No Anamporphic = No Problem
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Kane County
Posts: 815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No Anamporphic = No Problem
I've been setting up my new home theater with a Sony 1031 CRT Projector and DVDO line-doubler.
I've been playing my disks out of a new Samsung DVD/VHS player and it has a feature called EZ VIEW. They market this feature to eliminate the black bars for the Joe six-packs but when the player is set to output in widescreen it turns non-anamorphic disks into anamorphic disks by zomming on the 16x9 image then horizontally squezing the image.
The result is pretty damn good. My non-anamorphic disks look great projected in widescreen.
The only comparision I could do from an anamorphic and a non-anamorphic transfer was from CHARADE. They both looked great, although Universal's transfer is better in terms colors and vibrancy.
So my point is, don't pass up a movie you want if its non-anamorphic, there are other options.
I've been playing my disks out of a new Samsung DVD/VHS player and it has a feature called EZ VIEW. They market this feature to eliminate the black bars for the Joe six-packs but when the player is set to output in widescreen it turns non-anamorphic disks into anamorphic disks by zomming on the 16x9 image then horizontally squezing the image.
The result is pretty damn good. My non-anamorphic disks look great projected in widescreen.
The only comparision I could do from an anamorphic and a non-anamorphic transfer was from CHARADE. They both looked great, although Universal's transfer is better in terms colors and vibrancy.
So my point is, don't pass up a movie you want if its non-anamorphic, there are other options.
#3
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 1,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Non-Animorphic still = Problem
Originally posted by Groucho
It's a good compromise, but it's still a signifcant loss in resolution.
It's a good compromise, but it's still a signifcant loss in resolution.
Off topic- With such a nice projector I would suggest investing in a nicer dvd player. Those Samsung DVD/VCR combos are garbage IMHO and won't do justice to what your projector is really capable of.
#4
DVD Talk Gold Edition
It used to be that only fairly high end equipment (like the Panny RP-91 for example) could scale a NA movie. When did this change? Of course, if they called it EZ VIEW I wouldn't recognize it for what it was anyway. Damn marketing.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My JVC S500 has that feature. Does it automatically in most cases. I actually didn't realize a few of my DVD's were non-anamorphic for a while. I just thought they were sub par transfers.
#6
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: No Anamporphic = No Problem
Originally posted by DVD NDN
...when the player is set to output in widescreen it turns non-anamorphic disks into anamorphic disks by zooming on the 16x9 image then horizontally squezing the image.
...when the player is set to output in widescreen it turns non-anamorphic disks into anamorphic disks by zooming on the 16x9 image then horizontally squezing the image.
#7
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Kane County
Posts: 815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
DVDude!, I would agree with your clarification.
boston george, I don't know how much the player factors into the image I'm projecting as the DVDO Iscan does all the work on the image like 3:2 pulldown and line-doubling.
BTW, I'll post some screen shots in a week or so
boston george, I don't know how much the player factors into the image I'm projecting as the DVDO Iscan does all the work on the image like 3:2 pulldown and line-doubling.
BTW, I'll post some screen shots in a week or so
#8
Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have a DLP Projector (108") screen. In 4x3 mode non-animorphic (2:35:1) is big and not stretched and looks decent. (Non-animorphic 1:85:1 I have to use native mode and shows bars on either side) however when I am in 16x9 mode with animorphic video the actual resolution becomes better. It is hard to decribe. beyond fitting 16x9 screen without appearing stretched, anamorphic video is a great deal better than non-anamorphic in terms of resolution (all in progressive scan of course)
#9
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The only problem you've got now is if you watch a film with subtitles you won't be able to see them since on an non-anamorphic DVD they're placed on the black bars automatically.
#10
DVD Talk Legend
On my Samsung 16x9 I just click the screen to Zoom 1, and it cuts the top and bottom to the proper aspect ratio. I can even watch Angel and Enterprise fullscreen like this. Doesn't look too hot, but it works.
