![]() |
Apple does not invent technology. Its successes have been taking relatively new devices and technologies and packaging them in a stylish, easy-to-use way that's marketable in simple language and concepts.
Sometimes they are wildly successful at this, and sometimes they're not. The iPod was more wildly successful than anybody could have predicted, but there was nothing really new there. Apple adopting blu-ray by itself signifies little. After all, Apple put DVD-RAM drives in a series of desktops a few years ago, and look what that did for the format (nothing). We haven't seen how Apple intends to integrate High-Definition video into the Mac platform, or if they plan to introduce some new home/portable product line that will leverage blu-ray technology into the public eye. If all they do is stick blu-ray readers into next year's Mac desktops, we can all yawn. If we see some whole new Apple product concept ("iDef"?) based on blu-ray -- and who knows exactly what it might be? -- then there's the potential for Apple to be a huge player in the market and locking the gate on HD-DVD. But not if it's just putting BR drives in their desktops because they got a good price from Sony. RichC |
Originally Posted by rdclark
Apple does not invent technology. Its successes have been taking relatively new devices and technologies and packaging them in a stylish, easy-to-use way that's marketable in simple language and concepts.
Sometimes they are wildly successful at this, and sometimes they're not. The iPod was more wildly successful than anybody could have predicted, but there was nothing really new there. Apple adopting blu-ray by itself signifies little. After all, Apple put DVD-RAM drives in a series of desktops a few years ago, and look what that did for the format (nothing). We haven't seen how Apple intends to integrate High-Definition video into the Mac platform, or if they plan to introduce some new home/portable product line that will leverage blu-ray technology into the public eye. If all they do is stick blu-ray readers into next year's Mac desktops, we can all yawn. If we see some whole new Apple product concept ("iDef"?) based on blu-ray -- and who knows exactly what it might be? -- then there's the potential for Apple to be a huge player in the market and locking the gate on HD-DVD. But not if it's just putting BR drives in their desktops because they got a good price from Sony. RichC In reference to the DVD-RAM statement - I was an IT guy and we had some. Nobody knew what to do with them and media was expensive. We toyed with them for backup purposes, but they were ahead of their time - we found the server to be better for our backup needs and eventually just forgot about them. A multimedia box (iDef sounded like a good name) would be nice. There have been rumors for years about a set-top box project but nothing ever comes of it. Sony and Apple should team up and make one. It could, like you said, give BR the push it needs to win. Apple has been pushing towards lifestyle items and this would fall in that category. |
Originally Posted by chemosh6969
and you can thank Zerox for GUI interfaces.
I'd say that PDAs were something that would eventually come around whether or not Apple did it first. Anyway, Apple 85% of the time has some great ideas on how to use different technologies, so I will be watching. |
Originally Posted by speedyray
A multimedia box (iDef sounded like a good name) would be nice. There have been rumors for years about a set-top box project but nothing ever comes of it. Sony and Apple should team up and make one. It could, like you said, give BR the push it needs to win. Apple has been pushing towards lifestyle items and this would fall in that category.
|
The wrinkle here is that the studios and networks don't want you to be able to time shift, nevermind record your shows. They want you to watch as they air, commercials and all, and then buy when it is released.
|
exactly. Apple is not a part of Hollywood, per se. Nevermind pixar.
Apple will take the technology and do what they want with it. Look at them right now, iMovie, iDVD, Final Cut Pro, iTunes, and the iPod. They will build software around the technology, studios be damned. |
Originally Posted by speedyray
Yes, but would you like to argue that iTunes Music Store and iPod are not key and integral parts of mp3 revelotion. Being first is not always the most important thing.
|
One possibility -- which would hinge on blank media getting real cheap real fast -- is Apple getting into HD camcorders using the mini-BR disc that Sony is developing. (Sony BR camcorders have already been announced.)
A small, slick "iCam" that could record a couple of hours of HD or half a day's worth of SD video, plus function as a webcam and a multimedia source, combined with "iMovieHD," could conceivably define yet another new market. Thinking out loud... RichC |
Originally Posted by hogfat
What is your definition of "the mp3 revolution"? Only if it is wholly defined as the online sale of music does the iPod become integral.
