![]() |
Originally Posted by Terrell
Okay, I've got a question. If Lucas was to put out a 15-disc, six film box set in 2007, included the originals, and the price was $200, would you guys be pissed?:lol: Also, would you buy it?
|
Originally Posted by Terrell
Okay, I've got a question. If Lucas was to put out a 15-disc, six film box set in 2007, included the originals, and the price was $200, would you guys be pissed?:lol: Also, would you buy it?
Considering the money that I have spent on Star Wars since 1978, $200 bucks is nothing. |
The only reason I ask is because I can see something like that happening. I don't think Lucas will release the originals, but if he does I can see it happening that way.
|
Originally Posted by Terrell
Okay, I've got a question. If Lucas was to put out a 15-disc, six film box set in 2007, included the originals, and the price was $200, would you guys be pissed?:lol: Also, would you buy it?
But seriously though, $200 is alot of money but I'd easily drop that on an "Ultimate" Star Wars boxset. |
Originally Posted by Terrell
Okay, I've got a question. If Lucas was to put out a 15-disc, six film box set in 2007, included the originals, and the price was $200, would you guys be pissed?:lol: Also, would you buy it?
I'm not one to tear Lucas a new one regardless of whether he turns left or right. He's not damned if he does and damned if he doesn't in my estimation. I enjoy what he creates in the Star Wars universe, even though I consider much of it sub-par. If he were to offer the 77/80/83 versions of the original trilogy in the 2007 release, thus granting the hardcore fans their biggest wish, I would applaud him. A $200 15-disc set isn't a realistic scenario, though. The Ultimate Matrix Collection--10 discs--and the boxed set of all three Lord of the Rings extended cuts--12 discs--were just over $50 and $70 during their initial weeks of release, respectively. I'm guessing a Star Wars boxed set of this type would probably be in the neighborhood of $90 - $100 max. And that I would pay in a heartbeat for the ultimate Star Wars film set. --THX |
I'm guessing a Star Wars boxed set of this type would probably be in the neighborhood of $90 - $100 max. |
Originally Posted by Terrell
The 4-disc set retailed for $70.
|
only suckers pay retail |
Amazon is selling the 20-disc, Star Trek movie collection set for around $113...lists for $167.00.
I would be very surprised for Star Wars to list for $199. |
Originally Posted by Terrell
The 4-disc set retailed for $70.
Originally Posted by Terrell
...I'm not exactly talking discounts and whatnot. If a 4-disc set retails for $70, I wouldn't find it surprising if a 12-disc set was $199. Of course this is just guessing, because we don't know what kind of set Lucasfilm will put out. It was just fun to think about that particular situation.
At this point, though, I don't think I care anymore if Lucas ever gives us the originals. Pondering the two scenarios--the Mega Set with or without the 77/80/83 versions of the original trilogy--I find myself being indifferent about it. Think I would be just as happy with A New Hope, The Empire Strikes Back, and Return of the Jedi further enhanced to make them look and feel as much like the prequels as possible. --THX |
Does anyone know if the keepcases have different cover art from the previous release?
|
My signature is my list of my 20 favorite movies. I own all of them on DVD except for the top two, which are Star Wars and The Empire Strikes Back.
I hope the Easter Eggs on these new DVDs are the original versions. Why else would these be "limited editions" with practically no extras on them? |
I would be very surprised for Star Wars to list for $199. |
Originally Posted by Terrell
I remember dropping $240 on the definitive collection set.
|
This wins the 2005 award for most useless re-issue.
|
Originally Posted by DavidH
Yes, but that WAS laser disc, right? Laser disc prices, as a whole, were far, far higher than what we are paying for TODAY's DVD prices.
You know, I just realized something: for all the releases, on all the formats, over all the years, I don't think there's been a homevideo release of a SW movie that was really, really spectacular. There's always been the feeling that it could have been just a little better. Anyone else feel that way? |
Originally Posted by milo bloom
You know, I just realized something: for all the releases, on all the formats, over all the years, I don't think there's been a homevideo release of a SW movie that was really, really spectacular. There's always been the feeling that it could have been just a little better.
Anyone else feel that way? |
Originally Posted by CertifiedTHX
Afterthought: Then again...are the "special edition" changes things that only hardcore fans care about? Is the casual fan perfectly happy with the films as they are now? Friend of mine certainly falls under the latter category, and I don't think she even realizes what's new and what's not. A set of the original, unaltered films would sell big to fans like us, sure, but perhaps not as well as I thought to the general public. Hard to know, really.
--THX Also, while I don't think I completely agree with Terrell, he does make some valid points. GL gets flack for things that just slide by when other studios do it. While the LOTR EE and Giftsets contain the same versions of the movie with extra discs and features, couldn't the same be said here? Wouldn't the current version contain the same discs as the new release with the 4th disc being like the extra discs in the EE? I'm not doubting the difference in content or films, just the way some say this is a seperate release and the LOTR sets are not. All that said, unless there are major changes, this "SW Geek" will be passing. I think everyone will be happier when they realize that they don't need to own everything that is released. If you are happy with your current set, and this set offers nothing new to hook you, then skip it and leave it. |
Originally Posted by Qui Gon Jim
This is an excellent point that many overlook. Those of us HERE that are dying for an official release of the unaltered OT are probably a tiny minority of the overall target audience. I won't say I wouldn't buy them, but I am sure that many casual fans would pass.
|
I think everyone will be happier when they realize that they don't need to own everything that is released. |
Originally Posted by PatrickMcCart
This wins the 2005 award for most useless re-issue.
|
Originally Posted by Qui Gon Jim
Bullshit. That skid at Wally full of older releases (28 Days later and such) with new sleeves are useless re-releases. This nset will eliminate what some see as extraneous extras and has a lower MSRP.
|
Again: if you don't want to buy it, then DON'T. If you already have it, then don't buy it again. If you want to buy it, then please do!
It's really that simple, folks! |
Originally Posted by Numanoid
Q: Why?
A: Because there are plenty of Star Wars geeks that will double-dip based solely on a new box. Any other questions? :D |
Originally Posted by nodeerforamonth
Again: if you don't want to buy it, then DON'T. If you already have it, then don't buy it again. If you want to buy it, then please do!
It's really that simple, folks! Also agreed that this is a mostly useless release. I suspect Lucas gets more flack about something like this, though, because there is an overall stigma attached to him. Many of us have felt burned every time he has changed the original films. We have prayed every time they're re-released that he hasn't made further changes, thus marring the original experience ever more. We share a collective wince at unneeded, and truly cringeworthy, content. Many of us are pissed at Lucas's stubborn refusal to give us the unaltered films. (One problem I believe the hardcore fans have is that the only availability for the 77/80/83 cuts of the original films is on VHS and laserdisc. But unless you have copies of those that you can backup onto DVD--with video and sound only as good as the source material--the trilogy will one day die completely in its original form.) The Star Wars trilogy seems to have been re-released countless times; so many times that many of us may feel it's been repackaged just to make more money, possibly including an additional featurette or two to whet the appetite of fans to buy all over again. How many other franchises have been re-released that way? There may be others, but none comes to mind at the moment. This is all part of Lucas's stigma. I don't think The Lord of the Rings is a fair comparison at this point. It hasn't been around long enough for a lot of pointless re-releases to come forth. And I feel that what they have released is perfectly justified, given the scope of those films and the fanbase they have. Again--it doesn't matter to me how many times Lucas re-releases any of his films. That is entirely his choice, as it is entirely mine whether I accept or decline what he offers. This post is just my observation of us, the fans of his work, and my ideas as to why we generally feel about him the way we do. --THX |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:09 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.