![]() |
Re: do you think blu ray will over take dvds?
Originally Posted by Carcosa
(Post 9950286)
Well, its hardly unethical. The marketplace dictates these changes. A better format has come along...like it always has. The studios will be all for it, a chance to cycle through their catalogs all over again. And I will buy many films all over again because they look and sound better.
A lot of people had respectable VHS collections and said the same about DVD. I had a very respectable laserdisc collection and that was gone pretty quickly when DVD came to town. Blu-ray-DVD combo packs will be the future for awhile. Again, most people who had VHS collections were given a far superior disc format, it was compatible with their current TV and it gave people extra stuff the VHS tapes never had on them. The studios did not have to start taking away features on pre-recorded VHS movies or record them in crappy-looking SLP mode in order to make DVD look superior in comparison. The advantages of DVD were evident and when the price was within reason, it took off. |
Re: do you think blu ray will over take dvds?
Originally Posted by slop101
(Post 9949853)
Not to mention what Gizmo brought up in the HD thread:
Even I think that kinda sucks, but if that's not a sign of the disappearance of dvds, I don't know what is. I find it ironic that Universal now wants only SKU per title, when they were one of the worst offenders at repackaging and flooding the shelves with multiple versions of their movies. How many different versions of American Pie did they put out? |
Re: do you think blu ray will over take dvds?
Originally Posted by EnigManic
(Post 9950101)
I feel it is unethical to force consumers to buy blue ray by deliberately offering less features on the DVDs.
Originally Posted by orangerunner
(Post 9950591)
I don't feel Blu-ray is "unethical" but the studios are arguably manipulating the marketplace to entice people to switch to Blu-ray by taking away features from the DVD that were normally included.
|
Re: do you think blu ray will over take dvds?
Originally Posted by slop101
(Post 9946957)
Because you're going to Suncoast....
Here are some amazon prices of SE DVDs, vs their blu-ray counterparts: Up: dvd: 19.49, b-r: 19.99 Inglorious Basterds: dvd: 21.49. b-r: 19.99 Benjamin Button: dvd: 27.49, b-r: 18.99 Che: dvd: 35.99, b-r: 34.99 District 9: dvd: 22.99, b-r: 19.99 I could keep going, but I think you get the point. Anyone who's still clinging onto the argument of blu-rays being way more expensive than dvds needs a tall glass of shut the fuck up. And in some cases the Studios are giving the retailers a 'rebate' in order to move unsold BD product and/or old catalog titles (Warner is a great example). Studios have no qualms essentially giving away BD titles right now for free/next to nothing if it gets people in the mindset to rebuild their DVD collection with Blu-ray. With all the BD players sold over the Holidays, this is the best way to do it. |
Re: do you think blu ray will over take dvds?
Originally Posted by Josh-da-man
(Post 9950657)
That's just one studio; and it's a format that nobody outside of Universal seems to want, nevermind that it's probably going to be problematic because those types of flippers have a high fail rate.
|
Re: do you think blu ray will over take dvds?
Originally Posted by Mr. Salty
(Post 9950799)
Enticing people to buy the latest and greatest is hardly new, or unique to DVD/Blu-ray. Marketing has been around for a long, long time.
When CDs came out they gave you a few extra tracks that weren't on the record or cassette which is fair enticement of a new technology but they didn't remove anything from the record or cassette that was normally there in order to make the CD more appealing in comparison. |
Re: do you think blu ray will over take dvds?
Originally Posted by GizmoDVD
(Post 9951231)
You also picked titles that were heavily discounted by the studios for the Christmas push.
For every BD that is cheaper than the DVD, I can point to 5 which are not. |
Re: do you think blu ray will over take dvds?
Originally Posted by slop101
(Post 9951409)
I actually picked them by random off the top of my head, and FYI, these prices are now and Christmas was a month ago.
