Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > DVD Discussions > DVD & Home Theater Gear
Reload this Page >

Beginner to HDTV, need DVD player

Community
Search
DVD & Home Theater Gear Discuss DVD and Home Theater Equipment.

Beginner to HDTV, need DVD player

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-15-06 | 09:59 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Beginner to HDTV, need DVD player

We just got a sharp aquos and none of us are very familiar with all of this HDTV talk. From what I know I can tell that we need a new DVD player because the current one is not progressive scan. Does anyone have any suggestions for one that is not too expensive but not cheaply made and prone to burn out? I was looking at the phillips 642 because it's region-free and cheap, but will it last? Is there a whole lot more that can be done with the PQ?

I already have a region free player so it's not a big deal, whatever we get will be used basically for just watching DVDs.

Another question-- is an HDMI cable necessary to get 720p and up? The highest I was able to get out of the TV was 480p (hooking up my own dvd player) and I didn't notice a huge difference from 480i. There's still quite a bit of noise and shiny edges. Thanks for any suggestions.
Old 10-15-06 | 11:22 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: NC
A lot of people with HD setups, like this brand. I've not seen one personally, but they get rave reviews. http://www.oppodigital.com/
Good luck!
Old 10-15-06 | 11:30 AM
  #3  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,218
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Dark City
Originally Posted by DVD King
We just got a sharp aquos and none of us are very familiar with all of this HDTV talk. From what I know I can tell that we need a new DVD player because the current one is not progressive scan. Does anyone have any suggestions for one that is not too expensive but not cheaply made and prone to burn out? I was looking at the phillips 642 because it's region-free and cheap, but will it last? Is there a whole lot more that can be done with the PQ?

I already have a region free player so it's not a big deal, whatever we get will be used basically for just watching DVDs.

Another question-- is an HDMI cable necessary to get 720p and up? The highest I was able to get out of the TV was 480p (hooking up my own dvd player) and I didn't notice a huge difference from 480i. There's still quite a bit of noise and shiny edges. Thanks for any suggestions.
You can get HD via component cables as well, so you aren't locked into HDMI.

I've heard mixed things about the Phillips 642 although the price is certainly right. One complaint I've heard that I have never been able to verify adequately is that when the machine powers off, the progressive scan setting shuts itself off automatically. When you power back up, you would need to go into the settings an reselect it (even though it appears that it is still correctly set) to get it to start progressively scanning. Read the threads in the international forum on this unit.

The OPPO gets great reviews, is region-free, upconverts and comes with the HDMI cable. It is around $200 shipped which may be more than you want to spend. I personally am using the Toshiba HD DVD player ($350ish) now for most of my DVD watching and using my Toshiba SD4900 (I paid
Old 10-15-06 | 07:50 PM
  #4  
DVD Talk Limited Edition
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,830
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Mpls, MN
That is generally not correct above by chente. You CANNOT get HD resolution out of a DVD player with component video cables.

Samsung has never been high on the quality list, but the Philips mentioned above is even lower. A Pioneer, Panasonic, or Sony in this price range would probably give better picture quality.
Old 10-16-06 | 08:40 AM
  #5  
Chew's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 18,628
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: South of Titletown
If not $200, how about $150? The 970 Oppo model is fantastic. I've had it for a couple months now and it's easily the best player I've ever had.
Old 10-16-06 | 11:31 AM
  #6  
SoSpacey's Avatar
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 4,238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Jersey
Sony

I bought the above model at Best Buy because I had some reward certificates to use. Very well rated and solid unit.

Its the same price at BB and Amzon right now but you have to pay tax at BB, or at least most of us do.
Old 10-17-06 | 12:57 AM
  #7  
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,218
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Dark City
Originally Posted by Spiky
That is generally not correct above by chente. You CANNOT get HD resolution out of a DVD player with component video cables.

Samsung has never been high on the quality list, but the Philips mentioned above is even lower. A Pioneer, Panasonic, or Sony in this price range would probably give better picture quality.
That's right. What I thought he was asking is whether the component cables could pass the HD signal like say from an OTA HDTV box or a HD DVD player. My apologies for the confusion.
Old 10-17-06 | 11:22 AM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Sugar Grove, IL
How much did you spend on the TV? A brief search tells me that the cheapest Sharp Aquos HDTV (the 42" model) is over $2000. So why cheap out on the DVD player?

I've got an Oppo, and it's great, but if I didn't already have it I would easily justify the Toshiba HD-DVD player.

What you're doing sounds kind of like powereing $2000 speakers with a $50 receiver...
Old 10-17-06 | 12:12 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 567
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From: Sugar Grove, IL
OK, fair enough.

On the one hand, I'm not sure how noticeable the improvements will be on a 32" TV.

On the other hand, though, the OPPO is generally considered a great deal for the price. Plus it is easily made region free (as well as converting PAL to NTSC). To me the extra $100 or so would be worth it just so that I wouldn't be second-guessing myself, wondering if I was not getting the full quality out of my nice new TV. I guess that, even though the TV was only $1000 (instead of $2000), I can't understand why another $100 on the DVD player is that big of a deal.

Good luck, hope you're happy with whatever you get.

Last edited by berserker37; 10-17-06 at 12:15 PM.
Old 10-17-06 | 12:27 PM
  #10  
Chew's Avatar
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 18,628
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: South of Titletown
Again, or $50 more on the Oppo 970.

It does all that the 971 does, plus a few more extra features. Nearly every review I've read said the difference in picture quality would NOT be noticed the smaller the TV is, especially the one in question here.

In addition, the 971 is the outdated model. They're coming out with a replacement for it fairly shortly (which could also mean the 971 might go on clearance or show up cheap on eBay once that does happen).

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.