View Poll Results: How many are converting to Thinpak?
Have converted everything possible to Thinpak.



4
7.02%
Am slowly converting to Thinpak.



7
12.28%
Thinking about converting to Thinpak.



15
26.32%
Think it's a stupid idea.



31
54.39%
Voters: 57. You may not vote on this poll
How many people are converting their collection to Thinpaks?
#26
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: How many people are converting their collection to Thinpaks?
Ok, just ran into a hitch on one of my conversions. Need a little advice.
I had forgotten that one of my 2-disc sets was a store exclusive with a 3rd Disc in a paper sleeve inside. Would it be a good idea to slide said 3rd disc in between the other two in the slim case (keeping it in the paper sleeve mind you)? It doesn't seem like it would add much bulk to it. Come to think of it, would that maybe work for 3-disc sets in general, or am I about to commit a big 'no no'?
I had forgotten that one of my 2-disc sets was a store exclusive with a 3rd Disc in a paper sleeve inside. Would it be a good idea to slide said 3rd disc in between the other two in the slim case (keeping it in the paper sleeve mind you)? It doesn't seem like it would add much bulk to it. Come to think of it, would that maybe work for 3-disc sets in general, or am I about to commit a big 'no no'?
#27
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Re: How many people are converting their collection to Thinpaks?
ZT_Styles: Yeah, it's your collection so ultimately you have to decide what you want to do. There are some items which just cannot be converted to Thinpaks because all of the inserts just won't fit into a 7 mm case. Some of the old style 4 disc cases can, however, be converted to standard size (14 mm) cases. Personally I was quite happy to get those old style cases converted to standard size cases. The vast majority of my collection has now been converted - as follows:
converted to 7 mm cases = 342
converted to standard size cases (14 mm) = 28
not yet converted = 139 (TV sets, items for which no cover-art is available, stuff which I just plain don't want to convert, etc.)
danwiz
converted to 7 mm cases = 342
converted to standard size cases (14 mm) = 28
not yet converted = 139 (TV sets, items for which no cover-art is available, stuff which I just plain don't want to convert, etc.)
danwiz
#28
DVD Talk Godfather
Re: How many people are converting their collection to Thinpaks?
Not a fan of thinpaks at all, so I'd never do it. I can see why some folks would be inclined to based on storage space though.
#29
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Miami, Florida
Re: How many people are converting their collection to Thinpaks?
I'm about half way into my conversion, and I'm loving it. I just ordered another 500 thinpaks, and that should be more than enough to finish. Now, what to do with all that space?
Quick question... Is there a huge difference using 5mm cases?
Quick question... Is there a huge difference using 5mm cases?
#30
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: How many people are converting their collection to Thinpaks?
As for the 5mm cases, I dont know as I only use the standard (7mm i think) thinpak cases.
What did you do with you old cases?
Last edited by jjcool; 08-02-09 at 12:36 PM.
#31
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Re: How many people are converting their collection to Thinpaks?
Do you find it hard finding covers for everything you have though? I assume you keep your booklets as well too?
#33
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Re: How many people are converting their collection to Thinpaks?
The Thinpak CoverArt on R1db.com is designed for the 7 mm ThinPak cases. In addition, I believe that the 7 mm cases are just enough larger than the 5 mm size so that the titles are still easy to read. In addition, most inserts will still fit inside of the 7 mm cases, this is not the case with the 5 mm cases.
#34
Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: How many people are converting their collection to Thinpaks?
I've converted a good chunk of my movies and TV shows to thinpak cases, and I have since moved on to the real monster shelf eater of my DVD collection... my wrestling DVDs. I've started by converting my Ring of Honor DVD Collection. I've converted pretty much every show from Jan. '06 - Current. I basically made up a template in photoshop where I gave each cover a matching spine but retaining the original art on the front and back. My goal is to convert my complete wrestling collection one promotion at a time.
#35
Member
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: How many people are converting their collection to Thinpaks?
