DVD Talk Forum

DVD Talk Forum (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/)
-   DVD Talk (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/dvd-talk-3/)
-   -   Individual Bonds???? (https://forum.dvdtalk.com/dvd-talk/484022-individual-bonds.html)

iamnothitler 11-19-06 12:36 AM

Individual Bonds????
 
Are they going to release the 007 films individually? I don't think released more than a handful the last time they had the boxed sets.
Thanks for any info.
LJ

Robert 11-19-06 12:42 AM

NEVER. Forcing consumers to buy the expensive box sets is way more profitable than allowing them to buy the select individual movies they want.

emhello 11-19-06 12:49 AM

Are you sure that average consumers are going to really drop the larger $$ for the box sets rather than the $10-15 for each one? I find it hard to believe.

Mike Adams 11-19-06 02:06 AM

My take on this is that they won't do any more individual releases on standard DVD, it'll be HD-DVD or Blu-ray. Just a guess, though. Personally (as I've said before), once I finally buy "A View To A Kill" and the not-appearing-in-this-set "Never Say Never Again", I'm done with Bond... except of course every documentary I can get my hands on. ;)

Snowmaker 11-19-06 09:03 AM


Originally Posted by Mike Adams
and the not-appearing-in-this-set "Never Say Never Again", I'm done with Bond...

What's the point of even producing/buying the sets then if it won't give you every Bond film?

I have my single Goldeneye DVD, that's the only 007 film I've always loved enough to own.

Sean O'Hara 11-19-06 10:06 AM



Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Adams
and the not-appearing-in-this-set "Never Say Never Again", I'm done with Bond...
What's the point of even producing/buying the sets then if it won't give you every Bond film?
NSNA isn't part of the official Bond franchise, and isn't owned by MGM.

The story behind NSNA is rather complicated and involves lots of lawyers, but what it comes down to is that the movie rights for Thunderball belong to a third party. Saltzman/Broccoli were able to negotiate a deal to make Thunderball back in the '60s, but they didn't gain permanent rights to the book. Then in the early '80s, the rights-owners decided to make their own version of the novel under the title Never Say Never Again. They pulled off two major coups -- getting Connery to return as Bond, and getting their film in theaters a few months before Octopussy. Amazingly both movies proved successful at the box office.

I believe NSNA is now controlled by Warner Bros.

Mike Adams 11-19-06 10:38 AM


Originally Posted by Sean O'Hara
NSNA isn't part of the official Bond franchise, and isn't owned by MGM.

Yeah... what Sean said. ;)

Sorry, didn't mean to confuse or disappoint anyone by repeatedly mentioning one of the films that doesn't appear in the sets, but that's just one of the only two Bond films I'll be buying.

Sean, your explanation revealed a couple of things I didn't even know, especially that the story for "Never..." was from the 'Thunderball' book. I'll have to re-watch both films and see if I can see the plot similarities. Of course since Sean Connery was also in Thunderball, why make yet another version with the same bond? I'd assume the answer was money, but still, I was thrilled to see him back as Bond.

As for Bond films that aren't in the sets, "Casino Royale" would also qualify. No, I'm not talking about the new one. The film I'm referring to is the Bond parody starring David Niven as Bond. Of course I consider this new film to be a parody of sorts as well, only it wasn't intended that way. A blond Bond... indeed.

cgray 11-19-06 10:40 AM


Originally Posted by Robert
NEVER. Forcing consumers to buy the expensive box sets is way more profitable than allowing them to buy the select individual movies they want.

uhh... what about releasing the sets until everybody that is going to has bought one, then releasing the individual releases? isn't this what has been done with the hitchcock set, etc.?

Jim 11-19-06 10:48 AM

Most of the UEs released so far seem to be showing up individually on ebay. Some people seem to be splitting up the box sets and making money by selling them individually and others appear to be selling the 1 or 2 movies from a set that they don't care for.

iamnothitler 11-19-06 11:23 AM


Originally Posted by cgray
uhh... what about releasing the sets until everybody that is going to has bought one, then releasing the individual releases? isn't this what has been done with the hitchcock set, etc.?

