Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > DVD Discussions > DVD Talk
Reload this Page >

Do you think we'll ever get a S.E. of Darkman

Community
Search
DVD Talk Talk about DVDs and Movies on DVD including Covers and Cases

Do you think we'll ever get a S.E. of Darkman

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-05-05 | 03:26 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 7,422
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: San Leandro/San Francisco
Do you think we'll ever get a S.E. of Darkman

I was watching this the other night and I love the movie. Has anyone heard if Universal plans on a re-release of this title? It really cries out for one.
Old 04-05-05 | 03:47 PM
  #2  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 12,306
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I doubt it...at least in the near future. It seems to me the perfect time to release this would have been when Spidey 2 was hitting theaters. Build the hype, and all that. The other reason I don't see this one coming down the pipeline is that Universal did not select the series for a franchise collection. Darkman 3 was released just months ago for the first time. I had hoped they would release a franchise collection with some special features for the first film. It could happen, but I think we will have to wait for spidey 3.
Old 04-05-05 | 03:48 PM
  #3  
Needs to contact an admin about multiple accounts
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Las Vegas, NV
I've said it before, and I will say it again: The fact that DARKMAN still hasn't been rereleased is amazing.

Universal has had plenty of opportunites to revisit this title for maximum exposure.
Old 04-05-05 | 03:53 PM
  #4  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,019
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: So. Illinois
Cameron, I'm curious. Why do you say that Universal would have revisited Darkman during the Spidey 2 hype? How are those tied together? No offense meant whatsoever, I'm just curious as to your reasoning.
Old 04-05-05 | 04:07 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Mike Lowrey
Cameron, I'm curious. Why do you say that Universal would have revisited Darkman during the Spidey 2 hype? How are those tied together? No offense meant whatsoever, I'm just curious as to your reasoning.
Sam Raimi directed both movies.
Old 04-05-05 | 04:10 PM
  #6  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 3,208
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Boston
never say never... but i doubt it.
Old 04-05-05 | 04:25 PM
  #7  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,390
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: San Francisco
I'd kill for a "Take the F'cukin Elephant" Special Edition
Old 04-05-05 | 04:46 PM
  #8  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: East Coast
picked this up at bestbuy for $5.99 the other week. anamorphic to boot, not bad until a new version someday.
Old 04-05-05 | 05:29 PM
  #9  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 1,886
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Up State NY
I've been holding out on this forever. I figured when both Spidy 1 and 2 came out they would release it. With my luke I would buy it tomorrow then they would announce a SE the next day
Old 04-05-05 | 05:31 PM
  #10  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,019
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: So. Illinois
Originally Posted by fallfan
Sam Raimi directed both movies.
Oh OK. [J. Carson]I did not know that[/J. Carson]
Old 04-05-05 | 05:31 PM
  #11  
TylerDurden_73's Avatar
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,393
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Rochester, N.Y.
I would also like to see Universal revisit this title.
Old 04-05-05 | 05:34 PM
  #12  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 41,591
Received 1,807 Likes on 1,294 Posts
From: Kansas City, MO
Yes, put me down for an SE
Old 04-05-05 | 06:12 PM
  #13  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 12,306
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by fallfan
Sam Raimi directed both movies.
and it was also a marvel comic...though the comic was created after the movie



And Mike, thanks for asking questions instead of jumping the gun. It is refreshing, and look what you can learn.
Old 04-05-05 | 11:33 PM
  #14  
UAIOE's Avatar
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,598
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: LV-426
I'm suprised that Universal didnt cash in on this either....either from Sam Raimi & Spider-Man or with Arnold Vosloo(sp?) and the Mummy movies.

