"Why DVD's Better Than Blu-ray" (IGN.DVD article.)
#626
Re: "Why DVD's Better Than Blu-ray" (IGN.DVD article.)
http://dvd.ign.com/articles/963/963916p1.html
It's Cheaper Than Blu-ray
Think about it... You probably wouldn't own that copy of Renny Harlin's Cutthroat Island had you not seen it in the checkout line display for $8.99. Would you have snatched up a Blu-ray version for double that price? Not nearly as likely.
It's Cheaper Than Blu-ray
Think about it... You probably wouldn't own that copy of Renny Harlin's Cutthroat Island had you not seen it in the checkout line display for $8.99. Would you have snatched up a Blu-ray version for double that price? Not nearly as likely.
I certainly would not have just bought Cutthroat Island Blu Ray if Amazon hadn't had it for 8.99 on BF.
#627
DVD Talk Legend
Re: "Why DVD's Better Than Blu-ray" (IGN.DVD article.)
#628
DVD Talk Special Edition
Re: "Why DVD's Better Than Blu-ray" (IGN.DVD article.)
On the other hand, most people that have DTS sound capabilities are probably the types who have already purchased Blu-Ray players anyway thus making it somewhat pointless to bother putting it on the DVD.
I'd rather see that extra MB space on the DVD used for a higher bit-rate on the feature or some extras.
#630
DVD Talk Legend
Re: "Why DVD's Better Than Blu-ray" (IGN.DVD article.)
I'd rather see that extra MB space on the DVD used for a higher bit-rate on the feature or some extras.
#631
#632
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
#634
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Re: "Why DVD's Better Than Blu-ray" (IGN.DVD article.)
I for one want blu-ray(trying to convince the wife that we need a ps3).. but can wait to upgrade until the costs come down some. That being said I think the single biggest reason I have for upgrading isn't the picture.. but the sound... And buying anything other than a action/scifi or animated film would be a waste of $.
I loved the article bTw!
I loved the article bTw!
Last edited by adrenaline78; 12-09-09 at 09:46 AM. Reason: added content
#635
DVD Talk Legend
Re: "Why DVD's Better Than Blu-ray" (IGN.DVD article.)
That being said I think the single biggest reason I have for upgrading isn't the picture.. but the sound...
And buying anything other than a action/scifi or animated film would be a waste of $.
#636
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Re: "Why DVD's Better Than Blu-ray" (IGN.DVD article.)
BD players can be had for under $100 now. How much cheaper do they have to become?
Sure you can get a player for around 100 bucks. but the ones i have seen aren't worth the 100$ your dropping on it.
Note that you'll either need a receiver capable of receiving and decoding the new codecs, or a BD player that can decode and pass them to your receiver in a usable way (either PCM over HDMI or multi-channel analog).
I am working on upgrading my sound. My system is dang near 10 years old. Still 5.1. however.
You say that now, before getting Blu-ray, but afterwards you'll likely change your tune, especially if the cost difference isn't much, or if there isn't a price difference at all.
Correct.. Price is a huge part of this decision. But I just don't see the point of needing better picture and sound for a chick flick or a comedy..do we need Bring it on in hi-def?? Probably not!
I am not badmouthing blu-ray and have already purchaced a few titles. Quantum of Solace and Terminator: Salvation So don't get me wrong. there will be a time to upgrade.
Sure you can get a player for around 100 bucks. but the ones i have seen aren't worth the 100$ your dropping on it.
Note that you'll either need a receiver capable of receiving and decoding the new codecs, or a BD player that can decode and pass them to your receiver in a usable way (either PCM over HDMI or multi-channel analog).
I am working on upgrading my sound. My system is dang near 10 years old. Still 5.1. however.
You say that now, before getting Blu-ray, but afterwards you'll likely change your tune, especially if the cost difference isn't much, or if there isn't a price difference at all.
Correct.. Price is a huge part of this decision. But I just don't see the point of needing better picture and sound for a chick flick or a comedy..do we need Bring it on in hi-def?? Probably not!
I am not badmouthing blu-ray and have already purchaced a few titles. Quantum of Solace and Terminator: Salvation So don't get me wrong. there will be a time to upgrade.
