The Interpreter: Sydney Pollack's featurette on widescreen vs. pan & scan
#1
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sand Point
Posts: 2,249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Interpreter: Sydney Pollack's featurette on widescreen vs. pan & scan
If you haven't seen this yet, it's a really good look at the differences between widescreen and pan & scan (besides the obvious). Pollack really goes into detail about what he tries to accomplish through widescreen and what gets lost/butchered in pan & scan. A much better featurette than the Die Hard one to show your pan & scan buddies the error of their ways.
#2
DVD Talk Legend
Pollack is awesome. He actually sued Danish TV for showing Three Days of the Condor in pan and scan.
I noticed that the featurette is also listed on the back of the fullscreen version, so it will get to the right audience.
I noticed that the featurette is also listed on the back of the fullscreen version, so it will get to the right audience.
#3
Banned
This has to be one of the best extras ever. It gives an explanation that everybody can understand about aspect ratio. The irony is that the Interpreter was also released full screen, although like Drexl said, it may get to the right audience instead of preaching to the choir.
#4
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
I have'nt seen the film yet and was thinking of doing this exact issue for an "Informative Speech" I must give in a few weeks.
How long is the feature?
Since I own very few dvds which contain a P&S option. I was contemplating using A Fistful of Dollars as an example. The sequence where Clint confronts that gang in town at the begining is a great showcase.
And if I do use the film as an example. Would it be better to show the WS version first,then P&S. Or the P&S version first,then the 'big reveal' of the widescreen version where they may think "Wow" once realizing how much was missing?
How long is the feature?
Since I own very few dvds which contain a P&S option. I was contemplating using A Fistful of Dollars as an example. The sequence where Clint confronts that gang in town at the begining is a great showcase.
And if I do use the film as an example. Would it be better to show the WS version first,then P&S. Or the P&S version first,then the 'big reveal' of the widescreen version where they may think "Wow" once realizing how much was missing?
#5
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sand Point
Posts: 2,249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't recall off hand, but it was about 5-10 minutes long. He actually uses The Interpreter as an example of the differences, showing what's in a regular widescreen shot and then showing what happens after it gets cropped. He uses "50%" a lot to describe how much is lost when pan and scanned.
Unless a movie was matted, full screen is such a misleading label.
Unless a movie was matted, full screen is such a misleading label.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto, Ontario, CANADA
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Interpreter should have ONLY been released in Widescreen, so when people wonder why there's no full screen and ultimately buy the widescreen version, then they can WATCH that feature and be properly informed.
Sort of defeats the purpose of making that feature where Universal offers a full screen version for sale
Christian
Sort of defeats the purpose of making that feature where Universal offers a full screen version for sale
Christian
#7
Originally Posted by ChristianB
The Interpreter should have ONLY been released in Widescreen, so when people wonder why there's no full screen and ultimately buy the widescreen version, then they can WATCH that feature and be properly informed.
Sort of defeats the purpose of making that feature where Universal offers a full screen version for sale
Christian
Sort of defeats the purpose of making that feature where Universal offers a full screen version for sale
Christian
#8
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Too bad this movie sucked. I'd love to have that feature on hand for some of my more ignorant relatives who insist Fullscreen looks better (even on my WS TV!). I just wish it was on Three Days of the Condor or Jeremiah Johnson instead. There's just no way I'm buying this movie.
#9
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Originally Posted by Drexl
Pollack is awesome. He actually sued Danish TV for showing Three Days of the Condor in pan and scan.
I noticed that the featurette is also listed on the back of the fullscreen version, so it will get to the right audience.
I noticed that the featurette is also listed on the back of the fullscreen version, so it will get to the right audience.
#10
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Wouldn't you like to know?
Posts: 1,819
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
On the fullscreen copies it should play as soon as you pop it in your dvd player (like forced trailers) with NO way to go to the menu by chapter advance or fast forwarding. Make the P&S J6P watch it & see what he's missing.
They had a great featurette on the benefits of widescreen on the Vista Pearl Harbor too but of course Disney in their infinite wisdom hid it as a fucking Easter egg.
They had a great featurette on the benefits of widescreen on the Vista Pearl Harbor too but of course Disney in their infinite wisdom hid it as a fucking Easter egg.
#11
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Originally Posted by Mr.Briggs
On the fullscreen copies it should play as soon as you pop it in your dvd player (like forced trailers) with NO way to go to the menu by chapter advance or fast forwarding. Make the P&S J6P watch it & see what he's missing.
DJ
#12
Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: a hill in Connecticut
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Legolas
If you haven't seen this yet, it's a really good look at the differences between widescreen and pan & scan (besides the obvious). Pollack really goes into detail about what he tries to accomplish through widescreen and what gets lost/butchered in pan & scan. A much better featurette than the Die Hard one to show your pan & scan buddies the error of their ways.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
On TCM they show a segment alot with Martin Scorsese talking about the differences between p&s and widescreen. I know one of the clips they use are from 7 brides for 7 brothers. Very informative and easy to understand. The best way to describe it I have heard is to take the Last Supper, which is widescreen, and cut the sides off of it to make it fullscreen.
#14
Needs to contact an admin about multiple accounts
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 2,730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pollack is a little spazzy in the featurette. If it was a more polished piece, it might have more impact. As it is, it looks like a DVDTalker at their keyboard rambling on about the benefits of letterboxing.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: CA
Posts: 718
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mr.Briggs
On the fullscreen copies it should play as soon as you pop it in your dvd player (like forced trailers) with NO way to go to the menu by chapter advance or fast forwarding. Make the P&S J6P watch it & see what he's missing.
#22
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Just wanted to bump this. I bought the DVD a week ago, give or take. I was going to watch it tonight...but I came in to check up on the ol' internet first. I saw the most recent P&S vs. Widescreen thread, then recalled seeing that featurette listed on the back of the DVD. I went in and watched it, loved it, and figured this should be bumped for anybody who hadn't seen it yet.
-JP
-JP
#23
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by scott shelton
Pollack is a little spazzy in the featurette. If it was a more polished piece, it might have more impact. As it is, it looks like a DVDTalker at their keyboard rambling on about the benefits of letterboxing.
#24
Banned
Amen! Sheesh, aren't their more important causes out there? I've been all about widescreen since VHS, but I can give a hoot whether people buy fullscreen DVDs. More titles are available in widescreen than fullscreen nowadays. If a DVD is fullscreen only it's some P.O.S. movie that's got little artistic merit anyway. Can't we call this crusade over already?
#25
Originally Posted by dx23
As long as there are films that are only available in full screen when their original aspect ratio is widescreen, this "crusade" will keep on going. And besides, promoting full screen is like a math teacher telling you 2 +2 =3; it takes away from the directors vision and it cuts the picture and information on the screen for moronic reasons. This is why most of us give a "hoot" about the selling and purshasing of full screen dvds.