Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > DVD Discussions > DVD & Home Theater Gear
Reload this Page >

question about component vs s-video

Community
Search
DVD & Home Theater Gear Discuss DVD and Home Theater Equipment.

question about component vs s-video

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-13-01 | 07:35 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Westland, Michigan
Just bought a set of Monster cables for component. But doing a comparison between S-Video and Component, I really can't see a difference. I'm using a Toshiba 3109 connected to a Sony KP-61V85. There's a huge difference between Composite and S-Video/Component. Is it just me, that I can't tell the difference, or is there something wrong with my set?
Old 02-13-01 | 07:42 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: The Brooklyn in My Mind
it's not you...the difference is nowhere near as distinct as from composite to s-video
Old 02-13-01 | 07:55 PM
  #3  
Cool New Member
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by jorak
Just bought a set of Monster cables for component. But doing a comparison between S-Video and Component, I really can't see a difference. I'm using a Toshiba 3109 connected to a Sony KP-61V85. There's a huge difference between Composite and S-Video/Component. Is it just me, that I can't tell the difference, or is there something wrong with my set?
Boy those salesmen make you look dumb sometimes dont they. You paid about 4 times what those cables are worth.
Old 02-13-01 | 08:29 PM
  #4  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Westland, Michigan
Revco2k, thanks for an honest answer.

rajjneef, thanks for being a jerk. However, the fact that Best Buy has a 14 day return policy kind of negates your stupid comment. As for the price, why is everyone paying 100+ for bettercables.com cables, when they're 30 bucks more and compare "a bit better" than Monsters. Anyways, if you're just going to be a smartass, feel free to refrain from posting.

[Edited by jorak on 02-13-01 at 05:35 PM]
Old 02-13-01 | 11:01 PM
  #5  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 11,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Sydney, Australia (The other side of the planet).
Whoa, you can cut the tension in here with a knife...
Old 02-14-01 | 12:03 AM
  #6  
X's Avatar
X
Administrator
 
Joined: Oct 1987
Posts: 12,076
Received 419 Likes on 291 Posts
From: AA-
Originally posted by Fhrx
Whoa, you can cut the tension in here with a knife...
Just don't let either of them get ahold of it.
Old 02-14-01 | 12:25 AM
  #7  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 20,590
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: In a place without the cursed couch
What kind of S-Video cable did you have before?
If it was a MONSTER or a similar brand cable the difference may not be all the noticeable. I jumped from the S Video cable that came in the DVD player box, to a set of Gold plated Component cables, and I noticed a decent improvement.
Just food for thought
Old 02-14-01 | 12:31 AM
  #8  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Westland, Michigan
It was the S-video that came with the DVD player, I believe. Just one I remembered I had lying around. The Component cable I tried was the MonsterVideo2 cables with 24 karat gold connectors and all the other stuff. Barely saw a bit of difference.
Old 02-14-01 | 10:14 AM
  #9  
Member
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: bayside, ny, usa
Yes the difference is less noticeable than the jump from composite to Svideo but some feel it's worth it. I do. I believe that colors are more saturated and more realistic.
Old 02-15-01 | 06:30 PM
  #10  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: New York City
Also, the component video usually bypasses the TV's digital comb filter, which means you should calibrate the set with one of the HT setup DVDs.
Old 02-15-01 | 08:36 PM
  #11  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,452
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Los Angeles, CA
Please note that 'gold plated' connectors are neither a indicator of quality nor better image. In fact, on most cheaper cables it can be more a detriment, as their low quality gold plating is atop inferior metals. Gold is only used because it is a noble metal and doesn't corrode like others, and though it has inherent high distortion and resistance it's considered 'pleasant' and tolerable. High quality silver is far superior and far more desirable.

Interpretation: Gold connectors doesn't mean squat
Old 02-16-01 | 09:09 AM
  #12  
DVD Talk Special Edition
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: New York City
[i]Interpretation: Gold connectors doesn't mean squat [/B]
I could not agree more.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.