Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Archives > Archives > DVD Talk Archive
Reload this Page >

LOTR-EEs vs 9/21 Star Wars DVDs

Community
Search

LOTR-EEs vs 9/21 Star Wars DVDs

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-27-04 | 06:24 AM
  #26  
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
and Lucas gave Jackson advice on LOTR...so bah!
QuiGonJosh is offline  
Old 05-27-04 | 06:41 AM
  #27  
Shagrath's Avatar
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,383
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Orlando, FL
While watching one of the ROTK extras yesterday, someone said (not sure if it was PJ or someone else) that 'These films are no longer ours, and belong to the audience', or something along those lines. I looked to my wife and said, "Damn, I wish Lucas would realize that.."

I have no problems with Lucas releasing 'his' visions of the OT, but I would really enjoy it if the unaltered versions showed up on dvd at some point. I'll buy the new one anyways, but he could get me on a double-dip, no problem.
Shagrath is offline  
Old 05-27-04 | 06:55 AM
  #28  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4,809
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Carrollton, Ga
keep telling yourself that, LOTR gave Lucas many of his ideas for SW.
Please! Kurosawa's Hidden Fortress, as well as the old Flash Gordon serials were ten times more influential to Star Wars than LOTR ever was.

This is such a stupid thread.
Agreed!
Terrell is offline  
Old 05-27-04 | 06:57 AM
  #29  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Dammit
The theatrical versions of LOTRs are readily available for anyone that wants them (whether some people skip them or not). The Star Wars movies however are NOT available in their theatrical editions. Big difference.

I'd wager that if both versions of the SW trilogy were made available, the majority of people out there would watch the SE's more than the originals simply for the higher quality. I personally don't care THAT much about it. I'd like to own the originals but I'm not one of the "Lucas raped my childhood" people. I think they should be released in their original form because they are a piece of cinematic history and should be preserved as such.
And with the close of this post, so can this thread close. I think that Dammit has concisely distilled the difference between the two, without flaming or taking cheapshots. This post reflects my opinion on this topic 100%
Qui Gon Jim is offline  
Old 05-27-04 | 07:02 AM
  #30  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Rivero
PJ makes both versions available to his fans. Lucas does not.
Agreed. Lucas SHOULD do this.

PJ improves his films with his alternate versions. Lucas does not.
This is a matter of opinion, and some could argue it. The quality of the footage is not in question here.

PJ respects his fans. Lucas rapes their inner child.
This is trash and any poster who uses these types of arguments completely invalidates their opinions, IMHO. I will assume this was sarcasm.
Qui Gon Jim is offline  
Old 05-27-04 | 07:54 AM
  #31  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,647
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: chicago
This is trash and any poster who uses these types of arguments completely invalidates their opinions, IMHO. I will assume this was sarcasm.
i kind of thought that anyone using the word Rape in a SW thread was doing so facetiously.
its an in-joke at this point (that everybody should be 'in' on).

i don't see how anyone can deny a difference in attitude between the two men though.
i saw Jackson being interviewed for an hour on Charlie Rose, and when the subject of the DVDs came up, he was pretty up front that the EEs were not something that he needed to go to the trouble of doing for himself, they were for the fans.
i don't have a problem with anyone liking Lucas and his products, but c'mon- there is a gulf of difference here between the way one views and serves his audience and the way the other does.

its a little like having a meal in a resturant where the food is really tasty, but the servers are real pricks. having to put up with that kind of attitude makes the meal a lot less pleasant than it should otherwise be.
"you can have it baked or fried, we're going to be cleaning the grill soon."
"would it be possible for you to hold off on cleaning the grill for about 10 minutes? we've heard great things about the grilled salmon here and made a special trip..."
"no, baked or fried- take it or leave it"

Last edited by ckolchak; 05-27-04 at 08:01 AM.
ckolchak is offline  
Old 05-27-04 | 08:04 AM
  #32  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 23,225
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Plano, TX
Originally posted by huh?
This is such a stupid thread.
Quoted for accuracy.
PixyJunket is offline  
Old 05-27-04 | 08:04 AM
  #33  
Admin Emeritus
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 12,842
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Texas, our Texas! All hail the mighty state!
No.
Static Cling is offline  
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.