main issue I have is the price. Frankly, $20 a title for run-of-the-mill catalogue films is too much. Fortunately, Warner has been willing to put them on sale... IF you are patient.

Essentially, it boils down to four things:

1) The quality of these films is acceptable but not great and comparable or a bit better than what you're likely to see on TCM or other TV outlets (and widescreen and probably anamorphic to boot).

2) Longevity is not an issue unless you are a fanatic who watches one of these movies every day.

3) The odds are that these movies will NEVER be released in a tradtional pressed-DVD or a Blu-ray format.

4) You need to decide how much a particular title is worth to you and how much you are willing to wait a few months or so to get it at a better price.

marlboro_man 01-29-10 05:44 AM

Re: "Warner Archive" DVD-R Discs
 

Originally Posted by Silverscreenvid (Post 9969938)
2) Longevity is not an issue unless you are a fanatic who watches one of these movies every day.

DVD-R longevity/deterioration has nothing to do with how many times you watch the movie. A DVD-R disc may become unreadable just sitting in its case.

bsmith 01-29-10 08:00 AM

Re: "Warner Archive" DVD-R Discs
 

Originally Posted by marlboro_man (Post 9969965)
DVD-R longevity/deterioration has nothing to do with how many times you watch the movie. A DVD-R disc may become unreadable just sitting in its case.

Just curious if you have some source of empirical data to support these statements. I have seen a document from a lab showing that DVD-R's have the potential to last a fairly long time. By using standard reading tests to simulate useage over time.

My own personal findings would suggest that how many times a disk is watched can come into play. The only DVD-R's that I have where I see a pattern in failures over time is in some of my kids DVD's that are watched continuously and they go bad, and I have to make new copies after a few years. My assumption is that it is the heat that can cause early failure.

From an adults collection it is a little harder to make claims one way or another because we don't usually watch in repeated fashion, so it might takes us several years to get around to watching it again. So how does one quantify what they have without periodically testing them all.

Then you also have to factor in blank media differences and writers. Unfortunately, I don't see how anyone can know at this juncture. I own a few WB DVD-R titles I purchased during sales. I would prefer buying pressed disks but if the title is something I want bad enough then I'll risk it.

marlboro_man 01-29-10 08:47 AM

Re: "Warner Archive" DVD-R Discs
 

Originally Posted by bsmith (Post 9970080)
Just curious if you have some source of empirical data to support these statements.

My statements are based on years of experience with all sorts of DVD-R media and burners. Also, the DVD-R longevity issue has been beaten to death on specialized forums like cdfreaks.com

Silverscreenvid 01-29-10 09:38 AM

Re: "Warner Archive" DVD-R Discs
 

Originally Posted by marlboro_man (Post 9970152)
My statements are based on years of experience with all sorts of DVD-R media and burners. Also, the DVD-R longevity issue has been beaten to death on specialized forums like cdfreaks.com

Still, it really boils down to:

3) The odds are that these movies will NEVER be released in a tradtional pressed-DVD or a Blu-ray format.

4) You need to decide how much a particular title is worth to you and how much you are willing to wait a few months or so to get it at a better price.

I would add that the burners and discs that Warner has at their disposal are probably better than what most people have on their home computers or what fly-by-night bootleggers have.

I haven't had a quality problem with the Warner Archive titles I've bought. They appear to have corrected or minimized the problems they had with some of their earliest releases. Most of the titles I want, I'd pay $10 for, but not $20.

Mr-Sardonicus 01-29-10 10:18 AM

Re: "Warner Archive" DVD-R Discs
 
The number of people who have reported bad WA discs right off the press is enough to make one concerned that the discs that do play fine right now might have issues down the road.

orangerunner 01-29-10 11:11 AM

Re: "Warner Archive" DVD-R Discs
 

Originally Posted by marlboro_man (Post 9969965)
DVD-R longevity/deterioration has nothing to do with how many times you watch the movie. A DVD-R disc may become unreadable just sitting in its case.