#637
DVD Talk Legend
Re: "Why DVD's Better Than Blu-ray" (IGN.DVD article.)
When better BD players become cheaper, I'll likely buy one and move my current BD player into another room.
Correct.. Price is a huge part of this decision. But I just don't see the point of needing better picture and sound for a chick flick or a comedy..do we need Bring it on in hi-def?? Probably Not!
#638
DVD Talk Legend
Re: "Why DVD's Better Than Blu-ray" (IGN.DVD article.)
BTW, in case you haven't noticed, the best way to quote someone in a reply is to use the quote tags:
Clicking the "quote" link to reply will automatically generate quote tags around the entire quoted post, but if you want to make inline replies, you should add in more tags so that it doesn't appear as if your replies are part of the original quote.
HTML Code:
[quote][/quote]
#639
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Re: "Why DVD's Better Than Blu-ray" (IGN.DVD article.)
I have an Insignia BD player that I paid $120 for back in May. It's probably not offering the best image possible, but it still blows away my DVDs played on my upconverting DVD player.
When better BD players become cheaper, I'll likely buy one and move my current BD player into another room.
I haven't bought many BDs, but I usually rent, and I always rent the BD of any film if available, even comedies. The enhanced image quality just makes the viewing experience that much better for any film, for me. Do I need every film in BD? Probably not. However, I probably didn't need every film in DVD quality, yet I repurchased my meager VHS collection on DVD over the years.
When better BD players become cheaper, I'll likely buy one and move my current BD player into another room.
I haven't bought many BDs, but I usually rent, and I always rent the BD of any film if available, even comedies. The enhanced image quality just makes the viewing experience that much better for any film, for me. Do I need every film in BD? Probably not. However, I probably didn't need every film in DVD quality, yet I repurchased my meager VHS collection on DVD over the years.
You see I used to buy up everything and anything every Tuesday.. but now I rarely spend over $5 for any title. I rent first, if the movie is good then i will wait to buy it. The only time I will buy a new release is if it has cool packaging or something I know will go OOP sooner or later. The last title I bought new was that Star Trek enterprise case from Target.
Still trying to talk the wife into getting me a PS3.. so maybe santa will bring one for me this holiday.
As far as the quote tags. yeah i know how to use em. Just lazy!
#640
DVD Talk Legend
Re: "Why DVD's Better Than Blu-ray" (IGN.DVD article.)
I would. As far as purchacing, unless i'm getting a great deal on those comedy titles.. i would rather go with the cheapo dvd version.
As far as the quote tags. yeah i know how to use em. Just lazy!
#641
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: "Why DVD's Better Than Blu-ray" (IGN.DVD article.)
Since I last posted on this thread some time back I've watched the price drop on blu-ray discs far lower and faster than I thought would be possible. Some amazing prices on catalog titles like THE SEARCHERS, BULLITT and BRAM STOKER'S DRACULA ( what ever happened to Baracine?) for $7.99 each...they are actually cheaper than their DVD counterparts in some cases. Latest purchase was ANGELS AND DEMONS...looking quite amazing and well worth the $20 I spent. With players in the $100 range now how can anyone with a few bucks to spare NOT go blu-ray? You can still play all your DVDs on it just fine....
#642
DVD Talk Special Edition
Re: "Why DVD's Better Than Blu-ray" (IGN.DVD article.)
Since I last posted on this thread some time back I've watched the price drop on blu-ray discs far lower and faster than I thought would be possible. Some amazing prices on catalog titles like THE SEARCHERS, BULLITT and BRAM STOKER'S DRACULA ( what ever happened to Baracine?) for $7.99 each...they are actually cheaper than their DVD counterparts in some cases. Latest purchase was ANGELS AND DEMONS...looking quite amazing and well worth the $20 I spent. With players in the $100 range now how can anyone with a few bucks to spare NOT go blu-ray? You can still play all your DVDs on it just fine....
Question too, do blu-ray players play DVD-R discs as I have a lot of home videos I transferred? I also receive independant documentaries recorded on DVD-R as well that I wonder if they would play on Blu-ray.
#643
Senior Member
Re: "Why DVD's Better Than Blu-ray" (IGN.DVD article.)