Extract DVD $19.99 BD 24.99 Jennifers Body DVD 15.99 BD 22.99 Paranormal Activity DVD 15.99 BD 23.99 9 DVD 16.99 BD 22.49 Coming Soon: Whip It DVD 18.99 BD 27.99 Zombieland DVD 17.99 BD 24.99 Please do so. And don't forget, I wasn't trying to point out the b-ds were cheaper, just within the same price range. So please show me where a 2-disc special edition dvd is way cheaper than it's blu-ray counterpart with the same features. Number 23 DVD 12.49 BD 17.99 Land of the Dead DVD 8.49 BD 13.49 Chasing Amy DVD 10.49 BD 24.49 Logans Run DVD 5.79 BD 17.99 Did you want more? |
Re: do you think blu ray will over take dvds?
Thanks, you just made my point for me as, outside of just a couple titles, the price discrepancy isn't nearly as huge as it used to be.
|
Re: do you think blu ray will over take dvds?
Originally Posted by slop101
(Post 9951864)
Thanks, you just made my point for me as, outside of just a couple titles, the price discrepancy isn't nearly as huge as it used to be.
I'm obviously not going to go through and list the prices for 2,000 BDs. |
Re: do you think blu ray will over take dvds?
So let me get this straight.. You are all USED TO the fact that companies do whatever it takes to maximize profits, so you don't feel that anything they do is unethical? WOW!
As for technology advancing, (VHS to DVD, DVD to blu ray, etc.) Don't we live in a free country? Why are we forced to embrace a new technology, whether we want it or not? |
Originally Posted by EnigManic
(Post 9968581)
So let me get this straight.. You are all USED TO the fact that companies do whatever it takes to maximize profits, so you don't feel that anything they do is unethical? WOW!
As for technology advancing, (VHS to DVD, DVD to blu ray, etc.) Don't we live in a free country? Why are we forced to embrace a new technology, whether we want it or not? To me, it makes sense for the studios to add more features to the better format and put out bare bones releases on the dying format. Why? Fans of extra features tend to be those who adopt new technologies earlier to take advantage of the latest and greatest. You may be an exception to that rule but that doesn't change the general trend. Nor does it have anything to do with "ethics". I'd suggest buying a BD player and getting over it, but you are "free" to do as you wish; your DVDs will continue to work and new releases on DVD will likely be available for some years to come. |
Re: do you think blu ray will over take dvds?
Isn't it interesting that bonus material seems to be a more polarizing point than higher a/v quality in this debate? When we left VHS behind, there were few, if any, bonus features. Typically, they were a music video or a brief featurette that followed the feature. Over the last decade-plus, though, we've become so accustomed to two-disc special editions that behind the scenes features, outtakes, deleted scenes, etc. have become a de facto expectation for the titles in our libraries.
For the most part, I agree with the analogy about not forcing consumers to buy a tricked out model of a car because a less-equipped model is on the market. The problem, though, is that the studios have spent the last thirteen years or so conditioning us to look for, and even expect, all the bells and whistles with DVD's. I'm fine with feature-only rental discs, and I'm okay with Blu-ray exclusive bonus content. But the absence of material on some of the DVD releases we've seen in the last year or so is simply indefensible. |
Re: do you think blu ray will over take dvds?
Originally Posted by lizard
(Post 9970598)
As was pointed out by others, you are not "forced" to embrace a new technology. Your DVDs will continue to work in your DVD player and, if it breaks, will also work in a BD player, which can be had for $90. Eventually new DVD releases will start to disappear because more and more people will make the switch to Blu-ray Disc (or VOD) and the market for DVDs will diminish. Just as it did for VHS (and I do recall some gnashing of teeth of VHS fans over that newfangled DVD format). You can wring your hands over the transition to new technology, just as many have done over the switch to digital TV, but that won't make it go away.
That doesn't make Blu-Ray bad, but comparing Blu-Ray with DVD or VHS is comparing ants with elephants. And when the history books are written on them they won't even get as many pages as the laserdisc format. |
Re: do you think blu ray will over take dvds?
Dvds will be around untill the cost of a blu-ray is the same as a dvd. I will buy only blu-ray when that happens, I still buy some dvds.
|
Re: do you think blu ray will over take dvds?
Originally Posted by ctyankee
(Post 9971058)
Blu-Ray is already a near-death format, you just haven't realized it.
I'm sorry, but this has to be the funniest thing I have seen posted here lately....if you are really choosing to ignore facts and instead just wish to stick your head in the sand and pretend the numbers lie, then go right ahead.... |
Re: do you think blu ray will over take dvds?