Darkman one is great because its got all the Raimi trademark camera shots/angles as well as the Oldsmobile and Bruce Campbell.
Old 04-06-05 | 04:00 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 985
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: The Other Side
I'd like a SE of Darkman as well. I still prefer it to the CGI-orgies that are the Spider-Man films. Liam Neeson did a great performance here. The "wild takes" of him wigging out are classic Raimi. I think this has more personality than the Spider-Mans.
Old 04-06-05 | 05:11 AM
  #16  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Cameron
and it was also a marvel comic...though the comic was created after the movie



And Mike, thanks for asking questions instead of jumping the gun. It is refreshing, and look what you can learn.
Marvel always made comic book mini-series adaptations of whatever blockbuster was out. Darkman getting one doesn't really mean anything.
Old 04-06-05 | 07:21 AM
  #17  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 42,143
Received 1,447 Likes on 1,123 Posts
Put me down for an SE of this as well. Hopefully Universal will get off their butts.
Old 04-06-05 | 07:32 AM
  #18  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 12,306
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Spamcola
Marvel always made comic book mini-series adaptations of whatever blockbuster was out. Darkman getting one doesn't really mean anything.
I'd hardly call Darkman a blockbuster...plus just offering this as a small bit of knowledge. Spidey is right on the cover of the magazine....and it is marvel comics....i think that falls under the answer for what does Darkman have to do with Spidey.
Old 04-06-05 | 08:54 AM
  #19  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Spidey's head is covering the spot where the UPC would usually go. I see the logic you're using but it just doesn't apply to this situation. Darkman has nothing to do with Spiderman.

In retrospect I really do wish Darkman was a Marvel superhero or at the very least had an on-going comic. Star Wars, Transformers, GiJoe...hell even Robocop had ongoing comics from Marvel.
Old 04-06-05 | 12:44 PM
  #20  
UAIOE's Avatar
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,598
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: LV-426
Wasn't Darkman created by Sam Raimi? I thought i read somewhere that he made up his own superhero because he couldnt get the rights to do another (The Shadow i believe).
Old 04-06-05 | 01:36 PM
  #21  
speedy1961's Avatar
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 9,380
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: In a small pocket universe hoping to someday become a Moderator Emeritus at DVDTalk.com!
Originally Posted by UAIOE
Wasn't Darkman created by Sam Raimi? I thought i read somewhere that he made up his own superhero because he couldnt get the rights to do another (The Shadow i believe).
Ding Ding!

You are CORRECT SIR!

From IMDB.com:
Director Sam Raimi originally wanted to base this movie on "The Shadow" and had to create the character of "Darkman" when he couldn't obtain the rights.
Old 04-06-05 | 01:38 PM
  #22  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 42,143
Received 1,447 Likes on 1,123 Posts
That is correct, UAIOE. He wanted to do The Shadow, went to Universal who held the rights but they gave the project to Russel Mulcahey.
Old 04-06-05 | 01:40 PM
  #23  
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Sand Point
Originally Posted by UAIOE
Darkman one is great because its got all the Raimi trademark camera shots/angles as well as the Oldsmobile and Bruce Campbell.
Bruce Campbell was SUPPOSED TO BE Darkman, but Universal wanted a bigger name, which is odd since at that time Liam Neeson was just that Dead Pool/Next of Kin/Krull guy.
Old 04-06-05 | 03:00 PM
  #24  
Needs to contact an admin about multiple accounts
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Las Vegas, NV
Originally Posted by Legolas
Bruce Campbell was SUPPOSED TO BE Darkman, but Universal wanted a bigger name, which is odd since at that time Liam Neeson was just that Dead Pool/Next of Kin/Krull guy.

You forgot GOOD MOTHER, SUSPECT, and THE MISSION.

Neeson was on his way up. Campbell (and I mean this sweetly) was a Hollywood nobody at the time.
Old 04-06-05 | 07:23 PM
  #25  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 12,306
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Spamcola
Spidey's head is covering the spot where the UPC would usually go. I see the logic you're using but it just doesn't apply to this situation. Darkman has nothing to do with Spiderman.
No my point is...that Raimi created Darkman, and directed Spiderman...they both have marvel comics, and those are the two things that bind them together. Although be it trivial. Doing a Marvel comic deal with Darkman, introduced Raimi to people at Marvel comics...the rest is history.


Originally Posted by Legolas
Bruce Campbell was SUPPOSED TO BE Darkman, but Universal wanted a bigger name, which is odd since at that time Liam Neeson was just that Dead Pool/Next of Kin/Krull guy.
Bruce does play Darkman...check out the end of the first movie


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.