Gerry Conway on creators rights and DC's twisted logic.
#26
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Gerry Conway on creators rights and DC's twisted logic.
I do think it's a bit messed up that the movies (and cartoons)take so many cues from classic comic book stories and don't credit the creators. Like X Men 2 and God Loves Man Kills.
#27
DVD Talk Special Edition
Re: Gerry Conway on creators rights and DC's twisted logic.
I have also read (in Back Issue, IIRC) that Dikto left Marvel because he was pissed that he was not getting writing credit on Spider-Man and Dr. Strange, since all Stan was doing at that point was filling the word balloons. So there was a time when he had at least some desire for more credit, perhaps back before he completely fell into the Randian abyss.
#28
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Building attractions one theme park at a time.
Posts: 10,800
Received 82 Likes
on
49 Posts
Re: Gerry Conway on creators rights and DC's twisted logic.
True. That documentary also mentions how Ditko had an issue with how Stan worded his involvement as Spider-Man's co-creator - "I have always considered Steve Ditko to be Spider-Man’s co-creator." Steve did not like the word "considered."
#29
Re: Gerry Conway on creators rights and DC's twisted logic.
Part of the problem with early comics is one person comes up with the idea and another person fleshes out the look and design of the character. A lot of the Marvel characters were probably initially thought of by Stan, then he writes down the idea and the artist creates the visuals from the description. So I guess it depends on what you consider "created" to mean. Does it mean just the "idea" or also the "implementation" of the idea.
#30
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Building attractions one theme park at a time.
Posts: 10,800
Received 82 Likes
on
49 Posts
Re: Gerry Conway on creators rights and DC's twisted logic.
For Spider-Man, the story goes....
Stan had an idea for a teenaged hero named "Spider-Man." He pitched it to Jack Kirby who revamped his old Fly idea (while at Archie during the 50s) and drew up a few pages. Stan didn't like it and asked Ditko for his version of the idea. Ditko pretty much did everything else.
Stan had an idea for a teenaged hero named "Spider-Man." He pitched it to Jack Kirby who revamped his old Fly idea (while at Archie during the 50s) and drew up a few pages. Stan didn't like it and asked Ditko for his version of the idea. Ditko pretty much did everything else.
#31
Senior Member
Re: Gerry Conway on creators rights and DC's twisted logic.
I feel like if this was the case, Vertigo properties would have been taken advantage of a lot more. Y The Last Man has been in development hell for years, as was Preacher until the AMC series got moving. Sandman and Death have both been in "in the works" for about 20 years.
#32
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Gerry Conway on creators rights and DC's twisted logic.
I think that the Vertigo contracts have become less favorable to creators in recent years, which is why we're seeing so few Vertigo titles from a-listers, with most of them taking their stuff to Image or Avatar.
#34
Re: Gerry Conway on creators rights and DC's twisted logic.
That's why I don't like buying DC products. They screw over their artists and writers and as a result no one wants to create anything new for them, which is why we get "new" characters like Blue Beetle IV an Uncle Sam III. The company just regurgitates the same material on a monthly basis, with 20 different variations.
#35
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Building attractions one theme park at a time.
Posts: 10,800
Received 82 Likes
on
49 Posts
Re: Gerry Conway on creators rights and DC's twisted logic.
That's why I don't like buying DC products. They screw over their artists and writers and as a result no one wants to create anything new for them, which is why we get "new" characters like Blue Beetle IV an Uncle Sam III. The company just regurgitates the same material on a monthly basis, with 20 different variations.
To be fair, Marvel does the exact same thing when it comes to creators and regurgitation. Look at Miles Morales (Ultimate Spider-Man II) or the female Thor. And Jack Kirby's heirs had to sue just to get his credit on the books, something Marvel should have done a long long time ago. The disrespect Marvel has shown to Jack Kirby lasted for decades. Not to mention all the other Marvel creators who weren't lucky enough to be Brian Michael Bendis.
Last edited by The Valeyard; 04-30-15 at 09:00 AM.
#36
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Gerry Conway on creators rights and DC's twisted logic.
I think Marvel knew that Kirby had a legitimate claim to a lot of their intellectual property as at least co-creator. Their lawyers probably told them over the decades to minimize Kirby's credit so it wouldn't be used against them in a lawsuit.
#37
Re: Gerry Conway on creators rights and DC's twisted logic.
