Question about comic book ad from 1965...
#1
Thread Starter
DVD Talk Legend
Question about comic book ad from 1965...
This ad for "Record Riot" appeared on the back of numerous Charlton comic books in 1965.


It lists 60 then-popular songs, which would never have sold in one batch for $2.98 if they were by the original artists (the Beatles, the Four Seasons, the Drifters, the Beach Boys, Dusty Springfield, Roger Miller, etc.).
What did people get if they bought this? One group doing all the songs? Several different cover bands? Instrumentals only?
Well, I googled "Record Riot comic book ad" and got this page:
http://leescomicrack.blogspot.com/20...cord-riot.html
And it takes forever for the writer, Lee, to get to the question of what the music sounds like and he doesn't fully answer my questions, but here's what he says:


It lists 60 then-popular songs, which would never have sold in one batch for $2.98 if they were by the original artists (the Beatles, the Four Seasons, the Drifters, the Beach Boys, Dusty Springfield, Roger Miller, etc.).
What did people get if they bought this? One group doing all the songs? Several different cover bands? Instrumentals only?
Well, I googled "Record Riot comic book ad" and got this page:
http://leescomicrack.blogspot.com/20...cord-riot.html
And it takes forever for the writer, Lee, to get to the question of what the music sounds like and he doesn't fully answer my questions, but here's what he says:
Yikes. There are some adequate imitations in the mix, but quite a number are something less than same, with the Beatles, Beach Boys, and Rolling Stones numbers especially awful (it's a toss-up between Help Me Rhonda and Good Vibrations). Not bad at all are Surfin' Bird, Summer in the City (a tad under-produced, but what can we expect?), This Diamond Ring, and My Girl. Overall, lousy, but not as lousy as we might expect. (Faint praise, you say?)
So why did I hunt these down? Because I love sound-alikes--don't ask me why. I love all the tracks here--good, bad, and I-want-my-$3.49-back dreadful. Sound-alikes make up about 1/10 of my collection, so I guess I'd better like the things.
So why did I hunt these down? Because I love sound-alikes--don't ask me why. I love all the tracks here--good, bad, and I-want-my-$3.49-back dreadful. Sound-alikes make up about 1/10 of my collection, so I guess I'd better like the things.
Last edited by Ash Ketchum; 11-09-18 at 02:45 PM.
#2
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Question about comic book ad from 1965...
I'm almost positive it would be cover versions, possibly by some anonymous group doing all of them. That sort of thing was fairly common before the 1970s.
#3
Re: Question about comic book ad from 1965...
I found a few 8-track tapes in my mom's attic once with a bunch of covers of popular songs by unknown artists. I have no idea what they sound like 'cause my parents threw away the 8-track player ages ago.
#4
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Question about comic book ad from 1965...
Very likely covers by session musicians needing a paycheck. My understanding of music rights is that you have to get the artist's permission to use a song in a movie but you only have to pay royalties to have someone else do a cover. That's why so many movies use covers of Beatles songs.
#5
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Question about comic book ad from 1965...
I remember those compilation albums from the 70s and 80s by K-Tel, which went out of their way to let you know that all songs were recorded by the original artists.
In the above ad they are careful to only list the song titles and not the artists, though they never mention that they are covers by session musicians, so it’s still rather deceptive.
In the above ad they are careful to only list the song titles and not the artists, though they never mention that they are covers by session musicians, so it’s still rather deceptive.
#6
Re: Question about comic book ad from 1965...
Very likely covers by session musicians needing a paycheck. My understanding of music rights is that you have to get the artist's permission to use a song in a movie but you only have to pay royalties to have someone else do a cover. That's why so many movies use covers of Beatles songs.
Once a cover is recorded, you need separate permission/license to use that cover version in a movie/tv show.
Permission is required to perform a song live also. When you see an artist do another artist's song live, there is nothing spontaneous/unplanned about it.
Prior to the tour, artists will contact the original artist and get their permission(obtain a license) beforehand.
#7
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Question about comic book ad from 1965...
I remember those compilation albums from the 70s and 80s by K-Tel, which went out of their way to let you know that all songs were recorded by the original artists.
In the above ad they are careful to only list the song titles and not the artists, though they never mention that they are covers by session musicians, so it’s still rather deceptive.
In the above ad they are careful to only list the song titles and not the artists, though they never mention that they are covers by session musicians, so it’s still rather deceptive.
Also, I remember that there was a scam outfit who named their studio band The Original Artists.
#8
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Question about comic book ad from 1965...
You need permission to do a cover also. Before doing a cover you need to license the song from the publishers. Most artists form their own publishing company to control the licensing of their music. If the original artist is also the songwriter, the original artist could deny a license to record a cover if they want.
Once a cover is recorded, you need separate permission/license to use that cover version in a movie/tv show.
Permission is required to perform a song live also. When you see an artist do another artist's song live, there is nothing spontaneous/unplanned about it.
Prior to the tour, artists will contact the original artist and get their permission(obtain a license) beforehand.
Once a cover is recorded, you need separate permission/license to use that cover version in a movie/tv show.
Permission is required to perform a song live also. When you see an artist do another artist's song live, there is nothing spontaneous/unplanned about it.
Prior to the tour, artists will contact the original artist and get their permission(obtain a license) beforehand.
https://www.harryfox.com/license_mus...l_license.html
What you aren't allowed to do without the artist's permission is directly sample a song, or copy the melody while using your own lyrics.




