Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > DVD Discussions > DVD & Home Theater Gear
Reload this Page >

Are some DVDs not compatible with component output?

Community
Search
DVD & Home Theater Gear Discuss DVD and Home Theater Equipment.

Are some DVDs not compatible with component output?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-12-04 | 07:22 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All DVDs are compatible with component output. :)

I have several DVDs that have a playback problem through component outputs. I have seen this now on Titanic, Rush Hour, Mission Impossible, Birdy and The Pink Panther (new box set version).
They all look jerky, not smooth, like they are skipping frames or something. They play fine through S-Video.
The guy at the local A/V store said it must be that the discs were not recorded in the proper format to be played through component. Got basically the same story from Philips Support.

Equipment:
Samsung HLN4365W (43" DLP HD Monitor)
Philips DVDR75/17

Can anyone confirm, deny or otherwise know whats going on here?
Thanks.

PS- Also on Titanic and Mission Impossible, the aspects don't display correctly. I set the DVD player to display in 16x9 but If I put the TV on normal, they have a box all around. If I set the TV to wide (which is correct for most of my titles) it stretches the image.

Last edited by BDub; 05-13-04 at 07:55 AM.
Old 05-12-04 | 09:34 AM
  #2  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Make sure that your player is spitting a out a progressive scan stream - Component RGB is more or less reserved for this type of transmission from the deck to the display, and it requires that your DVD player be progressive scan capable - otherwise you are stuck with either S-Video or Composite (Yellow analog) - thats why it works through S-Video and not through RGB - you are experiencing the jitters because the display (connected through RGB) is expecting 480p but if your not outputing Progressive scan stream from the deck, its receiving 480i ... proverbial apples and oranges syndrome

According to Phillips, your deck is Progressive Scan capable -- you just need to find the switch or setting somewhere on the back or in the device's On-Screen menu to enable it (this is usually set of off by default)

Regarding the improperly displayed movies that you mention, check to see if they are anamorphic transfers - in a NON anamorphic transfer, the black bars are actually part of the displayed image and your screen is forced to display them...where as anamorphically enhanced titles are only just the aspect ratio image -- no black bars included in the video stream -- non anamorphic transfers suck and you have no choice but to use the various expand/stretch modes to view a proper picture.

Last edited by JupiterPrime; 05-12-04 at 09:48 AM.
Old 05-12-04 | 09:50 AM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks, Jupiter.
I tried switching between progressive and interlaced on Mission Impossible and it didn't affect the playback (except for quality).
Any other ideas? Were the A/V salesperson and the Philips Support guy full of it?
Old 05-12-04 | 10:17 AM
  #4  
X's Avatar
X
Administrator
 
Joined: Oct 1987
Posts: 12,067
Received 414 Likes on 289 Posts
From: AA-
Maybe your player has trouble deinterlacing badly flagged DVDs?
Old 05-12-04 | 10:39 AM
  #5  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by BDub
Thanks, Jupiter.
I tried switching between progressive and interlaced on Mission Impossible and it didn't affect the playback (except for quality).
Any other ideas? Were the A/V salesperson and the Philips Support guy full of it?
crappy cables? You want a good quality set of cables - I know someone who didnt want to spend the $80 for a good set of cables and just used some spare standard gauge audio RCA cables {shakes head} "Dude, you spend $2000 on teh set, $200 on the player, have at least 400 moveis and your penny-pinching on cables?"

needless to say he went and bought them - now I cant say that THAT will solve your problem, but hey you never know --- try using a differnt player if you have one and see if the player is the problem? It could be just as "X" described above
Old 05-12-04 | 11:33 AM
  #6  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by X
Maybe your player has trouble deinterlacing badly flagged DVDs?
That could be as my player does not have the Faroujda chip. But my TV supposedly does and image quality is better via progressive from the DVD player.

crappy cables? You want a good quality set of cables -
RCA brand component cables. Not the best but if they were crappy wouldn't it show on all DVDs?

I have an Apex player I can try the components on. Its not progressive though.

