Indy possibly in dts in region one!
#1
DVD Talk Hero
Thread Starter
Indy possibly in dts in region one!
I know you all would want to know that
Originally posted by dvdfileposter
...As French DVD site DeVilDead is reporting that the R1 editions of the Indiana Jones Trilogy are going to be in DTS. They are a good website, get lots of exclusives, and are rarely wrong.
Click the follwing link and judge for yourself:
http://www.devildead.com/indexdbtop...e=1&FilmsID=356
Interesting...
...As French DVD site DeVilDead is reporting that the R1 editions of the Indiana Jones Trilogy are going to be in DTS. They are a good website, get lots of exclusives, and are rarely wrong.
Click the follwing link and judge for yourself:
http://www.devildead.com/indexdbtop...e=1&FilmsID=356
Interesting...
#5
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 2,202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So a DTS track can be added to any film even 20+ years old??
They did a great job for Das Boot SB why not Indy right??
If true/possible that would be pretty cool!
They did a great job for Das Boot SB why not Indy right??
If true/possible that would be pretty cool!
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Cover town, USA
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
probably won't happen. given lucasfilm's involvement, you can expect to see DD 5.1-EX (aka THX Surround EX), but no DTS. I'm sure if you search you'll see this has been discussed ad naseum
#7
DVD Talk Legend
Originally posted by shanester
So a DTS track can be added to any film even 20+ years old??
They did a great job for Das Boot SB why not Indy right??
If true/possible that would be pretty cool!
So a DTS track can be added to any film even 20+ years old??
They did a great job for Das Boot SB why not Indy right??
If true/possible that would be pretty cool!
DTS could be added to The Jazz Singer if they wanted to. The point of DTS isn't about 6.1 channels surround channels, it's the higher bitrate and better compression algorithm. Imagine a mono film encoded in the full 1509 kbps DTS codec instead of the 192 kbps we usually get these days. Even mono tracks have dynamic range and those extra bits could help them sound better.
#8
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Posts: 2,456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by mdX
probably won't happen. given lucasfilm's involvement, you can expect to see DD 5.1-EX (aka THX Surround EX), but no DTS. I'm sure if you search you'll see this has been discussed ad naseum
probably won't happen. given lucasfilm's involvement, you can expect to see DD 5.1-EX (aka THX Surround EX), but no DTS. I'm sure if you search you'll see this has been discussed ad naseum
#9
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Spielberg is a huge proponent of DTS though.
Also, I certainly wouldn't look to any French DVD Website for the most accurate details about Region 1.
Last edited by DavidH; 06-08-03 at 05:56 PM.
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Somerville, MA
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Since THX (owned by Lucasfilm) has a direct connection to Dolby Digital ES they don't put Dolby's competitor, DTS, on their discs. Thats why there is no DTS on the first two Star Wars discs.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hillsborough, NJ
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by C Roberts
Since THX (owned by Lucasfilm) has a direct connection to Dolby Digital ES they don't put Dolby's competitor, DTS, on their discs. Thats why there is no DTS on the first two Star Wars discs.
Since THX (owned by Lucasfilm) has a direct connection to Dolby Digital ES they don't put Dolby's competitor, DTS, on their discs. Thats why there is no DTS on the first two Star Wars discs.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Edge of Obscurity
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The point of DTS isn't about 6.1 channels surround channels, it's the higher bitrate and better compression algorithm.
1) DTS (Coherent Acoustics) is not a better compression algorithm. This is why DTS requires a higher bitrate to sound good compared to Dolby Digital.
2) The higher bitrate that DTS sounds best at (1509 kb/s) is almost never used anymore.
Imagine a mono film encoded in the full 1509 kbps DTS codec instead of the 192 kbps we usually get these days.
Even mono tracks have dynamic range and those extra bits could help them sound better.
#16
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: NYC
Posts: 15,957
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by PacMan2006
Has there been a date set for the relase of the movies?
