Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Archives > Archives > DVD Talk Archive
Reload this Page >

Another Glaring Example of how worthless SUPERBIT is

Community
Search

Another Glaring Example of how worthless SUPERBIT is

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-31-03 | 03:56 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 9,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Chicago, IL
Another Glaring Example of how worthless SUPERBIT is

DVD Talk says that "Riverdance" Superbit looks like crap. I wonder why Sony uses their Superbit name on a POS video quality movie. Just another example of how ridicoulous SuperBit is!

http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/read.php?ID=8095

Do not watch this DVD hoping for great picture quality; in fact, even setting your sights for "acceptable" will result in a disappointment. To begin with, while the transfer is widescreen, it is not anamorphically enhanced, even though the case claims that it is. It gets worse, though: Riverdance just has a lousy transfer, period.
From DVD Talk's Review
chanster is offline  
Old 10-31-03 | 04:11 PM
  #2  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Hughson, CA
In my experience, the whole Superbit thing is either a hit or miss. I personally enjoyed the SB version of Fifth Element, though many of the other titles are just not worth upgrading.

Thanks for pointing this specific title out, btw!
victant is offline  
Old 10-31-03 | 04:17 PM
  #3  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Jakarta, INA
NOT anamorphic?!?!? WTF Sony?

BlackBeauty92 is offline  
Old 10-31-03 | 04:56 PM
  #4  
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 6,154
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: "Sitting on a beach, earning 20%"
A non-anamorphic superbit has got to be the most rediculous thing I've ever seen
Pants is offline  
Old 10-31-03 | 05:21 PM
  #5  
Johnny Zhivago's Avatar
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Korova Milkbar
I'll take the Pepsi challenge with a Das Boot Superbit vs the flipper version any day of the week. Ditto Lawrence Of Arabia Superbit vs the LE.

Granted, some Superbits are questionable in their need and/or improvement (based on your gear) and the choice of movies is suspect at best (I own 4 Superbits from the entire line), but to write them all off as worthless is wrong...

Non-anamorphic though? That's a little radiculos, Superbit or not.
Johnny Zhivago is offline  
Old 10-31-03 | 07:07 PM
  #6  
JimRochester's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 18,058
Received 67 Likes on 30 Posts
From: Rochester, NY. USA
Haven't upgraded any to Superbit. Never heard enough to convice me they were far superior.
JimRochester is offline  
Old 10-31-03 | 07:24 PM
  #7  
New Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: pensacola
i have five, and three of the five push my system to the max sound wise. two of the five just look great, although some dvds that i have can blow superbit out of the water anyday Saving Private Ryan DTS. Gladiator. The Haunting DTS. just to name a few
oris45623 is offline  
Old 10-31-03 | 07:44 PM
  #8  
DVD Polizei's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 54,564
Received 299 Likes on 223 Posts
You can only make a video track as good as the source. If you have an excellent video source, you can boost the quality a little. However, with an inferior track, it just gets worse because you are magnifying the problem.

That said, I think Superbit is crap.
DVD Polizei is offline  
Old 10-31-03 | 08:18 PM
  #9  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 9,975
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Ottawa
Superbit is just marketing speil. It's like "special edition" or "platinum edition"

People who think Superbits are incredible... I just don't understand. I once heard someone say they wanted Gladiator in Superbit. Uhh.. why? the picture is wonderful on the two disc set, and the second disc has TONS of extras. Basically this person was saying they want to pay more money to lose an extra disc of extras.
BizRodian is offline  
Old 10-31-03 | 09:59 PM
  #10  
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 4,986
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Right Behind You
Originally posted by Johnny Zhivago
I'll take the Pepsi challenge with a Das Boot Superbit vs the flipper version any day of the week. .....
That's a bold statement.
lesterlong is offline  
Old 10-31-03 | 10:09 PM
  #11  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 9,917
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
From: Sitting on a beach, earning 20%
Originally posted by BizRodian
Superbit is just marketing speil. It's like "special edition" or "platinum edition"

People who think Superbits are incredible... I just don't understand. I once heard someone say they wanted Gladiator in Superbit. Uhh.. why? the picture is wonderful on the two disc set, and the second disc has TONS of extras. Basically this person was saying they want to pay more money to lose an extra disc of extras.
I'm sure most people here share your sentiments, me being one of them - regardless, a Superbit update of a deserving title is often good news, if the release warrants an upgrade.

PS England has a Gladiator Superbit...
DonnachaOne is offline  
Old 11-01-03 | 12:29 AM
  #12  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Jakarta, INA
there are people that care to have extras & decent picture/sound quality & there are others who concern more on picture/sound quality more than anything... i fell in the middle but lean towards the last qualification

i got few SuperBits (7 to be exact) & most of the time i can see the difference (better) in picture quality even on my 27" HDTV... i can only imagine much better quality differences on bigger HDTV system
BUT i can really feel the difference in sound quality on SuperBits (thanx to DTS)... maybe not much, but its there
specially in action movies like Air Force One, Bad Boys ( ), Desperado, Fifth Element....

