Go Back  DVD Talk Forum > DVD Discussions > DVD & Home Theater Gear
Reload this Page >

Digital Output - Coax vs Optical

Community
Search
DVD & Home Theater Gear Discuss DVD and Home Theater Equipment.

Digital Output - Coax vs Optical

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-02-02, 02:32 PM
  #26  
X
Administrator
 
X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1987
Location: AA-
Posts: 11,473
Received 154 Likes on 124 Posts
Originally posted by renaldow
Now you sit down at the computer, dial up your ISP w/ your 56k modem, and you either have problems connecting at first and have to try a couple of time, or you're busy online and your modem loses connection. That's digital over copper, and the problems are caused by the interference on the line because the exact information being sent and received is being damaged.
My DSL comes over copper lines. At least 1000 feet away I'm still able to receive their max of 8Mbps (digital) over regular copper phone lines.

The reason the modem is slow is because it converts the digital signals to an analog signal to go over the phone line and reassembles it to digital on the other end. Even though digital "bits" are being transmitted, they're being sent in an analog form. It has to do with having to be compatible with the long-established audio circuitry and switching of the phone system, not that it's going over copper lines.
Old 12-03-02, 12:44 AM
  #27  
DVD Talk Hall of Fame
 
CaptainMarvel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 8,169
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally posted by bmello
Does anyone make a optical to coax adapter? I've used all of the optical slots on my receiver.
http://www.partsexpress.com carries them. Type in converter in the search box, and you can pull up powered coax-to-optical adapters and optical-to-coax adapters for around $17.00 each. They were recommended by some people at another forum.
Old 12-03-02, 12:55 PM
  #28  
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Montclair, NJ
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is absolutely no difference between a cheap-o coax cable and expensive gold plated cable when it comes to digital audio. Except price.

Shielding doesn't matter -- it just has to be conductive.
A few years back, someone soldered rca jacks onto a wire hanger. Not only was there no difference in sound, but there was no difference in bandwidth. As long as there is conduction, 1's and 0's are not affected.

In re digital audio, there is no difference between optical and coax. There is no difference between out of the box cables and Monster cable.
Old 12-03-02, 07:21 PM
  #29  
DVD Talk Legend
 
Josh Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Boston
Posts: 11,763
Received 257 Likes on 181 Posts
Originally posted by renaldow
It seems foolish to me not to use an optical cable if that option is available to you. Optical is inherenly a clean medium and it doesn't add to, and isn't effected by, the electrical storm that is your TV, center speaker, receiver, DVD player, VCR, game console and TiVo, cable box, direcTV box, etc.
You know, for every person that makes a passionate argument for the inherent superiority of optical cables, there is another person who can make an equally convincing case for why optical cables are garbage and only coaxial cables can transmit the signal correctly.

In reality, audible difference between the two is non-existent to human ears unless there is an outside circumstance affecting the results (such as a faulty digital connection on the DVD player or receiver).

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.