![]() |
Re: Disappointing Criterions
Originally Posted by Gobear
(Post 9600334)
Well, the Anchor Bay and the Criterion are both bare-bones, which is a problem. The Criterion is non-anamorphic (a second strike), and it has serious artifacting issues.
|
Re: Disappointing Criterions
Originally Posted by Peep
(Post 9601787)
Hmm... That almost makes it sound like the Anchor Bay is the better release. Have you heard anything about the picture being compressed?
|
Re: Disappointing Criterions
Originally Posted by Gobear
(Post 9600334)
Well, the Anchor Bay and the Criterion are both bare-bones, which is a problem. The Criterion is non-anamorphic (a second strike), and it has serious artifacting issues.
|
Re: Disappointing Criterions
Originally Posted by gglass4269
(Post 9599226)
I sat in front of my tv with no distractions, and watched the whole movie in one sitting, and at the end, if you asked, I could not tell you what that movie was about...
And that's just the surface. |
Re: Disappointing Criterions
Originally Posted by MoviePage
(Post 9602348)
:hscratch: The underground French Resistance to Nazi occupation?
And that's just the surface. |
Re: Disappointing Criterions
Is anyone else curious to read gglass4269's reviews?
|
Re: Disappointing Criterions
Originally Posted by NoirFan
(Post 9604912)
Is anyone else curious to read gglass4269's reviews?
http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/36526/taking-chance/ http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/36302/friday-the-13th/ Unfortunately, I took on a full time job and enlisted in the Navy within a week of becoming a reviewer, but now that things are starting to get settled down, I'm hoping to start writing some fresh ones! First up will be the classic Night of the Hunter. |
Re: Disappointing Criterions
Originally Posted by gglass4269
(Post 9604927)
First up will be the classic Night of the Hunter.
|
Re: Disappointing Criterions
no, the original dvd release. I'm waiting too for the SE. its one of my most anticipated.
|
Re: Disappointing Criterions
Just watched Brazil for the first time in it's entirety. I couldn't get through it the last time I started it... It was alright, quite funny and interesting. I think I'll have to buy it somewhere down the line.
|
Re: Disappointing Criterions
The Third Man is, for me, an over-rated film.
It's good... but not up my alley. I was disappointed by it. |
Re: Disappointing Criterions
Originally Posted by gglass4269
(Post 9604529)
I think it was very confusing and jumbled, not in the good kind of way, but in the bad direction kind of way. Like wtf was up with the first 20 minutes. That had absolutely no bearing on the rest of the movie, and them it jumps a couple months into the future without any kind of explination as to what the new plot/characters are doing. I think the srtanglation of the man in the rented room could have been set up alot more. I hate the feeling I get when a movie is confusing, when I know it's not supposed to be.
Although the strangulation scene I feel differently about. It helped set the tone of the film and the seriousness involved - leaving the motives to be established later in the film. Overall I think the film is a fascinating and compelling exploration of the human dynamics involving a group of people (French Resistance) caught between a rock and a seriously hard place. I'd actually really like to know how, or if this compares to some of Malle's works, specifically, Lacombe, Lucien. |
Re: Disappointing Criterions
Decided to chuck the alphabetical leaning in my "watch one unwatched DVD per day" rule, and concentrate on Criterions. Remembering my negative comment on it here, gave Withnail and I a second chance.
Was able to make it past 15 minutes this time, and actually ended up enjoying it. Don't think it will become a favorite or get re-watched often, but wouldn't be totally surprised if the film ends up growing on me a bit. I'm going to watch the documentary on it tomorrow. |
Re: Disappointing Criterions
Originally Posted by Trevor
(Post 9616967)
Decided to chuck the alphabetical leaning in my "watch one unwatched DVD per day" rule
|
Re: Disappointing Criterions
Originally Posted by manicsounds
(Post 9618429)
I got curious and counted how many movies that are unwatched in my collection, or unfinished (compilations or TV series) and came to the staggering number of 623 titles(!) A number of Criterions in there too.
You should check out the monthly unwatched threads that Mister Peepers facilitates here. |
Re: Disappointing Criterions
Originally Posted by GenPion
(Post 9612597)
The Third Man is, for me, an over-rated film.