That's what I was hoping. Then again, I don't think they did that the last time they put together their boxed sets.
LJ

rw2516 11-19-06 11:46 AM


Originally Posted by Sean O'Hara
NSNA isn't part of the official Bond franchise, and isn't owned by MGM.

The story behind NSNA is rather complicated and involves lots of lawyers, but what it comes down to is that the movie rights for Thunderball belong to a third party. Saltzman/Broccoli were able to negotiate a deal to make Thunderball back in the '60s, but they didn't gain permanent rights to the book. Then in the early '80s, the rights-owners decided to make their own version of the novel under the title Never Say Never Again. They pulled off two major coups -- getting Connery to return as Bond, and getting their film in theaters a few months before Octopussy. Amazingly both movies proved successful at the box office.

I believe NSNA is now controlled by Warner Bros.

MGM/UA now have NEVER SAY NEVER AGAIN. It was all part of the big deal that reverted all the pre 50s WB back to WB from UA. The DVD was released by MGM/UA and the WB logo is removed from the film. It is never included in the box sets because EON won't allow it. Some guy in Australia re-edited NSNA "EON-izing" it. He reedited it so the pace is quicker and rearranged some scenes. He added the gun barrel logo to the begginning and replaced all the music with ques from EON films, mostly Barry. It's awesome. Way better than the released film and actually seems like an EON Bond. It starts with the gunbarrel, the white dot expands on Bond in the jungle preparing to assault the terrorist compound, when the girl he is suppose to rescue stabs him the picture dissolves into the Maurice Binder credits to Thunderball with all the appropriate credit changes. I watched it several times in a few days it was so good. I'll never watch the official version again.

creekdipper 11-19-06 01:25 PM


Originally Posted by rw2516
MGM/UA now have NEVER SAY NEVER AGAIN. It was all part of the big deal that reverted all the pre 50s WB back to WB from UA. The DVD was released by MGM/UA and the WB logo is removed from the film. It is never included in the box sets because EON won't allow it. Some guy in Australia re-edited NSNA "EON-izing" it. He reedited it so the pace is quicker and rearranged some scenes. He added the gun barrel logo to the begginning and replaced all the music with ques from EON films, mostly Barry. It's awesome. Way better than the released film and actually seems like an EON Bond. It starts with the gunbarrel, the white dot expands on Bond in the jungle preparing to assault the terrorist compound, when the girl he is suppose to rescue stabs him the picture dissolves into the Maurice Binder credits to Thunderball with all the appropriate credit changes. I watched it several times in a few days it was so good. I'll never watch the official version again.

If you don't mind sharing, where did you find this re-edited version? We really like Connery in NSNA (much better than Diamonds Are Forever, for instance), but the pacing always did seem a little off...like an excellent film was in there just waiting to bust out.

UAIOE 11-19-06 02:17 PM


Originally Posted by Mike Adams
Sean, your explanation revealed a couple of things I didn't even know, especially that the story for "Never..." was from the 'Thunderball' book. I'll have to re-watch both films and see if I can see the plot similarities.

You won't have to look hard.



I'm also curious about the re-cut NSNA.

rw2516 11-19-06 03:58 PM

Another thing about the MGM/UA dvd of NSNA. When first released it was edited. The scene where Bond plays the video game with Largo was cut. The mistake was corrected but you cannot tell the difference between the cut and complete version by the cover or disc. If you've had it a few years and never played it you mat want to check out your copy. Also all R2 versions have the horse fall cut out of the horse hitting the water after Bond jumps from the castle wall on horseback.

RocShemp 11-19-06 09:08 PM

Color me curious about the recut NSNA. Where did you get it?

UAIOE 11-20-06 03:06 AM


Originally Posted by rw2516
Also all R2 versions have the horse fall cut out of the horse hitting the water after Bond jumps from the castle wall on horseback.

