Format War is a Go
#26
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Berlin
Posts: 3,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I will select the cheapest and HD-DVD is confirmed to be more cheaper to make and with my normal TV and with HD TV or Plasma, the picture is promised to be good.So since Sony and Panasonic decided to make thier own format and start a war with Toshiba,I will not buy any of them anytime soon,maybe 3 years after they come up with the bug free products
#27
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 1,827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is it really any surprise here that a format war is looming? I am currently pretty happy with my home theater, though I do appreciate HDTV and will embrace the technology beyond my big screen someday. As long as future HD dvd players are backwards compatible, I'll watch this battle from the sidelines by holding onto my wallet.
#29
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TylerDurden_73
Yeah me too. I see HD-DVD/Blueray being like Laserdisc, more for movie aficionado
1. There is one single universal disc format.
2. Prices of players have become affordable.
3. Players have been through enough production runs to correct initial bugs.
4. It's obvious no new important advancements to the technology are eminent (like the arrival of progressive scan DVD players in the first few years of DVD).
5. There are enough titles available that I want containing extras equaling or bettering their standard DVD counterparts. I'm not buying a bunch of bare-bones HD-DVD's when there are special edition SD-DVD's floating around (that only means the studios are deliberately withholding extras in order to boost HD-DVD sales with pre-planned double-dips - No thanks!).
#30
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 1,149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I like the Toshiba guy's contention that consumers prefer having less space on the disc. Like that's a benefit rather than a limitation.
I will select the cheapest and HD-DVD is confirmed to be more cheaper to make and with my normal TV and with HD TV or Plasma, the picture is promised to be good
HD-DVD is currently cheaper to manufacture, but that doesn't mean the hardware or the discs will be cheaper for the consumer.
I will select the cheapest and HD-DVD is confirmed to be more cheaper to make and with my normal TV and with HD TV or Plasma, the picture is promised to be good
HD-DVD is currently cheaper to manufacture, but that doesn't mean the hardware or the discs will be cheaper for the consumer.
#31
Needs to contact an admin about multiple accounts
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
just look at psp, the advertisments on tv, print and online have new releases on dvd and (umd)psp, no more dvd and video cassette, and this is with the lower than expected sales of the psp, sony's ps3 might not have the expected sales, but they will have blu-ray players out there and the movie industry will react the same way as they did with the psp (umd)format
#32
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by Qui Gon Jim
Impossible to say which is a superior forumat until you have the actual format to look at. At this point, both BR and HD are "paper-ware" (yes I know that there have been BD drives in Japan, yadda yadda but they are not the final BD-ROM spec).
I also don;t think PS3 will be the huge factor that many make it out to be. IMO, if it does clock in at $450-500 as reported. If XBox360 comes out six months ahead and is priced $150 lower than PS3, I think they can take the "crown" from Sony.
I also don;t think PS3 will be the huge factor that many make it out to be. IMO, if it does clock in at $450-500 as reported. If XBox360 comes out six months ahead and is priced $150 lower than PS3, I think they can take the "crown" from Sony.
There is no way the PS3 will be priced $150 more than the XBOX2. Sony would rather lose money on the console and make it back on licensing fees and game sales. Add the Blu-Ray marketshare issue and I think the PS3 will be priced lower than the XBOX2 or the same no way higher.
#33
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by gcribbs
There is no way the PS3 will be priced $150 more than the XBOX2. Sony would rather lose money on the console and make it back on licensing fees and game sales. Add the Blu-Ray marketshare issue and I think the PS3 will be priced lower than the XBOX2 or the same no way higher.
Other rumors abound about delays, underpowered hardware (for both units) and the omition of the BD drive from the unit to cut costs. They have already cut the wireless router function from the PS3.
I do agree though that any PS3 in people's hands increases the number of BD players. I just don't think the PS3 will be the success the PS2 was, and therefore the impact on total BD drives will be lessened.
#34
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The Archives, Indiana
Posts: 1,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by zombiezilla
I'll be doing the same thing I did when DVDs came out, and took out VHS. I'll sit on the sidelines, picking the winner long after the battle is over, and the winner has a huge stable of titles that I want/need.
