![]() |
Re: do you think blu ray will over take dvds?
Originally Posted by MinLShaw
(Post 9934911)
All true, but I'd love to know how many brick & mortar stores these places had during the era described. I suspect they weren't as widespread as they are today--and even today, you can find entire series of counties in many states who don't have one. Ditto for the circulation of Premiere, whose readership I suspect is more likely to live near a Barnes & Noble or Media Play than out in the sticks where "the Walmarts" is far and away the biggest thing going. Face it: there's a reason that the masses adopted DVD faster and more thoroughly than they did LD, and that's because of Walmart. If they don't bring it to town and throw their might behind it, it doesn't have enough exposure to make it.
|
Re: do you think blu ray will over take dvds?
Originally Posted by jjcool
(Post 9936996)
Keep in mind that Media Play was part of The Musicland Group, which inlcuded On Cue, Sam Goody and Suncoast stores. I know there was at least one Sam Goody brand store in every state except Vermont at one point during their run.
|
Re: do you think blu ray will over take dvds?
Originally Posted by MinLShaw
(Post 9937535)
It's not a matter of how many stores a chain has; it's a matter of how widespread those stores are. If they have five in a state, but three are in one city and two are in another, then everyone else in the state has to drive to those two cities to have access to the chain. It may sound like an exaggerated stereotype, but I personally know quite a lot of Kentuckians who wouldn't have considered Laser Disc something worth driving to Louisville or Lexington to buy. I'm sure that's a mentality that can be found in most states among rural residents.
I do know that the different models of stores were setup differently. Media Play or On Cue stores were designed to be free standing stores that had alot of different lines of products that were intended to be on their own, where as Suncoasts were intended to be in a mall type area. |
Re: do you think blu ray will over take dvds?
never blu rays arent worth it
who cares dvds are just as good as blu ray It's hard to believe anyone who has a decent 1080p HDTV and a Blu-ray player would ever choose either of these statements. The difference/improvement is quite obvious and I now regret waiting so long to adopt high definition. All my new purchases are Blu if it is available. DVD is fine if it's the only option. VHS is dead. |
Re: do you think blu ray will over take dvds?
Personally, I refuse to buy blue ray for a number of reasons.
Mainly, from what I've seen so far, I'm not impressed enough to put out money for a new, more expensive player so I can play more expensive discs. It feels like the same crap the industry pulled when CDs first came out. It was "the new thing", so CDs typically priced around ten dollars more than cassettes which were actually more expensive to manufacture. Can someone please explain to me why most of the blue ray movies I've seen in stores like Suncoast cost at least ten dollars more than their DVD counterparts? |
Re: do you think blu ray will over take dvds?
Originally Posted by EnigManic
(Post 9946800)
Can someone please explain to me why most of the blue ray movies I've seen in stores like Suncoast cost at least ten dollars more than their DVD counterparts?
Here are some amazon prices of SE DVDs, vs their blu-ray counterparts: Up: dvd: 19.49, b-r: 19.99 Inglorious Basterds: dvd: 21.49. b-r: 19.99 Benjamin Button: dvd: 27.49, b-r: 18.99 Che: dvd: 35.99, b-r: 34.99 District 9: dvd: 22.99, b-r: 19.99 I could keep going, but I think you get the point. Anyone who's still clinging onto the argument of blu-rays being way more expensive than dvds needs a tall glass of shut the fuck up. |
Re: do you think blu ray will over take dvds?
Unless of course you don't happen to be all that interested in the latest crap to hit disc, but rather the older catalog titles. In which case you still have to pay the blu-ray tax, if they even bother to release it at all.
|
Re: do you think blu ray will over take dvds?
Originally Posted by slop101
(Post 9946957)
Anyone who's still clinging onto the argument of blu-rays being way more expensive than dvds needs a tall glass of shut the fuck up.
|
Re: do you think blu ray will over take dvds?
Originally Posted by mdnitoil
(Post 9947188)
Unless of course you don't happen to be all that interested in the latest crap to hit disc, but rather the older catalog titles. In which case you still have to pay the blu-ray tax, if they even bother to release it at all.
Casablanca: dvd: 23.49, b-r: 19.99 Wages of Fear: dvd: 27.99, b-r: 21.99 Raging Bull: dvd: 15.49, b-r: 8.99 Robin Hood (1938): dvd: 25.99, b-r: 17.49 Seventh Seal: dvd: 27.49, b-r: 21.99 Amadeus: dvd: 22.99, b-r: 17.99 Wings of Desire: dvd: 26.99, b-r: 21.99 Goodfellas: dvd: 20.99, b-r: 11.49 |
Re: do you think blu ray will over take dvds?
Originally Posted by slop101
(Post 9947317)
sigh...
