Is this receiver a good choice (Technics SA-DA20N)?
#1
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Los Angeles
Is this receiver a good choice (Technics SA-DA20N)?
I'm a newbie and by no means an audiophile. From what I've read, this "discontinued" receiver seems to be a pretty nice value as I can get it from etronics.com for 305 shipped. The reviews here http://www.audioreview.com/reviews/A...ct_69121.shtml give it a 4.68/5 out of 41 reviews. However, searching home theater boards--I see know mention of it at all. Am I missing something here?
By the way, I plan to have it power JBL's NSP1 5 speaker system with a matching JBL 10" sub.
By the way, I plan to have it power JBL's NSP1 5 speaker system with a matching JBL 10" sub.
#2
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Los Angeles
i would also consider the yamaha htr-5460, denon 1602 (albeit less power here tho), or somthing from onkyo....
what makes one better than the other for powering this JBL NSP1 + sub setup?
Also, why did panasonic stop the technics receiver line? It appears from all the reviews that they were quality units and the sa-da20n originally had an MSRP of 800.
Thanks!
what makes one better than the other for powering this JBL NSP1 + sub setup?
Also, why did panasonic stop the technics receiver line? It appears from all the reviews that they were quality units and the sa-da20n originally had an MSRP of 800.
Thanks!
Last edited by ufgatorinla; 01-11-02 at 02:46 AM.
#3
DVD Talk Legend
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 14,810
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Is this receiver a good choice (Technics SA-DA20N)?
Originally posted by ufgatorinla
I'm a newbie and by no means an audiophile. From what I've read, this "discontinued" receiver seems to be a pretty nice value as I can get it from etronics.com for 305 shipped. The reviews here http://www.audioreview.com/reviews/A...ct_69121.shtml give it a 4.68/5 out of 41 reviews. However, searching home theater boards--I see know mention of it at all. Am I missing something here?
By the way, I plan to have it power JBL's NSP1 5 speaker system with a matching JBL 10" sub.
I'm a newbie and by no means an audiophile. From what I've read, this "discontinued" receiver seems to be a pretty nice value as I can get it from etronics.com for 305 shipped. The reviews here http://www.audioreview.com/reviews/A...ct_69121.shtml give it a 4.68/5 out of 41 reviews. However, searching home theater boards--I see know mention of it at all. Am I missing something here?
By the way, I plan to have it power JBL's NSP1 5 speaker system with a matching JBL 10" sub.
#4
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Los Angeles
whis is the onkyo 494 the better choice? especially since it puts out a lot less power (55) per channel than the technics (100).
Last edited by ufgatorinla; 01-11-02 at 11:23 AM.
#5
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 2,864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Alexandria, VA
Originally posted by ufgatorinla
whis is the onkyo 494 the better choice? especially since it puts out a lot less power (55) per channel than the technics (100).
whis is the onkyo 494 the better choice? especially since it puts out a lot less power (55) per channel than the technics (100).
I recently switched out a 100 WPC JVC receiver for a 70 WPC receiver (Onkyo 575-X). The Onkyo is not only louder but MUCH cleaner.
When you're looking at the power ratings, look at the additional stats....number of channels driven, frequency range of the test, and the THD values.
IMO, you're much better off with a comparably priced (and lower wattage rated) Onkyo, Denon, Marantz, etc receiver than one "rated" at 100+ WPC and with tons of bells and whistles. Most of the settings on your receiver (9,000 DSP modes, etc) will never get used. It's most important to go with the receiver that will give you better sound quality. That, (again, IMO) will come from receivers that use better componentry such as the Onkyo, Denon, etc.
Hope that helps, and happy shopping
#6
Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: florida
Yes to all the above!
Onkyo/HK/SonyES 3 or 5/JVC 9 or 10/Denon/are all quality units or brands.
I would save up and get the best rcvr you can that has 5/6/7 discrete full amps and built in 6.1 and dolbyES and II.
The pioneer 850 and sony 1075 are cheap 6 channel rcvrs. But You should go with Onkyo or Denon and maybe and I stress maybe the Sony 5es or JVC 10( too new on the market to know at this time).
Onkyo/HK/SonyES 3 or 5/JVC 9 or 10/Denon/are all quality units or brands.
I would save up and get the best rcvr you can that has 5/6/7 discrete full amps and built in 6.1 and dolbyES and II.
The pioneer 850 and sony 1075 are cheap 6 channel rcvrs. But You should go with Onkyo or Denon and maybe and I stress maybe the Sony 5es or JVC 10( too new on the market to know at this time).
#8
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Los Angeles
thanks for the help...i think i'll go with the onkyo 494 to start out with and upgrade later down the road....i just dropped a wad of cash on a 32" wega...anyone know a good place to get this for a decent price? jandr is out of stock..
#9
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 2,041
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by edclem
The Onkyo will be rated full bandwidth, all channels driven. Also, the Onkyo will have high current capability, and the Technics likely won't.
The Onkyo will be rated full bandwidth, all channels driven. Also, the Onkyo will have high current capability, and the Technics likely won't.