However, I get the feeling that the original contender (basic DVD) will win this one....
However, I get the feeling that the original contender (basic DVD) will win this one....
#35
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: True North Strong & Free
Posts: 22,930
Received 2,118 Likes
on
1,453 Posts
Originally Posted by diespine
just look at psp, the advertisments on tv, print and online have new releases on dvd and (umd)psp, no more dvd and video cassette, and this is with the lower than expected sales of the psp, sony's ps3 might not have the expected sales, but they will have blu-ray players out there and the movie industry will react the same way as they did with the psp (umd)format
#36
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm inclined to think Blu-Ray will win out since it is the technically superior format and since most of its "issues" can be worked out eventually (whereas HD-DVD's limitations are inherent). Then again, that was true of Beta also...
#37
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,775
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So silly of them to rush into it like this without settling the issues. HD discs won't take off the way DVD did because the vast majority of people don't have HD TV's! DVD made use of the t.v.'s that everyone had, but nobody without an HDTV is going to waste their money on a video quality they can't see. My point is they could have taken a couple more years to hash out an agreement because it'll be several more years before most people have HDTV's. If I could remotely afford an HDTV right now I'd love to have one, but that's no time soon, and I have invested way too much money and time into my DVD collection to think about switching to a new format. Anyway, didn't I blow your mind this time? Didn't I?
So, I'm with you all that are sitting this one out and laughing.
So, I'm with you all that are sitting this one out and laughing.
#38
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by lamphorn
If I could remotely afford an HDTV right now I'd love to have one, but that's no time soon
#39
DVD Talk Limited Edition
I honestly don't understand why the hardware manufacturers can't just standardize on a universal player that can play back both HD-DVD and Blu-Ray, in addition to standard DVD. That'll make a format war completely moot. Because the Film Studios can release their movies in either standard DVD, Blu-Ray, or HD-DVD, and consumers can buy any movie and be confident that their disc players can play the title back. The discs are all the same diameter, and the thickness issue can be dealt with too, so universal hardware shouldn't be much of a technical challenge.
It's a win-win situation with universal players as the only standard, while a format war with incompatible players and discs is lose-lose all around.
It's a win-win situation with universal players as the only standard, while a format war with incompatible players and discs is lose-lose all around.
Last edited by dhmac; 08-27-05 at 09:10 AM.
#40
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by dhmac
I honestly don't understand why the hardware manufacturers can't just standardize on a universal player that can play back both HD-DVD and Blu-Ray, in addition to standard DVD.
Originally Posted by dhmac
That'll make a format war completely moot. Because the Film Studios can release their movies in either standard DVD, Blu-Ray, or HD-DVD, and consumers can buy any movie and be confident that their disc players can play the title back. The discs are all the same diameter, and the thickness issue can be dealt with too, so universal hardware shouldn't be much of a technical challenge.
It's a win-win situation with universal players as the only standard, while a format war with incompatible players and discs is lose-lose all around.
It's a win-win situation with universal players as the only standard, while a format war with incompatible players and discs is lose-lose all around.
"Why should there be two formats?"
#41
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Originally Posted by cultshock
I'm thinking about that too. Most people will be sitting out during the format war, but many will technically side with Blu-ray by buying a PS3. Sure, they will be buying it for gaming, but at the same time, Sony will end up having a "trojan horse" installed base of Blu-Ray players. Movies on UMD were considered a secondary thing for PSP, but they have been selling considerably better than the studios expected, and look at how many titles are coming out in that format now (with more studios hopping on board). The same thing could very well happen with PS3. If the Xbox 360 included HD-DVD, it would be trickier to predict, but it won't. So with the looming format war, consumer confusion and/or reluctance to possibly choose the "losing" format, and the PS3 coming, I think that Sony just might win by default (but "win" is a relative term, because I also believe that standard DVDs will continue to predominate for a long time still).
But, I will not buy another Game Box without HD "DVD" built in. So, it looks like PS3 will be my next Game Box/DVD Player.
I already have an HDTV with a DVI, waiting for HD "DVD" to be released.
#42
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by sracer
You really don't understand? It's pretty simple. It's about licensing fees (of the technology) and corporate bragging rights. Why do you think that neither side has caved in and simply accepted the other format?