Columbia Star/Sony regular (or Special Edition) DVDs tend to have a rather skimpy extras anyway... so, i don't mind sacrificing 'em for better picture/sound quality

that just my take
BlackBeauty92 is offline  
Old 11-01-03 | 12:50 AM
  #13  
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 54,199
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: City of the lakers.. riots.. and drug dealing cops.. los(t) Angel(e)s. ca.
Just give me a damn two disc and I'll be happy.
Jackskeleton is offline  
Old 11-01-03 | 04:59 AM
  #14  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Montreal, Canada
Some Superbits are better than the their original release. Bad Boys,Lawrence Of Arabia and Das Boot (the DTS track at least) are noticably superior
shanester is offline  
Old 11-01-03 | 09:10 AM
  #15  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,463
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Every Superbit I have bought shows a noticable difference.
DavidH is offline  
Old 11-01-03 | 09:17 AM
  #16  
TomOpus's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 41,593
Received 1,807 Likes on 1,294 Posts
From: Kansas City, MO
Re: Another Glaring Example of how worthless SUPERBIT is

Originally posted by chanster
Just another example of how ridicoulous SuperBit is!
Actually, I think it's another example of how ridiculous Columbia is with some of their choices for a SuperBit release.

I have 4 SBs and I'm happy with 'em.
TomOpus is offline  
Old 11-01-03 | 09:43 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: WBB
Originally posted by DavidH
Every Superbit I have bought shows a noticable difference.
The problem is that those transfers should have been included on the discs originally.

And with most Superbits, there IS still quite a bit of free space on the disc that could be filled with extras. But that would ruin their marketing scheme, wouldn't it?
Gyno Rhino is offline  
Old 11-01-03 | 11:09 AM
  #18  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 19,506
Received 1,529 Likes on 1,024 Posts
From: Hamilton, Ontario
Originally posted by Gyno Rhino
The problem is that those transfers should have been included on the discs originally.

And with most Superbits, there IS still quite a bit of free space on the disc that could be filled with extras. But that would ruin their marketing scheme, wouldn't it?
Yep... when the original release is sabatoged to not look as good as it could - the Superbit will have to look better.

I think I'll stick to releases from other studios who do it right the first time with better transfers than the Superbits, and for a cheaper price too.

Marketing Scam all the way.
Coral is offline  
Old 11-01-03 | 11:42 AM
  #19  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 9,975
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Ottawa
The problem is that those transfers should have been included on the discs originally.

And with most Superbits, there IS still quite a bit of free space on the disc that could be filled with extras. But that would ruin their marketing scheme, wouldn't it?
Exactly.

It's all a marketing scheme. It has nothing to do with if you care more about extras or not. I personally do not. I'll buy the Lawrance of Arabia superbit over the other titles because of it's superior picture quality... it's just the people who want Superbits I don't understand. Why want a Superbit? why not want a nice 2 disc set with extras on one disc and a nice commentary, DTS, Dolby, and kick ass picture on the other.
BizRodian is offline  
Old 11-01-03 | 12:04 PM
  #20  
Michael Corvin's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 63,455
Received 1,377 Likes on 943 Posts
From: Louisville, KY
Desperado! Of course I haven't seen the latest re-re-re-re-release for comparison, but damn the SB looks FINE!
Michael Corvin is offline  
Old 11-01-03 | 12:20 PM
  #21  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,463
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The problem is that those transfers should have been included on the discs originally.
And with most Superbits, there IS still quite a bit of free space on the disc that could be filled with extras. But that would ruin their marketing scheme, wouldn't it?
If there is so much space left over, why are SBs looking better? Some have said they aren't applying the filter which allows more detail to be seen. This may be the case; I don't think anyone knows for certain. I am glad some space is left over on the disc to be on the safe side.

Yes, marketing is involved. But, it's no different that any other studio - every studio is releasing and re-releasing multiple versions of DVDs - which I am glad - some movies really need it (obviously, pre-2000 releases in particular).

But, to counter Columbia's marketing strategy, I NO LONGER purchase any of their movies until the Superbit version comes out.
If they would release both versions, or make "Deluxe" Superbits from the beginning, they would be getting my buck sooner. But, since virtually any movie from them that is a blockbuster, classic, or has a good transfer will become a Superbit, I will just wait. They aren't going to play me with it anymore.

Last edited by DavidH; 11-01-03 at 12:23 PM.
DavidH is offline  
Old 11-01-03 | 12:23 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: WBB
You obviously have no idea how DVDs work, let alone what a SUPERBIT actually is.
Gyno Rhino is offline  
Old 11-01-03 | 12:24 PM
  #23  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,463
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Are you talking to me?
DavidH is offline  
Old 11-02-03 | 09:26 PM
  #24  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Empok Nor
Bought my first Superbit a couple days ago, Bram Stoker's Dracula. Watched the entire film tonight and I am quite disappointed with it. The 5.1 DTS sound is pretty solid and uses the surrounds well, but the transfer is awful. Full of grain and lacks alot of detail. I was expecting something fantastic and was let down. Compression wasn't really much of a problem but I could see some speckles on the print every now and then. Some of the day scenes looked decent, but I'm very unimpressed with the picture overall. Hopefully not all Superbit titles are as lackluster as the Dracula one. I wouldn't even be able to count the number of Non-Superbit DVDs that blow away this one in terms of picture and sound. I was about to buy Das Boot Superbit but now I am reconsidering.
NaturalMystic79 is offline  
Old 11-02-03 | 10:46 PM
  #25  
Bill Geiger's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,924
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Florida
I never noticed any grain on the Dracula SB.... guess I'll have to do a double check....
Bill Geiger is offline  


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.