I can attest to that. I work in the industry and certain brands of discs will simply no longer play even though they have been sitting in a vault and have never been played since they were originally burned back in 2005.

It's a little scary because it's a fairly reputable brand as well. Don't throw away all of those home movie video tapes that you transferred to DVD. You never know!

i86time 01-29-10 12:56 PM

Re: "Warner Archive" DVD-R Discs
 

Originally Posted by orangerunner (Post 9970460)
I can attest to that. I work in the industry and certain brands of discs will simply no longer play even though they have been sitting in a vault and have never been played since they were originally burned back in 2005.

If the discs were never player after they were burnt, how can it be known that they were in fact good and THEN went bad over time (with or without being played)?

The main problem here is total lack of quantitative data.

There are two groups of thought as well, which although not mutually exclusive, need to come to terms. The first is that some burned discs just come out bad. This can be due to burner, disc manufacturer or the combination of both. This is fairly well documented (again, with only qualitative evidence of members on boards such as videohelp, avsforum, etc.). Based on this info, certain discs can burn well on most any burner, others only burn well with certain burner chipsets, and then there are certain burner chipsets and disc manufacturs (separately) which don't produce decent burns at all. So when you get a freshly burned disc, if it doesn't play, it can't be because of the dye degrading over time. It could be because of these factors.

The second claim, most vocal here, is that burned discs go bad over time, whether due to frequent use or not. This one is a bit more difficult, as damage to the surface of a DVD can hinder playback, but is not the result of dye degradation. Perhaps +/-R media are more prone to these scratches/gouges than pressed media, although I can't recall having read evidence for any such claims. And perhaps such damage make's it more difficult for the error correction of DVD players to read when combined with a burned disc rather than a pressed disc - thus damage is more frequently seen upon playback. But again, this should not be confused with actual DVD+/-R media failing over time; it is user damage.

What I can say is that over the past year, I have burned over 200 DVD video discs (TY 8x premium and 16x value line) from a mix of my standalone DVD recorder and computer burner. From my recorder, I have only come across maybe 3 discs with a couple small problems that appear to be related more to burning problems (spot checked right after the burn). Additionally, for those discs burned via computer, I create and burn md5 checksums with the data and test them after the burn, and if any of those fail (I've had maybe 2), I re-burn. I also have burned over 100 data discs, also with md5 checksums, that have not failed. While this doesn't say anything for the longevity of these burned discs, it at least lets me know I started off with a good burn, and I can re-vist this thread in 3-5 years with my results.

But I do have some data on longevity. Since the Fall of 2005 I have burned more than 250 data discs (also with md5's) containing live audio/video files. Whenever I trade or share these files, I go back to my backup discs and copy them to my HDD and check them via the checksum. I have probably gone through 40-50 of those discs getting various filesets and I have never had any corruption on any discs checked so far (all the way back to 2005). I suppose I could go through all 250+ and report back, but I don't have the time right now :)

And I have CD-R's I burned back in 1997/1998 which still play.

billz 04-01-10 04:41 PM

Re: "Warner Archive" DVD-R Discs
 
I'll be on my third copy of ALL THE MARBLES when WBshop sends it to me. I think they have a bad run of burns in that lot, but I don't know if they will do anything about it. Both discs I've received look like they have rings of faulty burn area on the read side of the disc and they freeze up when playing. Custom service has been nice about the replacements, but they need to talk to quality control. Buyer beware with these DVD-Rs I guess.

smurr05 04-01-10 06:59 PM

Re: "Warner Archive" DVD-R Discs
 
I recently bought 'Carny' with Jodie Foster and have had no problems with it. I am happy with the PQ and it is anamorphic. Of course when I bought it I did not realize it was a DVD-R but I am happy with my purchase-

Lastdaysofrain 04-02-10 07:10 AM

Re: "Warner Archive" DVD-R Discs
 
I picked up 11 discs in the sale last week and spot checked them all last night and all played fine. Some of them had surprisingly great transfers.

