Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > Archives > Archives > DVD Talk Archive
Reload this Page >

Indy possibly in dts in region one!

Community
Search

Indy possibly in dts in region one!

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-08-03, 03:30 PM
  #1  
DVD Talk Hero
Thread Starter
 
Rypro 525's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: a frikin hellhole
Posts: 28,264
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Indy possibly in dts in region one!

I know you all would want to know that

Originally posted by dvdfileposter
...As French DVD site DeVilDead is reporting that the R1 editions of the Indiana Jones Trilogy are going to be in DTS. They are a good website, get lots of exclusives, and are rarely wrong.

Click the follwing link and judge for yourself:

http://www.devildead.com/indexdbtop...e=1&FilmsID=356

Interesting...
Rypro 525 is offline  
Old 06-08-03, 03:33 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 829
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hope it's true.
MurraySiskind is offline  
Old 06-08-03, 04:07 PM
  #3  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Split time between DC and NYC
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That would be good news and explain why the movie discs are barebones with the supplements on the 4th disc.
ryuryu2949 is offline  
Old 06-08-03, 04:18 PM
  #4  
DVD Talk Reviewer
 
pro-bassoonist's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Blu-ray.com
Posts: 10,380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
.....it is the French connection!!!

....mystery!!
pro-bassoonist is offline  
Old 06-08-03, 04:18 PM
  #5  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 2,202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So a DTS track can be added to any film even 20+ years old??

They did a great job for Das Boot SB why not Indy right??

If true/possible that would be pretty cool!
shanester is offline  
Old 06-08-03, 04:29 PM
  #6  
mdX
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Cover town, USA
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
probably won't happen. given lucasfilm's involvement, you can expect to see DD 5.1-EX (aka THX Surround EX), but no DTS. I'm sure if you search you'll see this has been discussed ad naseum
mdX is offline  
Old 06-08-03, 04:36 PM
  #7  
DVD Talk Legend
 
milo bloom's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Chicago suburbs
Posts: 18,298
Received 1,408 Likes on 1,031 Posts
Originally posted by shanester
So a DTS track can be added to any film even 20+ years old??

They did a great job for Das Boot SB why not Indy right??

If true/possible that would be pretty cool!

DTS could be added to The Jazz Singer if they wanted to. The point of DTS isn't about 6.1 channels surround channels, it's the higher bitrate and better compression algorithm. Imagine a mono film encoded in the full 1509 kbps DTS codec instead of the 192 kbps we usually get these days. Even mono tracks have dynamic range and those extra bits could help them sound better.
milo bloom is offline  
Old 06-08-03, 04:41 PM
  #8  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Posts: 2,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by mdX
probably won't happen. given lucasfilm's involvement, you can expect to see DD 5.1-EX (aka THX Surround EX), but no DTS. I'm sure if you search you'll see this has been discussed ad naseum
Spielberg is a huge proponent of DTS though. Most of his major releases have seen DTS on them (Minority Report, AI, Catch Me If You Can), if not, then a separate DTS release (Jurassic Park I and II, Saving Private Ryan)
NitroJMS is offline  
Old 06-08-03, 05:48 PM
  #9  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,463
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Spielberg is a huge proponent of DTS though.
Yes, but these are Lucasfilms.

Also, I certainly wouldn't look to any French DVD Website for the most accurate details about Region 1.

Last edited by DavidH; 06-08-03 at 05:56 PM.
DavidH is offline  
Old 06-08-03, 05:56 PM
  #10  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Unique New York
Posts: 4,340
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Why not both? There aren't going to be any commentaries so there should be space for both tracks.
JoeyOhhhh is offline  
Old 06-08-03, 06:17 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Somerville, MA
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Since THX (owned by Lucasfilm) has a direct connection to Dolby Digital ES they don't put Dolby's competitor, DTS, on their discs. Thats why there is no DTS on the first two Star Wars discs.
C Roberts is offline  
Old 06-08-03, 07:06 PM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hillsborough, NJ
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by C Roberts
Since THX (owned by Lucasfilm) has a direct connection to Dolby Digital ES they don't put Dolby's competitor, DTS, on their discs. Thats why there is no DTS on the first two Star Wars discs.
...but some THX certified DVD's have both DTS and DD 5.1 on them.
Dacoops3 is offline  
Old 06-08-03, 07:36 PM
  #13  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
PacMan2006's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,506
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Has there been a date set for the relase of the movies?
PacMan2006 is offline  
Old 06-08-03, 08:37 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 897
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nothing would make me happier than having DTS tracks on the Indy films. &nbsp However, because of Lucasfilm, I just don't see it happening. &nbsp
Deckard-10 is offline  
Old 06-08-03, 10:48 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Edge of Obscurity
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The point of DTS isn't about 6.1 channels surround channels, it's the higher bitrate and better compression algorithm.
Two points...

1) DTS (Coherent Acoustics) is not a better compression algorithm. This is why DTS requires a higher bitrate to sound good compared to Dolby Digital.

2) The higher bitrate that DTS sounds best at (1509 kb/s) is almost never used anymore.