Casablanca: dvd: 23.49, b-r: 19.99 Wages of Fear: dvd: 27.99, b-r: 21.99 Raging Bull: dvd: 15.49, b-r: 8.99 Robin Hood (1938): dvd: 25.99, b-r: 17.49 Seventh Seal: dvd: 27.49, b-r: 21.99 Amadeus: dvd: 22.99, b-r: 17.99 Wings of Desire: dvd: 26.99, b-r: 21.99 Goodfellas: dvd: 20.99, b-r: 11.49 |
Re: do you think blu ray will over take dvds?
Originally Posted by slop101
(Post 9947317)
Casablanca: dvd: 23.49, b-r: 19.99 Wages of Fear: dvd: 27.99, b-r: 21.99 Raging Bull: dvd: 15.49, b-r: 8.99 Robin Hood (1938): dvd: 25.99, b-r: 17.49 Seventh Seal: dvd: 27.49, b-r: 21.99 Amadeus: dvd: 22.99, b-r: 17.99 Wings of Desire: dvd: 26.99, b-r: 21.99 Goodfellas: dvd: 20.99, b-r: 11.49 Has got to be to most expensive prices EVER! I got these for half the price in some sale or promotion in whatever region. |
Re: do you think blu ray will over take dvds?
Originally Posted by slop101
(Post 9947317)
sigh...
Casablanca: dvd: 23.49, b-r: 19.99 Wages of Fear: dvd: 27.99, b-r: 21.99 Raging Bull: dvd: 15.49, b-r: 8.99 Robin Hood (1938): dvd: 25.99, b-r: 17.49 Seventh Seal: dvd: 27.49, b-r: 21.99 Amadeus: dvd: 22.99, b-r: 17.99 Wings of Desire: dvd: 26.99, b-r: 21.99 Goodfellas: dvd: 20.99, b-r: 11.49 |
Re: do you think blu ray will over take dvds?
Originally Posted by Dane
(Post 9947346)
What a lousy comparison!!!
Has got to be to most expensive prices EVER! I got these for half the price in some sale or promotion in whatever region. These are prices for the 2-disc SE DVDs with the same feature-set as their blu-ray counterparts from the same store (amazon). Therefore, if you can find these dvds for cheaper during some promotion, it means that you will also find the blu-rays discounted just as much. Just ask Trevor about it. My god, you anti-blu-ray people really have to take a leave of your senses to justify clinging onto your ridiculously outdated arguments. |
Re: do you think blu ray will over take dvds?
Originally Posted by slop101
(Post 9947317)
sigh...
Casablanca: dvd: 23.49, b-r: 19.99 Wages of Fear: dvd: 27.99, b-r: 21.99 Raging Bull: dvd: 15.49, b-r: 8.99 Robin Hood (1938): dvd: 25.99, b-r: 17.49 Seventh Seal: dvd: 27.49, b-r: 21.99 Amadeus: dvd: 22.99, b-r: 17.99 Wings of Desire: dvd: 26.99, b-r: 21.99 Goodfellas: dvd: 20.99, b-r: 11.49 These titles are highly inflated examples. Are we comparing the Special Edition DVD to the bare-bones Blu-ray? I know the bare-bones Goodfellas and Raging Bull DVD can be had for $4.99 in almost any dump bin across the country. Even if they are special edition DVD prices, they are over-priced significantly. The new release special edition DVDs are artifically priced higher than Blu-ray by the studios because they want the movie fanatic consumers, who love the extras, to switch to Blu-ray. They are the easiest target group to make the switch. There's still an $6-$8 difference between Blu-ray and bare-bones DVD. At least now they've worked the price where you actually do get extra value (other than just better picture & sound) in the Blu-ray for the $6-$8 extra but only because they now give you less stuff on the DVD. The new release special edition DVD is just designed to market the advantages of Blu-ray & make the consumer feel confident in the extra value they received by buying Blu-ray at a lesser price. I don't think they really expect to sell too many new release SE DVD copies. That said, I agree they have really sharpened their pencil in the last couple of months with Blu-ray hardware & software making prices much less of a factor. |
Re: do you think blu ray will over take dvds?
But my main point wasn't even that blu-rays are cheaper than dvds; overall, they're not; they're just not much more expensive than their dvd counterparts like they used to be (and getting cheaper by the month), and anyone still clinging onto that argument either hasn't checked out recent prices or they're just lying to themselves in order to hold onto a losing argument.
|
Re: do you think blu ray will over take dvds?
Originally Posted by slop101
(Post 9946957)
Because you're going to Suncoast....
Here are some amazon prices of SE DVDs, vs their blu-ray counterparts: Up: dvd: 19.49, b-r: 19.99 Inglorious Basterds: dvd: 21.49. b-r: 19.99 Benjamin Button: dvd: 27.49, b-r: 18.99 Che: dvd: 35.99, b-r: 34.99 District 9: dvd: 22.99, b-r: 19.99 I could keep going, but I think you get the point. Anyone who's still clinging onto the argument of blu-rays being way more expensive than dvds needs a tall glass of shut the fuck up. You can see the shift happening now with retailers. Best Buy is now offering many recent catalog titles in sales as low as $3.99. I've been slowly divesting myself of some DVD titles now that I know I will be replacing with blu-ray eventually. More obscure discs and many older films I have from the 1920's through the early 1950's I'll probably never replace regardless..... |
Re: do you think blu ray will over take dvds?