I guess this DVD player will be my first "burn" on an electronics purchase.
Old 05-12-04 | 11:39 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From: Northern Virginia
PS- Also on Titanic and Mission Impossible, the aspects don't display correctly. I set the DVD player to display in 16x9 but If I put the TV on normal, they have a box all around. If I set the TV to wide (which is correct for most of my titles) it stretches the image.
Both Titanic and Mission Impossible are not 16x9 enhanced. Do yourself a favor and get a Momitsu V880 DVD player or a Bravo D2. Those two players will work wonders to your DLP display.
Old 05-12-04 | 12:27 PM
  #8  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by hoyalawya
Both Titanic and Mission Impossible are not 16x9 enhanced. Do yourself a favor and get a Momitsu V880 DVD player or a Bravo D2. Those two players will work wonders to your DLP display.
Thanks. I came across a review for the Momitsu and apparently it does the same thing:
Anamorphic Video - With TV type set to 16:9, the V880 presents non-anamorphic DVDs in correct proportions but in a "zoomed out" letterboxed format. By this I mean that the image has black bars on top, bottom, and both sides. Hence, the image although not squished is much smaller than the actual TV screen. One can "force" the image to zoom in by setting the TV Type in the SetUp menu from 16:9 to 4:3 Letterbox. This however results in the annoying stretched look (see picture below).
Old 05-12-04 | 01:39 PM
  #9  
X's Avatar
X
Administrator
 
Joined: Oct 1987
Posts: 12,067
Received 414 Likes on 289 Posts
From: AA-
This may address the problem you're having.
What Can Go Wrong

Flag Reading vs. Cadence Reading

Before we get into specific problems, be aware that progressive DVD players can be divided into two basic types: flag-reading and cadence reading. Flag-reading players use the flags embedded in the MPEG stream to make decisions about what deinterlacing algorithm to use. Cadence-reading players ignore the flags, and analyze the content of the frames as they come out of the MPEG decoder to figure out which algorithms to use.

Flag-reading players have two major difficulties: they are often tripped up by errors in the MPEG stream, where the flags are not correct, and they drop to video mode if the encoding is non-standard, even on good film material. They generally have no way of doing 3-2 pulldown detection other than looking for the alternating "repeat_first_field" flag, so if it's missing, the film mode won't kick in, and you end up seeing the video-mode deinterlacing. This is watchable, but the main reason to get a progressive DVD player is to get film-mode deinterlacing. You can get video-mode deinterlacing from the deinterlacer in the TV. In general, we marked a test "fail" if the player went to video mode on material that was sourced from film.

Cadence-reading players are not tripped up by non-standard or missing flags, which is good, but they can be tripped up by glitches in the cadence. If the 3-2 sequence is interrupted, sometimes the cadence-reading players will stay in film mode for a handful of frames, and the result on screen is combing, which is very distracting. Similarly, once a cadence-reading player is in video mode, it typically takes a few moments to re-synchronize to the cadence and return to film mode. During that time, the player is using the inferior video-mode deinterlacing when it perhaps doesn't need to. Our tests will tell you how long it took the player to return to film mode after being forced into video mode by a bad cadence break.

Some flag readers blindly follow the flags on the disc exactly as they are encoded, which fails miserably on a wide variety of films. The most common problem with this is the hundreds of discs that have a common encoding error where the progressive_frame flag alternates off and on every other frame. This causes the simple flag readers to constantly slip in and out of film mode, and potentially in and out of progressive chroma upsampling mode, both of which are very bad. The result is a constantly strobing image, sometimes subtly and sometimes grossly. This problem in the flags was caused by a bug in an MPEG encoder, but that MPEG encoder was extremely popular, and is still in use, for example for a variety of recent Disney releases. Players ignore this problem at their peril.

The better flag readers try to look at the overall pattern of flags and make good decisions based on the sequences going by. For example, when they see the alternating progressive_frame flag, they treat it (correctly) as though the progressive_frame flag was always on. Some of them have a small set of flag patterns that they recognize as "film" and ignore any other pattern. For example, they may only go into film mode if they see a progressive frame with repeat_first_field set, followed by a progressive_frame without repeat_first_field set (which is the most common 3-2 pulldown pattern used on most big Hollywood releases). Where this fails to do the right thing is with 2-2 pulldown content. 2-2 is not terrifically common in this country (though it does exist) but is very common in Europe.

There are also hybrid players that use both flag reading and cadence reading, as well as players that allow the user to select between the two strategies. Sadly, all the players that allow you to switch between the two strategies label the menu item incredibly cryptically, and some give terrible advice in the owner’s manual. One in particular suggests that "Mode 2," which is the flag-reading mode, should be used to avoid losing detail in dark areas, which makes no sense at all. We can only assume that the tech writer confused the black level setting with the deinterlacing setting, though that advice is bad even for the black level setting. In addition, the players that allow switching generally have excellent cadence-reading deinterlacers, so the flag reading mode is most of the time a big step down in quality.