The reason this matters is that nearly all of these players are owned by people who were new to portable music formats before they got an iPod. Yes, Apple *also* changed the face of music retailing with iTunes, but if there was an "MP3 revolution" it was turning a niche format that was mostly the realm of geeks and techies into a booming market, and then owning that market. I'm not a fan of the iPod and don't own one, but you have to give credit where it's due. Apple did for MP3 players what Bose did for expensive table radios: created a huge and lucrative market that hadn't previously existed. RichC |
I'm sorry, but Napster and Kazaa did more to spread awareness and use of mp3 files for music than the iPod. And predated the Apple product to boot.
|
Originally Posted by rdclark
you have to give credit where it's due. Apple did for MP3 players what Bose did for expensive table radios: created a huge and lucrative market that hadn't previously existed.
Originally Posted by hogfat
I'm sorry, but Napster and Kazaa did more to spread awareness and use of mp3 files for music than the iPod. And predated the Apple product to boot.
|
Originally Posted by rdclark
I disagree. Apple sells more MP3 players than everybody else combined, and has been doing so for three years. Something like half of all the player sin use are iPods.
The reason this matters is that nearly all of these players are owned by people who were new to portable music formats before they got an iPod. Yes, Apple *also* changed the face of music retailing with iTunes, but if there was an "MP3 revolution" it was turning a niche format that was mostly the realm of geeks and techies into a booming market, and then owning that market. I'm not a fan of the iPod and don't own one, but you have to give credit where it's due. Apple did for MP3 players what Bose did for expensive table radios: created a huge and lucrative market that hadn't previously existed. RichC Some common questions are: 'So where do I plug in my hi-fi so I can record music to it?' 'MP3?? But I don't have an internet connection.' 'So what does this thing actually do?' Seriously, to make people want to buy something (and come to buy in droves)they know nothing about is quite an achievement, and probably borderline mass mind control. Ok, that last one was sarcasm. But people who come to our store and ask for an MP3 player want something different from the guy who asks for an iPod. They've created the perception of something that totally stands out from the rest of the market. I too am not very keen on the whole Apple Assimilation Bandwagon, and don't own one and never will, but damned if Apple didn't strike a goldmine and make the most owned and talked about gadget in the last decade. |
Originally Posted by Michael Corvin
Maybe for the 12-25 crowd. the iPod brought it to the rest of the world. Bill Wyman (the Rolling Stones) was just on Bob & Tom talking about converting his cd collection for his iPod. Do you really think someone in his age group could have given a damn about MP3's before the iPod? I doubt it.
|
^ One person does not make a demographic.
Originally Posted by fmian
I too am not very keen on the whole Apple Assimilation Bandwagon, and don't own one and never will, but damned if Apple didn't strike a goldmine and make the most owned and talked about gadget in the last decade.
But back on topic. Despite a small market share, what Apple does, generally is watched by the entire PC world. They are considered innovators and are quickly "ripped off" by the mass market PC world. Just look at that iPod shuffle wannabe(hell, all the iPod wannabes). Look at how laptops from PC makers DRASTICALLY changed once the Titanium came out. Whether one wants to believe it or not, having Apple on your side is a good thing in this format war. |
Originally Posted by Michael Corvin
I don't get all the backlash for the iPod. Apple makes a high quality product everyone wants to own, and it is a bandwagon?
How about that 95% bandwagon that Bill Gates created for himself with a half assed OS? That is something I will never understand. But back on topic. Despite a small market share, what Apple does, generally is watched by the entire PC world. They are considered innovators and are quickly "ripped off" by the mass market PC world. Just look at that iPod shuffle wannabe(hell, all the iPod wannabes). Look at how laptops from PC makers DRASTICALLY changed once the Titanium came out. Whether one wants to believe it or not, having Apple on your side is a good thing in this format war. Apples recent success has been down to it's design and marketing. Not because of new ideas or technologies. Also, check out this link to an amusing forum thread about another new Apple product that has been rumoured. |
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:55 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.