Since I last posted on this thread some time back I've watched the price drop on blu-ray discs far lower and faster than I thought would be possible. Some amazing prices on catalog titles like THE SEARCHERS, BULLITT and BRAM STOKER'S DRACULA ( what ever happened to Baracine?) for $7.99 each...they are actually cheaper than their DVD counterparts in some cases. Latest purchase was ANGELS AND DEMONS...looking quite amazing and well worth the $20 I spent. With players in the $100 range now how can anyone with a few bucks to spare NOT go blu-ray? You can still play all your DVDs on it just fine....
#644
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: "Why DVD's Better Than Blu-ray" (IGN.DVD article.)
We've been down this road before, but I can NOT go blu-ray quite easily. I currently have 3 DVD players in the house, a computer player, two portables and one in the mini-van. That's a total of 7 potential locations for disc viewing. So, now I go out and plop a hundo on a blu-ray player and replace one of my DVD players. Next I go out and buy all these amazing cheap discs...well, not all that many since there hasn't been much of squat released. Finally, I go to watch these wunder-discs and...the one stinking television that is connected to the only BR player is unavailable because the wife just had to watch Grey's Anatomy on the big TV. Meanwhile, I can take my crappy old SD disc to any of the other players including the freakin' family vehicle and watch to my heart's content. So, from my perspective it's more like why would I take perfectly good money and waste it on blu-ray when I can get much more flexibility sticking with SD?
#646
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
#647
DVD Talk Legend
Re: "Why DVD's Better Than Blu-ray" (IGN.DVD article.)
I also prefer the firmware upgrades to what happened with my first DVD player: It wasn't capable of playing some newer DVDs (like the T2 Ultimate DVD with seamless branching), so I had to get a new player. Luckily I had a replacement plan for the player.
Question too, do blu-ray players play DVD-R discs as I have a lot of home videos I transferred? I also receive independant documentaries recorded on DVD-R as well that I wonder if they would play on Blu-ray.
#648
DVD Talk Legend
Re: "Why DVD's Better Than Blu-ray" (IGN.DVD article.)
I imagine right now the conversation is:
mdnitoil: I want to watch this DVD.
wife: Go watch it on one of the other TVs. I'm watching Grey's Anatomy.
But with a BD player, the conversation would be:
mdnitoil: I want to watch this BD.
wife: Go watch it on one of the other TVs. I'm watching Grey's Anatomy.
mdnitoil: I can't, this TV has our only BD player.
wife: Oh, OK. I'll go watch my show in the other room at the next commercial break.
#649
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: "Why DVD's Better Than Blu-ray" (IGN.DVD article.)
We've been down this road before, but I can NOT go blu-ray quite easily. I currently have 3 DVD players in the house, a computer player, two portables and one in the mini-van. That's a total of 7 potential locations for disc viewing. So, now I go out and plop a hundo on a blu-ray player and replace one of my DVD players. Next I go out and buy all these amazing cheap discs...well, not all that many since there hasn't been much of squat released. Finally, I go to watch these wunder-discs and...the one stinking television that is connected to the only BR player is unavailable because the wife just had to watch Grey's Anatomy on the big TV. Meanwhile, I can take my crappy old SD disc to any of the other players including the freakin' family vehicle and watch to my heart's content. So, from my perspective it's more like why would I take perfectly good money and waste it on blu-ray when I can get much more flexibility sticking with SD?
If there's a will, there's a way(unless the wife has stolen the will).
#650
DVD Talk Legend
Re: "Why DVD's Better Than Blu-ray" (IGN.DVD article.)
I went to blu-ray and I currently have 6 DVD players, 4 portables, 4 game systems that play DVDs, and 4 more players through computers. It's not really that hard to switch plus a lot of movies I'm buying have been DVD/Blu-ray combos.
If there's a will, there's a way(unless the wife has stolen the will).
If there's a will, there's a way(unless the wife has stolen the will).
It's the same as when DVD first came out; most people had only one DVD player, but several TVs and VCRs. Eventually, people bought second, then third, DVD players, game systems with DVD players, PCs with DVD-ROM drives, etc. So viewing options are limited at first, but grew over time after the first DVD player purchase.