Imagine a mono film encoded in the full 1509 kbps DTS codec instead of the 192 kbps we usually get these days.
A total waste of bandwidth. Even uncompressed stereo PCM has lower bitrate (1411 kb/s). With the inherent limitations of a mono film soundtrack, I would bet a week's pay that 99.99% of people could not tell the difference between a properly encoded Dolby Digital 1.0 track at 192 kb/s and the mono master.

Even mono tracks have dynamic range and those extra bits could help them sound better.
See above. DD 1.0 at 192 kb/s is capable of greater dynamic range and wider flat frequency response than any mono soundtrack master I know of.
Robert George is offline  
Old 06-08-03, 11:34 PM
  #16  
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: NYC
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by PacMan2006
Has there been a date set for the relase of the movies?

Said the man who was ultimately crushed by the rolling boulder from Raiders and just recently freed.
digitalfreaknyc is offline  
Old 06-09-03, 12:51 AM
  #17  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sitting on a beach, earning 20%
Posts: 9,917
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Now, I know that THX and Dolby are buddy-buddy, which is why DTS hasn't been on previous LucasFilm DVDs.

But haven't the laserdiscs featured DTS sound, in other countries? Isn't this the reason why there are DTS bootlegs of the discs?
DonnachaOne is offline  
Old 06-09-03, 01:56 AM
  #18  
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Etten-Leur, NB The Netherlands
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There has never been a digital sound release of Indiana Jones on laserdisc anywere.
Pioneer originally announced the trioligy to be released on laserdisc with Dolby Digital 5.1 sound at the end of the format but at the and cancelling it.
These bootlegs are not official soundtracks.
Quinty is offline  
Old 06-09-03, 03:41 AM
  #19  
Cool New Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As reported here on Dvdtalk it is suppose to be up for preorder 6/9 we will see
honey59 is offline  
Old 06-09-03, 08:18 AM
  #20  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Warren, MI
Posts: 5,979
Received 143 Likes on 98 Posts
Originally posted by JoeyOhhhh
Why not both? There aren't going to be any commentaries so there should be space for both tracks.
Bite your tongue we still don't know that officially . Plus it's not like there aren't movies with both DTS and commentary tracks on one disc. But somehow I don't see Lucas bending to the will of Spielberg on the DTS vs. DD 6.1 issue for Indy.
lisadoris is offline  
Old 06-09-03, 09:56 AM
  #21  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,851
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here are the specs according to Amazon (Not that Amazon is always right, but here you go):

Discographic Information:
DVD Encoding: Region 1
Available Audio Tracks: English (Dolby Digital 5.1), Spanish (Dolby Digital 2.0 Surround), French (Dolby Digital 2.0 Surround)
THX Certified
greatjedi is offline  
Old 06-09-03, 11:11 AM
  #22  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Josh Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Boston
Posts: 11,763
Received 257 Likes on 181 Posts
Originally posted by Quinty
There has never been a digital sound release of Indiana Jones on laserdisc anywere.
Pioneer originally announced the trioligy to be released on laserdisc with Dolby Digital 5.1 sound at the end of the format but at the and cancelling it.
Don't confuse "digital sound" with a 5.1 soundtrack. The laserdiscs had PCM digital audio.
Josh Z is offline  
Old 06-09-03, 05:47 PM
  #23  
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
DD 1.0 at 192 kb/s is capable of greater dynamic range and wider flat frequency response than any mono soundtrack master I know of.
But as you stated of 1509kbps DTS, the channel/bitrate configuration you mention is very rarely used on dvd these days, instead we normally get dual mono 2.0 at 192kbps, which would not carry the same fidelity.

I think mono or stereo tracks should be at least 384kbps... regardless of what tech specs may tell us of the dynamic range of 192kbps it still sounds just plain bad compared to an uncompressed PCM, regardless of source.
Dean Walsh is offline  
Old 06-09-03, 07:44 PM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Edge of Obscurity
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...instead we normally get dual mono 2.0 at 192kbps...
Warner being the notable exception. Most of their mono tracks are encoded as 1.0 with the same bitrate as 2.0 (192 kb/s).

I don't necessarily agree that 2.0 at 192 inherently sounds "bad". I have heard a number of 2.0 tracks that sounded just fine. In my experience, the relative quality of a 2.0 track depends on the fidelity of the source master. Very often the source material for older film soundtracks is of limited range and dynamics. In such cases, DD 2.0 has no problem sounding as good as the source, which may well sound pretty weak regardless of how it is delivered.

Bear in mind, AC-3 is a better codec than MP3 and with a decent encoder, stereo MP3 at 192 kb/s can sound pretty good. Of course not as good as the uncompressed PCM CD, but still relatively good.
Robert George is offline  
Old 06-09-03, 11:17 PM
  #25  
DVD Talk Gold Edition
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,065
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've got a double feature DVD in my collection that has a DD 3.0 mono (L, C, R) soundtrack on the first feature which is 320Kbps, and a DD2.0 224Kbps soundtrack on the second feature. It's the weirdest thing ever! (DVD is Life & Times of Colonel Blimp / A Matter of Life & Death double feature, Reg 2)

DTS or not, I'll be getting the Reg 1 release of the Indy boxset as one of the movies was censored on Reg 2.
Squirrel God is offline  


Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.