I've been slowly doing this myself. For covers, I simply simply scan the back of the existing insert, use a single font and color for the title spine, then Google the original poster art for the front cover. I've been printing them on regular paper, which looks just fine for my purposes. Further, I picked up some decorative boxes at Target to store them in, fits roughly 36 slim cases with room on the side for insert booklets. The twofold purpose of the boxes is that it keeps the DVDs out of my two-year old's sight so she can't grab hold of them. It's time-consuming, but most of our original DVD boxes were getting banged up whenever we moved, so this way the DVDs are essentially packed and ready to go at a moment's notice if such need arises.
#36
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: How many people are converting their collection to Thinpaks?
I've converted a good chunk of my movies and TV shows to thinpak cases, and I have since moved on to the real monster shelf eater of my DVD collection... my wrestling DVDs. I've started by converting my Ring of Honor DVD Collection. I've converted pretty much every show from Jan. '06 - Current. I basically made up a template in photoshop where I gave each cover a matching spine but retaining the original art on the front and back. My goal is to convert my complete wrestling collection one promotion at a time.
#37
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Re: How many people are converting their collection to Thinpaks?
I've been slowly doing this myself. For covers, I simply simply scan the back of the existing insert, use a single font and color for the title spine, then Google the original poster art for the front cover. I've been printing them on regular paper, which looks just fine for my purposes. Further, I picked up some decorative boxes at Target to store them in, fits roughly 36 slim cases with room on the side for insert booklets. The twofold purpose of the boxes is that it keeps the DVDs out of my two-year old's sight so she can't grab hold of them. It's time-consuming, but most of our original DVD boxes were getting banged up whenever we moved, so this way the DVDs are essentially packed and ready to go at a moment's notice if such need arises.
I used to use regular paper, until someone on here suggested I try matte photo paper, and wont go back to regular paper. The matte photo paper makes it look like the real deal, and when you put the printed one behind the clear plastic of the case, you really cant tell that it is a print out.
#38
Moderator
Re: How many people are converting their collection to Thinpaks?
What did people do with their old cases and/or artwork? Are there options to expanding my carbon footprint in the landfill?
#39
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Re: How many people are converting their collection to Thinpaks?
Recycle the plastic cases - or put them up for sale - there are probably people here who would buy them. Put the old artwork out with the other recycle paper.
Yes, r1db.com costs money - do your research on their site for costs - it's pretty dang cheap! I got all of my covers for probably less than $25 or so. And, once you sign up then they periodically send you an e-mail with a discount price for 500 credits or something like that.
Yes, r1db.com costs money - do your research on their site for costs - it's pretty dang cheap! I got all of my covers for probably less than $25 or so. And, once you sign up then they periodically send you an e-mail with a discount price for 500 credits or something like that.
#40
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: TN
Re: How many people are converting their collection to Thinpaks?
I tried the thinpak route but was not happy with having to either trim, fold or print new artwork. The Discsox sleeves are also very expensive. I've started converting my DVD's to Jazzloft DVD sleeves. The artwork folds along the fold already present on the spine so that the spine can either be displayed with the front cover or back cover. No need to create a new fold, and if I want to move everything back into a 14mm case, it will go back in looking like it never left. They're still pretty expensive: $0.60 for single disc sleeves and $1 for 2 disc sleeves. I'm only doing the DVD's at this point, no blu rays and no Criterion, MOC or other boutique label stuff. They save a lot of space. It took me a long time to make the plunge and they would not send me a sample. I'm happy with the result though. They won't hold snapper art though.
http://www.jazzloft.com/p-48874-spac...d-sleeves.aspx
http://www.jazzloft.com/p-49677-doub...d-sleeves.aspx
http://www.jazzloft.com/p-48874-spac...d-sleeves.aspx
http://www.jazzloft.com/p-49677-doub...d-sleeves.aspx
#41
Challenge Guru & Comic Nerd
Re: How many people are converting their collection to Thinpaks?
I converted 1000 or so to slims but regret doing it. With my collection ever growing it just doesn't save enough space. I'm putting some into binders now.
#42
Senior Member
Re: How many people are converting their collection to Thinpaks?
