Small 16x9 TVs?
#1
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Legend
Small 16x9 TVs?
Hi all.
Just wondering if there are any small room size WideScreen TVs. Like.. I have a 19" in my room and I'd like something around the same size. Are there any available that small?
Just wondering if there are any small room size WideScreen TVs. Like.. I have a 19" in my room and I'd like something around the same size. Are there any available that small?
#2
Senior Member
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Owings,MD,USA
The smallest that I've seen in the US is a 34" direct view (from Toshiba and I think RCA), and it's not that small - the rear part of the cabinet is pretty large. Europe has smaller models but I see you're in Dallas, TX and those sets are PAL anyway. Some int'l members of this very forum have posted about their 20" 16x9's - tiny.
The old 40" Toshiba WS projection TV is actually pretty small. The Best Buy near me still has them on display, so you could check that out.
The old 40" Toshiba WS projection TV is actually pretty small. The Best Buy near me still has them on display, so you could check that out.
#3
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: J-Ville
Samsung makes a 30" widescreen set EDTV (not HDTV) that sells at Costco for around $1,200. It also sells elsewhere but that is the cheapest I've seen it. It would make a nice TV for the PS2 or bedroom!
#4
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: On an island somewhere
Panasonic has a 15" 16:9 LCD flat panel display. And if you're thinking it might be expensive, you'd be right. I believe it's around $1500.
But hey! It's skinny!
BTW - It's an EDTV, not HDTV
But hey! It's skinny!
BTW - It's an EDTV, not HDTV
#6
Banned
Well, if we're talking TVs I think you're out of luck.
Now if we're talking monitors (i'd go this route anyways) there are a few 24" 16:10 monitors available. Some good deals to be found on older models.
Now if we're talking monitors (i'd go this route anyways) there are a few 24" 16:10 monitors available. Some good deals to be found on older models.
#8
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Indiana
Although these are 4:3 screen TVs, your best bet would be to go with a 27" Sony Wega; these are the smallest Wegas available with the 16:9 enhanced mode which allows the viewing of anamorphic DVDs in full resolution. There are three 27" models available; the least expensive model goes for about $549.
#9
Senior Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 765
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Springfield, VA
Originally posted by mjlukich
Although these are 4:3 screen TVs, your best bet would be to go with a 27" Sony Wega; these are the smallest Wegas available with the 16:9 enhanced mode which allows the viewing of anamorphic DVDs in full resolution. There are three 27" models available; the least expensive model goes for about $549.
Although these are 4:3 screen TVs, your best bet would be to go with a 27" Sony Wega; these are the smallest Wegas available with the 16:9 enhanced mode which allows the viewing of anamorphic DVDs in full resolution. There are three 27" models available; the least expensive model goes for about $549.
#10
Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the 16:9 mode makes the bars on the top and bottom even bigger. i do not like this.
i have the 27" samsung HDTV...
and BTW, samsung's 30" widescreen is an HDTV
these newer models support progressive scan and the like.
standard on my 27" tv is dolby pro logic sound, what does this mean for me?
i have the 27" samsung HDTV...
and BTW, samsung's 30" widescreen is an HDTV
these newer models support progressive scan and the like.
standard on my 27" tv is dolby pro logic sound, what does this mean for me?
#11
Banned
Oops. Sorry about the long reply.
Most of the big retailers carry the 16:10 monitors. Occasionally there are some deals, but they are relatively expensive, in the $2000 range.
If you have the money, you might want to take a look at the Sampo 30" 16:9 CRT. It's a nice monitor, although it's a bit bigger than what you're looking for, it's supports all the HDTV resolutions: 480p/1080i/720p, and makes a nice computer monitor to boot. They also go for around $2000
Most of the big retailers carry the 16:10 monitors. Occasionally there are some deals, but they are relatively expensive, in the $2000 range.
If you have the money, you might want to take a look at the Sampo 30" 16:9 CRT. It's a nice monitor, although it's a bit bigger than what you're looking for, it's supports all the HDTV resolutions: 480p/1080i/720p, and makes a nice computer monitor to boot. They also go for around $2000
#12
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 2,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: Long Island
I've had a Philips 28" Widescreen and can not recommend it: for Widescreen DVD's it's just too small to get the 'widescreen feeling' while for 4:3 viewing you really get a small picture. IMO 32" is the smallest possible size for widescreen TV's.
#13
DVD Talk Gold Edition
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From: J-Ville
Originally posted by BigHarp77
and BTW, samsung's 30" widescreen is an HDTV
and BTW, samsung's 30" widescreen is an HDTV
#14
DVD Talk Special Edition
Originally posted by BigHarp77
the 16:9 mode makes the bars on the top and bottom even bigger. i do not like this.
the 16:9 mode makes the bars on the top and bottom even bigger. i do not like this.
It sounds like you're not setting your DVD player to display in 16:9 mode once you set your TV that way. You'd end up with essentially a double-letterboxed picture.
#16
DVD Talk Legend
The 30 inch Samsung sells at best Buy for $999. I think I even saw it on sale there once for $899.
It has several features to make 4:3 viewing better. The stretch modes are decent, and when you crop the top and bottom, you can maunally pan up or down so you can only cut the top or bottom of the picture if you want. It's a flatscreen and has a great picture
On the minus side, 30 inches for a 16:9 TV is just too damn small.
It has several features to make 4:3 viewing better. The stretch modes are decent, and when you crop the top and bottom, you can maunally pan up or down so you can only cut the top or bottom of the picture if you want. It's a flatscreen and has a great picture
On the minus side, 30 inches for a 16:9 TV is just too damn small.
#17
DVD Talk Special Edition
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've got a 30" Philips 16X9 set and the size is perfect for me. I don't have a huge room, and sit about 8 feet from the TV.
I've yet to see a RPTV that impresses me enough to consider buying one. I'm keeping an open mind, but tubes seem to have a far better picture.
I've yet to see a RPTV that impresses me enough to consider buying one. I'm keeping an open mind, but tubes seem to have a far better picture.




