Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > DVD Discussions > DVD & Home Theater Gear
Reload this Page >

These new receivers are FAT

Community
Search
DVD & Home Theater Gear Discuss DVD and Home Theater Equipment.

These new receivers are FAT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-18-07 | 07:42 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 7,935
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Atlanta
These new receivers are FAT

Well, I'm sure there have always been larger receivers out there (the better ones, yeah?), but in my search for a new pup with HDMI features it seems most of them are well over 6'' in heighth. The shelves for my components can't fit anything taller than 5 7/8''. Can't adjust either (glass shelves... bought the thing cheap as a floor model a few years ago).

If you know of a good mid-priced receiver that is skinny, lay it on me! Or else I think I'll saw an inch into the bottom of one of the supports (1/5 of the support) to fit a new receiver. Ugly, but only seen by laying on the ground.
Old 03-18-07 | 07:55 AM
  #2  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 25,295
Likes: 0
Received 51 Likes on 40 Posts
From: Hail to the Redskins!
Isn't the JVC HDMI model like only 4" or so?
Old 03-18-07 | 08:45 AM
  #3  
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 7,935
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Atlanta
I'll have to check the JVC model again. At Amazon it says it's 6'' exactly, but it sure looks thinner in the photo.
Old 03-18-07 | 08:54 AM
  #4  
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 7,935
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Atlanta
Crutchfield lists the JVC RX-D412B at under four inches. That looks right (Amazon listed the specs wrong I think). I hate the idea of choosing a model based on it's size, but I'll have to look into this more. I was leaning towards the Onkyo 604.

edit: Eh, the JVC doesn't seem that appealing to me.

Last edited by atlantamoi; 03-18-07 at 09:31 AM.
Old 03-18-07 | 11:28 AM
  #5  
DVD Talk Hero
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 25,295
Likes: 0
Received 51 Likes on 40 Posts
From: Hail to the Redskins!
Originally Posted by atlantamoi
Crutchfield lists the JVC RX-D412B at under four inches. That looks right (Amazon listed the specs wrong I think). I hate the idea of choosing a model based on it's size, but I'll have to look into this more. I was leaning towards the Onkyo 604.

edit: Eh, the JVC doesn't seem that appealing to me.
Me neither, and you are right, you shouldn't be choosing a model based on size.
Old 03-18-07 | 02:04 PM
  #6  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,830
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Mpls, MN
My shortest one is over 7". Oh wait, receiver. Yeah, that too.
Old 03-19-07 | 08:12 AM
  #7  
SoSpacey's Avatar
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 4,238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Jersey
my expensive component rack ($600, 2 years ago) only supports 25lbs per shelf (glass shelves).

my new yamaha is almost 40lbs.

i had to sit it on the bottom shelf (wood). now all of my cables are the wrong length and i either have to use a remote or kneel on the floor.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.