I converted about 300 and also regret it. The spines are almost all unreadable. Thankfully, I only folded the art and did not cut it so I am slowly unconverting as standard boxes are becoming available. Best Buy actually took some of my converted slim cases without fuss in the recent blu-ray trade in.
What I do like is the 9mm double disk cases; they work fine, the spines are readable on the shelf and are 2/3 the size of standard. If I could find them in single disk I would probably use them.
What I do like is the 9mm double disk cases; they work fine, the spines are readable on the shelf and are 2/3 the size of standard. If I could find them in single disk I would probably use them.
#43
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Re: How many people are converting their collection to Thinpaks?
I am not at all unhappy that I converted pretty much my entire collection. I don't have to stand back 3 meters to read my spines, I am not afraid to get up to within a couple of feet and I can read them just fine. I printed all new artwork and also made some of my own.
I would never even consider going back to full size cases. hilts you say that you like the 9 mm cases - all of my thinpaks are 7 mm, so if you like 9 mm the difference between 7 and 9 mm is pretty darn small. In fact 2 mm = 0.0787402 inches, that's just a tiny bit larger than 1/16th inch!
I would never even consider going back to full size cases. hilts you say that you like the 9 mm cases - all of my thinpaks are 7 mm, so if you like 9 mm the difference between 7 and 9 mm is pretty darn small. In fact 2 mm = 0.0787402 inches, that's just a tiny bit larger than 1/16th inch!
#44
Senior Member
Re: How many people are converting their collection to Thinpaks?
I am not at all unhappy that I converted pretty much my entire collection. I don't have to stand back 3 meters to read my spines, I am not afraid to get up to within a couple of feet and I can read them just fine. I printed all new artwork and also made some of my own.
I would never even consider going back to full size cases. hilts you say that you like the 9 mm cases - all of my thinpaks are 7 mm, so if you like 9 mm the difference between 7 and 9 mm is pretty darn small. In fact 2 mm = 0.0787402 inches, that's just a tiny bit larger than 1/16th inch!
I would never even consider going back to full size cases. hilts you say that you like the 9 mm cases - all of my thinpaks are 7 mm, so if you like 9 mm the difference between 7 and 9 mm is pretty darn small. In fact 2 mm = 0.0787402 inches, that's just a tiny bit larger than 1/16th inch!
The 9mm cases have one other big difference - a square spine, versus the rounded spine of the 7mm, which greatly increases the readable space.
For the record, I am not afraid of my DVD's. I can kick their ass in, one at a time or in bunches.
#45
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Re: How many people are converting their collection to Thinpaks?
WOW! A square spine! Why the heck didn't they think of that years ago, I would like it so much better if all of my 7 mm thinpaks had square spines! Oh well! Such is life. But, thank you for the information.
LOL about your comment about not being afraid of your DVDs - so I guess that means that you are NOT afraid to get up to within a couple feet of them, eh!!
LOL about your comment about not being afraid of your DVDs - so I guess that means that you are NOT afraid to get up to within a couple feet of them, eh!!
#46
Senior Member
Re: How many people are converting their collection to Thinpaks?
WOW! A square spine! Why the heck didn't they think of that years ago, I would like it so much better if all of my 7 mm thinpaks had square spines! Oh well! Such is life. But, thank you for the information.
LOL about your comment about not being afraid of your DVDs - so I guess that means that you are NOT afraid to get up to within a couple feet of them, eh!!
LOL about your comment about not being afraid of your DVDs - so I guess that means that you are NOT afraid to get up to within a couple feet of them, eh!!
Flat. Oblong. Not round. Book-like. Oh, the heck with it.You really did put the conversion bug in me. I did the 9mm thing to my 2 disks, chucked all the fat double-amrays and converted to standard. Took my Mill Creek 4-disk envelope sets and bought some 4-disk standard-size cases to replace, you get the idea. It's just the 7mm thing that didn't work out for me and my feeble eyes.
No, I still do not like to get close to my DVDs. I'm not afraid, but they like to throw poop at me.



