Problem with my Elephant
Was I the only one disappointed with this movie?
While it wasn't exactly what I was expecting, I enjoyed it very much. What problems did you have?
"Was I the only one disappointed with this movie?"
While it wasn't exactly what I was expecting, I enjoyed it very much. What problems did you have?
My comments from another thread:
I really wanted to love this movie, and for the first 2/3, I thought I was going to. But I think my opinion began to change as soon as they started trying to "explain" why these boys went homicidal. Oh, of course! Violent videogames and homosexuality! Give me a break.
But the cheap cop-out explanation isn't even my biggest gripe. The last 20 minutes of this movie could have been intense as hell. If I had made this movie, I would have utilized the lethargic first half by shocking the hell out of the audience with the finale. The slow-paced drudgery should have exploded into a frenzy of out-of-nowhere violence. But that's not what happened. Instead of a chaotic mess of gunfire and panic (which I'm sure is what the real Columbine was like), we get a shootout that's just as slow paced and mundane as a character developing a roll of film earlier on.
Van Sant could have really made an emotional, moving, and shocking movie, but for some reason he didn't. He failed to take advantage of the heavy nature of the material at hand, which is a real shame.
I thought the movie was really good. It took about a day or so to really have it kind of sink in.
As far as the shooting being mundane, I'm pretty sure that's the whole point of it. To the killers, them going about doing that is as natural as a kid taking pictures, etc. Not that the shooters did this thing day to day, but you get the idea. I can understand how it could've been more intense (without resorting to Matrix styled slow motion w/techno music), but as far as the films intent goes, it realized what it aimed for. No pun intended.
Caiman hit one nail right on the head: The point was to objectively show the events in the mundane world that they occurred in. However, we can't resist that little temptation to pass judgment and make a political statement by throwing in the homosexual encounter (film would have been much better leaving that issue as unresolved innuendo as it did so much else) and blaming video games (the piano playing part was masterful, the video game denegrated the whole scene).
I understand that Van Sant wants to get back to his "indie" roots, but this was crap coming from an experienced director. I was a panel judge for a little film festival and I would equate this movie to the crap submissions that we sat through.
I understand the slow pacing and "non events" but they were drawn out periods of nothing that could have been better suited to developing the overly-stereotyped characters (which were as flat and one dimensional as 14th century Italians thought the world was).
Now, I really enjoyed the fractured timeline and how certain events led into other events, but this was sparsely done. More often than not the events did not lead anywhere.