Depends how you define price.
MSRP on Blu-rays is almost always higher than its DVD counterpart. Various stores will frequently have sales on DVDs and Blu-rays, though, and some really sweet deals can be found if you're inclined to seek them out. I certainly stocked up on Blus over the holiday season between Amazon's deals and Target's $5 coupon. As a general rule, Blu-rays do cost more than DVDs. Particularly with catalog titles, and certain studios. |
Re: do you think blu ray will over take dvds?
Wild Bunch:
MSRP dvd: 19.98, b-r: 14.98 ;) Seriously though, generally, blu-rays are only a couple dollars more than their dvd versions, except for Criterions which have the same MSRP for each version. But in a lot of cases, you're getting way more bang for your buck for that extra couple dollars. Take Up: the blu-ray's MSRP is $5 more than the 2-disc dvd, but you're also getting the dvd disc in that blu-ray package. Regardless, if you look around for a deal, which aren't too hard to find, the price discrepancy is even less than a couple dollars and practically negligible. Which is what makes it a non-issue now. |
Re: do you think blu ray will over take dvds?
Originally Posted by slop101
(Post 9948556)
Seriously though, generally, blu-rays are only a couple dollars more than their dvd versions, except for Criterions which have the same MSRP for each version
|
Re: do you think blu ray will over take dvds?
Originally Posted by slop101
(Post 9948556)
Wild Bunch:
MSRP dvd: 19.98, b-r: 14.98 ;) |
Re: do you think blu ray will over take dvds?
Originally Posted by Josh-da-man
(Post 9948373)
Depends how you define price.
MSRP on Blu-rays is almost always higher than its DVD counterpart. Various stores will frequently have sales on DVDs and Blu-rays, though, and some really sweet deals can be found if you're inclined to seek them out. I certainly stocked up on Blus over the holiday season between Amazon's deals and Target's $5 coupon. As a general rule, Blu-rays do cost more than DVDs. Particularly with catalog titles, and certain studios. |
Re: do you think blu ray will over take dvds?
Not to mention what Gizmo brought up in the HD thread:
From CES, the information I got was that the intention was to move to, for all new pressings of catalog, studio library titles from Universal to be these type discs. That the previous old DVD version SKUs that were in distribution were not going to be pulled in any way, but sold to exhaustion. Not sure if retail reorders of the DVD only versions would be filled, but most retailers would trend to the new combo discs anyway, if similar cost. Bottom line is the DVD only versions will trend to get scarer at brick and mortar retail over time, but online guys like Amazon etc will probably still have some old DVD versions lying around for some time. |
Re: do you think blu ray will over take dvds?
Originally Posted by orangerunner
(Post 9947713)
...At least now they've worked the price where you actually do get extra value (other than just better picture & sound) in the Blu-ray for the $6-$8 extra but only because they now give you less stuff on the DVD...
Maybe I can't afford a blue ray player right now, maybe I don't want one. I do happen to have a very nice dvd player, an xbox 360 and a respectable dvd collection. I feel it is unethical to force consumers to buy blue ray by deliberately offering less features on the DVDs. |
Re: do you think blu ray will over take dvds?
Originally Posted by EnigManic
(Post 9950101)
You made a very intelligent post and a good point. But this is exactly why I dislike blue ray.
Maybe I can't afford a blue ray player right now, maybe I don't want one. I do happen to have a very nice dvd player, an xbox 360 and a respectable dvd collection. I feel it is unethical to force consumers to buy blue ray by deliberately offering less features on the DVDs. A lot of people had respectable VHS collections and said the same about DVD. I had a very respectable laserdisc collection and that was gone pretty quickly when DVD came to town. Blu-ray-DVD combo packs will be the future for awhile. |
Re: do you think blu ray will over take dvds?
Originally Posted by EnigManic
(Post 9950101)
You made a very intelligent post and a good point. But this is exactly why I dislike blue ray.
Maybe I can't afford a blue ray player right now, maybe I don't want one. I do happen to have a very nice dvd player, an xbox 360 and a respectable dvd collection. I feel it is unethical to force consumers to buy blue ray by deliberately offering less features on the DVDs. Is it unethical that there's newer video game consoles even though I have a large collection that won't work with the newer system? There's nothing unethical about it. The same thing has happened and will happen with every advance in technology. Nobody is forcing anyone to do anything. Can you not go to a store and buy a DVD? No. Have they recalled DVD players? No. It's fine if someone doesn't want to get a blu-ray player but don't complain when, not if, technology advances and things change. Grandma dealt with it, or got put in an abusive nursing home when DVDs came out, and the rest of us should be able to handle it too or they'll just get put away somewhere. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:40 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.