Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > DVD Discussions > DVD Talk
Reload this Page >

One & Only Thread About Star Wars Trilogy Picture Quality (merged)

Community
Search
DVD Talk Talk about DVDs and Movies on DVD including Covers and Cases

One & Only Thread About Star Wars Trilogy Picture Quality (merged)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-19-04 | 04:20 AM
  #76  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,809
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Carrollton, Ga
We'll see more revisions and alterations esp. when the HD-DVD versions come out.
I don't think we'll see anymore changes other than fixing some things that still need to be fixed, as well as further cleaning up of some effects. After all, there weren't nearly as many big changes on this DVD as many predicted and expected. Other than adding Naboo in the celebration shot, insertin McDiarmid into ESB, and inserting Hayden at the end of ROTJ, most of the changes are very small, with most of them being cleanups of existing effects. The way websites were reporting things, you would have expect Lucas would have made numerous significant changes.

I think these versions are pretty much it. Like I said, there may be some small things redone and more cleanup. But I don't think we're going to get anything any different than these.
Old 09-19-04 | 08:47 AM
  #77  
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Miami Florida
Originally posted by mjlukich
Yeah, my set seems kinda dark too. This must be a trend, because I noticed the same thing on my Van Helsing, Troy, and Shaun Of The Dead DVDs.
i noticed the same thing too on my Shaun DVD
Old 09-19-04 | 12:19 PM
  #78  
Suspended
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: You have moved into a dark place. It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
Remember, when Lowry scanned these they did 4K scans, which is much higher resolution than HD-TV. So expect that they'll use the same cleaned-up versions for several media to come.

They could always continue to fix/change things digitally, though.

And we know of course that the originals are out there, since Lowry worked from the original negatives (and some of the cleaned up non-SE footage appears ever so mockingly in Burns's doc, too).
Old 09-19-04 | 01:31 PM
  #79  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,990
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Surrounded by idiots...
Two quick points from me:

1. I think there will definitely be more changes to come in the next releases, and I welcome them.

2. From the screenshots posted, I think people are a bit too nit-picky here. Maybe my eyes are bad, but if those are actually "good" examples, I barely see a difference.
Old 09-19-04 | 02:01 PM
  #80  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,019
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: So. Illinois
Originally posted by jough
Remember, when Lowry scanned these they did 4K scans, which is much higher resolution than HD-TV.
I'm not so sure of that. I thought that too, but it seems like I read somewhere where they only did 1080 scans for these. I may be wrong, but I found an on-line article about it somewhere that said 1080 and I was shocked that it wasn't the regular 4K deal.
Old 09-20-04 | 03:36 PM
  #81  
Suspended
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: You have moved into a dark place. It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
Well, at the press day event Lowry said they did 4K scans, but I'll see if I can dig up anything definitive.

If they only did 1080(p?) scans then they're still set for HD-DVD, but they'll have to revisit them again if they want to keep up with the emerging technology.

I mean, how long will HD-DVD be "high" definition anymore? My computer monitor has higher resolution than HD-TV.

Hell, my digital still camera is higher res. It's just a matter of storage capacity for digital video cameras to increase to the point where 11mp video is the norm.
Old 09-20-04 | 03:54 PM
  #82  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,809
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Carrollton, Ga
Remember, when Lowry scanned these they did 4K scans, which is much higher resolution than HD-TV.
Actually, I believe Lowry stated they did these at 2k, not 4k. At this point it doesn't matter, because there's nothing on the horizon beyond HD-DVD, at least not yet. Even so, these movies were shot on film. So even if there is a future display technology that surpasses the resolution of film, they will still be limited to that resolution. You're always limited by the lowest resolution, be it display capabilities or source resolution.
Old 09-21-04 | 12:37 AM
  #83  
Suspended
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: You have moved into a dark place. It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
Yes, but so far we have no home video technology that even comes CLOSE to the resolution of film, let alone a large format film like IMAX.

But we will, in time.

