Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Archives > Archives > DVD Talk Archive
Reload this Page >

Star Wars II DVD different than Theatre version?

Community
Search

Star Wars II DVD different than Theatre version?

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-24-03 | 06:47 PM
  #26  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Colorado Springs, CO
Originally posted by Josh-da-man
Also, on the DVD, did they "tone down" the "raisins" Padme was smuggling in her top?

Because I could swear they were more prominent when I saw them in the theater, and didn't think Geonosis looked quite that chilly.
They were more prominent in the theater because they were about 3 feet in diameter! Unless you have a front projector at home they'll probably be only a couple of inches in diameter maximum.
karnblack is offline  
Old 08-25-03 | 10:38 AM
  #27  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by milo bloom
[Ignoring threadcraps from 12 year old Matrix fans who think Anakin should stop bullets with his hand]

The Ep 2 DVD has a few slight changes. During the confession scene, there is a smidge more dialogue to make Anakin seem less of an ass. During the fight on Geonosis, there are more sparks added to Jango's jet pack to make sure people understand why he just doesn't fly off, and at the very end, a shot is inserted of
Spoiler:
Anakin's metal hand holding Padme's hand


I don't think that scene was changed you mentioned above.
If you are refering to me I actually like Ep 2 better than Matrix Reloaded. Cutting out some of those awful love scenes really help the movie a lot.

Also you sound like an ass calling people matrix fanboys when there is no mention of movie in the preceeding posts. However if there was some maxtrix fanboy's post that got deleted, then please ignore my comment.
MrBob is offline  
Old 08-25-03 | 10:56 AM
  #28  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Posts: 23,225
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Plano, TX
Originally posted by milo bloom
[Ignoring threadcraps from 12 year old Matrix fans who think Anakin should stop bullets with his hand]
Hilarious.
PixyJunket is offline  
Old 08-25-03 | 12:02 PM
  #29  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,337
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NJ
Originally posted by MrBob
Also you sound like an ass calling people matrix fanboys when there is no mention of movie in the preceeding posts. However if there was some maxtrix fanboy's post that got deleted, then please ignore my comment.
Agreed. Besides, the only difference between the Matrix fanboys and the Star Wars fanboys is that the Matrix fanboys are young enough to still get laid and move out of their parent's basement before they are 30.




of course I jest since I am a fanboy of both series myself.
fnordboy is offline  
Old 08-25-03 | 01:14 PM
  #30  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 9,975
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Ottawa
Agreed. Besides, the only difference between the Matrix fanboys and the Star Wars fanboys is that the Matrix fanboys are young enough to still get laid and move out of their parent's basement before they are 30.
You haven't seen the fan interviews on The Matrix Revisited. I mean, holy crap!
BizRodian is offline  
Old 08-25-03 | 04:41 PM
  #31  
milo bloom's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 18,998
Received 1,669 Likes on 1,208 Posts
From: Chicago suburbs
Originally posted by MrBob
If you are refering to me I actually like Ep 2 better than Matrix Reloaded. Cutting out some of those awful love scenes really help the movie a lot.

Also you sound like an ass calling people matrix fanboys when there is no mention of movie in the preceeding posts. However if there was some maxtrix fanboy's post that got deleted, then please ignore my comment.
The only mistake I think I truly made was even acknowledging the existence of the threadcraps in a thread that wasn't even a debate about the quality of Ep 2, but was purely Ep 2 theatrical vs. DVD.

The Matrix simply came to my mind first as it is usually the Matrix fanboys that rip on SW the most.

And I'm not going to debate the quality of the love scenes, as I'm sure we're all too old to remember being young, dorky kids in love and saying stupid, dorky things.
milo bloom is offline  
Old 08-25-03 | 04:49 PM
  #32  
Michael Corvin's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 63,455
Received 1,377 Likes on 943 Posts
From: Louisville, KY
And I'm not going to debate the quality of the love scenes, as I'm sure we're all too old to remember being young, dorky kids in love and saying stupid, dorky things.
EXACTLY! This is the first girl he has ever had a crush on let alone fooled around with. I think that whole point of this bringing the movie down is crud. I am quite sure everyone was not Cassanova with the first girl they liked.

Anyway as mentioned above, the DVD is from the DLP (digital cut) of the film. The hand shot was a pan up with his hand at his side, in the DLP cut Padme holds the metal hand. That is the major difference, everything else seems pretty minor.

On the IMAX cut: It had to be cut down to under 2 hours to fit the format. I didn't see it myself but read most of what was cut(around 20 minutes) was the love/relationship scenes. But I could be wrong not having seen it myself.
Michael Corvin is offline  
Old 08-25-03 | 06:32 PM
  #33  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 9,975
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Ottawa
EXACTLY! This is the first girl he has ever had a crush on let alone fooled around with. I think that whole point of this bringing the movie down is crud. I am quite sure everyone was not Cassanova with the first girl they liked.
I was but if I was in a child aimed movie, I'm sure I wouldn't have been :P
BizRodian is offline  
Old 08-26-03 | 05:32 PM
  #34  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Bay Area, CA
Everytime I hear the name "Padme" I think of Thai food.
masetodd is offline  
Old 08-26-03 | 10:35 PM
  #35  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Winston-Salem, NC
Originally posted by greatjedi
HoNuts and Darth Marino Just spoiled Episode II for me by not using spoiler tags! Anakin has a metal hand? What's up with that?
Well, since this crucial clue is now out of the bag. I guess it's safe to tell everyone that Anakin is actually Luke's father.
Yellowbeard is offline  
Old 08-27-03 | 11:15 AM
  #36  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 7,534
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: San Diego, CA
I have a friend who worked at Lucas Arts at the time and he said that Lucas was making changes to the movie WHILE IT WAS STILL IN THE THEATER!

Meaning, if you saw it on the first day it was in theaters and then saw it 4 weeks later, you were seeing a different version!
nodeerforamonth is offline  
Old 08-27-03 | 12:30 PM
  #37  
nycdude's Avatar
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NY
Originally posted by greatjedi
HoNuts and Darth Marino Just spoiled Episode II for me by not using spoiler tags! Anakin has a metal hand? What's up with that?
Priceless!!
nycdude is offline  
Old 08-27-03 | 10:24 PM
  #38  
Michael Corvin's Avatar
DVD Talk Godfather
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 63,455
Received 1,377 Likes on 943 Posts
From: Louisville, KY
Originally posted by nodeerforamonth
I have a friend who worked at Lucas Arts at the time and he said that Lucas was making changes to the movie WHILE IT WAS STILL IN THE THEATER!

Meaning, if you saw it on the first day it was in theaters and then saw it 4 weeks later, you were seeing a different version!
Not exactly but close. Nothing changed in the film versions, but the digital version wasn't released unil a few weeks later. That is the version that had the changes that have been discussed in this thread. Correct me if I am wrong, but that was my understanding.
Michael Corvin is offline  
Old 08-27-03 | 11:53 PM
  #39  
DVD Talk Platinum Edition
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 3,333
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Astoria, NY, USA
Originally posted by Michael Corvin
Not exactly but close. Nothing changed in the film versions, but the digital version wasn't released unil a few weeks later. That is the version that had the changes that have been discussed in this thread. Correct me if I am wrong, but that was my understanding.
The film and digital versions both opened up on the exact same day. The difference is that the digital version had extra time for post-production. The film version had to be finished quicker to allow the needed time for striking the prints, etc. The additional time afforded to the digital version led to some tweaking.

DJ
djtoell is offline  
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.