Not sure why they would have that cut, horses can swim. ;)

Mike Adams 11-20-06 02:33 PM


Originally Posted by UAIOE
Not sure why they would have that cut, horses can swim. ;)

Not with a broken back they can't, and the horse apparently landed on its back. Not having seen the movie since the original theatrical release, I don't know if they actually had the horse do the stunt or if the censors were just taking issue with the fact that it <b>looked</b> like the horse took the fall.

As for the edit, I still haven't picked up a copy of the DVD, so hopefully I'll be safe. Was the entire scene cut so that if I see Bond playing the video game I know I have a good DVD, or is there a specific bit of footage I need to look for?

UAIOE 11-20-06 02:52 PM

Well, the horse did take a fall....from probably 10-15 feet.

But it seems the horse was alright after the fall:

http://usera.imagecave.com/Push_Upst...cap001.bmp.jpg


The jump off the wall was all special effects.

Mike Adams 11-20-06 03:29 PM


Originally Posted by UAIOE
Well, the horse did take a fall....from probably 10-15 feet.

But it seems the horse was alright after the fall:

(image removed to save space)


Haha... you sound like my girlfriend. All's well that ends well, right? So sad.

Anyway, I think it was the risk to the horse they were concerned about. Doesn't matter if he/she was okay after hitting the water, because it might not have ended up that way. I don't blame the SPCA for taking a much closer look at the involvement of animals in films after that.

IamLegend 11-20-06 04:44 PM

Here is link to the site with some clips:
http://neversaymccloryagain.ohmss-007.com/

Mike Adams 11-20-06 05:35 PM

Well that won't last long... ;)

In my travels I see a lot of different tricks bootleggers use that they THINK will work to help them avoid prosecution, but this one takes the cake as the lamest yet.

<i>"Never Say McClory Again is a fan-produced project which is intended only for private viewing by the author under the 'fair use' provision of US copyright law."</i>

First of all, the "fair use" doctrine says nothing about editing a work, even if it's for your own private viewing. Secondly, you must violate the Digital Milennium Copyright Act in order to extract the digital audio and video tracks from a DVD as the author describes (he didn't say he just played the DVD into his computer, he actually "ripped" the tracks to his hard drive, defeating the CSS copy protection, which is illegal). And third, he contradicts his "this is only for my use" and "this is NOT for sale" assertions with the following:

<i>As a token of my appreciation, it is my custom to send donors a gift of a DVD R of the project in thanks for their unselfish generosity.</i>

Dude, if it's for YOUR eyes only (shameless Bond reference intended), why the hell are you giving away copies? For that matter, you claim you're not selling copies, but the fact that you only send copies to donors (and I'm sure there's a minimum donation required in order to receive a DVD), you ARE in effect selling a re-edited copyrighted work. None of the verbal calisthenics you're doing on your website will do you any good in court.

Note that I'm just venting -- I don't expect that the person who produced this is reading this forum, but you never know. Of course I see that the "Donations" page has been removed, so it looks like this guy has either been busted already, or has used his ill-gotten "donations" to buy himself a clue.

Being an amateur DVD producer myself, I think it's pretty funny that he's had to go to all the trouble of editing out the music and sound effects from a stereo mix (and gets up on a high horse to provide us lowly mortals with a "tutorial"), simply because he doesn't have the tools required to split the 5.1 soundtrack into separate tracks, which would not only save him a TON of work, it would make the finished product MUCH closer to what he's trying to achieve. It just bugs me when people are all tooting their own horn about their editing skills and the software they have, but they can't do something simple like splitting a Dolby Digital 5.1 audio stream. In those cases it's always "this is the BEST quality you can get... with the tools I have and doing it the way I'm doing it." How utterly pathetic.

Mabuse 11-20-06 06:59 PM

Regarding buying individual titles:

After the first wave of Bond box sets (in 1999) the titles were made available individually. Then they were put in the vault when a second round of box sets came out. Were they ever released individually after that?