JOE29 04-02-10 09:18 AM

Re: "Warner Archive" DVD-R Discs
 
So if they make these DVD-R's for movies does that mean these movies won't get a regular release with better treatment? And if these disc are a grade lower in quality why do they cost so much ? A lot of them are going for around $25. Seems to me if they're a lesser quality the price should be lower.
There's a few of them I would like to try out but not at $25 each.

Cheato 04-02-10 09:49 AM

Re: "Warner Archive" DVD-R Discs
 
Since when does quality equal price? The price for them "should be" what people are willing to pay for them.
Supply and demand equal price. These movies generally fill a niche demand.
And they're not $25 each, any more than regular DVDs are $25 each. If you can't wait and must buy things at full price, go ahead. Otherwise, get them on sale. The wbstore has a 5-for-$55 thing going on for their titles (or maybe just ended), and there are 2 $5-off coupons you can use, and free shipping, so you get 5 of them for $9 each.

Silverscreenvid 04-02-10 11:43 AM

Re: "Warner Archive" DVD-R Discs
 

Originally Posted by Cheato (Post 10084557)
Since when does quality equal price? The price for them "should be" what people are willing to pay for them.
Supply and demand equal price. These movies generally fill a niche demand.
And they're not $25 each, any more than regular DVDs are $25 each. If you can't wait and must buy things at full price, go ahead. Otherwise, get them on sale. The wbstore has a 5-for-$55 thing going on for their titles (or maybe just ended), and there are 2 $5-off coupons you can use, and free shipping, so you get 5 of them for $9 each.

The regular price off the WB site is $20 each, plus tax and in some cases shipping. Other online outlets that sell them charge more. As has been noted, some or all of these titles go on sale frequently for prices averaging $10-15 each, with additional coupons occasionally available.


Since Warner has virtually no overhead or built-in cost on these titles, they can sell them at whatever price the market will bear and still make a tidy profit. If plenty of people buy them at $20, the price will stay at $20. If not, then the price will go down to whatever people are willing to pay.

JOE29 04-02-10 02:07 PM

Re: "Warner Archive" DVD-R Discs
 

Originally Posted by Cheato (Post 10084557)
These movies generally fill a niche demand.
And they're not $25 each, any more than regular DVDs are $25 each. If you can't wait and must buy things at full price, go ahead. Otherwise, get them on sale. The wbstore has a 5-for-$55 thing going on for their titles (or maybe just ended), and there are 2 $5-off coupons you can use, and free shipping, so you get 5 of them for $9 each.

The ones that I have been looking for have not been on sale.
What niche demand? less quality for an equal or higher price?
And are these going to be the only ever releases or will they get a
regular DVD release later on? What i'm trying to say is will these releases
be it and nothing improved later on?
I've seen those 5 for $55 sales but they're only certain ones that are on sale.
The ones that I dont want.

man*machine 04-02-10 04:43 PM

Re: "Warner Archive" DVD-R Discs
 

Originally Posted by JOE29 (Post 10085066)
The ones that I have been looking for have not been on sale.
What niche demand? less quality for an equal or higher price?
And are these going to be the only ever releases or will they get a
regular DVD release later on? What i'm trying to say is will these releases
be it and nothing improved later on?
I've seen those 5 for $55 sales but they're only certain ones that are on sale.
The ones that I dont want.

Virtually every single-disc release was part of the last 5 for $55 sale. And all the 2-discs were on sale as well (35% off on those). You may have missed it, but it happened - and there have been times in the past when they've done similar sales across the board.

As far as these getting pressed discs down the road, don't hold your breath. I seriously doubt we'll see any of these get a pressed disc when they can get more money on what they're doing now and not have to worry about restoration, extras, excess stock and storage. This is the future, like it or not. Personally, I like it because we're getting a hell of a lot more catalog movies a hell of a lot quicker this way. Over 500 catalog titles in a year. Keep 'em coming!