#11
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Tscott
The only problem you've got now is if you watch a film with subtitles you won't be able to see them since on an non-anamorphic DVD they're placed on the black bars automatically.
The only problem you've got now is if you watch a film with subtitles you won't be able to see them since on an non-anamorphic DVD they're placed on the black bars automatically.
I plan on buying a LOT of foreign films soon. I probably won't get a widescreen set in the near future, but I'll have to factor the subtitles into my decisions. I was looking for anamorphic titles as a general rule, but some Hong Kong cheapies aren't anamorphic. In the future, when I have a widescreen set, these discs will be almost be pointless to own, I guess. In addition to losing resolution by zooming, the subtitles will vanish. Ick.
#12
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
The only time I had problems with subtitles was on Tombs of the Blind Dead (non-enhanced 1.66:1), because the RP-91 crops off portions from the top and bottom when it scales them. I don't have this problem with the HTPC.
FYI I've found that with many transfers of catalog titles, enhancement doesn't make much difference, because the detail simply isn't there.
I found this subject interesting enough to have written a couple of articles on it (one on scaling in general and one spedific to 1.66:1).
RD
FYI I've found that with many transfers of catalog titles, enhancement doesn't make much difference, because the detail simply isn't there.
I found this subject interesting enough to have written a couple of articles on it (one on scaling in general and one spedific to 1.66:1).
RD
#13
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: May 1999
Location: USA
Posts: 1,953
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Easy
It used to be that only fairly high end equipment (like the Panny RP-91 for example) could scale a NA movie. When did this change? Of course, if they called it EZ VIEW I wouldn't recognize it for what it was anyway. Damn marketing.
It used to be that only fairly high end equipment (like the Panny RP-91 for example) could scale a NA movie. When did this change? Of course, if they called it EZ VIEW I wouldn't recognize it for what it was anyway. Damn marketing.
#15
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 1,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by DVDude!
Thanks for pointing that out. I remember reading something somewhere (vague, aren't I?) about subtitles on widescreen sets, but couldn't recall the details.
I plan on buying a LOT of foreign films soon. I probably won't get a widescreen set in the near future, but I'll have to factor the subtitles into my decisions. I was looking for anamorphic titles as a general rule, but some Hong Kong cheapies aren't anamorphic. In the future, when I have a widescreen set, these discs will be almost be pointless to own, I guess. In addition to losing resolution by zooming, the subtitles will vanish. Ick.
Thanks for pointing that out. I remember reading something somewhere (vague, aren't I?) about subtitles on widescreen sets, but couldn't recall the details.
I plan on buying a LOT of foreign films soon. I probably won't get a widescreen set in the near future, but I'll have to factor the subtitles into my decisions. I was looking for anamorphic titles as a general rule, but some Hong Kong cheapies aren't anamorphic. In the future, when I have a widescreen set, these discs will be almost be pointless to own, I guess. In addition to losing resolution by zooming, the subtitles will vanish. Ick.
#16
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Kane County
Posts: 815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I noticed the sub-title problem when I was watching Star Wars and Jabba's subtitles were cut off...
Perhaps the thread's title should be changed to read:
Not Anamorphic = Couple Problems
Thanks for all the discussion
Perhaps the thread's title should be changed to read:
Not Anamorphic = Couple Problems
Thanks for all the discussion
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I like the controllable X:Y scaling on my Malata DVD player. I adjust one axis until it just about reaches the borders of my 16:9 screen, and the other axis has been proportionally scaled. I think that's about as good as one can do with NA discs.
#18
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Originally posted by Frank S
Believe me the "true" scaling feature on the Pany RP91 is signifigantly better then these "EZ View"
Believe me the "true" scaling feature on the Pany RP91 is signifigantly better then these "EZ View"
#21
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: May 1999
Location: USA
Posts: 1,953
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by DivxGuy
I found the RP-91 to have a less-than-stellar image, actually. You can do a lot better.
I found the RP-91 to have a less-than-stellar image, actually. You can do a lot better.
Last edited by Frank S; 09-25-03 at 09:27 PM.