Originally Posted by WMAangel
(Post 9971471)
rotfl
I'm sorry, but this has to be the funniest thing I have seen posted here lately....if you are really choosing to ignore facts and instead just wish to stick your head in the sand and pretend the numbers lie, then go right ahead.... |
Re: do you think blu ray will over take dvds?
Originally Posted by ctyankee
(Post 9972041)
Well, I'm glad to amuse, but I think you're confusing 'sales' with 'format' ... they aren't the same thing. And the Blu-Ray format is on life-support.
All trend lines with BD point upward (software sales, hardware sales, relative market share)...please explain how this means it is on "life-support" as you claim... Also, you originally claimed that "when the history books are written BD won't even get as many pages as the laserdisc format"....again, please explain why you honestly believe this when BD is already MUCH bigger, more widely adopted, and way more mainstream than laserdisc ever was even at its height... |
Re: do you think blu ray will over take dvds?
Originally Posted by WMAangel
(Post 9972098)
I'm not confusing anything...your "opinion" is simply a misbelief and completely flies in the face of simple facts...you can argue until you are blue in the face that grass is red, but that doesn't change the fact that it is green....
All trend lines with BD point upward (software sales, hardware sales, relative market share)...please explain how this means it is on "life-support" as you claim... Also, you originally claimed that "when the history books are written BD won't even get as many pages as the laserdisc format"....again, please explain why you honestly believe this when BD is already MUCH bigger, more widely adopted, and way more mainstream than laserdisc ever was even at its height... You CLAIM to understand the difference between "format" and "sales" yet STILL bring forward ONLY SALES RELATED info "software sales, hardware sales, relative market share" so CLEARLY you don't understand the difference or have no idea how to express yourself clearly. Either way, not worth any more of my time. |
Re: do you think blu ray will over take dvds?
Originally Posted by ctyankee
(Post 9972194)
Simple, laserdisc was a trailblazing digital format
|
Re: do you think blu ray will over take dvds?
Originally Posted by Josh-da-man
(Post 9972312)
LD was an analog format.
Audio could be stored in either analog or digital format and in a variety of surround sound formats; NTSC discs could carry two analog audio tracks, plus two uncompressed PCM digital audio tracks, which were CD encoded channels, (EFM, CIRC, 16 bit and 44.1 kHz sample rate)[11]. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laserdisc |
Re: do you think blu ray will over take dvds?
Originally Posted by ctyankee
(Post 9971058)
DVD will still be here after Blu-Ray has gone bye-bye.
|
Re: do you think blu ray will over take dvds?
Originally Posted by MinLShaw
(Post 9972476)
Your argument--and that of everyone else who supports it--ignores one important fact. You cannot un-ring the hi-def bell. People are already acclimating to HD broadcasts, HD sports on TV, HD video games, etc. The format of the future may not wind up being Blu-ray, but I guarantee you it will be HD, whatever it is.
But the Blu-Ray group dicked around getting their product released and once released was a cluster-fuck of a poor release. Then there was the format war and now ... tough economic times for gee-wiz stuff to prosper. All of these factors killing Blu-Ray as a format. So, in a nutshell, those of you that think that Blu-Ray is just going to pick up momentum and become some greatly adopted format with a tremendous market share ... are just dreaming. The future is not about products that need to be inventoried and the importance of home theatre as a factor for the 20-somethings is less than it was a decade ago. Sorry if I'm just cutting through the crap ... but why mince words? |
Re: do you think blu ray will over take dvds?
Originally Posted by ctyankee
(Post 9972572)
I own a Blu-Ray player and several discs. But this thread is about DVD versus Blu-Ray NOT DVD versus hi-def options and formats (plural) or the future of hi-def. So your argument belongs elsewhere.
Sorry if I'm just cutting through the crap ... but why mince words? |
Re: do you think blu ray will over take dvds?
Originally Posted by MinLShaw
(Post 9972592)
You're one of those people who pride yourself on "telling it like it is," aren't you? I'll let you in on a little secret: What you think of as "how things are" is nothing more than how you see them to be. Get over yourself.
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:51 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.