Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > DVD Discussions > DVD Talk
Reload this Page >

Bob Dylan: No Direction Home WIDESCREEN??

Community
Search
DVD Talk Talk about DVDs and Movies on DVD including Covers and Cases

Bob Dylan: No Direction Home WIDESCREEN??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-21-05 | 10:57 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bob Dylan: No Direction Home WIDESCREEN??

Hello All,

I went to best buy to pick this title up and all they had was full screen. I looked on the internet and couldn't determine if there was in fact a widescreen version of the dvd. Does anyone know if there is a widescreen version of the dvd?

Thanks!

Maynerd

Last edited by Maynerd; 09-21-05 at 11:04 AM.
Old 09-21-05 | 11:16 AM
  #2  
Rypro 525's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 28,263
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: a frikin hellhole
if i had to make a guess, its full screen mainly because of all of the archival footage that was shot back in the 60's and what not that wasn't shot in widescreen.
Old 09-21-05 | 12:28 PM
  #3  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Apr 1999
Posts: 1,115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Clearwater, FL
It is only Full Screen but it didn't have to be.
It is part of the American Masters series and every other show I have seen (Hank Williams and Joni Mitchell) have been 16x9 High Def.
According to the PBS website, there is no HiDef showing of the program which tells me no 16x9 version.
Old 09-21-05 | 12:44 PM
  #4  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 12,306
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
16mm archive footage...

this is a documentary. Full screen is pretty standard for a documentary.

buy it
Old 09-21-05 | 12:57 PM
  #5  
Shannon Nutt's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 18,591
Received 413 Likes on 310 Posts
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Originally Posted by Cameron
Full screen is pretty standard for a documentary.
I would disagree that this is not really the case anymore. It's actually a shame this documentary wasn't widescreen, but that's the filmmaker's choice, so I really can't argue.
Old 09-21-05 | 04:43 PM
  #6  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Montreal, Canada
widescreen or not this is an excellent documentary.

Another great job by Scorcese!
Old 09-21-05 | 05:04 PM
  #7  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,910
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Lower Appalachia
Just a comment about documentaries and OAR, I wish that the accepted practice were to show archival footage in the correct aspect ratio, whether pillarboxing or letterboxing to get the right shape. Footage from before the mid-fifties should almost certainly alwas be 4x3, and any footage originally shown on TV up to the late 90s should be 4x3 as well. So many times I'm watching a new 16x9 documentary with TV footage from the 60s cropped off top and bottom, and it just grates on me. I suppose one could argue that footage not originally shown in theaters doesn't have a fixed AR, but for that type of thing, 16mm and the like, I think 4x3 is probably the best ratio.

Does this bother anyone else, or am I alone in the wilderness?
Old 09-21-05 | 05:58 PM
  #8  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 4,521
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Helsinki, Finland
Certainly it does. I'm glad the AR for this one is 1.33:1.
Old 09-21-05 | 07:13 PM
  #9  
seymouru's Avatar
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Given Scorsese's passionate advocacy for OAR over the years, this was clearly a deliberate decision on his part. If he wants it to be 4:3, that's all I need to know.
Old 09-22-05 | 10:03 AM
  #10  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 4,533
Received 95 Likes on 65 Posts
From: Upright, in a cool, dry place
This is going to be on TV (PBS) next Monday and Tuesday(9/26 & 9/27) if you want to try it before you buy it.

Last edited by Quatermass; 09-22-05 at 10:06 AM.
Old 09-22-05 | 11:58 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is a vast amount of 1.33:1 footage in this documentary. Scorsese had to choose whether to crop it all for 16:9, or to use a dynamic AR, or to shoot the whole thing in 4:3.

Cropping would be out of the question for someone like Scorsese.

A dynamic AR would have been visually horrible, with constant inserts of 4:3 clips into 16:9 interviews. The AR would change dozens of times, for no good reason.

Making the whole thing in 4:3 was the only rational choice.

RichC
Old 09-23-05 | 12:20 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Buckeye State
I picked it up without looking and thought I made a mistake when I got it home, but I was so excited to watch it, I didn't care. Now that I know it was only full screen, I'm a little relieved, but it's brilliant either way. Best money I've spent in a long time.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.