Robocop Re-release Vs Criterion Editon
#30
Moderator
Originally Posted by DVD Josh
Probably would get an R today.
#31
Member
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Probably would get an R today
I have the Criterion and the Trilogy too, so I'm passing on the steelbook as well. Still, looks like a great release.
#32
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Ontario, Canada
I was never able to get the Criterion DVD because in Canada the average price I've seen them for (not including the all-too easy to find titles like "Chasing Amy") is about $60 and up. That's a TV-DVD set price right there. No thanks. Of course, RoboCop isn't available anywhere because it's out of print, but the cost of it at the time matches Criterions found today, that I've seen in stores.
#33
Moderator
Originally Posted by Dr. Forrester
I think so as well, considering Grindhouse and Hostel I and II passed the MPAA seemingly intact. I was watching "Starship Troopers" last night (this thread managed to get Verhoven on my mind something fierce), and even that film had more than a few moments that easily topped what had to be snipped out of Robocop to secure the R.
I have the Criterion and the Trilogy too, so I'm passing on the steelbook as well. Still, looks like a great release.
I have the Criterion and the Trilogy too, so I'm passing on the steelbook as well. Still, looks like a great release.
I'd love to see a fully uncensored cut of 'Total Recall' (the escalator human body shield scene, the stomach slitting) but I think those scenes are gone forever.
#37
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Originally Posted by Giles
I'd love to see a fully uncensored cut of 'Total Recall' (the escalator human body shield scene, the stomach slitting) but I think those scenes are gone forever.
But this new RoboCop DVD? Mine. As soon as I saw the steelbook art I put my Criterion on eBay, and this is one of the few titles that I would rebuy per diem (this will be my third after the Criterion and the trilogy). I'll buy this for 15 dollars!
#40
Ok, QUESTION over here.
The link that compares the bit rates. If you set destination master to accept, say at 8bits constant (CBR), how in the hell would you know if the bit rate by itself is better than the other releases? Because what you're doing, is "masking" the actual bit rate in another bit rate. So, are you actually getting more quality video per second, or is it just hyped in the inflated bit rate.
I don't have this movie at all, so I'm just curious. Is the Criterion actually better or are people just justifying their purchases. From the link provided, it looks like the Criterion is washed out and way too bright--I'll let my TV adjustments do that, thanks.
The link that compares the bit rates. If you set destination master to accept, say at 8bits constant (CBR), how in the hell would you know if the bit rate by itself is better than the other releases? Because what you're doing, is "masking" the actual bit rate in another bit rate. So, are you actually getting more quality video per second, or is it just hyped in the inflated bit rate.
I don't have this movie at all, so I'm just curious. Is the Criterion actually better or are people just justifying their purchases. From the link provided, it looks like the Criterion is washed out and way too bright--I'll let my TV adjustments do that, thanks.
#42
Originally Posted by DVD Polizei
Ok, QUESTION over here.
The link that compares the bit rates. If you set destination master to accept, say at 8bits constant (CBR), how in the hell would you know if the bit rate by itself is better than the other releases? Because what you're doing, is "masking" the actual bit rate in another bit rate. So, are you actually getting more quality video per second, or is it just hyped in the inflated bit rate.
I don't have this movie at all, so I'm just curious. Is the Criterion actually better or are people just justifying their purchases. From the link provided, it looks like the Criterion is washed out and way too bright--I'll let my TV adjustments do that, thanks.
The link that compares the bit rates. If you set destination master to accept, say at 8bits constant (CBR), how in the hell would you know if the bit rate by itself is better than the other releases? Because what you're doing, is "masking" the actual bit rate in another bit rate. So, are you actually getting more quality video per second, or is it just hyped in the inflated bit rate.
I don't have this movie at all, so I'm just curious. Is the Criterion actually better or are people just justifying their purchases. From the link provided, it looks like the Criterion is washed out and way too bright--I'll let my TV adjustments do that, thanks.
#46
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,664
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by PopcornTreeCt
I don't think anyone in this thread stated that the Criterion was better.
Originally Posted by Josh Z
Seconded. MGM's last DVD looked like a cartoon version of the movie, with glowing orange and red flesh tones and every color absurdly oversaturated.
What makes it a bit stickier is that the Criterion is in 1:66:1 (Verhoeven's preferred ratio) and all the others are in 1:85:1. Plus, I believe the film's DP, Jost Vocano, approved Criterion's transfer.
#50
DVD Talk Limited Edition
I'm confused. Are there any extras new to this release?
Also, I know this release will feature both cuts of the movie. Are either transfers different from the rated (standalone) and unrated (trilogy release) transfers already released by MGM?
I am desperately looking for a reason (besides the cool steel-case) to buy this rerelease. Oh, and I already have the Criterion also.
Also, I know this release will feature both cuts of the movie. Are either transfers different from the rated (standalone) and unrated (trilogy release) transfers already released by MGM?
I am desperately looking for a reason (besides the cool steel-case) to buy this rerelease. Oh, and I already have the Criterion also.