Silverscreenvid 04-02-10 08:30 PM

Re: "Warner Archive" DVD-R Discs
 

Originally Posted by JOE29 (Post 10085066)
The ones that I have been looking for have not been on sale.
What niche demand? less quality for an equal or higher price?
And are these going to be the only ever releases or will they get a
regular DVD release later on? What i'm trying to say is will these releases
be it and nothing improved later on?
I've seen those 5 for $55 sales but they're only certain ones that are on sale.
The ones that I dont want.

It's possible that some of these titles may be released eventually on a pressed DVD but I doubt it. Out of the 500 titles released so far, maybe 5-10 of them will see a regular relase... maybe.

Realistically, these are all second tier releases. Some of them have a cult following, but even that is realistically only a couple of thousand titles in most cases. Keep in mind that the people who post on forums like this are NOT typical DVD buyers. Those people want only the current titles and a handful of "name" catalogue titles like Star Wars or Gone with the Wind.

Everything Warner had was on sale during the 5 for 55 sale and they had a similar 10 for 100 sale at Christmas. If you're patient, you'll find something eventually.

Alan Smithee 04-03-10 01:49 AM

Re: "Warner Archive" DVD-R Discs
 
Having gotten my first Warner Archive disc, an important thing to note is that these are NOT standard DVD-Rs, they're special ones which supposedly are needed to keep the CSS encryption intact. Big thing is that they won't read on any PC drives (except ones made VERY recently to accommodate these discs) DVD recorder or any other device that is capable of writing, because they can't tell what type of disc they are. When playing on my Sony Blu-Ray player, the display said "DVD VIDEO" like a normal DVD, rather than "DVD-R" or "DVD+R" when playing either of those types of discs. Looking at the center of the discs they have "FOR DOWLOAD" etched into them.

My gripe about these besides the price is that they aren't chaptered correctly- they have chapters automatically placed every 10 minutes like you can set most DVD recorders to do. The title I got was a made for TV movie so they could at least have just put the chapters at the parts where the commercial breaks would have been.

It also remains to be seen whether they'll use dual-layer media for anything running longer than 2 hours.

rw2516 04-03-10 05:43 AM

Re: "Warner Archive" DVD-R Discs
 

Originally Posted by Alan Smithee (Post 10085833)
Having gotten my first Warner Archive disc, an important thing to note is that these are NOT standard DVD-Rs, they're special ones which supposedly are needed to keep the CSS encryption intact. Big thing is that they won't read on any PC drives (except ones made VERY recently to accommodate these discs) DVD recorder or any other device that is capable of writing, because they can't tell what type of disc they are. When playing on my Sony Blu-Ray player, the display said "DVD VIDEO" like a normal DVD, rather than "DVD-R" or "DVD+R" when playing either of those types of discs. Looking at the center of the discs they have "FOR DOWLOAD" etched into them.

I have approx. 75 Warner Archive titles and they play on anything I put them in. DVD players, recorders, PC drives(both read only and burners). The oldest PC drive I have is from 2003 and they work in it.

Any device should read them as DVD VIDEO because that's what they are. It's the format of the files on the disc. Just like a CD-R that plays in anything is CD AUDIO just like the cds you buy. Even the discs I burn on a standalone dvd recorder are recognized as DVD VIDEO because that's the format they are recorded in. If you download an avi file and want to burn it to watch on a dvd player, it has to be burned as a DVD VIDEO, and that is how the player recognizes it.

Silverscreenvid 04-03-10 09:38 AM

Re: "Warner Archive" DVD-R Discs
 

Originally Posted by Alan Smithee (Post 10085833)
My gripe about these besides the price is that they aren't chaptered correctly- they have chapters automatically placed every 10 minutes like you can set most DVD recorders to do. The title I got was a made for TV movie so they could at least have just put the chapters at the parts where the commercial breaks would have been.