To be fair, Marvel does the exact same thing when it comes to creators and regurgitation. Look at Miles Morales (Ultimate Spider-Man II) or the female Thor. And Jack Kirby's heirs had to sue just to get his credit on the books, something Marvel should have done a long long time ago. The disrespect Marvel has shown to Jack Kirby lasted for decades. Not to mention all the other Marvel creators who weren't lucky enough to be Brian Michael Bendis.
But I still watch some of their movies so I'm going to stop that too.
#38
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Gerry Conway on creators rights and DC's twisted logic.
I don't necessarily disagree with you but it is said that Stan's idea was to make him a teenager with real world problems which is what really pushed that character into the stratosphere, at least popularity-wise, at the time.
#39
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Gerry Conway on creators rights and DC's twisted logic.
Stan definitely had a hand in Spider-Man. I am not sure if the character ever becomes as popular as he became without Ditko's influence.
#40
Re: Gerry Conway on creators rights and DC's twisted logic.
Stan had the initial idea. Spider-Man started with him so he deserves the creator credit for that alone. Ditko took that idea and gave it form and shape; quite necessary in a graphic medium. So he deserve creator credit for that. Clear cut case of co-creators in my book.
#41
DVD Talk Ultimate Edition
Re: Gerry Conway on creators rights and DC's twisted logic.
Neil Adams chimes in: http://www.bleedingcool.com/2015/05/...-gerry-conway/
#42
DVD Talk Hero
Re: Gerry Conway on creators rights and DC's twisted logic.
Just reed this article about the creator of Gordon's wife, used on Gotham. He states that the check is only like 45 an episode anyway, but they still wouldn't pay:
http://comicbastards.com/comics/77685/
Mark Waid on the topic of royalties, and also brings up Levitz:
http://thrillbent.com/blog/how-dc-contracts-work/
http://comicbastards.com/comics/77685/
Mark Waid on the topic of royalties, and also brings up Levitz:
http://thrillbent.com/blog/how-dc-contracts-work/
Last edited by fujishig; 05-03-15 at 04:05 PM.
#43
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Gerry Conway on creators rights and DC's twisted logic.
Roy Thomas recently stated this:
Full article: http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/hea...-thomas-791320
You've said you actually didn't want to create too many things for Marvel. Why was that?
I knew I wouldn't own any of it. I accepted the work for hire, and as a result I didn't want to create characters that much because I knew I would get resentful if they ever made movies and TV shows and merchandising out of it that I didn't get money and credit for. I was never going to sue over it or anything like that, I just knew what I was doing when I did it, and I wasn't going to claim otherwise later. Even if you don't try, you have to make up a few heroes here and there, and you have to make up villains. You can't keep using the same characters all the time.
I knew I wouldn't own any of it. I accepted the work for hire, and as a result I didn't want to create characters that much because I knew I would get resentful if they ever made movies and TV shows and merchandising out of it that I didn't get money and credit for. I was never going to sue over it or anything like that, I just knew what I was doing when I did it, and I wasn't going to claim otherwise later. Even if you don't try, you have to make up a few heroes here and there, and you have to make up villains. You can't keep using the same characters all the time.
#45
DVD Talk Legend
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Vichy America
Posts: 13,533
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Gerry Conway on creators rights and DC's twisted logic.
Just reed this article about the creator of Gordon's wife, used on Gotham. He states that the check is only like 45 an episode anyway, but they still wouldn't pay:
http://comicbastards.com/comics/77685/
http://comicbastards.com/comics/77685/
Later on they were going to have a Vulcan engineer named Taurik who had been in another episode of TNG, but they changed it to his twin brother Vorik for the same reason.
#46
Senior Member
Re: Gerry Conway on creators rights and DC's twisted logic.
The plot thickens...
http://www.bleedingcool.com/2015/05/...so-succinctly/
http://www.bleedingcool.com/2015/05/...s-to-creators/
http://www.bleedingcool.com/2015/05/...ator-payments/
http://www.bleedingcool.com/2015/05/...so-succinctly/
http://www.bleedingcool.com/2015/05/...s-to-creators/
http://www.bleedingcool.com/2015/05/...ator-payments/
Last edited by John Pannozzi; 05-10-15 at 11:40 AM.
#48
DVD Talk Legend
Re: Gerry Conway on creators rights and DC's twisted logic.