HD-DVD will be semi-obsolete when it comes to market. We'll already be looking ahead for the next big thing.
Old 09-21-04 | 12:34 PM
  #84  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Oklahoma
Lowry did NOT work from the original negatives of the theatrical versions. They worked from the original negatives of the Special Editions.
Old 09-21-04 | 12:46 PM
  #85  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 666
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Death Star
Originally posted by Admiral7
Lowry did NOT work from the original negatives of the theatrical versions. They worked from the original negatives of the Special Editions.
Correct.. YCM Laboratories were the ones who handled the original negatives and made the SE ones in 1997.
Old 09-21-04 | 01:44 PM
  #86  
Suspended
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 4,533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: You have moved into a dark place. It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
So Lowry only cleaned up the post-sfx work, then?
Old 09-21-04 | 07:41 PM
  #87  
Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Another Star Wars DVD question

Just finished watching "A New Hope" and I see some mastering issues. Right after Ben gets killed by Vader and the Falcon is speeding away from the death star there is a battle with some tie fighters. Two of those tie fighters have very distinct matt boxes around them...they almost look worse than I remember them on LD and VHS. I thought they spent millions cleaning these up, how did something so basic slip by. I'm watching on a Panny 42" Plasma and a Toshiba 4700. Anybody else see what I'm talking about or is it just me?
Old 09-21-04 | 07:50 PM
  #88  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,656
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
From: Los Angeles
No, they kept a lot of the matte boxes in the film, and are mostly noticable in the space scenes. These films were never technically perfect to begin with, and will probably never be perfect. Just something to get comfortable with.
Old 09-21-04 | 08:11 PM
  #89  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,990
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Surrounded by idiots...
Yep, and as I answered in some other thread here or in Movie Talk, it gets noticeably better throughout the OT to the point that they disappear completely.
Old 09-21-04 | 08:14 PM
  #90  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 10,521
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Lower Beaver, Iowa
Maybe it was for the same reason Lucasfilm says the music is reversed in the surround channels: It was a deliberate artistic choice. Because, you know, they would never put out a less-than-perfect product after all these years.
Old 09-21-04 | 08:17 PM
  #91  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,990
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Surrounded by idiots...
Yeah, I almost noticed that.

No product is perfect; no one claims this one is.
Old 09-21-04 | 09:04 PM
  #92  
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Plano, TX
Yeah, it was more noticeable than in the VHS version. Maybe because the quality is so much better? The mattes looked cleaned up during the battle on the Death Star though -- well the remaining shots that weren't redone with CG.
Old 09-21-04 | 11:39 PM
  #93  
lordzeppelin's Avatar
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,946
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Pittsburgh, PA GO PENS!
Well, since this thread has digressed into the same old same old...

Let's get back on track. I'm utterly impressed with the transfers on these. They look absolutely brilliant on my setup (Sony KP57WS500 and a Panny CP-72S player, all freshly tuned up with the S&V disc). I don't get how people think they are too dark - I think they're dead on. I've always thought the VHS was too bright. In fact, I swear I read somewhere that VHS tapes in general were generally brighter because the darker they were the more they could show the flaws in the format with regards to picture quality degredation.

There's still quite a few effects that needed "cleaned up" but it's only because I was really looking for a few of them (damn this thread....heheh), such as the outline around the tie fighters in the end of ANH.
Old 09-22-04 | 12:30 AM
  #94  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: CA
Not sure if this is considered "Picture Quality," but in A New Hope, the scene where they escape the Death Star in the Falcon, and R2 puts out the fire with his extinguisher, I noticed that right before he puts out the fire, there are a few white flashes. Were those flashes always there, because I don't remember them from before. They actually seem out of place. The only thing I could think of was that they were flashes from the laser fire. Are these flashes present in everybody else's copies?

The scene in question occurs at approximately 1:35:05-1:35:06
Old 09-22-04 | 12:52 AM
  #95  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,831
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
The only thing I saw is a blue hazy tinge after the Death Star blows up in ANH.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.