That's the kicker. You're getting a barebones release at a definitely non-barebones price. I don't mind standing in line for my meal at McDonalds and refilling my drink when it runs low. If a five-star restaurant instituted a policy like that, it would lose customers very quickly, no matter how good the food was.

The price will adjust to whatever the market will bear. The concept is one year old and they've already had two sales (last week and at Christmas) where you could get a number of titles for under $10 each with the appropriate couponing. They've also had more limited sales in which you could get specific titles (like the Tarzan boxed sets) for the same low price. If you're patient, you'll eventually get what you want. If you feel you just have to see If Looks Could Kill next week, you may pay through the nose for the privilege.

JerryKILL 04-03-10 11:51 AM

Re: "Warner Archive" DVD-R Discs
 
I think the price ultimately goes back to what these titles were getting on the used market as out-of-print VHS tapes...usually $20, $50 or higher on Amazon. If people are willing to pay that much for a used VHS tape (or burned copies on the grey market), why not for a new DVD? It's simple: supply and demand. By going the MOD route, WB is supplying only what the consumer is demanding, which keeps the price per item as high as possible. No leftovers that end up in the bargain bin. They throw a bone to the complainers as it were with the occasional very brief sale. It's a brilliant marketing move, and the only way to counter it if you don't like the price is don't buy it, and by the same law the price should eventually come down. However, people are buying at these prices, so don't hold your breath.

Pizza 04-03-10 02:42 PM

Re: "Warner Archive" DVD-R Discs
 
I'm thinking that the cost to produce a DVD-R is higher than a DVD, therefore they cost more. They save by not having to put up the initial pressing costs that a DVD run would have, but with smaller numbers being burned, the higher the individual cost per disc and making it harder to discount. It probably takes longer to produce a DVD-R, too. Anybody know the actual process? Burn one disc or a couple of hundred at a shot? Either way, I suspect the cost per item is higher with a DVD-R.

Silverscreenvid 04-03-10 02:47 PM

Re: "Warner Archive" DVD-R Discs
 

Originally Posted by Pizza (Post 10086327)
Anybody know the actual process? Burn one disc or a couple of hundred at a shot? Either way, I suspect the cost per item is higher with a DVD-R.

I doubt they burn them individually. I'm guessing there's a stop-loss involved, so that when they get below, say, 20 copies of a title, they burn another batch. That way they won't have a huge amount on hand but they aren't burning onesies, twosies as the orders come in.

I placed two orders last Sunday for five Warner titles each (so I could use my coupons twice). One order shipped Tuesday and arrived Wednesday. I don't know when the other shipped, but it arrived Friday. They can't get turnaround time like that if they're burning every order individually.

JerryKILL 08-03-11 03:00 PM

Re: "Warner Archive" DVD-R Discs
 
I have a defective disc that I bought at the end of 2010. Warner refuses to replace it because it is outside the 30-day warranty period. Since they are now playing hardball with their replacement policy, I will no longer purchase Warner Archive discs. The defective title is "Zeppelin".

Ish Kabbible 08-03-11 06:16 PM

Re: "Warner Archive" DVD-R Discs
 

Originally Posted by JerryKILL (Post 10877565)
I have a defective disc that I bought at the end of 2010. Warner refuses to replace it because it is outside the 30-day warranty period. Since they are now playing hardball with their replacement policy, I will no longer purchase Warner Archive discs. The defective title is "Zeppelin".

Interesting. I've purchased about 200 titles all told and never had any problem with them replacing the few defectives they shipped. If they played hardball with me, I would end my relation with them as well. I will not be forced to watch my purchases within 30 days to get what I had payed for

rmw650 08-03-11 08:34 PM

Re: "Warner Archive" DVD-R Discs
 
Just another reason why i'm not a fan of these kinds of DVDs, but to each his/her own.

mdnitoil 08-04-11 06:24 AM

Re: "Warner Archive" DVD-R Discs
 

Originally Posted by JerryKILL (Post 10877565)
I have a defective disc that I bought at the end of 2010. Warner refuses to replace it because it is outside the 30-day warranty period. Since they are now playing hardball with their replacement policy, I will no longer purchase Warner Archive discs. The defective title is "Zeppelin".