The ones that use both flags and cadence usually have a small set of flag patterns that they will "trust" as being film mode. Typically this is one or two variants of the standard 3-2 pattern. If they don't see the 3-2 flag pattern, they hand off the decision-making to the cadence analysis on the deinterlacing chip, which then gets a chance to make the right choice. When the cadence analysis isn't very good, this tends to improve the deinterlacing. When the cadence analysis is good, there's no real reason to use this strategy because the likelihood of a good cadence reading chip missing a strong 3-2 pattern is very low.

A hybrid strategy that we believe would provide a small improvement over cadence analysis would be to use the flags to change the bias of the cadence analysis algorithm. If the flags say the source is film, then the cadence analysis would be weighted to be a bit more likely to choose film mode. If the flags say the source is video, the cadence analysis would be weighted the other way. If the cadence is strong, the weighting wouldn't make much difference. But in cases where the cadence is hard to read, the flag weighting would make a larger difference. This could give a player the best of both worlds, though there might be a handful of titles that would do worse than with cadence reading alone. Overall we think it would be an improvement. Unfortunately, we know of no player that does this.

Most of the problems listed below only affect one kind of player or the other. Flag problems don't trip up cadence-reading players, and cadence problems usually don't trip up flag-reading players. We prefer cadence-reading players, as they handle more material properly. No flag reading player has ever done very well in our tests. They just can't handle odd material.

So, That Said, Here is a Partial List of Things That Can Go "Wrong" on a DVD:

Alternating Progressive Flag

On some material sourced originally from film, the progressive_frame flag is on for one frame, then off for the next frame, then on for the next frame, and so on. This causes no problems for an interlaced display, but progressive decoders that use the flags religiously will switch every other frame between film-mode decoding and video-mode decoding, with results that range from almost unnoticeable, to very annoying. Titanic, Austin Powers, Bad Company, Return to Neverland, and Monsters Inc. are examples of discs with this problem, and there are many more, so it's not isolated to obscure discs. On the WHQL disc, the Film Alternate 2 sequence has this problem.

No Progressive Flag

Some discs have no progressive_frame flag set on any pictures on the disc, and don’t use repeat_first_field. They just dump the film transfer with its inherent 3-2 pulldown onto the disc without any special flags, as though it was video. When this is done, 2 out of every 5 frames on the disc contain fields from two different frames of film (see the third MPEG flags table at the top of the article for a diagram). Again, a player that uses the flags exclusively will treat this material as video, and you lose the special film mode deinterlacing that makes a progressive player look so good. In the worst case, the player will combine fields that are stored in one MPEG frame, but came from two different film frames, causing combing. Cirque Du Soleil: Quidam and the trailer on the Galaxy Quest disc are two examples of this problem, but there are literally thousands of discs that were transferred this way, mostly titles from smaller studios and video companies. In addition, you often see short spurts of this problem even on major-label discs, sometimes for hundreds of frames in a row, including titles like. Con Express, Cross Roads, Dinotopia, Felicity, Friends, Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Once and Again, and Mad About You are examples of discs with this problem, and there are many more, so it's not isolated to obscure discs. In fact, the majority of TV shows released on DVD are encoded this way. You also see this on a huge amount of supplementary material like documentaries and trailers.

Progressive Flag on Non-Progressive Material

This is a rare problem, but one that does crop up. This is when material that came originally from video, or film that has not been transferred correctly, has the progressive_frame flag set on every picture in the MPEG stream, even though some or all of the fields come from different points in time. This particular problem causes players that read the flags to comb badly (see below for pictures of combing). The Galaxy Quest main menu intro, The Big Lebowski making-of documentary, and the Apollo 13 making-of documentary all have this problem, as does the WHQL Mixed Mode Alternate 1 sequence.

3-3 and 2-2 Sequences

This usually happens when two MPEG pictures in a row have the repeat_first_field flag set the same, either true or false. If they are both true, you get a 3-3 sequence. If they are both false, you get a 2-2 sequence. Players that look exclusively at the cadence can be tripped up by both of these problems, if they continue to stay in film mode for a few frames even after they detect a cadence problem. This problem is sometimes caused by something like seamless branching, where the end of one segment ends with a 3 frame, and the next segment begins with a 3 frame. Most encoders won’t catch a problem like that. Also, some DVD encoders will do odd things to the flags right around a chapter stop, like switching to a 2-2 cadence, or dropping the progressive-frame flag, or both. A wide variety of mainstream movies have this problem scattered all over the disc, including Star Wars: Attack of the Clones, ET, Lord of the Rings: Extended Edition, Ice Age, Lilo and Stitch, and Independence Day, just to name a few.