It's good... but not up my alley. I was disappointed by it. The DEVIL AND DANIEL WEBSTER is one of my favorite films, and Criterion did a great job with the restored version...but I think I may actually prefer the truncated release that was on home video prior on VHS. The fantasy element was stronger and the New Deal political aspect in the longer cut kind of drags it a bit for me. They should have included both versions. |
Re: Disappointing Criterions
The original Salo DVD, the video transfer was terrible.
|
Re: Disappointing Criterions
Three words:
Fishing With John |
Re: Disappointing Criterions
All of them. They are overpriced, pretentious films.
|
Re: Disappointing Criterions
Originally Posted by Double_Oh_7
(Post 9648395)
All of them. They are overpriced, pretentious films.
|
Re: Disappointing Criterions
I just rented THE SPIRIT OF THE BEEHIVE. What a boring piece of shit film. And I almost blind bought this film based on all the praise of this being considered "the best Spanish film from the 1970s". Good acting by the two main girls, but overall bad flick.
|
Re: Disappointing Criterions
Originally Posted by toddly6666
(Post 9664468)
I just rented THE SPIRIT OF THE BEEHIVE. What a boring piece of shit film. And I almost blind bought this film based on all the praise of this being considered "the best Spanish film from the 1970s". Good acting by the two main girls, but overall bad flick.
|
Re: Disappointing Criterions
Originally Posted by ResIpsa
(Post 9664588)
You might want to try "L'Aventurra." I think there are more car crashes in that one. And when I think "piece of shit" films, I think Salo.... ;)
There's some "shit-worthy" scene in Criterion's "Sweet Movie" too (Sweet Movie was a good movie though, I still have to rent Salo and see how bad it is). |
Re: Disappointing Criterions
Originally Posted by toddly6666
(Post 9664803)
In "L'Aventurra", are there any martial arts and gun fight scenes? ;)
There's some "shit-worthy" scene in Criterion's "Sweet Movie" too (Sweet Movie was a good movie though, I still have to rent Salo and see how bad it is). |
Re: Disappointing Criterions
|
Re: Disappointing Criterions
Salo is not bad, just controversial. I thought it was a wonderful movie.
|
Re: Disappointing Criterions
Originally Posted by toddly6666
(Post 9664468)
I just rented THE SPIRIT OF THE BEEHIVE. What a boring piece of shit film. And I almost blind bought this film based on all the praise of this being considered "the best Spanish film from the 1970s". Good acting by the two main girls, but overall bad flick.
I love the Frankenstein (1931) tie-in to the story and it's a wonderful flim you should watch it again. |
Re: Disappointing Criterions
I'm gonna have to cast my vote for Days Of Heaven. Just give us a WORD Terry. Please, just say SOMETHING. Also, I would have killed to have seen a current interview with Linda Manz.
|
Re: Disappointing Criterions
Originally Posted by Perkinsun Dzees
(Post 8343307)
Salo
Bought it for like $700 off Ebay. I watched about half an hour then turned it off and tossed it in the trash. |
Re: Disappointing Criterions
Originally Posted by KillerCannibal
(Post 8344197)
I don't know if I'd necessarily say that. I'm a big 50's sci-fi fan and I loved Fiend Without A Face. It reminded me of other classic cheese-fests like The Brain from Planet Arous.
|
Re: Disappointing Criterions
Originally Posted by Zen Peckinpah
(Post 8347677)
Good Burger. I mean, come on, this is the same company releasing Seven Samurai, M, and Armageddon...D
|
Re: Disappointing Criterions
I just watched The Last Wave. It was ok, but not something that I'll run out and buy tomorrow. I did recognize an Aboriginal actor that's been in quite a few movies, lately Australia. But they didn't even show any scenery that might have saved the movie. All in all, it was a waste of an hour and 45 minutes.
|
Re: Disappointing Criterions
Originally Posted by shellebelle
(Post 9816876)
I just watched The Last Wave. It was ok, but not something that I'll run out and buy tomorrow. I did recognize an Aboriginal actor that's been in quite a few movies, lately Australia. But they didn't even show any scenery that might have saved the movie. All in all, it was a waste of an hour and 45 minutes.
Originally Posted by Dick
(Post 9816608)
FIEND WITHOUT A FACE is one of the films that was regularly shown on t.v. (unut) when I was young. The acting isn't great -- in a few cases it is quite terrible -- and the dialog is mediocre, but damned if the last twenty minutes aren't pretty awesome and (for sixties t.v. broadcast) incredibly graphic. The last quarter of the film, for me, is worth the price of admission, and the Criterion DVD captures it with perfection.
|
Re: Disappointing Criterions
Originally Posted by WEEDEDOUT
(Post 9803871)
|
Re: Disappointing Criterions
Armageddon Chasing Amy The Rock The Curious Case of Benjamin Button The Last Days of Disco The Life Aquatic with Steve Zissou Disagree Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas Man Bites Dog The Man Who Fell to Earth Night on Earth |
Re: Disappointing Criterions
He's dead wrong on "The Man Who Fell To Earth" and "Fear and Loathing..." The rest are crap, although for me Wes Anderson's use of Devo's "Gut Feeling" in the soundtrack for "Life Aquatic" makes the film worthwhile.
The comments in that link are brutal :) |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:53 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.