Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > DVD Discussions > DVD Talk
Reload this Page >

SAW - Unrated?

Community
Search
DVD Talk Talk about DVDs and Movies on DVD including Covers and Cases

SAW - Unrated?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-21-05, 12:47 PM
  #1  
DVD Talk Special Edition
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 1,144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SAW - Unrated?

Hey all,

I love trying to search for 3-word titles.... I swear that I saw a SAW DVD that had 'unrated' advertised on it -- now, isnt' the current release rated R? Is there another edition coming out?

Thanks,

Matt
Old 04-21-05, 12:53 PM
  #2  
Moderator
 
Giles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 33,630
Received 17 Likes on 13 Posts
I haven't seen Lion's Gate Home video double dip on it's horror/genre flicks, so I wouldn't get my hopes high on this (of course I could be wrong). The current US region 1 dvd edition is the cut R-rated cut of the film. For the record the import DVD's from Japan, UK (and possibly the Hong Kong) use the uncut unrated print of the film.
Old 04-21-05, 01:10 PM
  #3  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
buckee1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Minding the precious things in the Local Shop
Posts: 4,106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have both the Unrated R2 and the Rated "R" R1 discs. I'd advise you to save your money. The differences between the versions are so miniscule it hardly bears a second viewing, much less a double dip IMHO.
Old 04-21-05, 01:44 PM
  #4  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Philly
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by buckee1
I have both the Unrated R2 and the Rated "R" R1 discs. I'd advise you to save your money. The differences between the versions are so miniscule it hardly bears a second viewing, much less a double dip IMHO.
Strongly agreed...i had the UK disc and sold it b/c the differences were barely noticeable. And that i felt the R1 disc had much better sound and pic quality.
Old 04-22-05, 08:34 AM
  #5  
MrE
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,967
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
According to dvdcompare.net, the running length difference is 8 seconds.
Old 04-22-05, 09:56 AM
  #6  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Mr. Cinema's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 18,044
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I wonder if they can actually withstand trying to cash in like other studios and release an "unrated" version to coincide with the sequel.

Nah.....
Old 04-22-05, 11:27 AM
  #7  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 5,069
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have both versions and you would never notice the 8 seconds difference if you didnt know what to look for. I wouldnt double dip unless it has a ton of extras.
Old 04-22-05, 12:04 PM
  #8  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,937
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would double dip.

...but I wouldn't do it now until it get re-released in HD or Blue Ray (Whatever).

Right now it has decent tranfer and DTS so there is no reason to double dip right now.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.