This error is very common in supplements, but is also found distressingly often in major Hollywood releases, especially right around chapter stops. DVD encoding software often create cadence glitches right at chapter stops or at points where special features kick in and out (things like multiple angles and seamless branching). And there are films that just have cadence glitches at random intervals throughout the film for no apparent reason.

Film-to-Video Transitions

On certain kinds of material, mainly documentaries about film and making-of or behind-the-scenes videos, sections of video are interspersed with sections of film. Players that use cadence matching may see the film cadence and settle into the pattern, only to have a problem when the pattern abruptly ends. And from a flag standpoint, many MPEG encoders make mistakes in flagging right when the source switches from video to film. Some keep the progressive flag set to true for a frame or two after the film section has already ended, which causes combing, and some drop the progressive flag well before the film section has ended, which causes some players to drop into video mode before they really need to. Almost all making-of documentaries demonstrate this problem, and in fact many cadence-reading players comb on all such supplements. The Big Lebowski making-of video demonstrates this kind of problem, but in general all making-of documentaries will have the same set of issues.

Shot on Film, Edited as Video

A fairly large amount of material these days is shot on film to get a film “look,” then transferred to video for editing and other post-production, as editing and post are much cheaper for video. Almost all episodic TV, music videos, and made-for-TV movies are done this way. This is a torture test for cadence-reading deinterlacers, as each scene will have the 3-2 cadence internally, but edits will more often than not break it, since the makers didn’t care about keeping the film cadence intact. In our test suite, we used More Tales of the City, which is a textbook example of this kind of material. However, you will find that most music videos and made-for-TV material will have the same problem. In addition, shows with lots of special effects have this problem all the time, because often the live action is shot on film and has a 3-2 pulldown pattern, but the effects are produced in a computer and have a 2-2 pulldown pattern. Overlaid titles like subtitles, show credits, dates and places (things that are shown at the bottom of the screen at the beginning of a scene like "New York City, 1856") also tend to work this way - the title generators used for TV are 2-2 coherent, and cause strange cadence glitches. We've seen problems like this on the X-Files, Buffy the Vampire Slayer, and many other TV shows on DVD. Even films are not immune: the new footage on the special edition of Star Trek the Motion Picture has 2-2 special effects that screw up the cadence (and the flags).

Film Montages

This is really a special case of the above problem, where a documentary will pull together segments of film and edit them together on video. This often happens in trailers and ads designed for showing on TV, and in making-of documentaries, where segments from different parts of the film are edited together for effect. Again, the 3-2 cadence will generally break on more the half the cuts.
http://www.hometheaterhifi.com/volum...e-10-2000.html
Old 05-12-04 | 01:57 PM
  #10  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wow. Thanks X. (I think)

That linked page pretty much confirms that my player SUCKS.

FAILED
Layer Change
Chroma, 4:2:0 ICP
Blacker-than-Black
3-2 Cadence, Film Flags
3-2 Cadence, Alt. Flags
3-2 Cadence, Video Flags
3-2 Cadence, Mixed Flags
2-2 Cadence, Film Flags
Film Mode High Detail
Bad Edit
Video to Film Transition
Recovery Time
Incorrect Progressive Flags
Motion Adaptive
Old 05-12-04 | 03:00 PM
  #11  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 12,349
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
From: USA
Aside from the fact that your player is of poor quality (once again reinforcing my belief that you absolutely get what you pay for) I find it amazing that someone would actually suggest that the DVD was not produced correctly.

Imagine calling up one of the studios to inform that their product was not produced correctly because the "guy at the local store said so".

What I would do now that you know what to look for is to do research on better quality players and before you buy one, check out the return policy and take it home, hook it up and test it on these and some better quality discs.

Good luck!
Old 05-13-04 | 07:54 AM
  #12  
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, I was using this player with a 27" Sony CRT (no component inputs) since Dec. and was happy. Just recently was that replaced with the DLP. I did research posts about it here and at avsforum before buying and didn't read about any major problems like this.

Anyway, I hooked up my other player, and these tiltles play fine.

Emailed Philips support again and said I wanted a fix or an exchange for another model without this flaw (under warranty).

Will probably have to keep this and use it just for recording.

Thanks all.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.