That's interesting. I went through this exact same problem back in March. The defective title was a year old. After tweeting to Warner brass back and forth, my title was replaced and management said that their warranty policy would be ammended.

JerryKILL 08-10-11 06:46 PM

Re: "Warner Archive" DVD-R Discs
 
I posted to their FB account and that got their attention. A replacement is on the way, fingers crossed it's not defective as well. Meanwhile, I've joined ClassicFlix to start renting WAC discs instead of buying. I may still buy a few here and there, but with the 30-day warranty it is not worth the risk anymore. I've got over 100 discs now, with about 10 replacements, in other words 1 out of 10 were defective, with about 20 I still haven't watched all the way through.

LJG765 08-11-11 12:08 AM

Re: "Warner Archive" DVD-R Discs
 
I've bought only 2 of this type of dvd. Both times I've had to send for replacements. I knew about the fail rate so made sure to view both of them as soon as I got them so didn't have problems getting replacements. (Both replacements were fine.)

Neither title is something that is going to be released widely, so it is nice to have this option, but for the price (even with sales) and fail rate, it's hard to jump on other titles that are MOD that I have an interest in. Like others, I don't always watch my movies right away and I hate feeling obligated into watching.

JettBlackBerryX 08-11-11 01:34 AM

Re: "Warner Archive" DVD-R Discs
 
I've bought over 50 of these discs.
Yes, they are over-priced so I usually hit their 5 DVDs for $50 sales.

Also, if you put something in your cart and leave it there they sometimes contact you and offer a discount.

All discs have played and been just fine.

I have played them all just once so far with a few I've played twice.

Their service is fast and reliable.
I also bought some "Columbia Classics" from them which were worth it.

At Christmas they were also selling their Warner Gangster Box sets for just $15 each. Currently those sets are $35 and up on amazon.

So the WBshop.com is a pretty good deal if you go by your own terms.

filmfanforever 02-10-12 09:58 PM

Re: "Warner Archive" DVD-R Discs
 

Originally Posted by Silverscreenvid (Post 10085529)
It's possible that some of these titles may be released eventually on a pressed DVD but I doubt it. Out of the 500 titles released so far, maybe 5-10 of them will see a regular relase... maybe.

Realistically, these are all second tier releases. Some of them have a cult following, but even that is realistically only a couple of thousand titles in most cases. Keep in mind that the people who post on forums like this are NOT typical DVD buyers. Those people want only the current titles and a handful of "name" catalogue titles like Star Wars or Gone with the Wind.

Everything Warner had was on sale during the 5 for 55 sale and they had a similar 10 for 100 sale at Christmas. If you're patient, you'll find something eventually.

I beg to differ! 'Don't be afraid of the dark' had a high profile remake and even following that release Warner remastered the original and guess what? DVD-R archive crap again. It deserves a factory pressed version and if they don't want to do it, license it to a company that will. I know for a fact that they only need to book 500 copies a time at the pressing plant becuase I did it myself with my film and would never put a popular title on sale in that shoddy and unreliable format. Even a piece of crap like 'Trog' gets a release that no one wanted. The film wasn't a hit and no one asked for it. Yet 'Don't be afraid of the dark' is a cult film that has a fairly huge fan base. Honestly if they're not going to do this properly I will watch everything online for free and they can miss out on my business. I am not going to accept inferior product from a company like Warner. Many feel the same way as I do, and it's better to accept that especially with small cult films that have small followings. I wouldn't be sorry if Warner Archives sinks to oblivion. They suck.

man*machine 02-11-12 12:13 AM

Re: "Warner Archive" DVD-R Discs
 
I bought TROG.

And I also bought DON'T BE AFRAID OF THE DARK from Archives.

No complaints here. Keep 'em coming!


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:57 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.