Your "solution" fails to answer a very basic question....
"Why should there be two formats?"
Your "solution" fails to answer a very basic question....
"Why should there be two formats?"
That being said, I'm also glad that two formats have been fighting it out behind the scenes for the last 2-3 years. Thankfully both sides have improved many things because of this competition. (added Blue Laser/Lossless Audio/Better Codecs/More Storage Space, ect ....)
#43
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm sure it will only be a few years before dual-format players hit the market. I don't know about a lot of the big boys since they're committed to a particular format and have a lot vested in that, but I bet you'll start to see both high-end machines from some of the smaller videophile tech companies and low-end ones like Apex. That's exactly what happened with SACD and DVD-A.
#44
Banned
I am just going to stick with good 'ol DVD's. Because 15-20 years down the road, something better will come down the road then HD-DVD, and Blu-Ray. I think DVD is great quality and will still be around in 20-30 years. Cheap too!
#45
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Originally Posted by sracer
You really don't understand? It's pretty simple. It's about licensing fees (of the technology) and corporate bragging rights. Why do you think that neither side has caved in and simply accepted the other format?
Your "solution" fails to answer a very basic question....
"Why should there be two formats?"
Your "solution" fails to answer a very basic question....
"Why should there be two formats?"
So instead of letting this play out as a format war in which both sides possibly lose, why not resolve it on the hardware side and set guidelines for all players to play back both HD formats.
This is a universal-format solution that already works for DVD-Audio and SACD, DVD+R and DVD-R. But both took years for universal players to show up, which definitely hurt DVD-Audio and SACD in the market. So, instead, if universal HD players were defined as the standard before these hit the market, then a format war would not be a real issue and the growth of the market won't be stunted right out-of-the-gate.
#46
Retired
Originally Posted by Qui Gon Jim
That is not what "insiders" are saying. Word is that they will be losing money at $450.
Originally Posted by Qui Gon Jim
Discounting the Sony faithful, most people will go "Hmm...XB $250 or PS3 $450. I can get an XB with FOUR games for the price of the PS3." What would you choose?
Sony has a huge legion of playstation faithful. And to less serioius gamers playstation=video games. When I was little you'd here kids say "lets go play Nintendo." Now they say "lets go play playstation."
Originally Posted by Qui Gon Jim
I just don't think the PS3 will be the success the PS2 was, and therefore the impact on total BD drives will be lessened.
Atari let the market get flooded with worthless games and Nintendo took over. Nintendo ruled for more than a decade, then they broke a partnership with sony for a CD add on for the SNES and then decided to make the N64 a cart system. Those opened the door for the playstation and the rest is history.
As long as Sony does nothing stupid (meaning they launch within 6 months to a year of the 360 and launch at $399 or below) the PS3 will be just a successful as the PS2 if not moreso.
#47
DVD Talk Legend
Originally Posted by tofferman
Is it really any surprise here that a format war is looming? I am currently pretty happy with my home theater, though I do appreciate HDTV and will embrace the technology beyond my big screen someday. As long as future HD dvd players are backwards compatible, I'll watch this battle from the sidelines by holding onto my wallet.
#48
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 9,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There might be a vocal minority on this board (and a majority on the more home theater forums) but I really don't think the majority of the American public will shell out big bucks for Blue Ray or HD players. Most of them can't take advantage of it with their current TVs and will balk at spending hundreds of dollars for players where DVD players are like $50.
Maybe in about 5 years, this new format will gain traction, but until then, the public will most likely ignore it.
So invest in these new technologies at your own peril.
Maybe in about 5 years, this new format will gain traction, but until then, the public will most likely ignore it.
So invest in these new technologies at your own peril.
#49
Retired
Originally Posted by chanster
Maybe in about 5 years, this new format will gain traction, but until then, the public will most likely ignore it.
For Joe Six Pack DVDs will look fine even down the road when he finally gets an HD-DVD. He will thus still be unlikely to spend money on an new HD format DVD player and think about rebuying movies etc.
I see the new format being nothing like a marinally more successful Laserdisc being successful only among home theater buffs and movie afficionados.