What's the best transfer of 'Reservoir Dogs'?
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What's the best transfer of 'Reservoir Dogs'?
This has been on my wishlist for a while. Should I go for the orginal release or the 10th Anniversary transfer.
Thanks in advance.
Thanks in advance.
#4
DVD Talk Legend
Both have their positive and negative aspects, but the original has the better transfer.
Frankly, neither one is great and they really need to triple-dip this one and do it right.
Frankly, neither one is great and they really need to triple-dip this one and do it right.
#6
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Clarkston, MI
Posts: 1,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I rented the original awhile before the new version came out, and I didn't see anything that great with it. I bought the "Mr. Pink" version, and I don't have a problem with the transfer. I haven't seen the original in stores for a while, it'd be easier to pick up the SE.
#7
DVD Talk Hero
the only "problem" with the new version is that there is less color in the new version. imo there was too much color in the original print. the orignal version is also cropped on all four sides as well. if you watch the trailer again, you can see the top of the wall in teh opening shots when you couldn't see the top in the original version. plus there's too much grain.
#8
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: GA
Posts: 1,397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Rypro 525
the only "problem" with the new version is that there is less color in the new version. imo there was too much color in the original print. the orignal version is also cropped on all four sides as well. if you watch the trailer again, you can see the top of the wall in teh opening shots when you couldn't see the top in the original version. plus there's too much grain.
the only "problem" with the new version is that there is less color in the new version. imo there was too much color in the original print. the orignal version is also cropped on all four sides as well. if you watch the trailer again, you can see the top of the wall in teh opening shots when you couldn't see the top in the original version. plus there's too much grain.
see these threads for more:
http://www.dvdtalk.com/forum/showthr...ight=reservoir
http://www.dvdtalk.com/forum/showthr...ight=reservoir
http://www.dvdtalk.com/forum/showthr...ight=reservoir
and most importantly, pay attention to this link to see the color differences... though the original is a bit cropped, the SE has too many other issues to be the only version that I would own if I could help it.
#10
DVD Talk Legend
There's nothing wrong with film grain. It's part of what makes film film.
The 10th anniversary edition has horrendously poor black levels --- blacks were actually a washed-out gray --- and there are several missing lines of dialog as well.
The original pressing is much better.
The 10th anniversary edition has horrendously poor black levels --- blacks were actually a washed-out gray --- and there are several missing lines of dialog as well.
The original pressing is much better.
#12
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for all the help. I managed to find a copy of the original version which will do me for now. It pains me not to get the extras, but it is the film that is most important for me.
#13
DVD Talk Hero
Originally posted by Azrael23
Thanks for all the help. I managed to find a copy of the original version which will do me for now. It pains me not to get the extras, but it is the film that is most important for me.
Thanks for all the help. I managed to find a copy of the original version which will do me for now. It pains me not to get the extras, but it is the film that is most important for me.
#14
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: You have moved into a dark place. It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
Posts: 4,533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The original was over-saturated, resulting in a loss of fine detail. It also was non-anamorphic.
Now the new release is UNDER-saturated, but you can see all of the details.
The original was badly cropped on all four sides. The new release shows the correct image.
The new version has a whole bunch of extras. The original is bare-bones.
There is little to recommend the original unless you prefer the darker, cropped, oversaturated image that was transferred from the VHS telecine.
Now the new release is UNDER-saturated, but you can see all of the details.
The original was badly cropped on all four sides. The new release shows the correct image.
The new version has a whole bunch of extras. The original is bare-bones.
There is little to recommend the original unless you prefer the darker, cropped, oversaturated image that was transferred from the VHS telecine.
#15
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Originally posted by jough
There is little to recommend the original unless you prefer the darker, cropped, oversaturated image that was transferred from the VHS telecine.
There is little to recommend the original unless you prefer the darker, cropped, oversaturated image that was transferred from the VHS telecine.
"Own the NEW one? With all those flaws. Not likley. Buwaahahaha."
#16
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Central Jersey
Posts: 1,195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you play around with the brightness and contrast on your television the new transfer is actually not that bad. Theres no excuse for having to do that but it makes a significant difference.
#17
DVD Talk Special Edition
Do what I do: don't buy ANY of the releases until they get the transfer right.
Giving Miramax the money for either disc only sends the message that we'll take whatever crap they give us.
Giving Miramax the money for either disc only sends the message that we'll take whatever crap they give us.
#20
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Originally posted by Calculon
Do what I do: don't buy ANY of the releases until they get the transfer right.
Giving Miramax the money for either disc only sends the message that we'll take whatever crap they give us.
Do what I do: don't buy ANY of the releases until they get the transfer right.
Giving Miramax the money for either disc only sends the message that we'll take whatever crap they give us.
DJ
#21
DVD Talk Legend
Originally posted by DavidH
Correct OAR and framing should come above everything else.
Correct OAR and framing should come above everything else.
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: twin cities minnesota
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have both versions and the SE is one of the worst transfers i have ever seen,the color is so washed out that it makes the movie almost unwatchable,the original is by no means a great transfer but it is 20 times better then the se,but the SE has some great extras so if your a big tarintino fan you have to have both of them,if not just get the original one
#23
Suspended
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: You have moved into a dark place. It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
Posts: 4,533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The original is actually much worse, even if it looks better because the colours are richer.
The original disc has great really black blacks. The problem is that it has black greys, too. Any subtleties in colour shading is lost by the overuse of pumping up the contrast (they do this with lower-res transfers so that you can't see the flaws inherent in the print).
The SE is very much in line with how the film was presented theatrically, and while it's a little undersaturated (the colour timing is a bit off and the brightness is too high) you can actually adjust your display to correct the SE without losing the fine detail.
With the original, the picture information that is GONE is gone - you can never get it back.
They're both flawed, but the SE is less flawed than the original.
The original disc has great really black blacks. The problem is that it has black greys, too. Any subtleties in colour shading is lost by the overuse of pumping up the contrast (they do this with lower-res transfers so that you can't see the flaws inherent in the print).
The SE is very much in line with how the film was presented theatrically, and while it's a little undersaturated (the colour timing is a bit off and the brightness is too high) you can actually adjust your display to correct the SE without losing the fine detail.
With the original, the picture information that is GONE is gone - you can never get it back.
They're both flawed, but the SE is less flawed than the original.