Has there been a date set for the relase of the movies?
Said the man who was ultimately crushed by the rolling boulder from Raiders and just recently freed.
#17
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sitting on a beach, earning 20%
Posts: 9,917
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Now, I know that THX and Dolby are buddy-buddy, which is why DTS hasn't been on previous LucasFilm DVDs.
But haven't the laserdiscs featured DTS sound, in other countries? Isn't this the reason why there are DTS bootlegs of the discs?
But haven't the laserdiscs featured DTS sound, in other countries? Isn't this the reason why there are DTS bootlegs of the discs?
#18
Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Etten-Leur, NB The Netherlands
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There has never been a digital sound release of Indiana Jones on laserdisc anywere.
Pioneer originally announced the trioligy to be released on laserdisc with Dolby Digital 5.1 sound at the end of the format but at the and cancelling it.
These bootlegs are not official soundtracks.
Pioneer originally announced the trioligy to be released on laserdisc with Dolby Digital 5.1 sound at the end of the format but at the and cancelling it.
These bootlegs are not official soundtracks.
#20
DVD Talk Limited Edition
Originally posted by JoeyOhhhh
Why not both? There aren't going to be any commentaries so there should be space for both tracks.
Why not both? There aren't going to be any commentaries so there should be space for both tracks.
#21
DVD Talk Special Edition
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,851
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here are the specs according to Amazon (Not that Amazon is always right, but here you go):
Discographic Information:
DVD Encoding: Region 1
Available Audio Tracks: English (Dolby Digital 5.1), Spanish (Dolby Digital 2.0 Surround), French (Dolby Digital 2.0 Surround)
THX Certified
Discographic Information:
DVD Encoding: Region 1
Available Audio Tracks: English (Dolby Digital 5.1), Spanish (Dolby Digital 2.0 Surround), French (Dolby Digital 2.0 Surround)
THX Certified
#22
DVD Talk Legend
Originally posted by Quinty
There has never been a digital sound release of Indiana Jones on laserdisc anywere.
Pioneer originally announced the trioligy to be released on laserdisc with Dolby Digital 5.1 sound at the end of the format but at the and cancelling it.
There has never been a digital sound release of Indiana Jones on laserdisc anywere.
Pioneer originally announced the trioligy to be released on laserdisc with Dolby Digital 5.1 sound at the end of the format but at the and cancelling it.
#23
Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
DD 1.0 at 192 kb/s is capable of greater dynamic range and wider flat frequency response than any mono soundtrack master I know of.
I think mono or stereo tracks should be at least 384kbps... regardless of what tech specs may tell us of the dynamic range of 192kbps it still sounds just plain bad compared to an uncompressed PCM, regardless of source.
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Edge of Obscurity
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
...instead we normally get dual mono 2.0 at 192kbps...
I don't necessarily agree that 2.0 at 192 inherently sounds "bad". I have heard a number of 2.0 tracks that sounded just fine. In my experience, the relative quality of a 2.0 track depends on the fidelity of the source master. Very often the source material for older film soundtracks is of limited range and dynamics. In such cases, DD 2.0 has no problem sounding as good as the source, which may well sound pretty weak regardless of how it is delivered.
Bear in mind, AC-3 is a better codec than MP3 and with a decent encoder, stereo MP3 at 192 kb/s can sound pretty good. Of course not as good as the uncompressed PCM CD, but still relatively good.
#25
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,065
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've got a double feature DVD in my collection that has a DD 3.0 mono (L, C, R) soundtrack on the first feature which is 320Kbps, and a DD2.0 224Kbps soundtrack on the second feature. It's the weirdest thing ever! (DVD is Life & Times of Colonel Blimp / A Matter of Life & Death double feature, Reg 2)
DTS or not, I'll be getting the Reg 1 release of the Indy boxset as one of the movies was censored on Reg 2.
DTS or not, I'll be getting the Reg 1 release of the Indy boxset as one of the movies was censored on Reg 2.