Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Archives > Archives > DVD Talk Archive
Reload this Page >

Blair Witch Aspect Ration Question

Community
Search

Blair Witch Aspect Ration Question

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-23-03 | 10:10 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Blair Witch Aspect Ration Question

Hi,

I just bought the Artisan Blair Witch Project disc (shut up, I thought it was a decent movie). Anyways... on the back, it says: FULLSCREEN VERRSION: Formatted from its original version to fit your screen. I did a search around hee and elsewhere and I can not ifnd anything on it... but in the theaters, I remember it was shot with some kind of handheld, personal video recorder or something... (maybe I am wrong though). Anyways, it was definitely "Ful frame" or close to 4:3 in the theater. So, is this DVD really modified in some way or is it just a misprint? I haven't watched it all yet, but scanning through the disc, it looks like I remembered it looking.... Just wondering.

Thanks!

Zack
ZackR is offline  
Old 10-23-03 | 10:21 PM
  #2  
Rypro 525's Avatar
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 28,263
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: a frikin hellhole
Its supposed to "look like a camera" view. The true oar is 1:33:1 (thats what it was in theaters and on cable), so the dvd is a tad off.
Rypro 525 is offline  
Old 10-23-03 | 11:17 PM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Thanks Rypro,

That makes perfect sense to me... I have not seen it since its theatrical run, and I thought the DVD looked just as I remembered. But, if the true OAR is actually 1.33:1, then that would explain why I really did not notice it. (Plus, it has been a long while since I have seen it)

Thanks for the info!
ZackR is offline  
Old 10-24-03 | 12:11 AM
  #4  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 7,466
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Charlotte, NC
Re: Blair Witch Aspect Ration Question

Originally posted by ZackR
I just bought the Artisan Blair Witch Project disc (shut up, I thought it was a decent movie).
No shame in that, Zack . . . I'm a fan myself. I found the cinematography and the premise to both be extremely creative and the movie, in general, to be very effective at freaking out some of my more sensitive friends.

Now if you had said "Book of Shadows - Blair Witch 2", we might have needed to have a little talk.
talemyn is offline  
Old 10-24-03 | 03:11 AM
  #5  
Drexl's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 16,077
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
From: St. Louis, MO
Sometimes they'll say it's been modified to fit your screen even if it hasn't. Full Metal Jacket has this disclaimer, but the other 1.33:1 titles in the Kubrick Collection (The Shining, Eyes Wide Shut) do not, even though they are 1.33:1 for the same reason FMJ is.
Drexl is offline  
Old 10-24-03 | 09:11 AM
  #6  
Groucho's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 71,383
Received 130 Likes on 92 Posts
From: Salt Lake City, Utah
If only they'd brought more aspect rations, they would have lasted even longer out in the woods.
Groucho is offline  
Old 10-24-03 | 11:14 AM
  #7  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Aug 1999
Posts: 1,982
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Camp Crystal Lake
Originally posted by Groucho
If only they'd brought more aspect rations, they would have lasted even longer out in the woods.
DVD_O_Rama is offline  
Old 10-24-03 | 11:38 AM
  #8  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,499
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ianholm is offline  
Old 10-24-03 | 11:54 AM
  #9  
Johnny Zhivago's Avatar
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Korova Milkbar
Re: Re: Blair Witch Aspect Ration Question

Originally posted by talemyn
I found the cinematography and the premise to both be extremely creative
You've obviously never seen Cannibal Holocaust.

Last edited by Johnny Zhivago; 10-24-03 at 03:01 PM.
Johnny Zhivago is offline  
Old 10-24-03 | 01:55 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Rypro 525
Its supposed to "look like a camera" view. The true oar is 1:33:1 (thats what it was in theaters and on cable), so the dvd is a tad off.
It wasn't 1.33 in theatres, that is TV Ratio. 1.66 is the smallest theatrical.
moviezzz is offline  
Old 10-24-03 | 03:43 PM
  #11  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 3,333
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Astoria, NY, USA
Originally posted by moviezzz
It wasn't 1.33 in theatres, that is TV Ratio. 1.66 is the smallest theatrical.
You're wrong on a number of levels. First, current SMPTE standards for 35mm projection allow for four aspect ratios: 1.37:1 (also commonly referred to as 1.33:1), 1.66:1, 1.85:1, and 2.39:1.

Second, BWP was absolutely shown at 1.33:1 theatrically. The 1.33:1 frame was centered within a 1.85:1 frame on the theatrical prints. Theatres then projected the film at 1.85:1, but the picture area itself was only 1.33:1.

DJ
djtoell is offline  
Old 10-24-03 | 04:48 PM
  #12  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Second, BWP was absolutely shown at 1.33:1 theatrically. The 1.33:1 frame was centered within a 1.85:1 frame on the theatrical prints. Theatres then projected the film at 1.85:1, but the picture area itself was only 1.33:1.
BINGO!! That's exactly what I thought, but at the time, I was not "aspect ratio savvy" so I thought I might have remembered wrongly. Thanks!
ZackR is offline  
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.