UAIOE 11-21-06 12:00 AM


Originally Posted by Mike Adams
(image removed to save space)


Haha... you sound like my girlfriend. All's well that ends well, right? So sad.

Anyway, I think it was the risk to the horse they were concerned about. Doesn't matter if he/she was okay after hitting the water, because it might not have ended up that way. I don't blame the SPCA for taking a much closer look at the involvement of animals in films after that.

Well, you can see a difference in the actual movie between the "wall jump and fall" and the horse and stunt doubles falling into the water. How it was rendered (the SFX) they would have hit the water feet first.

But as for the safety, id be just as worried that the horse would have landed on top of someone just as much as the horse hurting itself.


As for the 2nd release: I don't think they were sold individually, as i had a hard time finding the movies that i wanted.

creekdipper 11-21-06 05:04 PM

[deleted by author]

bohemian1 11-21-06 05:27 PM

Looks like they are exploiting bond fans in USA. There are individual bond movies available in Europe. In fact, there is sale going on bond movies (2 for 12 pounds - B1G1)
http://www.hmv.co.uk/hmvweb/specialO...;-1&code=06WQS

UAIOE 11-21-06 10:40 PM

Figures.

But perhaps this is a sign that maybe they will come out individually at some point in the future? :bow:

Jay G. 11-21-06 11:17 PM


Originally Posted by UAIOE
But perhaps this is a sign that maybe they will come out individually at some point in the future?

They came out individually in R3 as well. I notice that DVDcompare.net states that the US Ultimate Edition DVDs are both R1 and R3 encoded, and also have the appropriate Asian subtitles:
http://www.dvdcompare.net/comparison....php?fid=578#2

This is a trick Sony has done in the past, notably with the Superbits, so that they don't have to press two different discs for different regions. Someone mentioned in the boxset thread that the UE discs contain the Sony copyright, since they were mastered by Sony before Fox got the video rights to the MGM catalog.

I found a site that carries the R3's from Taiwan, all 20 films individually for about $12 each.

007 James Bond Ultimate Editions: $12.13
http://mall.jsdvd.com/advanced_searc...on&language=us

Shipping's fairly expensive on the site though, even just Airmail. The covers also have Chinese writing on them, although that could be just a slipcover.

Keep in mind I don't know for sure that the Taiwan DVDs are the exact same discs as the US and R1 encoded as well. However, I do think there's a very good chance they are.

ETA: OK, I just noticed that the US and TW releases differ in subtitles and audio slightly, notably that the US release has French dub and sub, while the TW has Portuguese. So they're not the same disc. The dual-region Superbits had the exact same audio and subtitle options in both regions. Now I'm trying to figure out why the US DVDs are R3 encoded. :hscratch:

Still, the TW discs might appeal to someone multi-regioned who doesn't want PAL discs, and there's still the outside chance that the TW release is R1 encoded as well.

anthonyd 02-14-07 11:24 PM

Individual Movies Available
 
Hi all,

Looks like they released some of the Bond movies individually - does anyone know if they'll release all of them?

They only have the movie - not the bonus disc.

aintnosin 11-29-07 02:20 PM


Originally Posted by anthonyd
Hi all,

Looks like they released some of the Bond movies individually - does anyone know if they'll release all of them?

They only have the movie - not the bonus disc.

Just resurrecting this thread to inquire: They've now releaed pretty much every Bond Movie as an Ultimate Edition single disk except OHMSS? Anyone know if these are due soon?

outlander78 11-29-07 03:36 PM

In Canada I regularly see the latest versions of the Bond films in the bargain areas of HMV - 2/$20, that kind of thing. I think OHMSS was in the stack.

zepplin 11-29-07 04:52 PM

I am in Iceland and I bought all the bond film. I used Amazon and Ebay and of course my local dvd shop 2001. The were all in special offer. very cheap


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:08 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.